it's Crooked Dem Fucker Indictment time
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2015/03/06/391255700/source-justice-department-prepares-to-charge-sen-menendez-with-corruption
― touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Friday, 6 March 2015 20:02 (nine years ago) link
heeeyyy sup
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/02/mark-dayton-minnesota-governor-profile-scott-walker
turns out a depressed loser who doesn't want anything can't be cowed and can't be hurt (that's always been my read on the guy) (helps to be rich as shit to begin with too)
― goole, Friday, 6 March 2015 21:10 (nine years ago) link
i always thought herb kohl was a litle like that, only he was also kind of ineffectual
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Friday, 6 March 2015 21:15 (nine years ago) link
did dayton ever have anything to do with running the target corp? unfortunately like a lot of big-box chains they are known for union-busting, which would seem to cut against dayton's political agenda.
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Friday, 6 March 2015 21:19 (nine years ago) link
no i don't think so. he's an heir to the original family. the dayton's name isn't on anything anymore (except a parking ramp downtown, in my heart)
― goole, Friday, 6 March 2015 21:20 (nine years ago) link
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/bob-menendez-theory-iran-feds
this is p funny (BUT THEN WHAT IF)
― goole, Friday, 6 March 2015 21:23 (nine years ago) link
great moments in liberal website photo editing:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/texas-gop-sign-former-fetus
― goole, Wednesday, 11 March 2015 17:06 (nine years ago) link
tbf he looks like a fetus
he also looks like a grown up donkey lips from salute your shorts.
http://www.fanpop.com/images/polls/2127_3_full.jpg
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 11 March 2015 17:16 (nine years ago) link
If you had to pinpoint the moment this worldview began to crystallize, it would probably be around the first debt-ceiling showdown, in 2011, when Obama tried repeatedly and desperately to cut a budget deal with House Speaker John Boehner only to realize, eventually, that Boehner did not have the power to negotiate. The administration has now decided that in many cases, even adversarial bargaining fails because the Republican leadership is not capable of planning tactically. “You have to be careful not to presume a lot of strategy for this group,” Pfeiffer said. “I’ve always believed that the fundamental, driving strategic ethos of the Republican House leadership has been, What do we do to get through the next caucus or conference without getting yelled at? We should never assume they have a long game. We used to spend a lot of time thinking that maybe Boehner is saying this to get himself some more room. And it’s like, no, that’s not actually the case. Usually he’s just saying it because he just said it or it’s the easiest thing to solve his immediate problem.”This analysis puts the administration at odds with the reading of American politics that still dominates much of Washington reporting. Many political journalists imagine that the basic tension for the White House lies between Obama’s liberal base and appealing to Americans at the center, who will be crucial for tipping elections.Pfeiffer believes the dynamic is, in fact, the opposite: “The incentive structure moves from going after the diminishing middle to motivating the base.” Ever since Republicans took control of the House four years ago, attempts to court Republicans have mostly failed while simultaneously dividing Democratic voters. Obama’s most politically successful maneuvers, by contrast, have all been unilateral and liberal. “Whenever we contemplate bold progressive action,” Pfeiffer said, “whether that’s the president’s endorsement of marriage equality, or coming out strong on power-plant rules to reduce current pollution, on immigration, on net neutrality, you get a lot of hemming and hawing in advance about what this is going to mean: Is this going to alienate people? Is this going to hurt the president’s approval ratings? What will this mean in red states?” And yet this hesitation has always proved overblown: “There’s never been a time when we’ve taken progressive action and regretted it.”
This analysis puts the administration at odds with the reading of American politics that still dominates much of Washington reporting. Many political journalists imagine that the basic tension for the White House lies between Obama’s liberal base and appealing to Americans at the center, who will be crucial for tipping elections.
Pfeiffer believes the dynamic is, in fact, the opposite: “The incentive structure moves from going after the diminishing middle to motivating the base.” Ever since Republicans took control of the House four years ago, attempts to court Republicans have mostly failed while simultaneously dividing Democratic voters. Obama’s most politically successful maneuvers, by contrast, have all been unilateral and liberal. “Whenever we contemplate bold progressive action,” Pfeiffer said, “whether that’s the president’s endorsement of marriage equality, or coming out strong on power-plant rules to reduce current pollution, on immigration, on net neutrality, you get a lot of hemming and hawing in advance about what this is going to mean: Is this going to alienate people? Is this going to hurt the president’s approval ratings? What will this mean in red states?” And yet this hesitation has always proved overblown: “There’s never been a time when we’ve taken progressive action and regretted it.”
