David Foster Wallace vs. Thomas Pynchon

but what about the gambler, crime & punishment, brothers k, dream of ridiculous man, etc

if you cut brothers k off two pages earlier it's the most nihilistic shit imaginable

I meet ppl from time to time who are like I love literature I love brett easton ellis and I get all quiet and generally try not to make my face all crazy for a sec

I mean, his voice is cut from the cloth of Didion and Robbe-Grillet, so putting it out there as literature isn't the craziest idea.

I must've forgot about brett easton ellis' banana farm book

the other day i saw someone on a feminist blog complaining about what douchebags men were who put 'sex-positive' as a descriptor in their online dating profiles

anyway, nicholson baker

its true that in dostoyevskys middle period he has some under appreciated humanist works such as his short story i dont think theres something deeply fundamentally wrong w/just being alive, srsly, guys... guys and the unfinished novel i am trying really hard to write a single character thats not some sort of damaged misfit

<3 lagoooooooooon

I dont

*thinks dastardly thoughts*

I don't know if what BEE writes is "literature", but he, definitely writes books, with pages and sentences and paragraphs in them. I'll give him that.

btw anyone itt hating on barthelme is a complete idiot

Barthelme's Ellis parody.

xp

it's more than that though, in the gambler he expresses great sympathy for all people and their addictive vices. crime & punishment has the eternally faithful and forgiving sonya, as far as the nihilism in brothers k goes the small acts of human kindness and solidarity that permeate the family are imo prefiguring the humanism of french existentialists

- i am trying really hard to write a single character thats not some sort of damaged misfit -

this is a type of humanism in itself

a lurid cartoonish humanism

i liked the possessed or w/e its called in english

im not sure its 'humanist' tho

i mean i love dostoyevsky, guy can write like a motherfucker, but he in only the most convoluted generous reading a humanist

well i mean i thought the general agreement was that dostoyevsky seems all the time to be swinging between poles of 'god will fix it' 'god will fix it but we can live in a worthwhile way anyhow' 'no we're all fucked', okay you can't swing between three poles but yeah

like his relation to the possibility of a humanism comes from a place of negative capability, to suggest he had a 'humanist' 'program' would be off-base, but it's certainly not a completely irrelevant idea

all credit due lag00n has been killing it recently

like his relation to the possibility of a humanism comes from a place of negative capability

that's what i meant by the french existentialist ref

we are capable of kindness while facing the horror vacuui of life, that's humanism

poomanism

^^literature

we are capable of kindness while facing the horror vacuui of life, that's humanism

― the late great, Thursday, September 6, 2012 5:41 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

eh i think one thing that characterizes a lot of these guy writers is that the kindness is generally rather meager and futile in the face of the horror, a starving old lady feeds the last bread crust to her drowning grandchild, its often more sentimental and concerned w/symbolism than humanist imho

y so serious

tbh its something that ive been thinking abt recently cause i like a lot of said guy writers but im somewhat disturbed by the level of their emotional alienation

iirc sontag breaks it down much better than me in the intro to "summer in baden-baden" which was influential to me in my reading of d

i don't know man, maybe there's nihilist and humanist readers, i think in wallace and especially pynchon there's actually a great undying love of humanity

unfailing maybe

like the orgy scene in gravity's rainbow, unstinting admiration for the riot of all life's, uh, combinations

where's delillo

wallace is def more into the idea of liking the world but then of course wrote extensively abt his problems pulling that off - pychons characters never really felt like people particularly to me tho ive only read like one and a half of his books

what the fuck is this poll even

i mean, i love DFW but Pynchon is just beyond
i guess also beyond polls

pynchon def scrambles my brain more

i would def vote for delillo under other, or barthelme tho i dont know if he really fits w/these dudes, not that franzen or ellis do either

tbh its something that ive been thinking abt recently cause i like a lot of said guy writers but im somewhat disturbed by the level of their emotional alienation

― lag∞n, Thursday, September 6, 2012 2:55 PM (7 minutes ago)

otm, i feel the same way. and i think the "a great undying love of humanity" stuff that so often goes along with this genre often feels more like a self-aggrandizing and sentimental affectation than legit affection.

DFW clearly has an honest love and sympathy for his fellow saddos and addicts

ya i def agree that wallace is more emotional nuanced

y'all are such harsh cultural critics

who is the most humanist forumer

the...humanest....if you will

y'all are markov chains afaict

books, huh

*throws garbage* go back to yr blog, max

i voted for thomas pynchon. i really liked the ny trilogy when i read it but i havent read any other auster. BEE is a hilarious troll

i tried to read a lot of women authors this year,

= "Watched Girls"

burn