https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kq1JQUhwVQ
― mark s, Monday, 25 January 2021 12:27 (four years ago)
let's see where we net out
― Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 January 2021 16:12 (four years ago)
there's this commercial that mentions "secret stinks" and every time that phrase is uttered I recoil
― Wrong Screamed Barney (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 14:59 (four years ago)
conjures images of the existence of an Olfactory Freemasonry that has unlocked the hidden truth about malodorous areas of clothing
― Wrong Screamed Barney (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 15:00 (four years ago)
Very apt for 2021.
― Waterloo Subset (Tom D.), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 15:03 (four years ago)
you're right about that!
― Wrong Screamed Barney (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 15:05 (four years ago)
Nobody nose it, but
― Qanondorf (darraghmac), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 15:16 (four years ago)
all very reekondite
― John Wesley Glasscock (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 16:29 (four years ago)
every time that phrase is uttered I recoil
the ad copywriter reading that would high five everyone within reach
― Compromise isn't a principle, it's a method (Aimless), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 20:32 (four years ago)
"my dude" ugh
― cerebral halsey (rip van wanko), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 22:36 (four years ago)
similar to that, the youtube speak
"Hey viewers, it's ya boy/ya girl, <name>"
― Wrong Screamed Barney (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 February 2021 23:14 (four years ago)
I heard 'smash that like button' for the first time on a Youtube video the other day and I don't think any other word/usage/phrase has pissed me off like that for quite some time.
― kinder, Tuesday, 2 February 2021 23:56 (four years ago)
Y u all h8 twinsthenewtrend
― Qanondorf (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 February 2021 02:44 (four years ago)
if u smash the button on your keyboard, u won't be able to like more of their videos
― Wrong Screamed Barney (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 3 February 2021 02:45 (four years ago)
"Step down". It's somehow so obsequious a phrase. Just say 'resign' or 'quit' – especially when someone like Bezos is hardly moving down in becoming executive chairman.
― Alba, Wednesday, 3 February 2021 03:25 (four years ago)
― Mosholu Porkway (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 3 February 2021 03:40 (four years ago)
It was for real! that reminds me though, there is a new series of Pls Like on iplayer or somewhere
― kinder, Wednesday, 3 February 2021 08:20 (four years ago)
iPlayer yes :)
― Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 3 February 2021 10:34 (four years ago)
Colour me intrigued/surprised/amused/whatever.
Awful.
― chap, Wednesday, 3 February 2021 17:13 (four years ago)
gooey
― brimstead, Wednesday, 3 February 2021 18:08 (four years ago)
creampie
― Wrong Screamed Barney (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 3 February 2021 18:28 (four years ago)
coomer
― pomenitul, Wednesday, 3 February 2021 18:28 (four years ago)
Badd
― champagne heathernova (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 3 February 2021 18:34 (four years ago)
ooh, would you like to buy this wonderful giclée print? what’s that? you’re not familiar with giclée?
Derived from the French term gicler – meaning ‘to squirt or spray’, the term describes a printing process whereby microscopic dots of pigment-based ink are sprayed onto archival-quality paper to ensure the fidelity of a limited edition print to an original artwork.
― assert (MatthewK), Thursday, 4 February 2021 17:54 (four years ago)
if I were to order a giclee print i would hope it wasn't printed on someone's desktop canon.
― ledge, Thursday, 4 February 2021 18:07 (four years ago)
'pigment-based ink'
― mookieproof, Thursday, 4 February 2021 18:08 (four years ago)
"i would hope it wasn't printed on someone's desktop canon" - I literally have an 8-colour Canon A3 inkjet which uses the same pigment based inks (yes that's a thing, pigments are photostable mineral based colour, as opposed to dyes which fade) sitting on my desk at work. It produces exactly the same quality output as a gallery would sell as "giclée". The word was literally coined as a way to sell inkjet prints in a fine art context.
― assert (MatthewK), Thursday, 4 February 2021 20:15 (four years ago)
ok i would hope it wasn't printed on *my* desktop canon.
― ledge, Thursday, 4 February 2021 20:48 (four years ago)
I'd like to publicly apologise for making a post containing the word "literally" twice, it was a rough night.
