webcam tax prep I like it put me in touch with him
― frogBaSeball (Hurting 2), Monday, 23 January 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago) link
i had a client who wanted to have our consultation over skype, so that isn't that ridiculous an idea.
― sarahell, Monday, 23 January 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago) link
Boo, owing tax this year, due to a massive city tax refund from 2010. (My taxes are very simple and as a dirty foreigner I don't qualify for much in terms of deductions).
Last couple of years I've had refunds so filed quickly, now I shall hold off before paying, between this and being "pre-approved" for a credit card last week I feel very American.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 23 January 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago) link
for 2010, but unfortunately, not for this year, there was a lovely deduction that allowed you to subtract self-employed health insurance from your self-employment tax. missing u deduction.
― sarahell, Monday, 23 January 2012 18:40 (twelve years ago) link
Hooray? (Second year in a row now with one hell of a tax guy, got a very nice refund.)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 February 2013 04:57 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-maker-of-turbotax-fought-free-simple-tax-filing
norquist connection is interesting.
― s.clover, Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:09 (eleven years ago) link
And with a new year, etc. etc. I bit the bullet and crunched through all my numbers today, taking advantage of a quiet day at home. (Obv. have to wait on the various official forms as well but at least all the other stuff is out of the way.)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 7 January 2017 23:32 (seven years ago) link
I do our taxes rather than pushing it off to hired goons. I've done it all my life. It inspires me to keep our financial life very simple. All that arcana of sheltering income, other than IRAs and 401Ks, is strictly for the wealthy. They love that shit because it increases their wealth and they have hired goons to break their brains over the details for them.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 7 January 2017 23:56 (seven years ago) link
I misunderstood the income reporting part of ACA signup for 2016 and didn't realize it until a helpful heathcare.gov person straightened me out when I signed up for my 2017 plan. Anyway, I was supposed to be getting about $325/month in subsidies, didn't get them, and will theoretically get that money credited to me when I do my federal tax return. So a tentative tax time chaCHING for me.
And I sent in my quarterly estimated last Tuesday.
― aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Sunday, 8 January 2017 00:26 (seven years ago) link
Everything done, everything filed, waiting on refunds, tax papers packed away for another year, shredding old receipts from seven years back on Monday. How's everyone else doing?
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 4 March 2017 21:45 (seven years ago) link
Putting it off for another week. I don't want to know.
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 4 March 2017 23:51 (seven years ago) link
probably about 100 more to do, including my own -- I keep putting off opening the SEP-IRA and putting money away for retirement so I can save a much smaller percentage on taxes
― sarahell, Sunday, 5 March 2017 07:59 (seven years ago) link
It's that time! (Again.) These days I'm incredibly boring and obnoxious -- had all my numbers together right after New Year's, then just waited on the forms to arrive, forwarded everything along to my tax guy, got my return back yesterday, waiting on the refund, etc. Sorry. How's everyone else?
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 11 March 2018 14:16 (six years ago) link
I do our taxes, since our financial life is exceedingly uncomplicated. I have them about 85% complete and expect to finish up this week.
I find it increasingly annoying that our lawmakers cannot resist the temptation to address every social problem by making the income tax more baroque. New exemptions or credits seem to appear every year and each one is heavily qualified, requiring its own set of special calculations. I must calculate each one, and find we qualify for perhaps one in ten of them.
The Oregon tax form that's equivalent to the Federal 1040 now covers two double-sided pages, since the Department of Revenue can no longer fit it all on one double-sided page. Yet, I mistrust the politicians who tout tax simplification, because they all are captive to the rich and to the corporations, and for them "simpler" will undoubtedly mean "working people pay a bigger percentage, businesses and capital will pay less".
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 11 March 2018 18:55 (six years ago) link
I find it increasingly annoying that our lawmakers cannot resist the temptation to address every social problem by making the income tax more baroque.
wow, a Paul Ryan fan on ilx???
seriously, the complexity of the tax code, for the most part, is good, in that economics and issues are complex, and it should reflect that.
The Oregon tax form that's equivalent to the Federal 1040 now covers two double-sided pages
1. That's normal. 2. Use a software program
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:00 (six years ago) link
do you even bother to read?
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:07 (six years ago) link
oh, I read your post quite thoroughly -- generally people who complain about the tax code being too complicated are conservative republicans, like Ryan, who would prefer to eliminate the significant complexities, which often benefit the working classes, because they address social issues like: the cost of child care for working parents, college and professional education, encouraging low-income people to save for retirement, the high cost of health care, the untaxed transfer of wealth from parents to future generations, and tax evasion practices generally practiced by the wealthy.
