Star Trek Discovery: The Bryan Fuller TV reboot

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1250 of them)

did everyone know about this except me?

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0003/0041/7038/products/btmr_700x700.png

mookieproof, Friday, 22 February 2019 02:21 (six years ago)

I did not, and: lol

mh, Friday, 22 February 2019 15:18 (six years ago)

one of the signs that trek has too much baggage: the red angel person (people?) seems like a probable time anomaly and my first thought is, "isn't there an agency to keep tabs on that kind of thing, and is this guy one of them"

do we want to put money down at this point on whether the time traveling/teleporting/advanced tech being is someone we've seen before in other trek? seems like the Q angle is maybe ruled out if it's using some sort of mecha suit

mh, Friday, 22 February 2019 15:26 (six years ago)

Saru: You don't think I can uphold my duty as a Starfleet officer if I go down to my home planet??

*goes down to homeplanet*

Saru (within 60 seconds of meeting his sister): I COME FROM OUTERSPACE.

Anyway, midway through, I thought they were going to reveal that the Ba'ul were really the evolved Kelpiens, and that Saru's dad would be the one we'd see for the first time. Instead, they're a bunch of Armuses. So, good on the writers at least for surprising me, even if it's the more obvious route. Not to say that I liked this last episode much, though.

Gaseous Clay (Leee), Saturday, 23 February 2019 23:18 (six years ago)

the directors may change, but they each give us one camera-swirling-around-everyone scene each episode lol

mookieproof, Saturday, 23 February 2019 23:29 (six years ago)

“Don’t break GO1”
...
“Sure! Fire off something with untested and unknown planet-wide consequences on your hunch, seems fine”

stet, Sunday, 24 February 2019 10:45 (six years ago)

Has there actually been an episode of Star Trek where GO1/PD is mentioned and then subsequently not broken?

groovypanda, Sunday, 24 February 2019 18:37 (six years ago)

That's a good question! There's some episodes where it's an excuse for characters to be undercover, but I think even those episodes break it. I think TOS's "Bread and Circuses" used it as an excuse not to just beam the crew up out of peril.

adam the (abanana), Monday, 25 February 2019 00:21 (six years ago)

prime directive very passive aggressively being followed to the letter in this episode:
https://img.youtube.com/vi/2neNjZReByk/hqdefault.jpg

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 04:48 (six years ago)

one of the signs that trek has too much baggage: the red angel person (people?) seems like a probable time anomaly and my first thought is, "isn't there an agency to keep tabs on that kind of thing, and is this guy one of them"

do we want to put money down at this point on whether the time traveling/teleporting/advanced tech being is someone we've seen before in other trek?
My first thought, when the Red Angel was revealed to be a mysterious time traveller from the future with unknown motivations, was that it's "Future Guy" from Enterprise. Since the Enterprise writers kinda messed up the whole Temporal Cold War arc, we never actually found out who Future Guy was or why he was messing with the past, so maybe they're finally gonna reveal that? Though of course I know it's unlikely they would reference Enterprise in any way, since it (and the TCW plot especially) wasn't well-liked.

According to Brannon Braga, their original plan was to reveal that Future Guy was actually future Archer, who needed to fix the past for some reason. So it would be kinda funny (not really), if they brought back Scott Bakula to play the Red Angel.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 06:41 (six years ago)

But yeah, on a more serious thought, I wouldn't be surprised if they brought back the Federation temporal agents we saw in Enterprise and TNG. The Mirror Universe and Section 31 already play a big role in the story, so it doesn't seem they're afraid to bring back major elements from previous series.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 06:46 (six years ago)

Has there actually been an episode of Star Trek where GO1/PD is mentioned and then subsequently not broken?
There's the famously awful episode of Enterprise where Archer and Phlox refuse to give a species a cure for a hereditary disease that's killing them, because they are dominating another sapient species, whose time has now come, so Starfleet shouldn't interfere with the planet's "natural evolution", or some other pseudo-scientific bullshit like that.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 07:14 (six years ago)

Anyway, midway through, I thought they were going to reveal that the Ba'ul were really the evolved Kelpiens, and that Saru's dad would be the one we'd see for the first time.

