have you quit twitter yet?

I chose I will never quit even though I might quit someday. Elon buying Twitter didn't make me want to immediately leave, but I could imagine him running it into the ground. It's perfectly fine now and I'm on there a lot, following the news and my various personal interests. I actively mute anything that doesn't interest me or that I don't want to see, and I steer clear of personalities I outright despise.

elon hasn't bought it yet, deal will close in 3-6 months. so no point quitting now

Chose will never quit but depending on what changes get brought in I might. Change of ownership by itself not enough for me, tech giants always owned by horrible people.

I don't see the point of treating the overpriced battery on wheels man as an exceptional scumbag, they're all horrible.

Stopped using Twitter in late 2016, exactly 10 years to the day after I joined. Didn't delete my account, but basically unfollowed everyone. Occasionally use it when I want to find something out in real-time, or to read a thread which someone has linked to here. Don't miss it at all.

Deleted my account 3 weeks or so before Musk joined the board. Was no longer enjoyable or useful to me.

Agree with Calzino that Musk isn't more pernicious than other billionaires. For those who plan to stick with Twitter his plans to loosen the moderation of it are probably still troubling, tho.

I like it, I mainly just follow all the retro gaming people and it's all good fun. I follow some comedians too, but have generally found that I only enjoy Blain Capatch stuff. Hopefully whatever happens once the deal is in won't affect my usage, we'll see.

Musk is worse/worst on Twitter due to the performative petulance in recent years even if that's mostly 'just' insults against others. But this is pretty much just the 'is Trump the figurehead worse than countless lower profile Republicans? Actually...' argument.

Worse no, more annoying yes. But annoyance is a valid reason to quit a social network, ofc.

No plans to quit. I'm rarely pissed off by content.

twitter is a website for lazy narcissists who are wrong about everything

my running assessment has been "Twitter encourages psychological projection to a point that it feels like that's all the site does"

Never signed in but read it. No ads!!!

Twitter can’t be all bad, it has @Cats of Yore

and fantastic one joke accounts like politicians hair on football managers

it was all downhill after Your Aunt Diane stopped tweeting in 2012

https://twitter.com/YourAuntDiane

I agree tech company owners are universally despicable, but this was the last major thing I read about Musk so I think there's a case to be made that he's even on the bad side of the tech billionaire spectrum: https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-03-25/black-tesla-employees-fremont-plant-racism-california-lawsuit

otoh, I still have an IG account and I don't think Elon has facilitated a genocide yet, I'm typing this on a macbook etc.

https://i.imgur.com/IP36jUH.jpg

the chaff to wheat ratio on twitter is still too high though better obv than FB (actually FB has gotten better in this regard as I've unfollowed a million things and only look at posts from people I know, but I'm tired of the platform and UI now). that said, twitter has a unique ability to completely ruin my day so I'm going to stop looking at it so often. I avoided it for many years and only got really sucked in during the last year and a half.

Well ok but...twitter users are not the consumers of twitter products, which are advertising spots and user data. I don't really subscribe to this idea's most extreme versions—if you think of users as unpaid workers you have Terranova's "free labor"; if you prefer to think of them as the product being sold to the real consumers (advertisers) there's Smythe's "audience commodity"; or, popularly, "if the 'product' is free, you are the product." Those theories exclude a lot of what users get out of platforms & broadcast media, but nonetheless it's a fact that user-generated content creates the platform's value, so I don't think it's ridiculous to think about one's participation in social media as different from needing to consume goods and services under capitalism.

I'd say that a very small percentage of tweets are creating any value

sorry, I can't tell if that's just a joek or not

Only sort of. There are something like 500 million tweets per day, and the number of them that achieve high engagement, or are even read by another human, has to be pretty small. So unless you are a power tweeter you are only adding value in a butterfly-flapping-wings sense.

For me its as simple as weighing the utility of the site against my personal dislike of the oligarch in charge, and as it stands these days Prime Video continues to be good for my brain where Twitter is a dopamine addiction calibrated to piss me off between good jokes and obscure political pals

xp
Ah ok got it. So I perhaps unhelpfully combined two points:

1) Users create all the content on Twitter. If the users don't tweet, no one will visit twitter.com. This is the "free labor" theory* more or less: that the unwaged labor of tweeting is what creates the bulk of the company's value. It is true that much/most of this content goes essentially unseen, which is one reason likening it to wage labor isn't totally convincing, even apart from the issue of how users understand their own behavior on the network (generally speaking: not as labor). But at any rate, it's still significant that Twitter doesn't employ people to create content or even license it from elsewhere—compare to e.g., Netflix or Spotify—they get it for free from their users.

