rolling “Trump is gonna win” containment thread

the fact that Trump is constantly attacking them has convinced a lot of people that they are in fact good

― frogbs, Monday, August 17, 2020 10:55 AM (fifty-two seconds ago) bookmarkflaglink

this is a problem with a lot of things

it's a shame we didn't have this "cancel culture" twenty years ago as Trump would've been one of the most cancelled people in the world.

Insofar as I watch any cable news, it's ten minutes of MSNBC in the afternoons when I'm sure an NBC reporter is on. I'm rather surprised y'all watch CNN at all; 2016 may have been the last time I peeked.

i try to avoid it but little pieces of it appear on my screen all the time

I know there's a handful of decent people doing decent work but even so I sez nuke the entirety of tv news from orbit.

despite the name you are not obligated to C that NN

I don't have cable. I only see CNN clips when someone shares them on Twitter.

joe biden needs another schtick besides hiding and being senile.

Possibly by making decently well-publicized (if lackluster) speeches and announcements, including announcing a long-anticipated (and reasonably well-received) announcement of his running mate, and participating significantly in a new kind of national party convention, making due with a completely unprecedented set of circumstances?

Or are we really going to continue saying that the Biden campaign is Nothing But Basement?

* making do, gah

Knowing how much CNN despises Trump

Citation needed

They do. They're monomaniacal about it, one of the reasons they've become unwatchable. I've tried to explain this...you'd have to watch a day or two of CNN to understand, and no one's going to do that who doesn't already, so it's a Catch-22.

Hating Trump is the only acceptable response to Trump. But for a news channel, it leads to stories like this:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/06/investing/coronavirus-vaccine-stocks-goldman-sachs/index.html

CNN: Trump is so annoying!

Trumps
they wanna have fu-hun

That's just not accurate, OL. They're unwatchable, but it's not because they tread lightly around Trump. They've spent five hours a night almost since the day he took over assiduously chronicling every last lie--they're still going on about hydroxychloroquine--and their pandemic coverage has been unrelentingly end-of-the-world. I'm not even sure why I feel the need to frame their unwatchability accurately, but it's simply not true that they give Trump a pass.

For me, it's just exhaustion.

No no, you misunderstand. It's like that thing where a guy is all like, ugh that girl is soooo annoying.

Ugh these boffo ratings are soooo annoying.

we get the joke you can move on

I think they profit off of Trump’s outrageous behavior. And Trump profits from the endless negative coverage because it keeps him at the center of attention and he cares more about that than anything. Besides, his own attack dogs need negative coverage to react against, it provides a pretext for their flattery. It’s just a sick co-dependency, Trump and cable news.

Whether the reporters themselves like him secretly—they probably don’t. But like it or not they’re in the Trump business now.

I'll agree with that, and again plug a book that analyzes that brilliantly: James Poniewozik's Audience of One.

like it or not they’re in the Trump business now

Forget it Jake, it's Donaldtown.

joe biden needs another schtick besides hiding and being senile.

― treeship.

we need another ticket besides biden/harris.

Unmet needs are everywhere you look.

Unmet needs are everywhere you look.

― the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless)

and yet this is the one you prioritize pushing back on. interesting.

uh, kate, the prioritization was that your remark was literally under my nose, so I remarked back. how my remark qualifies as 'pushing back' at you is something I do not understand. I didn't contradict you in any way, but only expanded on your observation.

Whether the reporters themselves like him secretly—they probably don’t. But like it or not they’re in the Trump business now.

Their boss is definitely in the Trump business

This was not a coincidence. Zucker is a big sports fan and from the early days of the campaign had spoken at editorial meetings about wanting to incorporate elements of ESPN’s programming into CNN’s election coverage. “The idea that politics is sport is undeniable, and we understood that and approached it that way,” he told me. Toward that end, the network built “pregame” sets outside debate halls with excited crowds in the background and created a temporary rooftop studio for the final weeks of the campaign with sweeping views of the White House and the Washington Monument. An on-screen countdown clock ticked down the days (then hours) to Nov. 8. Trump, the trash-talking (and trash-Tweeting) underdog who inspired raw, powerful feelings among supporters and detractors alike, was the ideal subject for this narrative framework.

