Matt Taibbi

You have the weirdest way of dealing with facts and figures, Morbs.

You have the weirdest way of dealing with facts and figures, Morbs.

2 + 2 = HILLARY

Everything that pulls political attention and discussion away from government policies and actions, and toward backward-looking blame-casting, is a harmful distraction.

I again refer to a recent LGM post on this topic:

The purpose of the leaks and how Wikileaks framed them was precisely to sucker journalists into covering anodyne behavior as if it was scandalous. . . . It’s very hard to imagine even Clinton haters as obsessive as Fang and Greenwald writing a story about Hillary Clinton engaging in completely unexceptionable media engagement strategies any minimally competent campaign engages in if the story had been obtained from conventional sources, let alone hyping their “findings” as if they had he 21st century Pentagon Papers on their hands.

To the extent that the positioning of "OMG the Clinton campaign engages in public relations!!" as "scandalous" succeeded in turning off/turning away potential Clinton voters or allowing an already hostile media to say, "See, THE CLINTON BODY COUNT IS REAL" then a little finger-pointing is perfectly appropriate.

Everything that pulls political attention and discussion away from government policies and actions, and toward backward-looking blame-casting, is a harmful distraction.

Given that impeachment is impossible based on my understanding of the dynamics, I am inclined to agree. But if past interactions clearly reflect current/future policy obligations by trumpco, it's slightly scarier than the also clear facts they are anti-democratic, almost purely self-interested, inexperienced, uneducated morans, and incidentally closely allied with groups that actually are even worse.

they're a harmful distraction TO TRUMP, eg they are worth it

eg = ergo

XPOST OTM. It's amazing that a lot of people still don't understand (or disingenuously pretend not to understand) how the leaks function as propaganda and that it leads to the spread of misinformation. It's beyond depressing to hear someone say "but the information in the emails was true!"

replace "reflect" with "reveal"
xpost

where's the tax returns?

shakey otm. the russia stuff is pretty stupid but it is definitely paying off, dems should continue to hammer at it

"and *who* is arguing there shouldn't be an investigation"

That's generally the Intercept audience and left twitter's feeling on it. It's actually not uncommon to see it compared to birtherism. Defining the issue as "hysteria" and repeatedly pointing to marginal conspiracists as fully representative of the Dems on it might have something to do with that.

you are aware there is a spectrum of "Let's investigate" positions, yes? One end being Louise Batshit Mensch.

"left Twitter's feeling"

ah, its FEELING as measured by you, Nerdstrom. Very persuasive.

"and *who* is arguing there shouldn't be an investigation"

That's generally the Intercept audience and left twitter's feeling on it. It's actually not uncommon to see it compared to birtherism. Defining the issue as "hysteria" and repeatedly pointing to marginal conspiracists as fully representative of the Dems on it might have something to do with that.

― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Tuesday, April 4, 2017 11:56 AM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/849270233957355521

I think everyone needs to back off the "treason" claims or even the "Putin puppet" claims, but there is clearly a political advantage for Trump opponents in bringing up the Russia connections, especially since the admin. squirms and deflects every time anyone takes a close look. The main reason that Dems are focusing on the Russia stuff is because that is the one area where there is even a modicum of Republican cooperation, with guys like McCain, Graham, and Grassley acknowledging the need for an investigation.

What concerns me is when people on both sides of the aisle try to claim that the Russian hacking and propaganda machines did not influence any votes. Obviously, the leaked emails were not the primary reason for her loss, but conspiracy theory and disinformation caused a guy to storm Comet Pizza with a goddamn assault rifle, fergodsake. You're telling me that the disinformation couldn't convince people to change their votes or stay at home?

X-post: That's pretty disingenuous. They've been loud in their clamoring for 'real' proof, as in something that wasn't already brought up by independent observers last summer, and isn't classified, but they're calling every step of investigating it McCarthyism.

lol i got your independent observers right here

"they're calling every step of investigating it McCarthyism"

are you dumb or evil?

transparency in democracy was a bad idea. thank you Russia for showing us that.

Yeah Glenn legitimately wants an investigation of the issue he's been smugly dismissive about for months even after being wrong and cackling w Tucker Carlson about it on Fox. The best was when he said that Flynn and Sessions were victims of Russian hysteria.

https://twitter.com/charliearchy/status/849021749173731328

Could we have HOOS and the others back to save ILX leftism from these two fucking dolts, please?

our political threads have lacked a bit of steendriving IMO

Yeah Glenn legitimately wants an investigation of the issue he's been smugly dismissive about for months even after being wrong and cackling w Tucker Carlson about it on Fox. The best was when he said that Flynn and Sessions were victims of Russian hysteria.

https://twitter.com/charliearchy/status/849021749173731328

― Nerdstrom Poindexter, 4. april 2017 21:34 (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Otm. Go back a few steps on that Twitter to find Greenwald dismissing the evidence back in july.

i'm afraid you centrist dolts have driven HOOS away forever

btw gr8 discussion of Taibbi's piece as always, guys

thanks, teach

'When I said it was McCarthyism I just meant we instead need to have a House Committee to investigate these sort of Activities'

I think the point here is that if you want to get the democratic base (which I guess you guys are now, derisively(?) calling The Left) to resist, to show up and help pay for mid-term candidates, then maybe focusing on all of this Russia speculation might not be as effective as you think it is.

