I will keep doing, but not worth it! The 2016 Presidential Primary Voting Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5570 of them)

Rubio is every useless dipshit of a manager I've ever had who managed to bumblefuck their way to the middle without having a single worthwhile thing to contribute. It's a baffling phenomenon but I think it mostly boils down to the fact that people who don't have the time/energy to really scrutinize give the guy a once-over and say, 'yeah, he looks responsible enough'.

maybe my clam is just more toxic (Old Lunch), Friday, 19 February 2016 18:18 (ten years ago)

yeah the long-standing belief that he was somehow the GOP's obama has, i think, been pretty clearly torn to shreds. setting aside his just total lack of presence, he very obviously doesn't get people excited about him, or he wouldn't be mired where he is in this race.

shandemonium padawan (Doctor Casino), Friday, 19 February 2016 18:19 (ten years ago)

peter principle to presidency

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 19 February 2016 18:24 (ten years ago)

Rubio's affect does read like a lazy, immature, terrified kid who is carried everywhere on the shoulders of his handlers. But his handlers are fairly sharp and professional, so they've thrown a thin haze of competence around him.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 19 February 2016 18:26 (ten years ago)

i think he might be an actual moron

Don't say this, it might mean he's got a shot! And for sure fellow moron GWB took his share of vacations, too.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 19 February 2016 18:33 (ten years ago)

"Thin Haze of Competence" / "Responsible Enough" 2016!

living colour me badd english beat happening (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 19 February 2016 18:39 (ten years ago)

talk to republicans and they're under the impression that Obama is the biggest vacation-er in the white house and he and Michele act like king and queen and are constantly on million dollar vacays. I don't get it.

akm, Friday, 19 February 2016 19:30 (ten years ago)

in the history of the White House, I meant.

akm, Friday, 19 February 2016 19:30 (ten years ago)

and Michelle eating hamburgers while advocating alfalfa sprouts for school lunch.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 February 2016 19:31 (ten years ago)

When I read the comments that many republicans make about Obama, I have to wonder what they'd do if they didn't have the ACA to help pay for their thorazine.

maybe my clam is just more toxic (Old Lunch), Friday, 19 February 2016 19:34 (ten years ago)

talk to republicans and they're under the impression that Obama is the biggest vacation-er in the white house and he and Michele act like king and queen and are constantly on million dollar vacays. I don't get it.

hmm I wonder if this is at all related to popular racist conception of black people as lazy? nah.

Οὖτις, Friday, 19 February 2016 19:41 (ten years ago)

Considering that they view him simultaneously as a bumbling incompetent and a dangerous tyrant, you'd think they'd want him to play as much golf as possible.

living colour me badd english beat happening (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 19 February 2016 19:54 (ten years ago)

GW Bush was often viewed as a bumbling incompetent, but also as dangerous, and he also spent a heck of a lot of time on his ranch in Texas, so...

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 19 February 2016 19:59 (ten years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JTtI3D6lqk

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:00 (ten years ago)

Maybe Republicans would be cool with Obama if he cleared more brush.

living colour me badd english beat happening (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:04 (ten years ago)

let's leave manscaping out of this

its subtle brume (DJP), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:08 (ten years ago)

GWB was viewed as dangerous because he was incompetent, and very obviously getting led around by competently dangerous and tyrannical people like cheney, so that every time he did show up the white house he'd do something like starting a war that killed hundreds of thousands of people for no reason at all. whereas yes there is a cognitive dissonance between obama as dictatorial mastermind who "knows exactly what he is doing" and obama as lazy vacationer. and indeed i do think the gap between these is papered over by racism.

shandemonium padawan (Doctor Casino), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:12 (ten years ago)

yeah i mean GWB and his cronies literally lied their way into a war that's been destructive in a way that will probably only be fully felt years down the road and no member of congress yelled "LIAR!" at him during the middle of a speech.

nomar, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:16 (ten years ago)

in fairness, they yelled "LIAR!" because they knew they couldn't get away with yelling "NIGGER!"

its subtle brume (DJP), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:18 (ten years ago)

i think obama will enjoy his post-presidency years more than any other president. i can't imagine him wanting to stick around D.C. any longer than he'd have to. board that helicopter, turn around, give the double middle finger salute, and chill out in Chi-town with michelle and the kids imo.

