this criticism does not make sense. the hilt needs to be able to stop a lightsaber and so must be made of lightsaber. it is not necessarily a blade. the whole concept of blade and non-blade lightsaber is just...maybe you don't have what it takes to be a tru believer.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, November 30, 2014 1:54 AM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
ok but in real sword land if the hilt had to be made out of blades then they would've just said "let's not do this because it will backfire and hurt real quick" so thanks again george lucas
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Sunday, 30 November 2014 07:06 (ten years ago)
yeah i'm putting this one on george
well there's no guarantee that the lighthilt would do damage. maybe the photon density is lower in the hilt or something.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 30 November 2014 07:09 (ten years ago)
and maybe when the dude hits the lighthilt with a lightsaber it's all SSKKKGGGGHHH! SKKKGGHH SKKKGGGGGHHH! and he's like AWWWW YEAH! and that makes it worth the risk.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 30 November 2014 07:11 (ten years ago)
we're descending to a level i never meant to descend to
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Sunday, 30 November 2014 07:15 (ten years ago)
to the planet core
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 30 November 2014 07:18 (ten years ago)
is Adam Driver wielding the hilt? wh y is there no frontal shot of his lightsaber?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 30 November 2014 07:36 (ten years ago)
No lens flare. Some teal but not much orange. I'm OK with this teaser.
― abanana, Sunday, 30 November 2014 10:25 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v93Jh6JNBng#t=67
― MaresNest, Sunday, 30 November 2014 10:53 (ten years ago)
xp: Oh, there was lens flare alright. I noticed it on the first view.
I feel like this teaser does not provide me with enough information to confidently pump yet.
― put your money where the maracas are (how's life), Sunday, 30 November 2014 11:10 (ten years ago)
yeah the lack of T and O is a very good thing. are we past peak T and O now? i think we must be, thing really seems to have tailed off.
― piscesx, Sunday, 30 November 2014 11:20 (ten years ago)
I watched Walter Mitty the other day and it was crazy levels of T&O in places.
― MaresNest, Sunday, 30 November 2014 11:25 (ten years ago)
I'm OK with lens flare when it's used to make special effects blend in. Lens flare when the Falcon passes by a sun is fine.
― abanana, Sunday, 30 November 2014 13:25 (ten years ago)
All I want to know is how Obama will mess this up, too.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 30 November 2014 14:03 (ten years ago)
Can't wait for this HD Star Wars reboot by JJ 'I'm a movie director' Abrams.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Sunday, 30 November 2014 15:28 (ten years ago)
no matter how craptastic it is, it's NOT A REBOOT
they have 3 fossils reprising their roles for God's sake
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 30 November 2014 16:03 (ten years ago)
Six fossils, counting whacky sidekicks.
― jmm, Sunday, 30 November 2014 16:05 (ten years ago)
― Raccoon Tanuki, Sunday, November 30, 2014 10:28 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
You know who's an even shittier director than Abrams? George Lucas.
― my jaw left (Hurting 2), Sunday, 30 November 2014 16:08 (ten years ago)
you have no idea who's wearing those tin suits, let's be honest
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 30 November 2014 16:13 (ten years ago)
Sir Derek Jacobi, most likely.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 30 November 2014 19:34 (ten years ago)
new robot footage!
― Punny Names (latebloomer), Sunday, 30 November 2014 19:40 (ten years ago)
check the YouTube comments on the Trailer for huffy nerd gems such as: "It really baffles me how you guys are overreacting. First off these are STORMTROOPERS not CLONE TROOPERS, their is a huge difference. Second off the light saber doesn't look that bad, so stop being a bunch of babies."
― the tune was space, Sunday, 30 November 2014 20:47 (ten years ago)
*clutches darth maul travel mug*
― difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 30 November 2014 20:48 (ten years ago)
hard to make a judgment about whether this movie will be good or bad off of 45 seconds of footage, but i will say the x-wings and corellian freighter look mighty cool
― the late great, Sunday, 30 November 2014 20:54 (ten years ago)
Not gonna lie, that money shot of Falcon v. TIE fighters with the main theme playing made my heart skip a beat
me too
― the late great, Sunday, 30 November 2014 20:57 (ten years ago)
I like the title. "STAR WARS". It really pops.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 30 November 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
sounds like something lucas would name it tbh
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Sunday, 30 November 2014 21:16 (ten years ago)
apparently the narrator is Andy Serkis
― Number None, Sunday, 30 November 2014 22:06 (ten years ago)
Star Bores more like it right?
