Matt Taibbi

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1970 of them)

ON TRUMP:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-america-made-donald-trump-unstoppable-20160224

Long article, worth reading if you like feeling a creeping horror and bile rising in your throat.

Mongolian Cow Yoghurt Supergirl (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Sunday, 28 February 2016 12:37 (eight years ago) link

there are some good grafs in there but was it edited? by anyone? it reads at times like someone cut all the grafs out and shook them up in a hat and started laying them down one after the other at random.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 28 February 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

I had to skim it. Tracer OTM, it gets close to free association at points. Possibly from listening to too much Trump.

Sith Dog (El Tomboto), Sunday, 28 February 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

The number of predictable "he's got a real shot at this you guys" pieces between now and September is going to get really mind-numbing

Sith Dog (El Tomboto), Sunday, 28 February 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

gonzo writing sort of falls down when everyone already gets how nutty everything is.

Option ARMs and de Man (s.clover), Sunday, 28 February 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

two weeks pass...

on how the NYT gutted their 'positive' Sanders profile online

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-new-york-times-sandbagged-bernie-sanders-20160315?page=2

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

interesting

curmudgeon, Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link

two months pass...

it's about time someone with (successful parents) a voice spelled it out ~

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trump-isnt-the-campaign-medias-first-mistake-20160519?page=3

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 20 May 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

i think he gives the media too much credit. it's not like they were tricking americans into voting for these plutocrats. america elected reagan twice and liked it so much they elected his vp too. donald trump is a strange aberration and taibbi's "you should've seen it all along" is v self-congratulatory. now it makes sense to me that ppl should vote in their self-interest, but they didn't do that for so long that thomas frank wrote an entire book on the topic. taibbi understands the self-interest part but he has no explanation for why now.

Mordy, Friday, 20 May 2016 21:42 (eight years ago) link

whenever i read this guy's name all i can think of is how fucked up and misogynistic the eXile was

Treeship, Friday, 20 May 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

i don't think he's giving the media credit so much as admitting their class bias is so steep few up top can see what's going on down below where the majority of america (without successful parents) scrambles to survive: "The tone of American political coverage for some time hasn't matched the reality of what voters have been going through. Even as America lost its manufacturing base and tens of millions of people were put out of good jobs, the campaign story for years remained the same weirdly celebratory soap opera." it's not the media who sets reagan, bush, bush, romney, and trump up to run; the (increasingly privileged) media is too class-blind to point out the plutocratic BS is his thesis i think

xpost

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 20 May 2016 22:05 (eight years ago) link

whenever i read this guy's name all i can think of is how fucked up and misogynistic the eXile was

I think the dude grew up, it happens sometimes.

You say tomato, Isao Tomita (RIP) (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Saturday, 21 May 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

i'm not saying it should be held against him, really. i just have a hard time looking past it personally. it's not like he was sixteen years old in those days he was like, the age i am now.

Treeship, Saturday, 21 May 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

i also realize mark ames was worse than taibbi

Treeship, Saturday, 21 May 2016 18:35 (eight years ago) link

two weeks pass...

except regular posters here don't want to hear that i'd bet

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 June 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

or know it already

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 June 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

hi matt!

germane geir hongro (s.clover), Friday, 10 June 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

taibbi is mostly right, but i suspect most of us would agree with him. but i don't think that what taibbi predicts is a foregone conclusion.

it seems like morbs is wearing some kind of weird anamorphic lenses when he reads ILX that cause him to make sweeping generalizations about our opinions that aren't remotely true. of his many odious traits, that's the most confounding and frustrating. i don't have any real explanation for it other than he must get off on feeling superior, so it serves his interests to project straw men onto those he's talking (or "talking") with.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 10 June 2016 21:44 (eight years ago) link

and FWIW i do worry that trump's obvious odiousness, and the likely fact that hillary will win this thing in a (relative) rout, means that people will be a celebratory mood and won't hold her feet to the fire before or after the election. she'll interpret her major victory not just as the defeat of fascism but as a endorsement of her kind of corporatist incrementalism.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 10 June 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link

now, let's watch as morbs continues to condemn the lot of us as sniveling hillarybots.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 10 June 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

feel like the lesson the democratic party hasn't learnt yet is how to get all yr constituents to go out to town halls over the summer and threaten to primary / vote out their congressmen if they refuse to pass the legislation that they want, or how to get them to come out in midterms to show that there's teeth behind that threat.