nomar, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:29 (ten years ago)

if Hillary wins and Ginsberg retires, I wouldn't be surprised if he flew back to be on the Supreme Court

Οὖτις, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:30 (ten years ago)

those confirmation hearings would be a blast

nomar, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:31 (ten years ago)

i think he said he didn't want to do that

a (waterface), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:33 (ten years ago)

but yeah that would be sweet, he could school all those republican dipshits on the judiciary committee

a (waterface), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:33 (ten years ago)

xps

Cognitive dissonance is a common enough trait that most people are very good at finding ways to paper it over. In Obama's case, racism is probably a handy set of blinders, as you say. My only point was that what matters are the presidents' actions, many of which we do not see, whereas the stories we tell ourselves about the motives and personalities of presidents are usually a few shrewd observations, grouted together by a selective paste of stories in the media, pure guesswork, and projection. This is as true of presidents whose actions we like as those we hate.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:34 (ten years ago)

http://www.etonline.com/photo/2016/02/24216598/640_Britney_Spears_Hillary_Clinton_Instagram.jpg

I don't seem to be alone in thinking that just barely looks like Britney Spears.

clemenza, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:37 (ten years ago)

well, the one on the right is Britney Spears.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:40 (ten years ago)

That's definitely Britney. Not sure who the tall one is though.

crüt, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:40 (ten years ago)

xp

crüt, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:40 (ten years ago)

whoa britney has changed a lot

marcos, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:42 (ten years ago)

grouted together by a selective paste

Let's leave Bill Clinton out of this

living colour me badd english beat happening (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:44 (ten years ago)

Britney showing the ravages of too much wheatgrass juice?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:45 (ten years ago)

Vegas 24/7 is some hard livin'?

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:48 (ten years ago)

Britney Spears is 34 and has two kids.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 19 February 2016 20:53 (ten years ago)

^^^

Οὖτις, Friday, 19 February 2016 20:55 (ten years ago)

yea absolutely no negative judgement from me i just realized i hadn't seen a recent photo of britney spears in a really long time

marcos, Friday, 19 February 2016 21:02 (ten years ago)

it's also just a bad photo of her, she is making a weird face

iatee, Friday, 19 February 2016 21:04 (ten years ago)

The bullshit of the presidential vacation controversy is that the Bushes and Reagan all had ranches and estates to retire to, because they were fucking rich. Whereas Clinton and Obama came into the White House with nowhere near that level of funny money largesse. So Obama, unable to retreat to Kennebunkport or Crawford, gets shit for occasionally going on a vacation like the rest of us. The nerve of that guy, for visiting Hawaii, his place of birth! And how dare he bring along secret service, just because he doesn't have a goddam castle to hide in.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 19 February 2016 21:51 (ten years ago)

obama was very wealthy in 2008 from his books, wasn't he?

k3vin k., Friday, 19 February 2016 22:02 (ten years ago)

certainly not Reagan/Bush level wealthy

Οὖτις, Friday, 19 February 2016 22:04 (ten years ago)

I don't think so, not yet. He also didn't have an estate or anything.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 19 February 2016 22:08 (ten years ago)

The number I just saw is that he was a worth $1.3 million when elected.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 19 February 2016 22:11 (ten years ago)

he was well within the top 1%, but yeah, not clinton- or mccain-rich

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/may/17/nation/na-money17

k3vin k., Friday, 19 February 2016 22:14 (ten years ago)

Clintons worth less than $1million when elected, with a lot of debt, but now Bill is the wealthiest living president and, adjusted for inflation, in the top 10 off all time. That'll show those snobs over in Camp Nazimoney!

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 19 February 2016 22:14 (ten years ago)

I get newly shocked when I remember how wealthy LBJ was when he left office (most of it probably of questionable legality too).

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 February 2016 22:15 (ten years ago)

First the Pope, now Apple. Good luck, Trump!

I do love the idea of Obama getting rich by writing a pair of well-received books.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 19 February 2016 22:16 (ten years ago)

Obama's assets were worth between $2.02 million and $7.35 million at the end of 2007

that was definitely not within the top 1% fwiw

xxp

Οὖτις, Friday, 19 February 2016 22:17 (ten years ago)

that's net worth, not annual income - net worth for the top 1% is in the double digit millions

Οὖτις, Friday, 19 February 2016 22:18 (ten years ago)

what are you hiding, Shakey? show us your tax returns

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 February 2016 22:20 (ten years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.