...

Zucker lives about 10 blocks from Trump Tower, and three of his four children still attend the same Upper West Side private school as Trump’s youngest son, Barron. “I like Donald,” Zucker told me, before quickly correcting himself. “I guess I shouldn’t call him that. I like President Trump. He’s affable. He’s funny.” He paused, searching for another adjective.

“He’s good company?” I suggested.

“He’s good company,” Zucker agreed. (The White House declined to comment on the record for this article.)

joe biden needs another schtick besides hiding and being senile.

― treeship., Monday, August 17, 2020 2:28 PM (yesterday)

can we stop with the "senile" crap already

He should stop being senile then.

three of his four children still attend the same Upper West Side private school as Trump’s youngest son, Barron

My first thought: Barron lives in DC and goes to school in MD right? Then, never mind, that article is from 2017.

xp he's just regular old

you should save "senile" for the real thing, if and when it happens, because otherwise people like me will be like "yeah but you were calling him senile back when he was just regular old"

old like we all will be sooner than we think

you should save "senile" for the real thing, if and when it happens, because otherwise people like me will be like "yeah but you were calling him senile back when he was just regular old"

― The GOAT Harold Land (Karl Malone)

senility gatekeeping olympics

post-Covid athletics looking truly dire

i'll still take it over gridiron football

Starting to become more nervous about this

why's that?

i mean, i understand why in general *gestures at world*

i just meant, is there anything more specific that happened?

Polls will tighten, their side is louder than hours.

Let's get our people out. That's all we can do.

er, ours

45's going to win if COVID reproduction rates are better than they were at their worst. he's going to lose if we're in a second or third or kalita wave. you heard it here first.

i'm feeling good about things, to be honest. he's really letting his true colors show, this time. he was in 2016, but somehow in a way that enabled people like my cousin to say things like "let's just give him a chance!" on election day in response to me being depressed that we just elected an openly white supremacist. this time around? well, this time it's an open white supremacist, and yeah, it's really sad that 80-90% of the GOP is cool with that, and that another 30-40% probably thinks it's a very good thing that should be promoted more. but that other 10-20% of shitty people that voted for him last time that are either burned out, ashamed, or bored with the entire trump project - that's going to lose him the election, even as the loud maga dipshits appear to the naked eye to be more or less the same as last time around

Seems like the weight of a potential long-term economic depression is going to have a bigger impact than COVID numbers to me.

He'd sign whatever the Democrats put in front of him for a stimulus IMO but the Senate GOP won't do it for their own reasons, the Democrats have no reason to cave in since prolonging the pain hurts the GOP... but if there's no stimulus before November, the Senate flips and Trump loses, they're going to do everything they can to destroy the economy before January.

further destroy*

Yeah, I'm more terrified about Biden Dems thinking, "Yep! It's time for austerity!" As I read Reaganland, I don't underestimate this instinct.

on the democratic side, you've got at a _bare minimum_ almost everyone who voted for clinton, plus people who got directly fucked over by trump, plus some of those sad trump 2016 voters who want to make things right, plus a bunch of people who didn't vote in 2016 because they thought clinton was going to win (and didn't understand or care that there were also many other down-ballot races that needed their vote) and got a wake-up call from whatever the fuck has happened outside since january 2017, plus some kids downs down the street that i'm paying to fraudulently vote in the elect on behalf of the democrats.

Yeah, I'm more terrified about Biden Dems thinking, "Yep! It's time for austerity!" As I read Reaganland, I don't underestimate this instinct.

same here. it seems very, very likely, almost inevitable. you can see Chuck Todd asking the question, you can see Chuck Schumer (or whoever) giving the answer. i caught myself worrying about the 2024 election earlier today (imagining this scenario, that the democrats had just fucking FAILED during biden's term as once again america's collective amnesia arises to blur the edges of the trump nightmare)

but, one terrible thing at a time

Oh 2022 is going to suck, because Biden/Pelosi/Schumer are not capable of doing what needs to be done.