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:19 (six years ago) link
xp
the complexity of the tax code, for the most part, is good, in that economics and issues are complex, and it should reflect that.
"The tax code" covers a lot of ground. I was speaking directly to the slice of the tax code that covers personal income taxes. Within the larger tax code, personal income is not "the most part", but a very specific piece of it, which ordinary citizens are expected to understand and comply with. Corporations and the wealthy have accountants who deal with the intricacies of the corporate tax code, and this is where complexity is required to deal with the complexity of the economy you cited.
1. That's normal.
This is not an argument in favor. Normal is not 'good' or 'bad', but simply a statistical observation. Back when something less complex was the norm, that was normal.
2. Use a software program
Data doesn't acquire itself or enter itself. The time savings created by software is not primary to the task.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:26 (six years ago) link
I was speaking directly to the slice of the tax code that covers personal income taxes.
As was I!
Actually, it can pretty much do so at this point.
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:28 (six years ago) link
Unless you're talking about things like calculating the square footage of a home office, that you will probably want to measure.
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:29 (six years ago) link
there are even apps that track and calculate your mileage.
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:30 (six years ago) link
I'd love to hear how my financial data can be accumulated, analyzed and correctly transferred into tax forms, accurately, safely and with minimal effort on my part. Of course, completely changing how I currently operate my personal finances would not qualify as "minimal effort".
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:33 (six years ago) link
It seems like almost every bank or credit card provider, even some credit unions, can provide you a categorized list of your transactions in csv format, (a lot of their default categorizations of things are kinda worthless).
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:34 (six years ago) link
I'd love to hear how my financial data can be accumulated, analyzed and correctly transferred into tax forms, accurately, safely and with minimal effort on my part.
https://www.intuit.com/
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:35 (six years ago) link
Do any of those banking institutions assume liability for incorrectly categorizing transactions for tax purposes?
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:43 (six years ago) link
I'm sorry, but, considering how much time you spend posting on an internet message board, I don't see why you have any right to complain about having to make a spreadsheet and type numbers into a computer program, that will ask you basic questions and requires little outside knowledge.
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:48 (six years ago) link
Have you ever figured out how much time you've spent interacting with all those apps, banking sites, csv files, bookkeeping software and tax software annually in order to achieve the final results?
I have my doubts about the ease you are promising me, and suspect that it is more a matter of a thousand brief tasks performed throughout the course of a year, each of which seems small in itself, but when collected together add up to a considerable outlay of time and effort.
how much time you spend posting on an internet message board, I don't see why you have any right to complain about having to make a spreadsheet
Sorry. This is not a very persuasive argument. I enjoy time posting on ilx. It is recreational for me. It is hardly comparable to working on taxes.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 11 March 2018 19:59 (six years ago) link
Yes, I have clients I bill by the hour to do these things for them, so I regularly calculate this. Personally, over half of my income is from self-employment, so the time spent actually translates into dollars saved.
Doing it on a regular basis over the course of the year makes it easier. If you have no need or desire to track your income and spending -- most people I know, may not have a desire to track their spending, but they seriously need to -- well, that's very nice for you.
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 20:12 (six years ago) link
New exemptions or credits seem to appear every year and each one is heavily qualified, requiring its own set of special calculations. I must calculate each one, and find we qualify for perhaps one in ten of them.
Practical tip -- you're probably better off getting software, doing the "user-friendly" interview, and then seeing if you need to do any calculations. Re-reading your post, it sounds like you are making wayyyy more work for yourself than necessary.
― sarahell, Sunday, 11 March 2018 20:23 (six years ago) link
What do I need to do other peoples’ taxes? A CPA? I could do this for other people and make money.
― Mr. Snrub, Sunday, 11 March 2018 23:14 (six years ago) link
you don't need an accounting degree. some states require passing a qualifying exam, and continuing education each year, and having a professional bond -- California and Oregon do, but others uh ... don't. The IRS tried to create a licensing system that had an education component but that got quashed for "states rights" issues. So, depending on where you live, you could just buy pro software and uh, profit.
― sarahell, Monday, 12 March 2018 01:59 (six years ago) link
oh, you would need to get a PTIN, and if you do 10 or more tax returns a year for money, you will need to get an e-file number (EFIN).
