Chicago: customers are advised to allow extra travel time

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3603 of them)

xpost

kenan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.akirachicago.com/

dan m, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

I like my version a lot better.

kenan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 21:59 (seventeen years ago) link

So, Jordan, working late sucks, eh?

dan m, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, Dan. Yeah.

Jordan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I went out and got my dinner (crappy burger & fries), and ate it, so now the fun part of the evening is over.

Jordan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't even get to eat until I leave. I scraped up the last bit of hummus from my lunch with a fork 'cause I'm out of pita.

dan m, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:10 (seventeen years ago) link

I have baby carrots.

jaymc, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:12 (seventeen years ago) link

You should share with Dan.

Jordan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Argh, now M and K are going to the bar to drink beer and watch soccer :(

dan m, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:23 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I got a call from a friend who wanted to go to dinner, he lives in NYC and I think it's his last night in town. :(

Jordan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:25 (seventeen years ago) link

A friend keeps telling me she's going to take me shopping at Akira. Why is there no address on that fucking stupid website?

Jesse, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Or am *I* the one who is fucking stupid?

Jesse, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:44 (seventeen years ago) link

One Yelp reviewer has this to say of Akira:

My guy friend bought a jacket from here for $100. that made him look so hot, I actually considered giving up the poon. Then I came to my senses.

That's a dirty trick Akira for Men.

Jesse, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:47 (seventeen years ago) link

The jacket wasn't that great, obv.

Jordan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Or am *I* the one who is fucking stupid?

OK you're really setting yourself up there.

There are like 4 Akiras in the vicinity of "the Crotch" referenced upthread. Hence me asking if they are the taint. I think they're all on North Ave.

dan m, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:52 (seventeen years ago) link

I could never wear anything from their men's store in a million years. Too tall, wide, fat, built, take your pick. Their clothing is made for wee men, even more wee than H&M crap.

dan m, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:53 (seventeen years ago) link

I wonder if I could make it work.

Jesse, Thursday, 23 August 2007 00:02 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm going jean shopping at lame places this weekend, after buying another pair of cheap Levi's that don't really fit and that I don't want to wear.

Jordan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 00:14 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm still at work.

Jeff, Thursday, 23 August 2007 00:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Just about to go, not soon enough...

Dunno if I'll make the show, I've gone and gotten myself a bit of a headache and I am completely frazzled from my day. I hate getting old.

dan m, Thursday, 23 August 2007 00:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Good.

xpost

Jordan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 00:41 (seventeen years ago) link

i need some new jeans.

deej, Thursday, 23 August 2007 00:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Why is there no address on that fucking stupid website?

duh, because if you were cool enough to go there, you'd already know where is was

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 00:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Time and a half rocks. I'd work 80 hours a week if I could.

Jeff, Thursday, 23 August 2007 02:59 (seventeen years ago) link

That's why I hate being a salaried employee, there's no real overtime. That and getting paid monthly.

dan m, Thursday, 23 August 2007 03:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I can't remember what the law says about being salaried....I know there have been cases we saw at |WJ in which employees were "promoted" to "management" so that the employer could pay them salary and avoid overtime, (though to legitimately be management you have to have hire-fire authority, etc.). In what other situations can an employee be strictly salaried?

At my work I don't keep a time sheet, but the partners told me that by law I am entitled to be paid time-and-a-half after 40 hours because of my position.

Jesse, Thursday, 23 August 2007 04:43 (seventeen years ago) link

My friend from the restaurant is taking care of her man as he recovers from nasal surgery, so I picked up her weekend. By Saturday night I will have worked 62 hours this week. And I'm just fine.

This T-storm is awesome.

Jesse, Thursday, 23 August 2007 04:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Time and a half rocks. I'd work 80 hours a week if I could.

Good God, no. I hate overtime. Time >>>>>>>> Money.

jaymc, Thursday, 23 August 2007 05:06 (seventeen years ago) link

Not an atypical statement of a product of privilege.

Jesse, Thursday, 23 August 2007 05:09 (seventeen years ago) link

HEY. The show was really fun last night. :-D

Nick called in sick today for the computer. It's like when people call in sick because they have a sick kid.

KitCat, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:03 (seventeen years ago) link

jesse, that's mean.

I don't get time and a half either... salary is a blessing and a curse. One one hand, it means that no matter how much I work, I get paid the same thing. On the other hand, it means that no matter how LITTLE I work, I get paid the same thing.

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Especially with three weeks a year of vacay... I can basically take a day off any time I want, as long as I give a little notice.

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:20 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm in the same boat as Dan, no overtime + monthly pay. I'm not complaining, though, I put in the long days a lot less often than some people.

Jordan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:23 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think Jesse was mean, I think what he said is true...but one could be charitable and assume that was John meant was more like "at this point is my life, since my basic needs are met, I value my time more." Of course the equation shifts when basic needs are threatened.

Laurel, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Fortunately, I don't have to work overtime that much at this job. At my last job, if you weren't working more than 40 hours/week, you weren't considered a good employee. "That's publishing," they said, as if that explained it, rather than the fact that they were short-staffed.

jaymc, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:33 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost yeah, the true/charitable scale bites me in the ass all the time, too. :(

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:34 (seventeen years ago) link

"at this point is my life, since my basic needs are met, I value my time more."

Right, of course. As long as I can pay my rent and groceries and can afford to go out and have fun once in a while, then I'd rather have more free time than more money. If you're working all the time, how do you ever enjoy the extra money? This is all sort of an extension, too, of my disappointment about how I'm not as productively creative as I was when I was younger, and there are several reasons for that, but one of them is that a 9-5 schedule makes it tough to work up the inspiration to make art. I long for solitary mornings when my mind is fresh.

jaymc, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:37 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, the reason JMC's statement grated was that he stated it as "truth" instead of moderating it as something transitory or subjective. Which is totally understandable, but also totally John.

Laurel, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Er xp.

Laurel, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think I needed to qualify it as subjective -- should I precede all my posts with "in my opinion"?

jaymc, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

we've talked about this before.

xpost to laurel It's also totally me. Whatever, it's not easy to get your intentions across without the gentle music of spoken language. :)

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Plus, I think Kenan is way more guilty of "stating things as 'truth.'"

jaymc, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link

xp

jaymc, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link

IT'S LIKE WE ARE OF ONE MIND OH NO

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Hahah yes but when Kenan does it it's patently ridiculous and a clearly matter of taste/style rather than anything substantive, and no one listens to him anyway. ;)

Laurel, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:43 (seventeen years ago) link

people listen to jaymc?

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:43 (seventeen years ago) link

OK, let's break this down then:

Good God, no.

"I disagree."

I hate overtime.

"I personally hate overtime."

Time >>>>>>>> Money.

"In my opinion, time is more valuable than money."

I really don't understand how this is being read as anything other than subjective, and it bothers me because I like to think I actually take pains to qualify things when others don't.

The ">>>>>>" is something that's used on lots of threads, and when someone says, "GZA >> RZA >> Raekwon >>>>>>>>> U-God," no one actually thinks that that's anything other than someone's opinion.

I mean, how ridiculous would it be if I actually meant that EVERYONE should value time more than money? Give me some credit already.

jaymc, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:49 (seventeen years ago) link

jaymc, whats the best way to break into publishing, but not work more than 40 hrs a week? did you temp first, or have a connection, or just luck into something?

deej, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:50 (seventeen years ago) link

how ridiculous would it be if I actually meant that EVERYONE should value time more than money?

where would we be if some children weren't forced to work 14 hour days?

kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:51 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.