My wife had the same exact guess while watching, and it certainly looked like they were heading towards that kind of plot twist. Given that they didn't, I find it a bit odd that the Ba'ul only communicated via audio, and the one individual who appeared onscreen was covered in black goo so we couldn't properly see its features... So maybe it's still some kind of a spoiler what the Ba'ul look like, and it's gonna be revealed later?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 07:37 (six years ago)

I would hazard a guess that there's a 0.01% chance we'll see a direct reference to a plot point in the Enterprise tv series. It's the trek property they're least likely to return to.

my incredibly horrible idea that has an even lower chance of being true is the guy in the Red Angel suit is... Picard

the new Picard series would then be a story about how he became a time traveler

it gives me a perverse joy to come up with the worst plot ideas possible, tbh

mh, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 16:47 (six years ago)

actually it's . . . nog

mookieproof, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 17:00 (six years ago)

I'd be 100% in for that

mh, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 17:21 (six years ago)

I would hazard a guess that there's a 0.01% chance we'll see a direct reference to a plot point in the Enterprise tv series. It's the trek property they're least likely to return to.
IIRC there were some minor references to Enterprise in the latest ST movie, and Mirror Universe Georgiou here is implied to be a descendant of Mirror Universe Yoshi from that series. But I agree it's quite unlikely they would return to any major plot points of Enterprise, like what the hell the Temporal Cold War was really about.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 20:09 (six years ago)

is enterprise at all worthwhile? i don't particularly like scott bakula, but at least there's no neelix

mookieproof, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 22:52 (six years ago)

in short: no

mh, Tuesday, 26 February 2019 22:55 (six years ago)

The first two seasons of Enterprise are mostly bad, with an occasional highlight. The third season has a long story arc that's quite ambitious and entertaining to watch, even if it doesn't always deliver. The fourth season is more episodic, and is mostly good, except for the very last episode, which was an infamous misstep and you would do better just to skip it (the penultimate episode provides a pretty good conclusion for the series, so you really can just stop there).

Bakula takes his time to find his groove, and he's notably awkward while trying to deliver lofty Picardian speeches, but he does also get better as the series progresses. All in all it's worth watching, if you're willing to accept that it only becomes truly enjoyable during the second half.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 06:26 (six years ago)

I don't know if it's just my TV but the sound mix on Discovery sucks. I have to turn it up to understand dialogue and then any music/special effects are blaring.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Wednesday, 27 February 2019 06:26 (six years ago)

That's common on a lot of modern TV shows. If you're able to listen on headphones it's much clearer.

groovypanda, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 06:35 (six years ago)

What if the red angel is Wesley Crusher? (srs question!)

Q was the other thought we had, but eh.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 27 February 2019 10:29 (six years ago)

spock is my thought, since the first visions of the red angel were in his head. and he time traveled with "red matter" in the reboot movie.

adam the (abanana), Wednesday, 27 February 2019 11:02 (six years ago)

Trayce, congrats on coming up with an even worse option!

mh, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 14:47 (six years ago)

ghost of all red shirts roaming time and space to prevent meaningless disposable deaths.

or michael burnham in a borg suit.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 18:15 (six years ago)

What if the red angel is Wesley Crusher? (srs question!)
He wouldn't need a special time travel suite since he could just use his own innate powers.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 18:39 (six years ago)

That's common on a lot of modern TV shows. If you're able to listen on headphones it's much clearer.
I think a lot of TV shows these days, especially on Netflix and HBO, are mixed for 5.1 surround system first and foremost. We have that, and I've no issues hearing the dialogue since it's coming from a dedicated middle speaker, but I could imagine it doesn't sound very good with two speakers.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 18:45 (six years ago)

I always thought of dialogue being hard to understand because of the contemporary fashion for "authentic" speech, which makes the clearer enunciation of TNG, DS9, etc. sound stagier.

Gaseous Clay (Leee), Wednesday, 27 February 2019 19:10 (six years ago)

the angel being wesley sort of makes sense, suit aside. you can imagine the trek rights holders being worn down after 25 years of him begging to be in something

mookieproof, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 19:52 (six years ago)

I thought it was just me struggling with dialogue in so many recent shows! I am quite deaf but dear god, the dynamic range in some shows is ridiculous. I'm forever yelling STOP MUMBLING at the tv.

What was with the inky monster thing on that note. Was he an alien or a NIN video?

