Monty Python's Flying Circus - Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (596 of them)
The wee-wee sketch was, as I recall, ousted by the censors in cahoots with Cleese, who thought it was completely juvenile and icky and disturbing.

Isn't the beauty of Python that it allows for happy juvenile geekdom too, though?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Saturday, 6 September 2003 17:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

That's the thing, as much as I want to be all clever and shocking and against the grain and come in here and say "Dud".... it wasn't. The semaphore version of Wuthering Heights is one of the five funniest things I've ever seen.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 6 September 2003 18:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Man, I'm laughing at just the mention of some of these sketches.

oops (Oops), Saturday, 6 September 2003 18:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Which is to say: what's your idea of 'good' comedy, then, andrew?)

The Simpsons, The Day Today, Tommy Cooper, Morecambe and Wise, Wayne's World, Police Squad, Blackadder, early Friends.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 7 September 2003 23:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

While some of the BBC imposed edits are still there, there's actually some missing material *restored* which I find more of interest

One edit I always found curious in the versions I have (which are some kind of US VHS ones done in the late 80s) - the sketch where the black spot appeared on the guys face. In the original showing they apparently said he died of cancer. In the copy I have it is dubbed over (very badly and obviously - on purpose?) with the word "gangrene" which is absurd.

I dont know if the dubbing was a BBC thing or a US thing... *consults her 200 years of python book* Ah it was a BBC thing. Which word is used in the box sets? I'd like to buy the DVDs but now I'm dubious if it is true they're poor prints...

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 8 September 2003 00:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

There are theories that that bit of dubbing was made to sound as bad as possible for comedy value, but it's also possible the BBC were just being really stupid. I think the version of the show that has the word "gangrene" is the only version remaining.

This is very interesting.

Chriddof (Chriddof), Monday, 8 September 2003 10:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

the Pythons might have got away with more if Hugh Greene had continued as director-general of the BBC after 1969, or if he'd been succeeded by someone in the same vein - instead they went with Charles Curran, who was much more conservative and cautious, and was far more likely than Greene would have been to impose edits like that. that being said, they won a great many battles over script content which they would inevitably have lost had it been the full-on 1950s Auntie Beeb (it could never have swung back that far again, even at the height of Curran's cautiousness, which like much of British culture in the 70s represented a nervous response to the 60s) and they certainly couldn't have gone so far on the main US networks of the time. I doubt whether ITV of the early 70s would have done Monty Python, either, great as it was in other ways.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Monday, 8 September 2003 10:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Wow Chriddof thats an amazing page (and quite recent too it seems, that find), the Jesus on the telephone poles thing is BIZARRE.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 8 September 2003 10:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Preferred Milligan's various Q series (without which no Python - Ian McNaughton produced both) and "Do Not Adjust Your Set," which for younger ILxors was a children's programme which went out on ITV Tuesday afternoons, written by and featuring Palin, Jones, Idle and David Jason (who played "Captain Fantastic" and has subsequently said on numerous occasions that he nearly became part of Python but didn't due to anti-Oxbridge bias). The Bonzo Dog Band were the resident group.

Most consistent/coherent Python show was the one with Palin as the cyclist, more or less parodying himself 20 years later (Pole to Pole etc.), which probably remains funny because it doesn't get rerun that often.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 8 September 2003 11:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

I doubt whether ITV of the early 70s would have done Monty Python, either, great as it was in other ways.

I don't know how accurate this is, or if this is actually true - but I recently read that Thames offered to produce Monty Python in 1969, and planned it as a 45 minute show in a primetime slot. For some reason Thames couldn't commit themselves to doing the show until 1971 and so they went with the BBC. Again, I'm not sure if this is true, as I'm sure I remember something about them being with the BBC from day one but it's an interesting "what-if" story, anyway.

Most consistent/coherent Python show was the one with Palin as the cyclist

Mr Pither's Cycling Tour. Very good that - with Terry Jones losing his memory and thinking he's Clodagh Rogers, and then Lenin.