Mordy, Friday, 10 June 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

taibbi's point seems to be smugness above inhibits the rank and file. how to "ameliorate" that is a burning question

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 June 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

now, let's watch as morbs continues to condemn the lot of us as sniveling hillarybots.

― wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, June 10, 2016 5:46 PM (17 minutes ago)

you know, you could do better not to bait him with every other post of yours

k3vin k., Friday, 10 June 2016 22:05 (eight years ago) link

maybe he could, maybe he couldn't. hard to say.

μpright mammal (mh), Friday, 10 June 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i should just ignore it. it's hard when every third post in these political threads is him baiting the lot of us.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 10 June 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

i shouldn't 'speak' for him but i think he's calling bullshit on self-styled enlightened egalitarians, not baiting people for the hell of it. sorry dr-m if i am misrepresenting you

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 June 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

i'm not speaking, so go ahead.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 11 June 2016 06:37 (eight years ago) link

OTMx1000:

The maddening thing about the Democrats is that they refuse to see how easy they could have it. If the party threw its weight behind a truly populist platform, if it stood behind unions and prosecuted Wall Street criminals and stopped taking giant gobs of cash from every crooked transnational bank and job-exporting manufacturer in the world, they would win every election season in a landslide.

schwantz, Sunday, 12 June 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

yep

pleas to Nietzsche (WilliamC), Sunday, 12 June 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

no morbs but... they appoint Wall Street criminals to cabinet posts.. so not gonna happen

brimstead, Sunday, 12 June 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

(sorry morbs)

brimstead, Sunday, 12 June 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

no, because those interests bankroll the really fuckin' weird tv ads that speak to identity politics that motivate a fair number of voters

μpright mammal (mh), Sunday, 12 June 2016 23:30 (eight years ago) link

If the party threw its weight behind a truly populist platform, if it stood behind unions and prosecuted Wall Street criminals and stopped taking giant gobs of cash from every crooked transnational bank and job-exporting manufacturer in the world

It's probably apocryphal, but there is a 'quote' out there along these lines: "I don't care who votes, so long as I choose the candidates." -- Boss Tweed --

The quote may be phony as a $3 bill, but the sentiment is correct enough and the rich and powerful endorse it through their actions in every election.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 13 June 2016 05:16 (eight years ago) link

drag out the evil lesserism

The Democratic Party leaders have trained their followers to perceive everything in terms of one single end-game equation: If you don't support us, you're supporting Bush/Rove/Cheney/Palin/Insert Evil Republican Here.

That the monster of the moment, Donald Trump, is a lot more monstrous than usual will likely make this argument an even bigger part of the Democratic Party platform going forward....

Dissenting voices like this year's version of Nader, Bernie Sanders, are inevitably pitched as quixotic egotists who don't have the guts to do what it takes to win. They're described as just out for 15 minutes of fame, and maybe a few plaudits from teenagers and hippies who'll gush over their far-out idealism.

But that characterization isn't accurate. The primary difference between the Nader/Sanders platform and the Gore/Clinton platform isn't rooted in ideology at all, but money.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/ralph-nader-bernie-sanders-lesser-evilism-20160620

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

It's a sound formula for making ballot-box decisions, but the people who push it never seem content to just use it to win elections. They're continually trying to make an ethical argument out of it, to prove people who defy The Equation are, whether they know it or not, morally wrong and in league with the other side. Beltway Democrats seem increasingly to believe that all people who fall within a certain broad range of liberal-ish beliefs owe their votes and their loyalty to the Democratic Party. That's why, as a socially liberal person who probably likes trees and wouldn't want to see Roe v. Wade overturned, Nader's decision to take votes from the party-blessed candidate Gore is viewed not as dissent, but as a kind of treason.

insane the amount of strawmanning here. no one is immoral or evil for voting for nader / jill stein. they're just dumb and make poor strategic decisions. and no one thinks they're treasonous. just dumb.