* tbf Terranova's theory predates the rise of social media and was more applied to people doing things like open-source software development, which more clearly resembles wage labor. It was also applied to blogging (I can't remember if she did that or people picked up on it from her), which also bears a resemblance to the waged labor of media production. OTOH media workers are often expected to tweet as part of their job responsibilities, so some of these lines get murky fast and that's not even mentioning influencers.

2) Users are the audience for all the content on twitter. Twitter sells this audience to advertisers and if you've ever played around with soc med advertiser tools, you'll know this isn't a metaphor, you can get quite specific with demographic targeting. Without users looking at tweets, there is no audience to sell. For advertising, it doesn't really matter which tweets users see, you just need them to pay attention to their feed / the site. And even if you never tweet or like a tweet or even make an account, you will still be sold to advertisers. Plus your behavioral data is commoditized, and, thanks to that, every single tweet holds some value even if no user sees or engages with it.

Sorry if this is all rather 'splainy; I don't have a good sense of how much non-academic people care about this stuff.

rob, have u read The Twittering Machine?

I have not! Would you recommend it? Seymour is the Lenin's Tomb guy, right?

yeah correct -- i quite liked it and there's a podcast called Our Regrettable Century hosted by a group of lefty burnouts that did a great three part series on it

thanking HOOS

this might be my first 'platform ditching' experiment. i feel like if i take the thing i really like about twitter (art account tweets) and make it more active research 'around the web' and in books on my part, it will be a more engaging and rewarding experience. i also have no professional reason to be on there and few followers. so it might actually take hold if i put in some effort. i guess i might miss being up on everything and having the occasional lol and trawling through random restaurant. but i think that stuff might be worth losing for the peace of mind, and also losing my login seems easier than unfollowing all of the annoying people. i never really understood the feeling of 'social media is a net drain on my life' until ca 2019-2020. like there was still an exciting or funny or engaging aspect to it up until that point. but i have a stronger feeling than ever that i need less of it. instagram for dj stuff and personal fb sounds manageable.

i guess i don't have to completely avoid the site if i lose my login either, like i can still check brisk god videos if i'm bored and tired lol

by 'lose my login' i think i mean deleting my account

the site is really unusable if you don't have an account

(one of the few good things about twitter)

i deactivated.

i also have no professional reason to be on there

See this was my mistake, putting all my eggs in DJ Twitter instead of DJ Instagram :)

perhaps the best solution to fixing Twitter is indeed to turn it off

i get most of the best parts of twitter (lit memes) when they show up on discord, and the worst parts of twitter (The Discourse, utter lack of healthy emotional boundaries) are a big part of, well, why i ghosted this site for like 20 months - just trying to learn how to interact with people in an emotionally healthy manner and shit.

it’s good to see you back here :)

Kate !!!!

y'all are sweet, good to see you again :)

@kate I read someone once saying Twitter was doomed because no one goes there to use it, it just gets repeated on other websites people do use.
But maybe that was too dire a prediction

I actually had to get a Twitter account as part of a class I am taking but luckily I already had one

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

Ominous

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

Only 8 elon socks here

elon hasn't bought it yet, deal will close in 3-6 months. so no point quitting now

― flopson, Wednesday, April 27, 2022 3:20 AM (one week ago)

This is kind of where I landed. If Musk actually does any of the deranged stuff he's said he might do, I will delete.

I will say while I recognize the truth of "all company owners are scum," there is something esp galling about how Musk wouldn't just be the owner of twitter he'd also be its most prominent user. Like if every time you bought something on Amazon a little animated Bezos popped up saying "thanks dawg" I would be even more hardcore about avoiding it, or if the app icon for Instagram was Zuckerberg's quasi-human face I would delete it instantly

there should be fines on Twitter tbh. i want bad tweeters fined.

Elon's Regret

Trying to quit Twitter because it'll be 10 years for me at the end of this month and that feels too long

I quit for like a year but went back. Made some changes though. Use different accounts now focused on different subject areas. So I can easily log out of a couple of them and still read about basketball. I also mute all replies and retweets, which cuts down on a lot of the low effort tweeting. I still leave quote tweets, but they are in a short leash. If it’s just people constantly dunking on others then I’ll either unfollow or mute. No hate follows.