Chriddof (Chriddof), Monday, 8 September 2003 13:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was thinking of that very episode the other day when the board kicked in again! It is just great -- the Palin/Jones tendency to an overarching story within an episode got one of its few chances to flourish fully here and it's handled perfectly.

"Pither! What a stroke of luck to find you again!"

"Well, yes and no..."

the Jesus on the telephone poles thing is BIZARRE.

I remember for the LONGEST time being utterly befuddled by the brief clip of the animation of that showing in the 'episode recap' and trying to pause the videotape just so so I could read it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 8 September 2003 13:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dinsdale's one major weakness is his pathalogical fear of a giant hedgehog he calls Spiny Norman. Norman varied in height but there was a Gilliam segment at the end of the sketch with a approx 200ft Norman towering over central London, saying "Dinsdale.....Dinsdale", apparently looking for Dinsdale.

Nick H, Monday, 8 September 2003 14:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Anyone read Palin/Jones' 'Bert Fegg's Nasty Book For Boys and Girls?' A scrapbook thing 'edited' by the eponymous Fegg, a homicidal maniac and featuring the 'Useless Page' (DESTROY the useless page! Rip it RIGHT out you WEEDS!) Roughly contemporary with the 4th series. Freaked me RIGHT out as a kid.

Myron Kosloff, Monday, 8 September 2003 21:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Anyone read Palin/Jones' 'Bert Fegg's Nasty Book For Boys and Girls?'

Wonderful book, picked up a republication when I was 16 or so. Very goofy and ridiculous. The Famous Five parody is absolutely stellar.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 8 September 2003 21:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Chriddof - you may be right if only because "Do Not Adjust Your Set" was produced by Thames (well, they took it over after they took over the London franchise; it was originally produced by Rediffusion)

robin carmody (robin carmody), Monday, 8 September 2003 22:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

We got the complete DVD set as a wedding present, I believe, & spent several months going through them all... I think my single favorite bit is Mrs. Premise & Mrs. Conclusion Visit Mr. and Mrs. Jean-Paul Sartre, just because Cleese and Chapman get so deep into their inane batty Pepperpot characters that they actually seem to be playing it straight.

Douglas (Douglas), Monday, 8 September 2003 23:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ned: yeah the fact those two stills were in that clip montage and not in the show was something hardcore fans had always wondered about, and that page Chriddof linked above talks about how theyve now found the missing bits. I wonder if they'll put them into a rerelease seeing as its been sent back to the BBC.

Annoying how the BBC has lost so much wonderful old footage - Goodies, python, dr who etc.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 8 September 2003 23:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Thanks for the Dinsdale, Spiny Normal explanation, Nick H. All is now a bit less murky *grin*

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 02:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Pither! What a stroke of luck to find you again!"

"To save time, I will continue in English ..."

brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 02:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Thought I'd resurrect this thread for the following link, a lengthy extract from the upcoming Python biography:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2092-806332_1,00.html

Chriddof (Chriddof), Friday, 12 September 2003 12:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

There's another one? I've already got two or three!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 September 2003 14:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

the times online is the most annoying thing ever. apparently even after registring they won't let me get to this url, they want me to pay for something.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Friday, 12 September 2003 15:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

That's weird, I was able to get to it without any registration or anything.

Chriddof (Chriddof), Friday, 12 September 2003 19:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

it told me to register, then when I did, said I had to pay because I wasn't in the UK. Anyone care to share their UK login?

(not even sure why I care at this point though, slow day at work obviously)

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Friday, 12 September 2003 21:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

three weeks pass...
I must resurrect this thread for this:

http://web.ukonline.co.uk/sotcaa/python.html

The above link is of a truly incredible website that examines the production of the shows, movies and records, with fantastically detailed examinations of various edits, out-takes, alternate versions of episodes/records, acres of quotes from actual rehearsal scripts featuring - yes! - the Wee-Wee Sketch in full, along with a great big press archive dating back to the very first article ever written about Python in the Radio Times in 1969! It is wonderful and I have spent virtually the whole evening reading it.

