Fucking hell it's tomorrow
I have concerns but I really *want* it to be good
― Chuck_Tatum, Saturday, 23 September 2017 17:43 (seven years ago)
I guess I hadn't been paying attention but, uh, you have to pay for some CBS streaming service to watch this beyond the first episode? Really? I hope everyone enjoys the first ST series to last exactly one season.
― Señor Winces (Old Lunch), Sunday, 24 September 2017 15:02 (seven years ago)
It's on Netflix in the UK and a bunch of other countries
― Chuck_Tatum, Sunday, 24 September 2017 15:22 (seven years ago)
A few reviews have slipped through the embargo and been decent
― Chuck_Tatum, Sunday, 24 September 2017 15:23 (seven years ago)
This should be worth a flyer just for more Michelle Yeoh.
― Insane Clown Fosse (Leee), Sunday, 24 September 2017 15:27 (seven years ago)
I'm sorry, I misunderstood: CBS is only airing the first half of the two hour pilot on actual TV. Fun idea.
― Señor Winces (Old Lunch), Sunday, 24 September 2017 15:51 (seven years ago)
If they streamed it only on the CBS app but allowed digital purchases on amazon, itunes, etc. it'd make more sense. but, afaik, they are making it only available on the CBS app
so irritating, I'd shell out for the entire season purchase even if it trickles out a week at a time as per usual
― mh, Sunday, 24 September 2017 16:48 (seven years ago)
i'll probably wait until next year and stream the whole season then. or find "other ways" that will appear soon, i'm sure
― Nhex, Sunday, 24 September 2017 17:00 (seven years ago)
I just did the free CBS trial on my tv device, but I guess it doesn't air until tonight? boo
― mh, Sunday, 24 September 2017 17:22 (seven years ago)
― Señor Winces (Old Lunch)
yeah i mean i know game of thrones seems to do ok and all but i'm not sure why directly adopting a piracy-based business model is cbs's schtick here
anyway when the streaming service fails they'll probably just toss it to another streaming service. doesn't necessarily doom the show.
― bob lefse (rushomancy), Sunday, 24 September 2017 18:48 (seven years ago)
Phase II - proposed for Paramount Television Service, a fourth US networkVoyager (1995-2001), Enterprise (2001-2005) - designed to support UPN (1995-2006)
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Sunday, 24 September 2017 18:56 (seven years ago)
nice ship -- too bad they haven't invented probes yet and have to send their first officer into lethal radiation
― mookieproof, Monday, 25 September 2017 02:00 (seven years ago)
this was fun but fuck CBS for making me watch a thousand NAVY SEALS promos and then asking for money to keep watching
― El Tomboto, Monday, 25 September 2017 02:15 (seven years ago)
points for having the main plot thread be about a black woman trying to tell everybody "no really, they're going to kill all of us" and being shouted down
― El Tomboto, Monday, 25 September 2017 02:17 (seven years ago)
cbs has consistently been tightassed with digital access to its programming since the tv-web boom, it's annoying
― j., Monday, 25 September 2017 03:20 (seven years ago)
Enjoying this!
First question: how can I get one of those dope uniforms
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 04:42 (seven years ago)
We signed up for free trial - canceled after 2nd ep & got a month free so 4 more episodes
But seriously $6 for 1 original show and commercials is a joke. $10 if you want commercial free? Eat a dick
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 05:20 (seven years ago)
A few minutes in, it looks right at least. The ship and cinematography look like a Star Trek show (vs. the new movies).
― louise ck (milo z), Monday, 25 September 2017 05:43 (seven years ago)
New Klingons - ehhhhhhhh. The makeup is so heavy their faces barely move.
― louise ck (milo z), Monday, 25 September 2017 06:02 (seven years ago)
Huh.
― louise ck (milo z), Monday, 25 September 2017 06:59 (seven years ago)
The theme manages to have twelve different sections, goes a bit Mahler for some reason, not very catchy
Although I speak as someone who liked Faith of the Heart so ignore me
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 25 September 2017 07:44 (seven years ago)
Only seen the first hour - I feel like I can semi-credibly guess which ideas/dialogue came from Fuller and what came from Kurtzman/Goldsman. Not bad but the character-backstory shit is hacky and painful.
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, 25 September 2017 14:13 (seven years ago)
Thought it was ok. Will keep watching. But yeah, the theme tune is a mess
― groovypanda, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:17 (seven years ago)
I liked the show!
At the beginning I was thinking "hmm, is this Star Trek enough?"
