Words, usages, and phrases that annoy the shit out of you...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10569 of them)

well it's not really scolding

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Sunday, 9 June 2019 21:47 (five years ago) link

Yeah, that was an enjoyable, well-crafted, and stimulating post that wasn't scolding.

mick signals, Sunday, 9 June 2019 22:18 (five years ago) link

Agree it was enjoyable and stimulating. And just a little scolding. Linguistic explanations unavoidably tend to come off that way, or at least sound a bit condescending to those who misguidedly posit human agency.

punning display, Monday, 10 June 2019 00:30 (five years ago) link

Conversate in action:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnK5si4ZQnM

Sassy Boutonnière (ledriver), Monday, 10 June 2019 00:47 (five years ago) link

I've talked about the distinction in one of the rolling linguistics threads, but it's sorta a division between explicit and implicit knowledge, two different kinds of learning - native speakers have a large body of implicit knowledge about their language, and don't exert that much agency over those aspects of it. One reason why this thread has over 5,000 responses-even though you may hate a neologism or catchphrase, you often can't stop yourself from thinking it or even using it. Language is an animal thing. Unique (maybe) to us, but animal still. We tend to overexplain language change, because like our own histories, the events are no longer accessible to us. All we have is the narrative. (this is exploratory rambling)

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Monday, 10 June 2019 01:25 (five years ago) link

Language does not evolve, it changes. You can map the changes, but it does not lead anywhere. You're making constellations from stars; the stars themselves are not involved.
<3

always good posts about language from f hazel

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Monday, 10 June 2019 01:50 (five years ago) link

Evolution also doesn't lead anywhere tho.

Sassy Boutonnière (ledriver), Monday, 10 June 2019 22:57 (five years ago) link

it's about the journey

findom haddie (jim in vancouver), Monday, 10 June 2019 23:02 (five years ago) link

Evolution also doesn't lead anywhere tho.

True, but a common folk belief about language is that it is constantly being degraded by its own speakers and will go to ruin without intervention. The ongoing intelligibility of the language does not ameliorate this worry... it is instead explained away by narratives about past successes with conscious optimization or holding the line against neologisms.

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Monday, 10 June 2019 23:11 (five years ago) link

always good posts about language from f hazel

― weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Monday, June 10, 2019 3:50 AM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes! Great posts F Hazel.

Uptown VONC (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 11 June 2019 07:30 (five years ago) link

What's up with the way lawyers say "defendant" ending with ANT instead of the normal, unstressed "uhnt"? Speakers do a similar thing when they mention a legislaTORE. I don't know what impression they're shooting for. They annoy the shit out of me.

punning display, Tuesday, 11 June 2019 13:44 (five years ago) link

what is this, a court for ANTS?

kinder, Tuesday, 11 June 2019 18:29 (five years ago) link

To me, "Nailed it" has gone from totally unremarkable to kind of annoying. There's something very buzzfeed-headline about it, at least when it's used in a kind of cutesy enthusiastic way.

ed.b, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 01:27 (five years ago) link

boom

mookieproof, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 01:33 (five years ago) link

'smashed it', 'smashed my gym goals' etc hate hate hate this

kinder, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 09:28 (five years ago) link

yeah, anything like that. smashed it, killed it, bossed it. ugh.

meaulnes, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 14:44 (five years ago) link

I do kinda like the way slang like this passes through predictable phases as we experience it individually... hearing, understanding, initial use, normal use, ironic use, silent revulsion, violent protest

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:00 (five years ago) link

totally
also the fact that it serves a banal purpose -- in this case, bragging

no one would write "i accomplished my fitness goals today" and then post it but for some reason it's deemed acceptable to write "smashed my gym goals" with an emoji of user's choice

so many items shared could be filed under the even more banal category of "showing off" -- and because "no one likes a showoff" is a perennial truism, we remain annoyed. like sand through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives.

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:06 (five years ago) link

"nailed it" and "spot on" are both v useful early warnings of writing that's bad and you are better off not reading it

ditto when writing is described as "brilliant" -- ignoring it is living your best life

mark s, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:09 (five years ago) link

relatedly https://qz.com/547463/are-you-the-friend-that-everyone-finds-insufferable-on-facebook/

Mordy, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:19 (five years ago) link

'smashed my gym goals'

Seriously?

