2015 American Politics Thread: The 114th Congress Is in the House!

A tidy distillation of the history of the 20th century speakership.

https://twitter.com/costareports/status/656950637834424320

Ideologically, Ryan is man of right. He's friendly w/ F. Caucus. Those things in his favor. Not helpful: his long tenure, ties to ldshp

THIS IS INSANE

goole, be a dear and check on your pals at NRO.

Paul Ryan is not "smart", sorry

He is A smart

Compared to you, maybe

Compared to you, maybe

http://i1050.photobucket.com/albums/s402/Albertocrazy86/sw6_2004-palpatine-1.gif

I think you are probably a smart too

You have clearly demonstrated you are a stupid

boys, please, none of us are brain surgeons

Then what are you a doctor of??

id monsters

boys, please, none of us are brain surgeons

― skateboards are the new combover (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, October 21, 2015 7:50 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

surgeons are technicians. many of them, like their fellow male- and sometimes right-leaning engineers, are not what you would call intellectuals. a nutty seventh-day adventist especially (how much of the nuttiness is an act i'm not sure, but i think precious little) - he compounds the irrational self-belief of the fundamentalist with the slightly but not greatly more rational self-belief you find in lots of docs - and i assume his unusual degree of fitting-the-facts-to-suit-the-belief is plain to everyone else too. he is, though, at least in some sense, "smart" in a way that ryan, who's far better-versed in nearly anything a president might confront, is not.

PS my parents are brain scientists (not surgeons). before that, my dad was a rocket scientist. literally, as joe biden would say.

I'm a proud male-leaning engineer.

gabbneb I don't know if you've heard of this thing called colloquial usage, it's a total hoot

so you a) don't know any brain surgeons and b) missed the reference?

some of my best friends are brain surgeons

understandable

so you a) don't know any brain surgeons and b) missed the reference?

No, everybody got the reference; nobody else was so shit-brained stupid that they thought it required more than 100 words of explanation.

The Washington Post's morning inside the beltway politics email "The Daily 202" after focusing on the tea party caucus reaction to Paul Ryan adds this down near the bottom--

With a bigger profile, Ryan is about to become a bigger boogeyman on the left. Several liberal outlets are attacking him for hypocrisy. Here is a taste of the headlines:
• Jezebel: “Paul Ryan, Opponent of Paid Family Leave, Demands Congress Respect His Need for Family Time.”
• The Nation: “Ryan Was Already Rejected for a Leadership Position—by 2012 Voters.”
• Salon: “Ryan is arrogant clown, drunk on years of flatterers lying about how smart he is; GOP Rep thinks he’s a Randian hero, but is quickly learning that even conservatives find his arrogance revolting.”

meanwhile BENGHAZI

i am listening to it in the background while i work because apparently i hate myself with a burning passion

I still can't believe this is real: http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--XncX0XtS--/181u5acpq4f8yjpg.jpg

I also can't believe this is real: http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTk5Mjg4NDg4NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMTQzMjA0NjE@._V1_SY317_CR1,0,214,317_AL_.jpg

looks like Ryan is in

I give the Freedom Caucus 3 months before they turn on him

Didn't Michael Bay want to wait to hear what comes out of the hearings?! And what about the Oscars? A mid January release makes it tough to keep on the awards radar for a whole year. He better hope there are more hearings, because NEVER FORGET!

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2015_10/clintons_opening_benghazi_stat058251.php

In Hillary Clinton’s opening statement at today’s Benghazi hearing, she began by extolling the virtues of Ambassador Chris Stevens and explaining why he wanted to serve in Libya and why he was in Benghazi taking risks with his life. In Clinton’s estimation, it’s critical that our diplomatic staff be engaged in dangerous places and willing to put their lives on the line in order to talk to people.

She then went right for the throat by bringing up the attacks on our personnel in Beirut during the Reagan administration that killed over 250 people. She also mentioned other attacks on our diplomatic corp that took place during the administrations of her husband and George W. Bush. In other words, why is this particular attack the focus of such obsessive attention?

Did I hear on the radio this morning that Freedom Cocks "support" Ryan even though they are officially "endorsing" another candidate?

sort of, details here: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/us/politics/paul-ryan-house-speaker-freedom-caucus.html?_r=0

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YGCrjQpTzUk/ViggGjHTwII/AAAAAAAAcAE/TI6wG6hz-RY/s640/Screenshot%2B2015-10-21%2Bat%2B4.30.14%2BPM.png

She then went right for the throat by bringing up the attacks on our personnel in Beirut during the Reagan administration that killed over 250 people. She also mentioned other attacks on our diplomatic corp that took place during the administrations of her husband and George W. Bush. In other words, why is this particular attack the focus of such obsessive attention?

heh - gotta say this is pretty classic

Classic Hillary.

"PS my parents are brain scientists (not surgeons). before that, my dad was a rocket scientist. literally, as joe biden would say."

Wait, so are you making an argument against nature or nurture?

he's explaining why his parents are so disappointed in him

did they go to top 5-10 schools tho

when they were younglings

"PS my parents have the highest midichlorian count anyone has ever seen. even higher than master yoda. from a certain point of view, as obi-wan would say"

LOL

Gowdy patting himself on the back...

If those previous congressional investigations were really serious and thorough, how did they miss Ambassador Stevens' e-mails? If those previous investigations were serious and thorough, how did they miss Secretary Clinton's e-mails? If those congressional investigations really were serious and thorough, why did they fail to interview dozens of key State Department witnesses, including agents on the ground who experienced the attacks firsthand?

Dem. Cummings---But, Madam Secretary, you are sitting there by yourself. The Secretary Of Defense is not on your left. The director of the CIA is not on your right. That's because Republicans abandoned their own plans to question those top officials.

trying to recall the last time there was such a highly publicized Senate hearing at which absolutely nothing was at stake beyond the pure political theater

Congressional hearing, I mean

like, everyone knows there is no significant legislative or foreign policy or legal issue at stake here, it is strictly the parties trying to score points against each other (Clinton as guilty on that count as much as Gowdy)

https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/657221560642572288

If the Republicans were a serious party, they could absolutely devastate Hillary by looking at large disaster of Libya not just Benghazi.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-2016-libya-intervention-213277

Hillary backers just say Libya would be even worse off if we had not proceeded as we did

Michael McFaul ‏@McFaul 12m12 minutes ago
As ambassador in Russia, I enjoyed multiple ways to communicate with Secretary Clinton. Email was never one of them.

https://hollywoodhatesme.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/smuggery.jpg

waiting for the eventual Benghazi telegraph scandal

Anyone know Hillary's Grindr handle?