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/03/dan-pfeiffer-exit-interview.html
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 11 March 2015 18:57 (nine years ago) link
better late than never, sigh
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 11 March 2015 18:58 (nine years ago) link
Usually he’s just saying it because he just said it or it’s the easiest thing to solve his immediate problem.
he's not the brightest oompa loompa
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 March 2015 19:02 (nine years ago) link
“There’s never been a time when we’ve taken progressive action and regretted it.”
smdh. is it any wonder that half the voting age population never votes.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 11 March 2015 19:08 (nine years ago) link
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2015_03/lets_give_em_something_to_talk054580.php
Kilgore:
I dunno about you, but I’d rather have HRC debating, say, Bernie Sanders or Martin O’Malley than Ron Fournier or the many hounds at Politico. It would feed the hungry media beast in a way that would if nothing else chew up words otherwise available for narrative-driven obsessions of the media’s own choosing that have little or nothing to do with what she’d do as president.
versussome comments on the posting:
media just wants to obsess on HRC the same way they did on Gore, so no matter what issue a Sanders might raise, they will just focus on HRC alone
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 12 March 2015 17:28 (nine years ago) link
I heard the question being asked on npr this morning and it was the stupidest fucking thing I've heard this week
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015/03/11/3632393/john-kerry-obliterates-marco-rubios-conspiracy-theory-iran/
RUBIO DO U KNO WE ARE FIGHTING ALONGSIDE IRAN IN TIKRIT RIGHT NOW YOU DUMB FUCK
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 12 March 2015 17:43 (nine years ago) link
Kilgore seems little concerned about the email thing, while others are a little bit more unhappy, meanwhile Jeb Bush chuckles as his private emails issue was largely uncovered.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/top-democrats-are-alarmed-about-clintons-readiness-for-a-campaign/2015/03/11/36c0763a-c818-11e4-aa1a-86135599fb0f_story.html
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/03/11/two-names-the-press-omits-from-email-coverage-c/202847
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 12 March 2015 17:44 (nine years ago) link
How about that Secret Service (D'oh):
Two Secret Service agents suspected of driving under the influence and striking a White House security barricade disrupted an active bomb investigation and may have driven over the suspicious package itself, according to current and former government officials familiar with the incident.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/secret-service-agents-disrupted-bomb-investigation-at-white-house/2015/03/12/0eb74590-c8c4-11e4-aa1a-86135599fb0f_story.html?hpid=z1
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 12 March 2015 19:31 (nine years ago) link
onion is on it
WASHINGTON—Expressing gratitude for helping her escape certain punishment, Malia Obama quietly thanked two Secret Service agents Thursday for taking the rap after she crashed a government vehicle into a White House barricade while returning from a late-night party. “Thanks so much, you guys; I promise I’ll be way more careful next time,”
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 12 March 2015 19:45 (nine years ago) link
Prince Andrew of New York had this guvmint email archiving figured out -- his admin PURGES all official email after 90 days! Til now, I guess. A true Clintonite down to his corpuscles.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/cuomo-calls-policy-criticism-email-purges-29616981
― touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 March 2015 19:16 (nine years ago) link
as a paralegal that has to deal with compliance for discovery requests and lawsuits this shit is a circus
if this was something like bank of america instead of the gov't you'd have like 50 different backups of everything
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 13 March 2015 19:40 (nine years ago) link
fun charts too
Spending channeled through the tax code tends to overwhelmingly benefit the wealthiest Americans.
