outbreak! (ebola, sars, coronavirus, etc)

in orbit I don't venture into *that part* of Twitter anymore because it's toxic, but there is definitely an entire wing of Twitter that spreads mass misinformation under the guise of "the truth you're not being told"

Yes I'm aware there are covid cranks on the internet. What I'm asking is that we not equate them with people who have a reasonable message that one just doesn't like the content of.

I mean I think we're on the same page!

absolutely!

Yeah I don't think any of us are disagreeing. My whole point was that I've seen a few new (to me) Twitter experts that really ride the line between reasonable messaging and OTT spec content - folks that share legit data and science but also spin off into what is clearly their own speculation and interpretation about some of the finer points. That's what I meant by finding it harder lately to separate the wheat from the chaff. Like threads that start out with a general warning (good!), then several tweets linking to studies and data (good!) but then swing to unsourced speculation (less good!).

on another note, I hate living in FL because the entire pandemic has been politicized. DeSantis didn't order any extra vaccine after vaccinations were approved for under-5 (they can still get them, especially since nobody in FL wants to get vaccinated anymore, but he didn't order any because he had his own Department of Health recommend against having under-5s get them). His Department of Health has also recommended against gender reassignment surgery based on very specious science, as a very clear dog whistle for transphobia.

and he appointed a Surgeon General who is basically not far removed from "COVID is a hoax". we're truly on our own here.

DeSantis getting to the national level is a scary disaster I worry about. dude is Trump on even scarier crazy pills, without the drama and distractions derailing his momentum like the former.

Jon not Jon, thanks for the suggestion for Jetelina, I've read a few of her posts and they're clear and easy to follow. and I don't have to venture onto Twitter! woohoo

Just like...what does it say about the state of the world that, in seeking accurate news about an ongoing pandemic, laypeople are left trying to discern which Twitter users are and are not full of shit. It's insane.

I'm just trying to come to terms with the notion of wearing a mask pretty much everywhere but my home for the next several years at least. It seems like that's all that I as an individual can do at this point (aside from getting boosted regularly).

Jetelina talked about BA5 being more transmissible in her last few emails, but seems to be a bit less EVERYBODY PANIC about it

Not on Twitter and don’t know who the ppl under discussion are so just wanking aloud as usual, soz, but this discussion is ringing strangely from here in uk where there is almost total tacit consensus that we don’t really discuss covid and what might be done to control its spread (and nobody wears masks, anywhere, lol) despite a huge chunk of the workforce currently being off sick with it. Like in my experience ppl do talk about it but only to be like “haha everyone’s getting covid rofl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯” it’s a v strange phase of this v strange era

In other news this dickhead still a dickhead (thought the revive might have been about this) https://www.newsweek.com/naomi-wolf-accused-inciting-harassment-restaurant-over-vaccine-policy-1722389

I didn't post that to rip on Topol, though I find him among the most over-reaction prone (justified or no) of the smart people. I just posted it for the histrionic headline that elides some important context. That is, BA5 (or whatever) may be the "worst" in terms of transmissibility, but afaict (including in that article pic I posted) there is no indication (yet) that it is any worse in terms of hospitalization or death or serious illness, especially among the vaxxed. (right?). Personally, I'll take an illness that is much easier to get but much less likely to seriously harm than an illness that is slightly harder to get but more likely to put me in the hospital. Not that there seems to be any research affirming who gets hardest and why.

And as far as ott goes, I've seen a few people online that keep stressing that it's N95 mask or nothing, but it's unclear to me if it means KN95 interchangeably with N95 or the full-on double-strap tight fit N95. I've had almost nothing but good experiences at the many vaccine clinics I've now volunteered at over the last couple of years, but the only time I saw people close to frustrated or angry was a winter clinic, where people where waiting aside to reduce congestion inside, and my job was to hand out then-required N95 masks and walk them through putting them on. It was maybe 15 degrees out, and these poor folks had to take off their gloves and hats, take off their masks, then put on a tricky double-strap N95 before they went inside. I've not seen the local health department try to impose those things on anyone again.

that we don’t really discuss covid and what might be done to control its spread (and nobody wears masks, anywhere, lol) despite a huge chunk of the workforce currently being off sick with it. Like in my experience ppl do talk about it but only to be like “haha everyone’s getting covid rofl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯” it’s a v strange phase of this v strange era

To be fair, this is generally true here as well, I find this board to be among the outliers. Mask wearing is effectively non-existent even in my liberal enclave.

god I hate Naomi Wolf. one of the worst Naomis to ever Naomi.

outside of the Twittersphere, my circle doesn't even talk about COVID much unless it's to report that they got it themselves. the fight director of my last play at the Fringe festival had to plead w/ people on FB to wear masks indoors to shows, as multiple shows had their runs end early due to COVID. and this was among people who dutifully masked all throughout 2020 and 2021 who just randomly gave up or didn't realize reinfections were much more common with Da Cron.

one (now former) friend of mine attended shows WITH AN ACTIVE COVID INFECTION, unmasked.

Xpost
Yeah the headline of that WaPo piece was the one bit of it I objected to. THE WORST VARIANT. The body of it seemed fine

I mean I understand the need to move on psychologically, 2 years in and vaccinated - for those of us on the ground what is there to talk about really? I doubt ppl spent 3 years talking constantly about flu in early c20 either. It’s the policy vacuum of govt/bosses &c that’s more unnerving, really feels like vulnerable ppl have been hung out to dry when something must be possible between “lock them away forever” and “fuckem last one back at work is a rotten egg” idk

Sorry again this maybe better for the (defunct?) venting fears & experiences thread

ahh gotcha. yeah it does feel a little Lord of the Flies-y even here.

