rolling “Trump is gonna win” containment thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5989 of them)

mcdonald's will cook it for you

j., Monday, 18 May 2020 17:40 (five years ago)

James Woods Mindset

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:47 (five years ago)

Step one: destroy your serotonin receptors with cocaine
Step two: ????

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:48 (five years ago)

"There's so much we can do-o-o-o-o...."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay6GjmiJTPM

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:50 (five years ago)

yes

methinks dababy doth bop shit too much (m bison), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:52 (five years ago)

maybe this is the wrong thread to say this but

i dont think trump is gonna win

methinks dababy doth bop shit too much (m bison), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:52 (five years ago)

we cannot stop you, we can only hope to contain you

Karl Malone, Monday, 18 May 2020 17:54 (five years ago)

guess we need a rolling "trump is not gonna win" containment thread

fatuous salad (symsymsym), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:56 (five years ago)

i really don't know. some days i lean he'll win some days i lean he'll lose.

Mordy, Monday, 18 May 2020 17:58 (five years ago)

I'm no longer as despondently convinced he'll win as I was when I started the thread but I still don't think "a lot of people hate Trump" is much of a winner. I guess the covid depression adds a variable.

silby, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:01 (five years ago)

otoh a lot of people hate Hillary was a winner tho

Mordy, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:07 (five years ago)

I'm assuming he'll barely win and will be pleasantly (there's an understatement) surprised if he doesn't

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Monday, 18 May 2020 18:12 (five years ago)

Whether he wins or loses, I think we are in for a really, really rough winter of court cases, whining and MAGA anger.

soaring skrrrtpeggios (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 18 May 2020 18:17 (five years ago)

xxp I think a significant part of it is that democrats think a politician needs some general appearance of being liked or loved, that someone looks and acts presidential, whatever the hell that means

other people will complain about their manager but cheer on when management fires slackers, or even when their department gets eliminated because it's an unprofitable part of the company. and seeing government as a major corporation isn't limited to the left or right. so Trump seems unscrupulous, greedy, and conniving but we've decided government is business and we ended up with President Deals

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:22 (five years ago)

And that, I think, whatever you might think of Cillizza himself, is the point of the piece I linked to. I also think--he wouldn't say so--that it's aimed at the complacency of thinking Trump can't win, that it's meant as a warning against 2016 happening all over again.

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:31 (five years ago)

Cilizza doesn't offer warnings. That would imply that he is capable of caring about other people. He knows that whatever happens, his job is secure (and extremely remunerative), and that's all he needs to know. US politics is a sport to him; it has no broader significance, certainly no victims he needs to worry his empty little head about.

but also fuck you (unperson), Monday, 18 May 2020 18:34 (five years ago)

I say that in part because I fall into that complacency all the time. (Usual disclaimer: Canadian, etc., etc.) A year ago--like 2016 never happened--I suggested to a friend that Trump couldn't win this time. He, meanwhile, had settled into the opposite view, that Trump couldn't lose.

I know everyone here hates CNN. As I've said, I do too sometimes, especially during the pandemic. My issue has always been with the notion that they're not sufficiently anti-Trump. They are--they're as anti-Trump as you can be, to the point of obsession.

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:37 (five years ago)

That would imply that he is capable of caring about other people.

I guess that's just a fundamental difference in how I see mainstream journalists. I know they can be glib, I know they simplify things, I know a provocative story is worth a thousand times more than calm analysis, etc. But I don't see them as monsters or anything.

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:40 (five years ago)

certainly no victims he needs to worry his empty little head about

Two of the on-air people Cillizza works with every day contracted COVID; I'm sure he cared about them.

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:42 (five years ago)

I know people's attention is elsewhere right now but nobody I know seems complacent about the 2020 election

frogbs, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:48 (five years ago)

I guess that's just a fundamental difference in how I see mainstream journalists. I know they can be glib, I know they simplify things, I know a provocative story is worth a thousand times more than calm analysis, etc. But I don't see them as monsters or anything.

Cilizza is not a journalist. He is a political "analyst" - an opinion columnist. (I can say that because I am a journalist. I may focus mostly on music, but I have actual skills - research, finding people who know about things, calling them and asking them questions, asking follow-up questions, asking other people for contrasting perspectives, etc. - that Cilizza either does not possess, or does not use to do his job. And I have not always been only a music journalist. I used to edit local newspapers, interviewing sheriffs and mayors and sitting through town council meetings to report on sewer repairs and the installation of stoplights.) No one is quoted in that piece, except James Woods and Donald Trump. It's just dribble, published because his contract requires him to publish something.

but also fuck you (unperson), Monday, 18 May 2020 18:54 (five years ago)

I have no strong feelings about *CNN* one way or another, but Cillizza has become a punching bag precisely because he's such an obvious example of vapid politics-as-sport/horse-race journalism.

jaymc, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:54 (five years ago)

I think by concentrating on Trump's appeal and analyzing it only in that way, Cilizza isn't criticizing. It's a very surface read of why "Trump is bad" plays without acknowledging the basic underlying premise that people think politics is about a bottom line, twisting the knife, and should be more straightforward with a clear winners/losers dynamic, no matter if the losers are their fellow citizens. CNN does imply that there's something wrong with that world view in their commentary, but they seldom offer any evidence of why it is bad, or what the alternative would look like.

I can only handle so much of that content because while it's more concise than some more bloviating printed publications, it's still a bizarre echo chamber without clear stances.