According to an analysis of $340 billion in tax subsidies for housing, education, retirement and savings in 2013, the top 1 percent received about $95 billion, more than the $90 billion received by the bottom 80 percent combined, said the Corporation for Enterprise Development, a nonprofit organization that seeks to build assets for low- and moderate-income families.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/18/business/economy/taxes-take-away-but-also-give-back-mostly-to-the-very-rich.html
― touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 18 March 2015 18:37 (nine years ago) link
, the top 1 percent received about $95 billion, more than the $90 billion received by the bottom 80 percent combined
reminds me of this fun chart:
http://www.motherjones.com/files/income-inequality-2.0.gif
― who is dankey kang (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 18 March 2015 19:05 (nine years ago) link
I should save up my pennies to buy a lobbyist for myself
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 18 March 2015 19:06 (nine years ago) link
seriously though, that's astounding. if everyone receiving a bonus on wall street took half of their crazy bonuses and gave it to a minimum wage employee, it would double the wages of the ~1 million people who work for minimum wage.
― who is dankey kang (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 18 March 2015 19:10 (nine years ago) link
^^^ THIS! (Or you should just go to school and better yourself, and get out of that minimum wage job.)
― Losing swag by the second (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 18 March 2015 19:11 (nine years ago) link
Exactly. And once this House budget proposal passes (with its changes to Medicare and Medicaid), those minimum wage workers will really learn how to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/03/18/give-house-republicans-credit-for-producing-a-budget-this-cruel/
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 18 March 2015 19:25 (nine years ago) link
Dick Cheney likes lattes. Seated in his favorite brown-leather chair in the sunlit study of his home in McLean, Virginia, the former vice president of the United States can toss back two of the warm java blasts in an hour. They come from a stainless-steel machine in the kitchen and a slender, mustachioed housekeeper named Gus, who serves them in custom-ordered white Starbucks cups outfitted with cardboard Starbucks sleeves.
that's the first paragraph of the playboy interview, apparently (choosing not to click because i'm at work)
― who is dankey kang (Karl Malone), Thursday, 19 March 2015 20:35 (nine years ago) link
I'd prefer a Playboy interview with Gus. xPOST
― RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 19 March 2015 20:39 (nine years ago) link
Two lattes in an hour!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 19 March 2015 21:43 (nine years ago) link
they keep his heart beating
― Aimless, Thursday, 19 March 2015 21:47 (nine years ago) link
new from evil angel: dick's warm java blasts vol viii
― bizarro gazzara, Friday, 20 March 2015 10:56 (nine years ago) link
Was reading on ilm that Azealia Banks was being interviewed in Playboy, didn't realize Cheney as well.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 20 March 2015 15:17 (nine years ago) link
his wife did write softcore porn
http://www.amazon.com/Sisters-Lynne-Cheney/dp/0451112040
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 20 March 2015 15:34 (nine years ago) link
lol
What do women want? A new edition ofBy A Customer on May 1, 2004Format: Mass Market Paperback Verified PurchaseJust focus for a moment on the nickname of the husband of the authoress, and it becomes E-Z to understand why Lynne Cheney's throbbing pudenda compelled her to write this novel more than two decades ago. As directed by the Commander in Chief, the White House gynecologist has since infibulated the author. Yet potent testimony of the intensity of gratified female desire remains between the well-thumbed pages of the few yellowing copies of "Sisters" that have not been purchased and burned by Attorney General John Ashcroft and his staff members.
"Sisters" made its debut when Mrs. Cheney was an unknown scribbler, though her words undoubtedly inspired the life choices of her daughter Mary. It is shameful that partisan political pressure upon Lynne's publishing house, as well as her current status as Second Womyn of the United States, keeps this moist, glistening gem from being reissued. Readers across America would find "Sisters" a fine excuse for self-abuse if only this exquisite paean to Sapphic love, as well as to prophylactic-clad heterosexual bonking in the Wild West, became widely available once again! Forty-four bidders attempted to buy a yellowing copy from eBay, yet only one succeeded, at a price beyond rubies.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 20 March 2015 15:37 (nine years ago) link
Obama has ended up following Cheney's worldview nearly to the letter, but I guess just not as lol, and that's what matters.