― sarahell, Monday, 12 March 2018 02:01 (six years ago) link
I remember learning about the professional bond stuff when I first started working with my tax guy, though it's just an extra form to fill out on my end. Still, interesting to see the bureaucracy at work.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 20:36 (six years ago) link
it's cheaper than the insurance a lot of other professions are required to have.
― sarahell, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 20:49 (six years ago) link
I must calculate each one, and find we qualify for perhaps one in ten of them.
How about figuring out if you qualify and then doing no calculations for the ones you don't qualify for?!?
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 20:52 (six years ago) link
my (canadian) taxes are extremely simple. i have one employer. they give me a form. i fill the details from that form in on a website that is free. i hit submit. i get a cheque for $7.78 6 weeks later.
― Louis Jägermeister (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 13 March 2018 20:58 (six years ago) link
I mean I am sure this is just an attempt to use "calculate" as a synonym for pondering, but during a process with actual calculations I think I'd be a little more tight with the terminology.
I have no kids nor significant deductions, but I do own a house and refinanced a mortgage last year. The turbotax site (good ol' intuit corp) took maybe... fifteen minutes this year? To be fair, I have all my tax documents in one pile (bank interest statement, mortgage interest statement, employer tax form, etc) and I'm basically clicking through the same workflow year to year.
It's just a series of "did you do any of the following this year" question lists, followed by a quick data entry question for anything where you answered in the affirmative.
I think the government could easily have a TurboTax-style thing themselves but some lobbying keeps it a private industry.
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 20:58 (six years ago) link
sorry, that was an xp over jim's description of sublime simplicity
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 20:59 (six years ago) link
― mh, Tuesday, March 13, 2018 1:58 PM (one minute ago)
"easily" is questionable. They do subsidize private industry software fees for low-income people with simple returns through the free file program. Should they expand on that? I forget which situations/forms Turbo Tax doesn't cover/exceeds the abilities of the software. I'm sure they increase what it can do each year.
― sarahell, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:08 (six years ago) link
Some background on how Intuit lobbies against tax prep simplification:https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/03/22/521132960/episode-760-tax-hero
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:13 (six years ago) link
well, not "easily" without completely fucking up the current competitive landscape for tax software
they could just nationalize intuit :)
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:14 (six years ago) link
"Easily" in terms of contracting/bidding, determining the parameters,(does it cover everything, how many different languages should it be in, etc.), the user interface, the actual programming is probably pretty simple.
― sarahell, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:19 (six years ago) link
HAHAHAHA
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:19 (six years ago) link
xp - Intuit is not alone -- H&R Block lobbies just as hard for that.
sorry, spent the afternoon reading about business process management tools and the idea that the if/then logic of the tax code is simple to implement blows my mind
tbh the *code* part could be, but only if you used an off the shelf decision engine. the *configuration* would require a staff of full-time business process management advisors, easily
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:21 (six years ago) link
as someone who has paid taxes in four countries, i feel pretty confident in saying that anyone defending the US way of doing it has a kind of sickness
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:26 (six years ago) link
so, uh, that part would also not be easy, either? AHAHAHAH
Is the complexity coming from the interview-based interface of a consumer program like TurboTax? The tax prep chains (Block, Jackson Hewitt, et al) have similar interfaces for their software. Professional programs don't have that.
― sarahell, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:28 (six years ago) link
xp - how do businesses pay taxes in other countries?
― sarahell, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:29 (six years ago) link
the interface probably has its own complexity but I don't really do that kind of stuff
so you *could* use an off the shelf process management engine, but then you have this entire layer of analysis: how do we define eligibility for a specific deduction or exemption? it could be age, income, location, or a weird combination of those things. are they all the same type of qualifiers, or do we have a bunch of different types to define? do deductions interact with each other, and do they do so in a specific way?
there are just a million small process pieces that the IRS has probably modeled out as well, but having all of this as some software-defined state machine is a hell of a lot of analysis and configuration
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:33 (six years ago) link
the process to submit to individual states alone is probably a nightmare
I have a coworker whose partner works in a part of the company that handles employee data, as a software developer, and someone dropped the ball when it came to documenting and handing off the tax return process. She got called in to work on that and did something like a 72 hour week just to get it up and running. Every single state had a different way of submitting the employee income tax file for businesses, and several didn't work.
― mh, Tuesday, 13 March 2018 21:37 (six years ago) link