But, thinking back, the best shows start out with their own scope and integrate. Enterprise was slavishly devoted to tying into continuity while not fleshing out much history. More than anything I got the impression that someone (Fuller? looked like he was the writer w/Ortzman) had an understanding of what TNG and DS9 did well.
The previews make it look like it's going to be scientific discovery (hah!) in a time of war. Which is a clearer mission statement than we've gotten recently.
― mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:20 (seven years ago)
Yeah did enjoy that and thought there was going to be more, but I guess CBS is running it as a weekly show and selling it on elsewhere.
― Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:30 (seven years ago)
Gotta free up airtime for those Chuck Lorre productions and NCIS: Anchorage.
― Gewgaws for Meemaw (Old Lunch), Monday, 25 September 2017 14:38 (seven years ago)
I know it's a Toronto production, so I hate to say this but most of the sets looked pretty lacklustre. Felt like they were adding the occasional lens flares out of sheer desperation to spice it up. And yeahhh, the guys playing Klingons can't even act in all that get up. Hopefully they will sort it out as it goes along.
― Manitobiloba (Kim), Monday, 25 September 2017 15:35 (seven years ago)
I'm guessing the backgrounds in the Klingon ship were put there in post-production, because they were pretty ornate?
― mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 15:44 (seven years ago)
I thought the story was engaging & the character development pretty solid for a 2-ep premiere. I am so used to expecting exposition dumps for new shows but this played out like a mini movie, it was kinda thrilling tbh
I think the Michael character has been set up with good layers & i’m really interested to follow her journey now
Doug Jones was great & I loved Michelle Yeoh
Klingon makeup looks more like the movie Romulans but dont they always seem to screw around with their look iirc?
Mr Veg had some gripes about how it doesn’t look like it’s taking place before the original series but i wasnt too bothered by that myself
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 16:41 (seven years ago)
I was wondering if teh original Klingons were supposed to look like evil humans intentionally. Seem to be a bit Hispanic pirate update in the tv series or something don't they? Is that why they were made to look less human.
― Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 16:45 (seven years ago)
Latest look has shades of Tudor era doublet and hose and tunic look don't it?
― Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 16:46 (seven years ago)
klingons lose a bit of menace when they sound like they're trying to talk through a retainer.https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/1/1f/Shelley.pngtoday ish a good day to die, you turdsh!
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 25 September 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
lol
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 16:59 (seven years ago)
should I watch this or is it going to be totally cancelled within a year
― akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:22 (seven years ago)
(I hated enterprise and found most of voyager boring as fuck)
it won't get "cancelled"... i'm sure first season's in the can also, if they're really using this as a push for CBS All Access (I wonder how The Good Fight did) they'll probably keep it alive for that alone, regardless of ratings or quality. i mean look at Netflix's insane stable of shows, who knows how well any of these do or how much they cost to keep going with the verticality of it all
― Nhex, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
i can't even imagine picking up another subscription tv service, not for this. piracy it is.
― akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:43 (seven years ago)
The first hour was a disaster. tons of pilot-speak where characters explain things that should be obvious in their world. tons of phrases that they put in because they sounded cool despite not making sense -- how is a species both "prey" and "bred to sense death"? the michael actress ruins a bunch of her lines. i found michelle yeoh's accent distracting, but the rest of her performance was solid. filler with an optical scrambler that lets them do the "go back to old technology" bit, which has been done frequently in Star Trek but still sucks. crap CG during the space walk.
second hour does the "balance of terror" / enemy below thing. not the best use of it but it still works. lots of forced parallels that are more coincidental than meaningful. i was pleasantly surprised by the ending.
oh and i was distracted by trying to figure out where in the ST timelines this happens -- young Sarek + Klingons gone for a century = shortly before TOS, timeline still not split. i suppose ST fans will just look it up online.
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Monday, 25 September 2017 18:42 (seven years ago)
Continuity-wise, Shran from Enterprise will be happy to see they've named a ship after him... it's certainly BEEN A LONG ROAAAAAAAAAAD
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 25 September 2017 18:59 (seven years ago)
I thought this took place before Enterprise?
― akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:28 (seven years ago)
100 years after Enterprise, or thereabouts. About a decade before the original series.
― mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:32 (seven years ago)
Just read it said that it was supposed to be about 10 years before the Shatner series. But that might be open to debate.
― Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:34 (seven years ago)
They might run into, or at least hear about, the Enterprise commanded by Christopher Pike
― mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:40 (seven years ago)
oh I'm sure they will at some point if not this year then next year when the ratings start to flag. expect a time travel episode with someone from TNG at some point too to revive interest.
― akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:45 (seven years ago)
they've already got Sarek, what else do they need?
― mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:47 (seven years ago)
Khan's older stoner brother Chad.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:51 (seven years ago)
CHAAAAAAAAAD
― mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:53 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:57 (seven years ago)
I liked this quite a bit and I think it's about as good as a Star Trek show could be in 2017. It's not what I would consider ideal, but it's what works now. Hopefully, they can keep it up.
― Spencer Chow, Monday, 25 September 2017 22:37 (seven years ago)
the internet informs me that giving strong female characters traditionally male names is a 'trademark' of fuller or one of the other three dozen executive producers
i don't really gi
― mookieproof, Monday, 25 September 2017 23:01 (seven years ago)
xpost Haha you can’t make me
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 26 January 2025 00:45 (five months ago)
>:( first to watch everything but this yeah i see how you are COWARD RAGGETT
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 26 January 2025 01:24 (five months ago)
just checking this thread after seeing the chaotic trailer and man if a fun movie loses VegGrrl it has truly lost the war. such a forgiving movie fan!
oh well i will keep watching old Chopped episodes. or maybe season two of the night agent...
― scott seward, Sunday, 26 January 2025 01:46 (five months ago)
xpost I’m currently watching this terrible Godfrey Ho-adjacent film and I have no doubt it’s eight million times more entertaining than what you all suffered through https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxQ_IGiXxBo-
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 26 January 2025 02:34 (five months ago)
ok that was really bad and annoying
― mookieproof, Sunday, 26 January 2025 04:06 (five months ago)
So now we have a new answer for "what is the worst Star Trek movie ever?" I'm bummed because whatever we were collectively imagining as "Michelle Yeoh leads Star Fleet's CIA" is just so embarrassingly shitty. This is what Marvel folks put up with now? Jesus christ...
― Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 26 January 2025 10:47 (five months ago)
I've had very little desire to watch this based on the trailer. The fact that it's directed by the constantly-spinning-camera guy from Discovery doesn't help either. And I watched through all the TOS movies in the past two weeks, which puts me in even less of a mood for NuTrek...this thread seals the deal.
― Duane Barry, Sunday, 26 January 2025 13:54 (five months ago)
a) kacey rohl deserved betterb) her character, rachel garrett, who would ultimately captain the enterprise-c, deserved exponentially better than 'learning to appreciate chaos'c) the dudes from 'let that be your last battlefield' were supposed to be both extremely powerful and also the last of their kind; why would you make one of them a maître d'?d) ffs
― mookieproof, Monday, 27 January 2025 06:46 (five months ago)
This shit made Star Trek V look like Wrath of Khan.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Monday, 27 January 2025 07:10 (five months ago)
Is it worth watching this at all?
― groovypanda, Monday, 27 January 2025 07:38 (five months ago)
Oh ugh the black/white guy. Was it really neccesary that he had to be like an extra from Drag Race or something?
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 27 January 2025 10:24 (five months ago)
I actually enjoyed how aggressively garbage this was -- there's a weirdly pro-military / anti-utopian segment of the trek fanbase that really loves the idea that the federation can't cope without a morally bankrupt black-ops service, and I'd argue this is truly the ultimate expression of that line of thinking.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 27 January 2025 22:38 (five months ago)
And look, I'd be perfectly OK with that kind of storyline! They did that for a whole season of Babylon 5, as an example (Earth prez corrupt, sets up his own Orwellian propaganda arm, has blackshirts etc etc). They could have made a GREAT film about S31's methodology, problematic actions, struggles with/against the Federation.
but noooooooooooooo we had to have a ragtag team of fucking Guardians of the Galaxy twats punching people for 90 minutes.
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Tuesday, 28 January 2025 00:29 (five months ago)
The cool wars crime committing faction secretly propping up your woke commie utopia feels like a real War on Terror throwback.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 28 January 2025 00:41 (five months ago)
Some folks look at DS9 and took all the wrong lessons from it (Section 31, Not losing a leg).
Thanks all for your service, I know not to bother with this. I've had enough of hate watching Trek.
― Baroque Obama (Leee), Tuesday, 28 January 2025 15:15 (five months ago)
And miss out on off-brand-borg-implanted jamie lee curtis as perhaps not the spymaster realpolitrekkies wanted, but definitely the one they deserved?
― Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 28 January 2025 19:42 (five months ago)
Rewatching this from the start again because my other half is a masochist or something, apaz.
Best lol so far, when Vance is trying to negotiate an armistice with the Emerald Chain but Osyrra is jerking him about and eating fruit and stalling, and he breezily says "that's made from our shit, you know".
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 2 July 2025 07:31 (two weeks ago)