― assert (MatthewK), Thursday, 4 February 2021 21:04 (four years ago)
mid
― mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Friday, 5 February 2021 16:16 (four years ago)
The word was literally coined as a way to sell inkjet prints in a fine art context.
at a time when that technology wasn't cheap ... and there's a great variation between types of inkjets and the paper, etc. .... anyway, regardless of the method, you are getting a copy, and not an original, if that means anything re value. the term does bother me when the artwork literally looks like something printed on 8 1/2 x 11 HP photo paper on a desktop Canon.
― sarahell, Friday, 5 February 2021 17:18 (four years ago)
I'm absolutely fine with buying a pigment-ink archival quality inkjet reproduction (or original, if it's a digital image), it's just the use of a pretentious term as if it were a centuries-old printmaking technique perfected in 19th century Paris, instead of just the French word for "squirted". Which was coined by a Californian in 1990, to be clear.
― assert (MatthewK), Saturday, 6 February 2021 04:27 (four years ago)
I actually think it’s very funny
― Canon in Deez (silby), Saturday, 6 February 2021 04:33 (four years ago)
a fly marrying a bumblebee
― he said that you son of a bitch (Neanderthal), Saturday, 6 February 2021 04:34 (four years ago)
As with any art that depends on a particular technique for reproducing an image multiple times, the quality of the output varies with the skill of the artist and how compatible the image is with that technique and the materials used. Carved woodblock prints come easily to mind.
― Compromise isn't a principle, it's a method (Aimless), Saturday, 6 February 2021 04:34 (four years ago)
things sold as squirto prints are not typically art that has been especially conceived and crafted for the medium of squirto
― shivers me timber (sic), Saturday, 6 February 2021 05:04 (four years ago)
I was going to suggest a bubbling-under chart for annoying phrases, like Billboard used to have as a supplement to the Top 100, but I guess "whataboutism" has been around longer than I thought--its first appearance on ILX was in 2017 (at least when spelled as one word). It's getting a real workout this week because of Marjorie Taylor Greene.
― clemenza, Saturday, 6 February 2021 15:07 (four years ago)
ailsa wrote this on thread Rangers Have gone into Administration on board I Love Football on 15-Feb-2012
I believe I've also been quite complimentary toward the twitter output of Rangers' Official Media Partner, btw, to give another example to counteract your flailing whataboutery.
― The Man DeLorean (onimo), Saturday, 6 February 2021 15:18 (four years ago)
bad enough on its own but particularly unbearable when combined with the suggestion that a basic appeal to hypocrisy is some kind of devious russian propaganda trick (the context in which I first came across those words)
― Left, Saturday, 6 February 2021 17:04 (four years ago)
it's just the use of a pretentious term as if it were a centuries-old printmaking technique perfected in 19th century Paris, instead of just the French word for "squirted".
oh definitely! In my years of exhibiting art, I would always go with "archival inkjet print" as opposed to using that term
― sarahell, Saturday, 6 February 2021 18:54 (four years ago)
also most of the art that is sold as being a "giclee" was usually horrible. Like, I associated the term with, "bad art digital print"
― sarahell, Saturday, 6 February 2021 18:56 (four years ago)
Sounds hawt tbh.
― pomenitul, Saturday, 6 February 2021 19:03 (four years ago)
same kind of thing happened with the term "lithograph", most of those you see for sale aren't
― fbclid=fhAZ3l (f. hazel), Saturday, 6 February 2021 19:33 (four years ago)
I may have mentioned this before and sorry in advance for sports but it drives me up the wall when people refer to a first round draft pick as a “number one draft pick”
― brimstead, Saturday, 6 February 2021 20:25 (four years ago)
yes, because that is just factually wrong and misleading
― Compromise isn't a principle, it's a method (Aimless), Saturday, 6 February 2021 20:28 (four years ago)
'jokingly'
the worst of the adverbs.
― maelin, Monday, 8 February 2021 18:43 (four years ago)
My housemate always says "assumedly" instead of "presumably," and I guess it's technically a word but it doesn't feel like a word.
― I am not a psychic community (Lily Dale), Monday, 8 February 2021 18:51 (four years ago)
My boss says "irregardless" all the time
― Andy the Grasshopper, Monday, 8 February 2021 18:56 (four years ago)
irregardless is a real word
― shivers me timber (sic), Monday, 8 February 2021 19:36 (four years ago)
if enough people use a word and enough people understand what it means, it's a real word, however awkward or ugly it is, like "crunk".
― Compromise isn't a principle, it's a method (Aimless), Monday, 8 February 2021 19:39 (four years ago)