http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/people/stam/suomi/stam/pics/duck_rabbit.gif
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:17 (twenty years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:18 (twenty years ago) link
― amateur!!st, Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:20 (twenty years ago) link
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:20 (twenty years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:21 (twenty years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:38 (twenty years ago) link
― amateur!!st, Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:47 (twenty years ago) link
(x-post)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:52 (twenty years ago) link
No, but maybe a little daffy.
― Mooro (Mooro), Sunday, 7 November 2004 14:54 (twenty years ago) link
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 7 November 2004 17:38 (twenty years ago) link
"Lynch on Lynch" is one of the most entertaining books i have ever read.
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 7 November 2004 18:12 (twenty years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 7 November 2004 18:34 (twenty years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 7 November 2004 18:35 (twenty years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 7 November 2004 18:37 (twenty years ago) link
lynch's nuanced use of the widescreen frame above all.... his knowing evocations of the heyday of 'scope and the accompanying emotional registers
still i think it's less than the sum of its parts somehow, i'm never too interested in rewatching the whole thing
that's a problem w/lynch
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 7 January 2005 05:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 7 January 2005 05:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 January 2005 06:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 7 January 2005 06:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 January 2005 06:28 (nineteen years ago) link
i am interested in the "business end" of motion picture filmmaking
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 7 January 2005 07:02 (nineteen years ago) link
er
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 7 January 2005 07:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 January 2005 15:53 (nineteen years ago) link
oy!
― .adam (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 January 2005 15:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 January 2005 15:54 (nineteen years ago) link
Lynch invades an 'Empire' Digital pic details a mystery
By ADAM DAWTREY David Lynch is making a new movie with StudioCanal. In fact, he's already been shooting it under the radar for two years.
Titled "INLAND EMPIRE" (in capitals, though Lynch doesn't explain why), it stars Laura Dern, along with Justin Theroux, Harry Dean Stanton, Jeremy Irons and a host of others Lynch won't specify.
In fact, there's still very little the enigmatic Lynch is comfortable to reveal about the movie.
"It's about a woman in trouble, and it's a mystery, and that's about all I want to say about it," he comments diffidently.
The title refers to the bleak residential area on the edge of the desert near L.A. -- the antithesis of the tony locale of his last movie "Mulholland Drive."
Lynch has shot much of his latest film in Poland with local actors, after making friends with the organizers of the Camerimage festival in Lodz. He's now back shooting in and around Los Angeles.
Even at this relatively advanced stage of production, Lynch is cagey about when it will be finished. But it's understood that StudioCanal is aiming for a world preempreem at Cannes next year.
"Making a film is a beautiful mystery," Lynch says. "You go deep into the wood, and you don't want to come out of that wood, but the time is coming very soon when I will have to."
Lynch has financed the production to date from his own resources, with his wife and longtime artistic collaborator Mary Sweeney producing. The budget is unknown.
StudioCanal, which financed "Mulholland Drive""Mulholland Drive" and "The Straight Story," has come aboard "INLAND EMPIRE" to handle worldwide sales.
Digital convert
What Lynch will reveal -- and indeed, waxes lyrical about -- is the fact that he's shooting the movie on digital video.
"I started working in DV for my Web site, and I fell in love with the medium. It's unbelievable, the freedom and the incredible different possibilities it affords, in shooting and in post-production."
"For me, there's no way back to film. I'm done with it," Lynch says. "I love abstraction. Film is a beautiful medium, but it's very slow and you don't get a chance to try a lot of different things. With DV, you get those chances. And in post-production, if you can think it, you can do it."
DV has clearly given Lynch the freedom from having to clarify his intentions -- to financiers, or even to himself -- before he starts shooting.
"The explaining of things in words is always a huge problem," he confesses.
He characterizes the DV production process as a journey of "huge exploration" to discover what his film will be.
"I'm writing as I go," he says. "I believe in the unity of things. When you have one part, and then a second part that doesn't relate to that first part, it's very curious to find that they do relate after all. It's a most beautiful thing."
He also believes that it produces a different kind of performances from actors. "When you run out of film, you have to stop and reload, and during that time the heat sometimes goes off. But with this medium you can keep that heat, and it builds, and it's beautiful to see."
He says that Dern, in particular, has benefited from this freedom. "She's the most incredible actress. Some people get roles and do their thing, but some have a lot more inside and don't usually get the chance to show it."
As for the quality of the DV image, Lynch says, "It looks different. Some would say it looks bad. But it reminds me of early 35mm, that didn't have that tight grain. When you have a poor image, there's lots more room to dream."
"But I've done tests transferring DV to film, and there are all kinds of controls to dial in the look you want."
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― charleston charge (chaki), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:26 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link
2) Skeptical about Lynch's fascination with DV. I really hope it looks good. Disappointed that he's abandoning film altogether.
3) I know it's Variety and all, but "world preempreem"? Gag.
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link
I'm glad to see he's breaking into new territory!
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:31 (nineteen years ago) link
Gotta love him.
― d'ngullberry (noisemeltdown), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:34 (nineteen years ago) link
1) very excited too, also wished/hoped this would be about a new film2) very excited about this. i'd much rather see what lynch can do with this stuff than george freakin' lucas. also: collateral3) wasn't sure if that was a cut&paste error but if not i love it
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:34 (nineteen years ago) link
I was kinda worried about DV until I saw Collateral - in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing, format is increasingly becoming irrelevant.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― Jay Vee (Manon_70), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― Mallett McFlatFlat, Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link
worst one: peter greenaway who totally cheated!!
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link