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 March 2015 15:39 (nine years ago) link
well he hasn't shot any friends in the face yet
― Οὖτις, Friday, 20 March 2015 15:43 (nine years ago) link
still time tho
Outward Bound w/ Rahm
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 March 2015 15:52 (nine years ago) link
more drones than troops for O
― curmudgeon, Friday, 20 March 2015 17:39 (nine years ago) link
Giuliani urges Republicans to confirm Lynch as AG
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/20/rudy-giuliani-loretta-lynch_n_6910424.html
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 22 March 2015 04:43 (nine years ago) link
Seems like this can go here (and not just the Rahm E thread)
Unless they get the crazy lefty money machine going nationally, it’s not going to matter that there’s a resurgent left,” said an adviser to Mr. Emanuel who did not want to speak publicly about strategy. “The liberals at Heartland Cafe in Rogers Park can think great thoughts and read poetry for Chuy, but nothing else will happen.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/us/chicago-mayors-race-is-cast-as-a-test-of-liberalism.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=2
― curmudgeon, Monday, 23 March 2015 14:03 (nine years ago) link
"Crazy Lefty Money Machine," my fave early Paul Simon composition
really how many George Soroseseses are there?
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 March 2015 14:20 (nine years ago) link
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/03/23/mitch-mcconnell-has-a-plan-to-derail-obamas-climate-agenda-it-might-actually-work/
Former Obama legal issues and appointments advisor, Law Prof Larry Tribe helping MCConnell with constitutional analysis (that others differ with) re state rights re fed regulations
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 March 2015 16:57 (nine years ago) link
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said he didn't know what the Republican party's environmental platform is, but he does know that GOP inaction on climate change is Al Gore's fault."You know, when it comes to climate change being real, people of my party are all over the board," Graham said after a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations while responding to a question about whether Republicans could work with Democrats to address climate change."I said that it's real, that man has contributed to it in a substantial way," Graham continued. "But the problem is Al Gore's turned this thing into religion. You know, climate change is not a religious problem for me, it's an economic, it is an environmental problem."The senator then said that Republicans do not have a clear stance on climate change, or a plan to address it."I think the Republican Party has to do some soul-searching. Before we can be bipartisan, we've got to figure out where we are as a party. What is the environmental platform of the Republican Party? I don't know, either," he said.Graham, who has said before that environmental policy could be a problem for the GOP in 2016, indicated that he would like to help the party develop an environmental platform."I'd like to have a debate within the party. Can you say that climate change is a scientifically sound phenomenon? But can you reject the idea you have to destroy the economy to solve the problem, is sort of where I'll be taking this debate," he said.
"You know, when it comes to climate change being real, people of my party are all over the board," Graham said after a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations while responding to a question about whether Republicans could work with Democrats to address climate change.
"I said that it's real, that man has contributed to it in a substantial way," Graham continued. "But the problem is Al Gore's turned this thing into religion. You know, climate change is not a religious problem for me, it's an economic, it is an environmental problem."
The senator then said that Republicans do not have a clear stance on climate change, or a plan to address it.
"I think the Republican Party has to do some soul-searching. Before we can be bipartisan, we've got to figure out where we are as a party. What is the environmental platform of the Republican Party? I don't know, either," he said.
Graham, who has said before that environmental policy could be a problem for the GOP in 2016, indicated that he would like to help the party develop an environmental platform.
"I'd like to have a debate within the party. Can you say that climate change is a scientifically sound phenomenon? But can you reject the idea you have to destroy the economy to solve the problem, is sort of where I'll be taking this debate," he said.
― who is dankey kang (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 24 March 2015 18:53 (nine years ago) link
so basically he's about 30 years behind
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 March 2015 18:56 (nine years ago) link
god he's dumb
― who is dankey kang (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 24 March 2015 18:57 (nine years ago) link
or MAYBE strategically and cynically "dumb"
what is the difference these days, who knows
― who is dankey kang (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 24 March 2015 18:58 (nine years ago) link
all of those debate "questions" were literally addressed decades ago
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 March 2015 19:01 (nine years ago) link
the GOP has a long list of items that require soul-searching. i like to imagine them all wandering into the desert together to search for their souls, getting lost, and never coming back.
ohohohoh or maybe they get lost but then they FIND their souls and return and suddenly kick ass
― who is dankey kang (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 24 March 2015 19:04 (nine years ago) link
wrapping your servitude to the owner class inside bait for the starving class takes a certain kind of genius/cojones/deathwish, take your pick.
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 24 March 2015 19:06 (nine years ago) link
What is the environmental platform of the Republican Party?
You have to destroy the economy to solve the problem
Seems like he kinda answered his own question there.
― Losing swag by the second (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 24 March 2015 19:08 (nine years ago) link