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 30 November 2014 22:34 (ten years ago)
I hope to god Cumberbatch isn't a main villain in this shit because that's the worst sort of fan service, and not even for Star Wars fans
― valleys of your mind (mh), Sunday, 30 November 2014 22:49 (ten years ago)
jj abrams is not that great and this will undoubtedly be trash but that shot of x-wings kicking up spray across water shows more wit and sense than lucas has shown for my whole adult life
― goole, Sunday, 30 November 2014 22:52 (ten years ago)
The only Abrams I have seen was Super 8 and although I don't remember much, apparently my kid liked it enough that we bought it for him and I periodically see it pop up while I'm flipping through our dvd book. Should I go back and watch it again with a cynical and jaded critical eye and realize how bad it was after all?
― put your money where the maracas are (how's life), Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:02 (ten years ago)
i'm suspending judgment, i thought the star treks were really corny but i could see that corniness working better in the star wars context
― the late great, Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:05 (ten years ago)
I feel like Abrams at least understands what people liked about the originals and will produce at least part of a movie that feels true to that
― valleys of your mind (mh), Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:09 (ten years ago)
And if it sucks, maybe Rian Johnson will get weird with the next one.
― jmm, Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:11 (ten years ago)
As far as big $$$ H'wood Product I'm way more excited about these new SW films than I could ever be about the bland and noisy superhero mush that continues to be churned out.
― Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:23 (ten years ago)
And I'll pop in Solaris (Tarkovsky model) or Stalker if I ever want my highbrow SF fix. I dig that, too. No shame in my SW love over here.
― Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:26 (ten years ago)
Qft
― max, Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:28 (ten years ago)
tbf you could say the same for THE DARK KNIGHT RISES and um
― resulting post (rogermexico.), Sunday, 30 November 2014 23:31 (ten years ago)
The X-wings in _The Dark Knight Rises_?
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 1 December 2014 00:05 (ten years ago)
there's really no reason to believe Cumberbatch is in this at all
― Number None, Monday, 1 December 2014 00:42 (ten years ago)
? You didn't see this leaked pre-production still?
http://i.imgur.com/vKqaEtL.png
― 龜, Monday, 1 December 2014 00:44 (ten years ago)
so handsome sigh
― Clay, Monday, 1 December 2014 00:44 (ten years ago)
other than fans of all nerdom hoping it, and Abrams love of casting people he's previously casted
what is the over/under on Greg Grunberg appearing in the background as an extra
― valleys of your mind (mh), Monday, 1 December 2014 00:45 (ten years ago)
still got my fingers crossed for a big red ball
― difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 December 2014 01:25 (ten years ago)
agreed
― gbx, Monday, 1 December 2014 01:48 (ten years ago)
also agree w this
― gbx, Monday, 1 December 2014 01:49 (ten years ago)
first star trek was cool. second was laaaaaaame. so I'm glad that jj will be cut off after 7.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 1 December 2014 01:55 (ten years ago)
isn't RT supposed to chime in, why all this enthusiasm
― valleys of your mind (mh), Monday, 1 December 2014 02:02 (ten years ago)
I can imagine this new one being just as competent and just as stupid as his "Star Trek" films. It's some miracle that the cast and effects and general construction of the original "Star Wars" movie allowed it to surmount its innately corny origins (which, of course, in embarrassing pre-edited/spiffed up FX form made people think it was destined to flop). These new ones, I know they will look great and be technically perfect, but today's blockbuster dudes have real problems with the scripts. It's like they've forgotten how to tell stories, or rather, their stories have become so overly ambitious despite their generally shallow substance that they totally fall apart once the destructive inevitability of the contemporary H'wood by corporate committee process kicks in. I can only imagine how much of a mess the Marvel movies would be if they did not have decades of comics canon to draw on. At least Lucas, surprisingly savvy, was straightforward that his prequels (which he produced independently, no less) were kids flicks meant to jumpstart a new generation of fans (which I think worked). But these "Star Wars" films on the other hand are a tougher task liable to satisfy no one even if the end product is totally satisfying and lucrative. They have to tie to old mythology, add new mythology, entertain kids and fulfill the hopes of the faithful all at once. That doesn't give them much room to move other than right toward the middle.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 1 December 2014 02:04 (ten years ago)