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:21 (five years ago) link

smashed my gym goals, workout buddy, car into a stop sign on the way home

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:27 (five years ago) link

"Smashed it" annoys but not "crushed it"? Has "crushed" made it to the acceptably ironic phase?

punning display, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:29 (five years ago) link

cremated it

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:34 (five years ago) link

I think actual conversation has the advantage of a blow-softening ephemerality that social media posts definitively lack

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:48 (five years ago) link

if anyone said "spot on" to me in conversation i'd jab my finger in their eye

mark s, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:50 (five years ago) link

I also think LL raises a good point, to some extent the nucleus of any social media post is a brag.

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:51 (five years ago) link

my maxim is that ppl go onto social media to boast or complain (hi haters)

ogmor, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:54 (five years ago) link

social media has always felt to me like answering a question that no one asked, providing more or less unsolicited information.

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:56 (five years ago) link

How about the overuse of "prior" and "prior to" when "before" works fine?

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:57 (five years ago) link

(xpost)
I also like how often slang that has jokey origins so predictably gets stripped of all irony when it passes from an insider group into wider usage. I believe this happened somewhat with "rockist". The most striking recent instance, which you could trace practically in real time, was "Like a Boss". (Granted, SNL is hardly confined to insiders.) Within months of the video showing Andy Samberg doing decidedly non-bosslike stuff, it had passed from mildly self-deprecating popular use to straight up bragging.

punning display, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:16 (five years ago) link

^I guess Slim Thug coming first undermines that example, but the pattern stands.

punning display, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:32 (five years ago) link

"nailed it" and "spot on" are both v useful early warnings of writing that's bad and you are better off not reading it

i love "nailed it," i used it twice yesterday

american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:36 (five years ago) link

would never describe anything as "brilliant" that wasn't light-based tbf

american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:36 (five years ago) link

Specifying one's age before posting to this thread should be mandatory.

'Nailed it' is fine (34).

pomenitul, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:38 (five years ago) link

To me, "Nailed it" has gone from totally unremarkable to kind of annoying.

oh what a coincidence, "to me" really annoys me

american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:38 (five years ago) link

I'm still unaccustomed to the overuse of 'brilliant' in the UK.

pomenitul, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:39 (five years ago) link

How about the overuse of "prior" and "prior to" when "before" works fine?

a colleague does this; see also 'within' rather than 'in' and unnecessary use of 'in order to'

mookieproof, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:44 (five years ago) link

not sure I ever use "brilliant" un-sarcastically

last used last night as my train was cancelled due to flooding

Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:48 (five years ago) link

I'm guilty of using 'prior to' and 'in order to'. Might be a holdover from French ('avant de', 'afin de') and Romanian ('înainte de', 'pentru a').

pomenitul, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:50 (five years ago) link

Prior to when? Prior to that point in time.

punning display, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:50 (five years ago) link

When students use the phrase, at least I get it: word count requirements. For example: "Prior to lunch, I went to the gym."

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 16:58 (five years ago) link

Consonance is occasionally a factor.

pomenitul, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 17:03 (five years ago) link

tbh my attitude to most stuff in this thread is: go for it! not only don't get OFF my lawn, get ON it! my generation left yours an utterly fucked world, even if most of us don't acknowledge this yet, and i'd rather spend time being charmed by the babble of the invention of new silly habits than aggrieved that it's no longer something i get to do

― mark s, Thursday, January 18, 2018 1:03 AM (one year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the problem with "nailed it" and "spot on" in my experience is less to do with age than with judgment: the people who use it are always wrong, and what they're pointing at excitedly is always bad not good

mark s, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 17:04 (five years ago) link

Besides, doesn't "nailed it" carry unsavory associations in this Me Too era?

punning display, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 17:15 (five years ago) link

I disapprove of this slangy use of "went" as the past tense of "go", tell your students they should be using "yode"

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 17:18 (five years ago) link

there's nothing wrong with disliking some innovations in language (or even some older parts of language) and if enough ppl dislike them they probably won't have staying power. acknowledging that language is an evolving thing and that there isn't an abstract or platonic right way to speak it doesn't preclude finding certain innovations in it clumsy, redundant, obscuring meaning, trite, vapid, etc.

Mordy, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 17:37 (five years ago) link

Maybe but then why is this thread so unrelentingly bad

shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Wednesday, 12 June 2019 17:38 (five years ago) link

level 1. SAE the way i was taught in school (or by my grammatically anal retentive parent) is the correct way to speak and write and people who stray from this are monsters
level 2. any way ppl want to speak and write is fine bc language evolves and we should be descriptivists and ppl who criticize are monsters
level 3. lots of ppl use language in stupid + clumsy ways often cribbing cliches that they learnt yesterday on twitter/in the boardroom nonetheless we should always be open to creative + novel uses of language bc it can enrich our lives

put some exploding brain meme pic next to each of those or something

Mordy, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 17:40 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.