I think I will try to popularize the term "protes" for proteins.
― fletrejet, Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:36 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:37 (twenty-one years ago) link
― fletrejet, Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:38 (twenty-one years ago) link
For example, all the words in Chinese annoy me, because why can't they fucking standardize on an alphabet and some basic usage patterns, and why do the damn Shanghainese have to pronounce everything different from everybody else and etc. Fuck Chinese words, they annoy me.
All the words in Japanese annoy me because what in the jesus do you need three writing systems for. Especially anything written in Katakana, jesus. MA KU RO DO NA RU DO!!!! Arrrrrgh, fuck them words.
And all the words in Korean ESPECIALLY annoy me because I hear them and I read them and I learned all of them and I should know them and be able to understand them very well and I don't because I haven't used a lick of it in like two years. That shit is about the most irritating thing on earth. Fuck some Korean words.
And all the other foreign languages? Those words annoy me too because what are you, talking in code? Are you saying shit about my girlfriend? I ought to kick your ass. Speak English, you twerp. This is America! Learn the rules!!
― TOMBOT, Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:46 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:46 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:50 (twenty-one years ago) link
I heart the Tombot.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:50 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:54 (twenty-one years ago) link
I'm going to go get lunch now. It will be... food. With food in it.
By the way, restaurantese is REALLY annoying. They use a lot of nouns in verbs: "Plate that right this time!" meaning "put it on a plate and use all the proper garnishes in our standard hideous arrangement or you will be fucked with by your manager for the rest of the day."
"Magnificently plated!"
Every job I've ever had has turned me into a bigger language crank.
― Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 20:46 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 20:49 (twenty-one years ago) link
There is such a shock of recognition from post to post, as phrases I didn't know I hated alternate with ones I use too much...
'Action' - "We need to action this now..."
'Paradigm' - you can blame Thomas Kuhn for this one I think. It arrived into common parlance (ugh! hate that phrase) via the caring professions (ow!) ex-students of which had digested it as part of their philosophy units (in spite of the fact that Kuhn thought the social sciences and philosophy were preparadigmatic - which makes you wonder whether he thought his own theory of paradigms was preparadigmatic). As his critics never tired of pointing out, Kuhn never defined the word consistently either, using it in all kinds of ways. Now all it really means is 'area' or 'field'.
'Do a 360' when it should be 'do a 180' was mentioned above; what about 'it's a steep learning curve' to describe a task that is hard to pick up? Now, if time is on the Y axis and competence is on the X-axis, as is the convention, then a steep curve indicates a job that is picked up very quickly. It's a _shallow_ curve that indicates difficulty. Perhaps people have the mental picture of a steep curve being hard to climb.
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 20:49 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 21:08 (twenty-one years ago) link
(Also, I am a dick but not THAT much of a dick.)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 21:14 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago) link
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 21:23 (twenty-one years ago) link
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 21:24 (twenty-one years ago) link
― David. (Cozen), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 21:26 (twenty-one years ago) link
Short for "We need an action item for this now..."?
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago) link
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 22:30 (twenty-one years ago) link
"Schizophrenia" used to refer to multiple personality or other psychological disorders.
Certain people's way of pronouncing "ask" as "ax."
― j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 23:13 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Gilles Deleuze (daria g), Thursday, 25 September 2003 01:25 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Nicolars (Nicole), Thursday, 25 September 2003 01:30 (twenty-one years ago) link
That's because Freud represents your father to you; no doubt the fear is related to a childhood incident where you were discovered doing something naughty. You are now projecting your fear on to authority figures of all kinds, and on to theories which may, so to speak, 'find you out' by revealing the psychodynamics of your neurosis. But, due to the psychological defence of reaction formation, you may find this hard to accept during the initial phase of treatment.
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 25 September 2003 01:32 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Roland Barf (daria g), Thursday, 25 September 2003 01:44 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Vinnie (vprabhu), Thursday, 25 September 2003 03:31 (twenty-one years ago) link
― lupine lupin (lupinelupin), Thursday, 25 September 2003 03:36 (twenty-one years ago) link
As in the study of light? why is that a bastardization or annoying?
― A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:10 (twenty-one years ago) link
and any host of words used by annoying people I know.
― A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:11 (twenty-one years ago) link
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:18 (twenty-one years ago) link
― A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:29 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Bryan (Bryan), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:52 (twenty-one years ago) link
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:04 (twenty-one years ago) link
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:11 (twenty-one years ago) link
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:14 (twenty-one years ago) link
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:17 (twenty-one years ago) link
Anyone else have any anatomical or medical terms that annoy? I think saying "syphilis" is just plain fun, but "chlamydia?" I shudder to type it.
― Major Grubert (Grandin), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:29 (twenty-one years ago) link
It's terrible to use, but sometimes, what else would you use?
Could you imagine if grad students ran around saying "zeitgeist" and "weltanschauung?" "Postmodern" and "paradigm" are bad enough. I think "discourse" is the least of our worries.
Ooooh, but you know what I bet is the worst? Applying "discourse" to ILE.
― Major Grubert (Grandin), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:32 (twenty-one years ago) link
if fact, anything with a 'rrh' in it..
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:35 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Officer Pupp, Thursday, 25 September 2003 06:33 (twenty-one years ago) link
― rob geary (rgeary), Thursday, 25 September 2003 06:49 (twenty-one years ago) link
― rob geary (rgeary), Thursday, 25 September 2003 06:50 (twenty-one years ago) link
― mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 25 September 2003 06:59 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Alfie (Alfie), Thursday, 25 September 2003 07:08 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:11 (twenty-one years ago) link
So what WOULD be a correct use of 'irregardless'?
Furthermore, I DETEST:
'the bottom line'
'flexibility' when used by Human Resources people (not real keen on 'human resources' either)
'mutual obligation'
24/7
'sooner than later' without the rather in the middle,
'at the end of the day'
all SMS shorthand but especially 'prolly'
'would/could/should of'
'traitor' and 'tragedy' used in sporting contexts
'bias' as an adjective (as in 'the ABC is bias', what does that mean: the ABC goes to Mass 12 times a week?)
Most Freudian or postmod jargon
'Go Pies'
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:24 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:31 (twenty-one years ago) link
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:36 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:38 (twenty-one years ago) link
it feels completely disgusting to be called adorable so thanks for the support!i mean that.
― weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Wednesday, 6 September 2017 15:34 (seven years ago) link
people using "begs the question" incorrectly. When someone uses it correctly it really makes me want to weep for joy.
I've been thinking about this. I'm genuinely curious how many instances there are of someone using this expression 'correctly' outside the context of philosophy academia - unless it is just for the sake of 'correcting' the 'incorrect' usage. When I Google "beg the question", the first five pages of results consist entirely of either definitions or people discussing what the correct usage should be. It is only on the sixth page that I come across someone using the expression to describe a fallacious argument - and this is in a scholarly article in Informal Logic. Are there many actual instances of e.g. an opposition MP saying "the Honourable Minister begs the question when he argues for increased military intervention on the grounds that the Middle East has been growing more unstable since our involvement began"? For comparison, I can find several examples of "strawman". In any situation I can think of where one might use "beg the question" 'properly', it seems like it might be clearer and simpler to just say "you are assuming x without proving it".
― All along there is the sound of feedback (Sund4r), Friday, 6 September 2019 17:45 (five years ago) link
it seems like it might be clearer and simpler
I'd say it not just "might be", but it would be.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 6 September 2019 18:21 (five years ago) link