I also don’t really tweet, I just consume. Very few interactions.

Twitter-wise, they banned Amy Klobuchar's official account earlier this week.

I see people on Bluesky talking about Twitter in three main ways:

-Actual news events related to the company, like Grok generating CSAM
-Surfacing unhinged tweets from people like Elon Musk or Bill Ackman or Stephen Miller and using them as evidence of how modern-day Twitter is cooking the brains of the people who obsessively use it
-Complaining that many politicians, media organizations, and public figures continue to use it, in light of what it's become

I don't get the sense that any of this is motivated by an "inferiority complex"; it's just that activities on Twitter continue to be notable to people who are interested in politics and media, as much of the Bluesky userbase is.

we unfortunately need to understand that the government/media complex stews in this environment

https://bsky.app/profile/seamas.bsky.social/post/3mckkuzsicc2r

https://bsky.app/profile/seamas.bsky.social/post/3mckkuzsicc2r

Yeah ok point taken there’s a lot that needs to be called out on Twitter now it’s mostly not an inferiority complex.

I haven’t been active on Bluesky long and my feed is not yet very broad so I had stuff like this in mind:

https://bsky.app/profile/deejaygeejaygee.bsky.social/post/3mckqfonnus2j

“people talk about the benefits of being on bluesky instead of twitter, but I can't see any bluesky posts that'll get shown in black & white with foreboding music underneath in future documentaries”

That’s what we call “a joke” it’s not really indicative of much

bsky doesn’t talk about x too much but it definitely talks about bsky too much

I definitely prefer bluesky to twitter but I just wish the scolding would stop, tired of people I like going on about "IF YOU EVER USE TWITTER/AI YOU ARE DEAD TO ME FOREVER NO EXCUSES YOU ARE 100% A NAZI" - I mean yes, I also fucking hate Twitter and AI but it's not useful to anyone to continually spiral and lash out.

Not microblogging at all is the way to go imo (I know it's not an option for those with things to promote).

Similar to photoshop, there's already people being falsely accused of making AI music

https://twitter.com/home

gone!

It's back...

ILX mute function when

(xpost)

i can't help judging people who are still on twitter. at dinner a few months ago, a friend mentioned offhandedly that he enjoyed twitter as a source of funny videos, and i felt like he was admitting to voting for trump.

― jaymc, Friday, 16 January 2026 15:48 (one month ago)

This happened again but with my brother. He asked whether I was still on Twitter as a preface to recapping some dumb controversy he saw on there. I said, half-joking, that I thought we all collectively agreed to leave Twitter, and he seemed slightly confused.

I think perhaps more of the people I followed on Twitter (liberal journalists and other media folks) decamped to Bluesky, whereas the people he follows (leftists and people who post about basketball, I'm guessing) were more likely to have stayed there.

I still see a lot of music and film writers I follow on Twitter.

Yup, quite a few critics on there still

Twitter is really the place to go if you want to see media folks make 'jestergooning' jokes for two weeks straight.

Obv. I am in my own media bubbles, but whenever I hear about what's happening on Twitter, it's always unhinged stuff posted by Silicon Valley CEOs and hustle bros, Republican politicians and other professional racists, gamer/incel dudes, etc. I assume there must be some worthwhile discourse over there, but I'm not hearing about it.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/08/more-scientists-choose-bluesky-over-twitter/

As someone who as a kid wanted to be a meteorologist, and who still follows weather forecasts closely, the weather people and storm chasers all still gather on there, and the National Weather Service still has active local accounts there as well. So between that and more academic-leaning literary folks (the algorithm gave me a torrent of Michael Silverblatt tributes this week), that’s what I’m finding. Not much right-wing stuff gets in my feed. I often consider deactivating my account but haven’t.

Obv. I am in my own media bubbles, but whenever I hear about what's happening on Twitter, it's always unhinged stuff posted by Silicon Valley CEOs and hustle bros, Republican politicians and other professional racists, gamer/incel dudes, etc. I assume there must be some worthwhile discourse over there, but I'm not hearing about it.

― Venus of Willendorf on Golf (jaymc), Wednesday, 18 February 2026 bookmarkflaglink

Fixed

lol I just opened up Bsky and saw this: https://bsky.app/profile/weeder.bsky.social/post/3mf5vda5cp22u

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:6ixhocm5tk3fsqbclrbq36mf/bafkreihvm5plvpx7iw273lhd4npuo2swdiqn4ekdgncdj74hsqtueb3soe@jpeg