If what you want is more to "distract" Trump, sure, I guess this fits the bill. So far, I haven't seen that it is really doing a whole lot to derail Trump's agenda (he's managing to do that with his own horrible policy-making), but I am seeing that it is a nice way for centrist folks in the party to continue ignoring the fucking cancer of neoliberalism that has sucked all of the enthusiasm out of being a democrat. Replacing that with red-baiting and conspiracy theories may work - we'll see - for some, but it's not working for me.

oh great we're recycling that angle for the 345th time

I'll stop recycling if anyone listens.

'The Left' is not the Democratic base.

he's managing to do that with his own horrible policy-making

Trump isn't writing policy because he a) can't/is not interested and b) is spending all his time picking fights over this Russia stuff

I think the two are totally unrelated.

like is it really that difficult to acknowledge that this isn't a damn conspiracy theory but rather something that actually needs investigating and is only growing larger in volume because the White House, instead of saying "Y'know, fine, investigate, you won't find anything", is actively interfering?

remember how during inauguration week how silent the Russia story had become? It only grew to this height because he kept throwing gasoline on his own fire which led to more and more leaks. personally if an actual bipartisan investigation somehow miraculously happened and revealed there were some shady actions by individual players but no actual collusion with Russia, I'd accept it and move on, but it's impossible to get to that point when nobody will approve a special prosecutor and the White House attempts to get people inside intelligence organizations and even within the House intel committee itself to dismiss negative reports against it.

as much as I'm "yeah, weaken this administration by any legal means necessary because it's dangerous", the concept of Russia interfering in our electoral process actually DOES bother me.

OF COURSE INVESTIGATE. Just don't get your hopes up is all Taibbi is saying.

And who is the Democratic base, O' wise Frederik? Do you ever stop being smug? You were wildly wrong about EVERYTHING last election, and you're still acting like you know what the fuck you're talking about. When I make arguments, I add things like "I think" and "to me." Some of you guys have a real knack for making pronouncements without a hint of humility or uncertainty. Yeah yeah posts that sum up ilx or whatever.

that's not really all that Taibbi is saying

can we knock off this "red-baiting" and "mccarthyist" bullshit already? putin's russia is not the soviet union and nobody has lost their job or been blacklisted for sympathizing with russia. the ppl being attacked for alleged ties to russia are rich powerful reactionary creeps who are currently running the executive branch, not ordinary citizens being terrorized for their political views.

The aforementioned Mensch, a noted loon who thinks Putin murdered Andrew Breitbart but has somehow been put front and center by The Times and HBO's Real Time, has denounced an extraordinary list of Kremlin plants.

She's tabbed everyone from Jeff Sessions ("a Russian partisan") to Rudy Giuliani and former Assistant FBI Director James Kallstrom ("agents of influence") to Glenn Greenwald ("Russian shill") to ProPublica and Democracy Now! (also "Russian shills"), to the 15-year-old girl with whom Anthony Weiner sexted (really, she says, a Russian hacker group called "Crackas With Attitudes") to an unnamed number of FBI agents in the New York field office ("moles"). And that's just for starters.

xxxxpost yeah and this is the same seesaw we fucking keep going through.

if Taibbi is saying "don't get your hopes up", he's addressing a small subset of a larger base that thinks there definitively was a mustache-twirly 75 point Russia interference plan that is going to take down the whole admin, whereas the rest of us are sitting here saying "idk maybe could we just ask for an investigation that isn't being run by a partisan cinderblockhead like Nunes?".

besides, "don't get your hopes up" is a fairly pointless message at this point because everything is still mostly classified so we barely have any insight into what's going to come out of it. If Trump was about to go down, the FBI and CIA wouldn't let that shit leak - they're only leaking ancillary shit atm. There's no real way to know the tenor of the investigation. And the White House keeps reacting as if investigators are getting close to something - perhaps that's their dumbshit way of handling investigations, but y'know...

People kept interpreting Schiff's comment of "no info to date to suggest active collusion" to be confirmation that there isn't and not "at this point in the investigation, we haven't seen it, yet".

DJI otm

i also can't fathom how people still want to jedi handwave away how scandals disproportionately affected Trump and Hillary as if it was purely her shittiness as a candidate that sunk her. for instance, there was way more questionable info uncovered about Trump foundation, yet whose Foundation news was the narrative that stuck after the election ended?

few things can be attached to "purely"

I don't see why Taibbi and Greenwald can't wait until the Dems take control of the Senate and/or the House in 2018 or 2010 to write stories about American liberal perfidy.

man I hope we can retroactively take back Congress in 2010

...in the style of the Liberal 8-Year Nap concluded last Jan 20.

xp

The most loyal group of Dem voters is black women, the last primary was decided mostly by black voters in the south. So... how is that not the base?

xxxxxpost

yet whose Foundation news was the narrative that stuck after the election ended?

Whose was? Seriously, I'm asking. In my world, we all moved on from the Clinton non-scandals a long time ago. I guess the right wing media kept the Clinton shit burning, but the MSM has been pretty-much focused Trump's myriad of scandals since the election.

funny, because while I would agree neither are big stories atm, whenever I see any foundation brought up, it's Clinton's (and much of that noise from liberals)