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:57 (five years ago)

in short, jaymc otm

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:57 (five years ago)

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/are-older-voters-turning-away-from-trump/

― Karl Malone

Even though it assumes a simple-minded ossified politics that drives me to despair, I think that just as much as Trump's bungling coronavirus, the fact that Joe Biden is a very old white man, who is identified with past politics, is a major factor in the defection of older voters from Trump. They can easily imagine him as president, as opposed to 'that woman' or a 'that socialist'; they trust him to think like one of them, not like somebody with all these strange new ideas. iow, all the same reasons why under-30s look at Biden and want to gouge out their own eyes.

A is for (Aimless), Monday, 18 May 2020 18:57 (five years ago)

I think saying he's bad at his job is one thing and saying he's incapable of caring about other people--saying he's Trump, essentially--are two different things.

This is sort or where I came into ILX 10 years ago (yikes): pushing back against the horror of horse-race politics. I don't see how threads on ILX that consist of people saying Trump-will-win/no-he-won't/Biden's-doomed/Warren-should-drop-out/Warren-should-stay-in/etc. are any different.

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2020 18:58 (five years ago)

I don't think CNN offers an alternative to the idea that social and economic prosperity, let alone political success, are anything other than a zero-sum game where any republican loss is a gain for democrats, and a corresponding balance of the scales in international relations

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 19:00 (five years ago)

two weeks pass...

Starting to think that maybe “lots of people really hate him” will be more of a deciding factor than I did some weeks ago.

all cats are beautiful (silby), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 02:13 (five years ago)

OTOH scenes of widespread looting and lawlessness are the ideal Trump free campaign ad.

o. nate, Tuesday, 2 June 2020 02:44 (five years ago)

just deepfake it to look like Trump was all of the looters

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 02:45 (five years ago)

Destroy: all newspaper columnist comparisons to "1968."

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 02:46 (five years ago)

all the shots of police brutality will also be a pretty good campaign ad

frogbs, Tuesday, 2 June 2020 02:47 (five years ago)

I was on Facebook saying the same thing--that Nixon had to pay money for this ad in '68, whereas CNN provided him with one for free today (law-and-order speech on the left side of a split-screen, chaos on the right).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEdtwQ8OguY

I don't think it'll work, though. Nixon was (however phony his concern) responding to LBJ's chaos; Trump created this himself.

clemenza, Tuesday, 2 June 2020 02:51 (five years ago)

I don’t think people are going to be rational though, it’s a simple fear reaction and they’ll side with whoever projects toughness and an easy to understand moral schema that demonizes those in the images that scare them.

o. nate, Tuesday, 2 June 2020 02:54 (five years ago)

Imagine if there’d been a candidate who could clearly explain over and over that this is the result of inequitable systems, capitalism, and deliberate creation of division

I’m sure Joe Biden’s vision of “we’ll go back to training cops to shoot you in the lower half of the body, not the top. That’s my promise to you as a Biden” will cut through nearly as well, though

massage angry pixels (sic), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 03:41 (five years ago)

Comparisons to the '60s don't work because liberals are less racist - everyone to the left of Joe Manchin seems to be getting radicalized (in this one area) by all this bullshit. The people who'd latch onto an authoritarian daddy figure were already going to vote for Trump.

Donald Trump Also Sucks, Of Course (milo z), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 03:51 (five years ago)

^^^ subject to change depending on how long active unrest governs everyone's life

Donald Trump Also Sucks, Of Course (milo z), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 03:52 (five years ago)

Imagine if there’d been a candidate who could clearly explain over and over that this is the result of inequitable systems, capitalism, and deliberate creation of division

I think this is literally impossible for a huge number of Americans to ever comprehend

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 05:53 (five years ago)

it'd help if they got to hear it a lot, though

massage angry pixels (sic), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 07:05 (five years ago)

From those condescending elitists? Pfft

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 07:20 (five years ago)

I don’t think people are going to be rational though, it’s a simple fear reaction and they’ll side with whoever projects toughness and an easy to understand moral schema that demonizes those in the images that scare them.

Are you this dumb and easily manipulated? Then maybe don't assume "people" are.

but also fuck you (unperson), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 11:22 (five years ago)

i do think Trump could have used the protests to his advantage if he'd been capable of projecting any sort of gravitas or sobriety. he could even keep his fascism and his law & order bullshit if he'd just been able to be a little grave about it. but the only thing he ever knows how to do is escalate everything to a higher, more insane pitch and I do think there's a substantial set of low-information voters who will be swayed by whoever seems more likely to turn down the temperature.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Tuesday, 2 June 2020 13:35 (five years ago)

Noted other places, but one reason he's suddenly on the pose-with-Bibles offensive (I guess he has another church photo op today?) could be due to weakening support among evangelicals. Grain/pillar of salt, etc.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 2 June 2020 13:43 (five years ago)

xp unperson: But this is true. There are people like this. Lots of people. I live with some of them. They're watching CNN and supporting Trump and the cops.

Nhex, Tuesday, 2 June 2020 15:25 (five years ago)

Something changed last night. I am hearing from conservative friends and relatives in states like WV, VA, and SC who are finally done with Trump. One is writing in "Romney-Mattis." Another one is voting Biden. He just told me, "I want him [Trump] crushed."

— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) June 2, 2020

j., Wednesday, 3 June 2020 00:01 (five years ago)

oh cool it's all over!

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 3 June 2020 00:02 (five years ago)

Some guy is hearing from his friends!

all cats are beautiful (silby), Wednesday, 3 June 2020 00:19 (five years ago)

Interested in the very specific breed of brainworm that causes someone to come up with “Romney-Mattis” as a write-in

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 3 June 2020 00:26 (five years ago)

I want him buried, so I'm gonna....write-in a vote!

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 3 June 2020 00:34 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.