Mordy, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:12 (eight years ago) link

Once you get to the point where there is a general election for president your options for effective action for positive change have narrowed to whoever is on the ballot and has enough organization and support to win. Voting for someone who has no chance to win will not be an effective action for positive change.

If progressives are serious about changing the system, they must begin by organizing, raising money, identifying a candidate and what their winning issues are long before the first primary is held. It's pretty late in the day to do anything more than vote for a candidate who is on the ballot, preferably one who can win.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

i don't disagree

and i stopped believing the Dems can be "changed from within" a long time ago

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

reminder from that great recent lemeiux post:

It is also worth noting that this is not an ideological dispute; it is not about FAILING TO RECOGNIZE THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE TO YOUR LEFT. Noam Chomsky believes that swing-state voters should support the leftmost viable candidate in general elections; Tom Friedman, conversely, shares Freddie’s view that there really needs to be a third-party candidate that agrees with him in every detail because coalition-building should be obsolete for today’s consumer.

has nothing to do w/ evil, or dissent, or the left. it has to do w/ childish atomistic consumerism replacing pragmatism. "lesser evilism" is the telling phrase. the so-called democratic liberals don't use the idiom when making their argument bc they aren't making an argument based in morality. it's the priority of a stunted morality that sees voting as an expression of their personal purity and views compromise as somehow contaminating said purity. don't vote for the lesser evil. vote for the option that best fits your issues. if one candidate fits 20% and the other fits 10%, vote for the 20% one. if both fit 0% (like let's say you're a one issue capitalism voter and the options this year are fascism and communism, or more practically if you're a one issue hardcore anti-imperialism voter and your options are interventionism and belligerence, and neither seem superior to the other) then don't vote. no one is asking anyone to vote for a candidate who they don't agree with on any issue. they're just saying that if you agree with one politician more than another, the only intelligent decision is to vote for the one you agree with more. the whole purity in politics thing is bizarre.

Mordy, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

re treason, Taibbi is talking about the snotty, punchable attitude of DLC types, funny i can't think of an example just now.

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

taibbi feels bad about himself and he's projecting all kinds of /attitudes/ to DLC types that aren't being made. no one said anyone /owes/ Hillary their votes. what they said was that only stupid people don't vote for the best of the two candidates. it's the left-wing political fluoride hysterics (and their related versions throughout the political spectrum including tom friedman self-obsessed voters) who believe anyone is making a case about treason or evil or whatever. he admits himself that voting for the better candidate is a good way to make a decision at the ballot box. he can't quite bring himself to admit that it's the only logical way to make a decision but even he realizes that he's complaining about the demons in his head and not actually people.

Mordy, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

MaxSpeak had a pretty great run on LGM front page the other day. One of about eight posts of his - http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/06/confessions-of-a-bernie-bro

Some on the left seem to make it their mission to invite the contempt of others. I’m always reminded of an appearance by the late Harvey Pekar on David Letterman’s show, decades ago. Pekar’s message could be boiled down to, I’m the left, and you all suck. Ah, politics. Winning friends and influencing people! His hatred was pure! Some on the left fall prey to this, if only occasionally.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

lots of good responses in the comments imo - he does come off as smug and repetitive (like someone points out - it's as if he thinks no one has heard the case for bernie yet, maybe bc he still can't believe that someone heard the case and didn't sign on), but i thought this was a gracious way to end the run:
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/06/kumbaya

Mordy, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

Absolutely. Also I can't imagine how he wrote all of those in one day but for all I know he did, which is pretty amazing.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

he said somewhere in the comments that he started prepping them a week ago

Mordy, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

someone else who doesn't understand Harvey Pekar

anyway, Debs was right, I do not want what i do not want (Or was that Morrissey?)

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

the weird thing about you isn't that you don't have a strong grasp of how our political system works (most americans don't) but that you think anyone cares to hear yr personal preference stated over and over again. you'd make a good fit on the nyt op-ed pages next to maureen dowd.

Mordy, Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

btw every winning presidential candidate has been elected mostly by stupid people, it's just how the math works

i don't give a flying fucking shit what anyone cares to hear

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

it's a messageboard, your time can be wasted any which way

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

incrementalism is good imo

de l'asshole (flopson), Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.