Chriddof (Chriddof), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
Inflammation of the foreskin
reminds me of your smile
I've had ballanital chancroids
for quite a little while
I gave my heart to NSU
that lovely night in June
I ache for you my darling
and I hope you get well soon.

My penile warts, your herpes
my syphilitic sores
Your moenelial infection
how I miss you more and more
You dobie's itch, my scrumpox
our lovely gonorrhea
At least we both were lying
when we said that we were clear

Our syphilitic kisses
sealed the secret of our tryst
You gave me scrotal pustules
with a quick flick of your wrist
Your trichovaginitis
sent shivers down my spine
I got snail tracks in my anus
when your spirochetes met mine.

Gonococcal urethritis, streptococcal ballinitis,
Meningo myelitis, diplococcal cephalitis,
Epididymitis, interstitial keratitis,
Syphilitic choroiditis, and anterior u-ve-i-tis.

My clapped out genitalia
is not so bad for me
As the complete and utter failure
every time I try to pee.
My doctor says my buboes
are the worst he's ever seen
My scrotum's painted orange
and my balls are turning green.

My heart is very tender
though my parts are awful raw
You might have been infected
but you never were a bore
I'm dying of your love my love
I'm your spirochaetal clown
I've left my body to science
but I'm afraid they've turned it down.

Gonococcal urethritis, streptococcal ballinitis,
Meningo myelitis, diplococcal cephalitis,
Epididymitis, interstitial keratitis,
Syphilitic choroiditis, and anterior u-ve-i-tis.

"Medical Love Song," I salute you.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 May 2005 04:39 (nineteen years ago) link

one year passes...
I read that coffee table book about Monty Python with lots of nice pictures and nothing but interviews. It was a cool read. Interesting to read about how the writing actually worked. Jones & Palin were one writing team, while Cleese & Gilliam & Graham were another, although apparently Graham was quite an alcoholic and didn't do all that much in the writing department.

One story: when King Arthur crossed the rope bridge, it was actually an extra, as Graham was suffering from the shakes and couldn't really perform that day.

Cleese fought to play Brian in TLOB, but he was shouted down.
Eric Idle wrote strictly on his own, and out of all five, he's the only one who comes across as a primadonna and an arrogant jerk. He seems to despise Cleese with a passion, and always blames Cleese for any trial or tribulation suffered by the group, usually contradicting all four of the other pythons.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:01 (eighteen years ago) link

i hate to say it but MP is one of those things that would be absolutely classic if no one else had ever heard of it.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:04 (eighteen years ago) link

There's definitely a lot of detritus in the Flying Circus, but I feel it's an essential by-product of the process they used to create their best sketches, which, as far as I can tell, consisted of wholly unbridled, anything goes silliness.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:06 (eighteen years ago) link

my friend recently drove cleese around for a festival and she said he was the nicest guy you could ever hope to meet. he sounded just awesome.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Ah, now that's good to hear.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:10 (eighteen years ago) link

I recently saw a documentary with Cleese in it about Lemurs. I can't say he was hilarious, but his jokes certainly spiced what could be a dull proceeding, and it was great how he got the various scientists to go into hysterics.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Makes me wonder how those Terry Jones historical things are.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Maybe six or seven years ago, I heard an interview with Cleese in which he more or less said he felt he'd lost his edge in terms of humor. What he said was kind of sad and the gist of it has stayed with me since then, something VERY loosely along the lines of "When you're young, you notice all these little inconsistencies in the world, things that aren't quite right, people who don't quite seem to know what they're doing, and you can derive humor from that. But when you get older, you start to realize that nothing is really right at all, that no one has any idea what they're doing, and then it stops seeming as funny."