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 27 February 2019 20:30 (six years ago)

He was supposedly the Ba'ul, but it's impossible not to also think of the oil slick that killed Tasha Yar.

Gaseous Clay (Leee), Wednesday, 27 February 2019 20:38 (six years ago)

counterpoint: it was possible

mookieproof, Wednesday, 27 February 2019 21:45 (six years ago)

Oh Sorry I knew it was Ba'ul, I guess I meant what was with his ridiculous industrial band angsty goo form (he was even moving like people Ive seen at goth nights on the dancefloor tbrh)

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 27 February 2019 22:23 (six years ago)

the ba'ul are an aquatic skeksis or somesuch

mh, Thursday, 28 February 2019 15:11 (six years ago)

Disco set to change showrunners again: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/02/star-trek-discovery-gets-renewed-for-season-three-adds-a-new-showrunner/

Gaseous Clay (Leee), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:42 (six years ago)

That was a good episode! The pacing was excellent, and when Georgiou purposely missed phasering Burnham, the WUHT look she gave was IRL LOL.

Gaseous Clay (Leee), Saturday, 2 March 2019 20:52 (six years ago)

Yeah, I liked this one. I don't know why they even bothered with the time anomaly b-plot though.

adam the (abanana), Saturday, 2 March 2019 21:44 (six years ago)

The time anomaly subplot was actually pretty significant, no? First of all, the cyborg bridge officer (what's her name?) got infected, which will obviously play out in later episodes. And what happened with the probe suggests that either the Red Angel is not as benevolent as most people thought, or that there's another time-travelling faction working against the RA. Maybe they really are bringing back the Temporal Cold War?

Tuomas, Sunday, 3 March 2019 09:11 (six years ago)

The plots of this season are better than in the last one, but jeez, these people still suck at writing dialogue! The dialogue between Michael, Amanda, and Sarek felt so unnatural, even for a sci-fi show. They're supposed to be a family but they talked to each other like they were total strangers.

Tuomas, Sunday, 3 March 2019 09:16 (six years ago)

Stop trying to make Enterprise references happen!

mh, Sunday, 3 March 2019 14:10 (six years ago)

"My mother taught me the greatest mysteries come in threes."

sorry kid your mother was an idiot.

large bananas pregnant (ledge), Sunday, 3 March 2019 21:45 (six years ago)

Just caught up with this. The last two episodes were great. I loved the NIN sludge monster - a rare selfconsciously creepy design that was actually effectively creepy. I thought they were gonna full Cthulhu with it at one point.

Separating burnham from the crew seems like a good opportunity to finally let her do something.

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 5 March 2019 23:30 (six years ago)

enjoyed the cheesiness of having the TOS tie-in

tomorrow, Friday, 8 March 2019 23:36 (six years ago)

the 'revelation' of how burnham was mean to child spock was pretty weak, but i am enjoying adult spock being dickish to her

mookieproof, Saturday, 9 March 2019 01:11 (six years ago)

They're really hinting heavily that the Red Angel is Burnham from the future, aren't they? In fact the hints were obvious enough that it made me think that they're a red herring, and it's actually someone else than Burnham... But whoever it is the RA seems to have a personal connection to her and Spock, so the only other candidate seems to be Amanda.

I'm also wondering who the Red Angel's opposing force is... All we know is that they're from the 28th century and they're adept at assimilating technology. My guess is it's an evolved version of the Borg collective. The red dots seen in the cyborg officer's eyes when they're controlling her remind me of the red laser lights of the Borg, and it being them would also explain the plan to exterminate biological life.

Tuomas, Sunday, 10 March 2019 21:04 (six years ago)

apparently an AI runs Section 31

so, most likely the AI goes nuts in the future and is responsible for the matrix squid thing

mh, Sunday, 10 March 2019 21:38 (six years ago)

If they are going with Burnham being the red angel as they seem to be, they should go full bootstrap paradox and have Airiam be behind the evil future robots who mind-control Airiam.

adam the (abanana), Sunday, 10 March 2019 22:28 (six years ago)

What did I miss that suggested Burnham = red angel?

Mordy, Sunday, 10 March 2019 22:49 (six years ago)

it’s human, linked to Spock, is an ongoing character in the series that seems to be mostly Burnham-centered

mh, Sunday, 10 March 2019 22:54 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.