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:25 (eighteen years ago) link

In light of that, maybe he's a classic example of someone not writing much because he knows he just doesn't have much to say?
which is great, as opposed to pumping out material devil may care.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:30 (eighteen years ago) link

Which is what some of the other Pythoners seem to do.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Friday, 15 September 2006 02:44 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean, Spamalot - is Eric Idle the Mike Love of comedy or what?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 15 September 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago) link

When you're young, you notice all these little inconsistencies in the world, things that aren't quite right, people who don't quite seem to know what they're doing, and you can derive humor from that. But when you get older, you start to realize that nothing is really right at all, that no one has any idea what they're doing, and then it stops seeming as funny."

This--and I know you're just paraphrasing--is fucking brilliant.

g00blar (gooblar), Friday, 15 September 2006 10:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Similar thoughts went through my mind watching the first episode of the second series of Extras last night.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 15 September 2006 10:18 (eighteen years ago) link

The big article in the Guardian by Dave Eggers was interesting mostly in that it alleges they're quite pally, and doesn't paint Eric Idle as a complete cunt.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 15 September 2006 10:19 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean, Spamalot - is Eric Idle the Mike Love of comedy or what?

ask neil innes!

This--and I know you're just paraphrasing--is fucking brilliant.

agreed!

i am not a nugget (stevie), Friday, 15 September 2006 10:25 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, well you can't rely on what Dave Eggers says, can you?

In Idle's defence, he was responsible for one of the great TOTP performances - "Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life" where he systematically demolished the stage set.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 15 September 2006 10:25 (eighteen years ago) link

about the only python related anything I can stomach anymore are michael palin's travel series, which are really fascinating. too much python in adolesence kind of spoils it for the rest of your life...maybe I'll come around again, some day.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 15 September 2006 12:29 (eighteen years ago) link

The Python episode featuring Palin as a cyclist kind of spoiled Palin's travel series for me.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 15 September 2006 12:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Makes me wonder how those Terry Jones historical things are.

Very pleasant and likeable, in the same way Palin's travelogues are very pleasant and likeable. Jones and Palin are still very good friends, I believe.

chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Here's a really good recent interview with Michael Palin: http://www.idler.co.uk/archives/?page_id=157

M Carty (mj_c), Friday, 15 September 2006 15:05 (eighteen years ago) link

In Idle's defence, he was responsible for one of the great TOTP performances - "Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life" where he systematically demolished the stage set.

Agreed. I was so happy to see that at long last, having heard about it for years.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 September 2006 15:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Eric Idle, This paraphrased from a rutles thread on ILM...

Basically the dispute between him and Innes is well known, and I watched the Rutles with the "director's commentary" i.e. Idle's, and two things struck me:

1) No mention at all of Innes
2) or anybody else who did non-oncreen work.


Until about halfway through when he discusses Innes' wonderful songs, the co-director's work and everyone else. Ah well, I guess he warmed up.

Oh, and 4) It actually isn't unfair to claim he wrote it, as there is a great deal in it that isn't purely beatlessong or story.

Also, that he 'idly' pondered getting out all the out-takes and extras and making a sequel. "YOU NUTS??" I thought.... (It's easy to think this bloke chatting over the film is in the chair next to you)..

So I look up on Amazon, IMDB etc, and that is exactly what he did do. And how dreadful the reviews were for it.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 15 September 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

one year passes...

Monty Python & Stephanie Edwards hosting A.M. America in 1975. Includes bonus Peter Jennings reporting on the fall of Saigon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfmS-DM8Jc0

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 8 August 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

My son has just started watching Monty Python and repeating the lines as I did as an irritating teenager (although he's only 11) and indeed still do as an irritating 40 something. It was one of the first programmes I was allowed to stay up and watch back in the early 70s. The circle is unbroken.

Ned Trifle II, Friday, 8 August 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.