I am often the only one masked in my gym, but today, I bouldered some hard problems with a guy who was also wearing one. Made me not feel like such a crank.

Am going to wear one while working the bar tonight— here's hoping it doesn't have an effect on my tips.

In a hotel room while a techie (unmasked) fixed my WiFi problems, I got so nervous I kept my mask on 10 minutes after he'd left, even though he'd been in the room no more than three or four minutes ("What if droplets linger in the AIR?!").

lost count of how many nurses I saw prairie-dogging it at dad's hospital. I doubt intentionally, dicknosing happens with those surgical masks over the course of a day, and sometimes they pull it down momentarily and get sidetracked due to being overworked and forget it's down.

NONE of them in the room working with my dad, thankfully, and in fact they've all been wonderful. but elsewhere in the building.

lol that is not the definition of "prairie-dogging" with which i am familiar

A good unhysterical read.

That was good, thanks. Reads essentially like public health officials more realistically lining up with what much of the public already decided. Get vaccinated. Consider masking indoors or in situations that make you uncomfortable. Most likely safer outside than inside. If you're at higher risk, take more precautions. Test if you think you've been exposed. If you feel sick, stay away from others. If someone seems sick, stay away from them. And so on. Pretty practical, definitely not hysterical.

For myself, I'll be with my dad in Eugene, Oregon here in a few days for the world track and field championships, and that's held outdoors. I gather the seats are comfortable individual ones where they used to be just wooden bleachers not even that long ago, but I still expect it to be packed, and am planning on wearing a mask out of caution. (The events we'll be attending will be at night as well so it'll be cooler in general, and therefore not as uncomfortable as it might be during summer; otherwise I suspect we'll be generally chilling in our rooms and doing individual ambles around town; I plan on taking all meals outdoors by default.) As my dad did recently have his bout but also then got his second booster when feasible, I'm not AS worried he'll catch it again given general reports on possible reinfection, but he's indicates he's wisely taking no chances regardless. Obviously we'll be masked on the flights up and back.

i keep worrying about my dad getting it in the hospital, but so far hasn't. i am masking around my mom at home because I keep visiting dad.

mom's recovery from surgery is progressing to the point where her oxygen levels are almost back to normal, so don't wanna fuck that up.

i sit outdoors when I can too. but quite honestly....I love being outside, so that's not a huge ask. granted, it IS stiflingly not, but most places have fans or shade or umbrellas.

SF has fully embraced the parklet/outdoor seating area model to the point where it's been fully incorporated into law/code here, so that's been a relief; numerous spots have heating options as well during cold times (which, of course being SF, can be any time of the year, depending).

I just continue to be annoyed by the prevailing sense online that the choices are "be terrified of getting COVID" or "live your life, act as if COVID didn't exist." I wear my N95 in stores and I eat outside whenever I have the option to (which is most of the time), so I'm not acting as if COVID doesn't exist, but I am also not terrified of getting COVID, I'll almost certainly be just fine when I get COVID, I just -- don't mind these minor modifications that much and in no way feel they prevent me from "living life"! I'm not single, I don't need to be in a bar where everybody can see my beautiful face.

otm

My face is beautiful enough to be visible through a mask, though.

the prevailing sense online that the choices are "be terrified of getting COVID" or "live your life, act as if COVID didn't exist."

Because the online world is basically 'flat' in terms of who can publish their opinions, the drive to frame those opinions in ways that attract the most attention promotes moving in the direction of opposing extremes, even when those extremes are transparently dysfunctional. It's how the thing is built.

I found this interesting/useful: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/470690/whose-breath-are-you-breathing

Ed Yong's latest

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/07/ba5-omicron-variant-covid-surge-immunity-reinfection/670485/

Using that logic, buttressed by some back-of-the-envelope calculations, some commentators have claimed that BA.5 is as transmissible as measles, making it among the most contagious viral diseases in history. But those calculations are “fully wrong,” Trevor Bedford, a virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, told me. Variants can spread rapidly without being any better at finding new hosts, as long as they’re better at slipping past those hosts’ immune defenses. That property—immune evasion—likely enabled BA.1 to oust Delta last winter. It might also explain why BA.5 is rising now.

glad this was called out. that Nature article bad math infuriated a lot of epis.

don't want to focus just on that, though, good article overall. just because this might not be quite like pre-vaccines, or because you got BA.1 already, doesn't mean you won't get (re)-infected and have a bad time, and it isn't going to be a great time.

I actually have done a fairly good job of rationing indoor time where possible (outside of being at the hospital with dad)

this discussion is ringing strangely from here in uk where there is almost total tacit consensus that we don’t really discuss covid and what might be done to control its spread (and nobody wears masks, anywhere, lol) despite a huge chunk of the workforce currently being off sick with it

Yeah, it's pretty weird to see non-UK people posting about big chunks of the population getting 4th jabs (Australia) or getting hold of Paxlovid (US) and meanwhile our govt/press is like "Covid doesn't exist any more even though you probably know more people than ever with it, and there's definitely no need for any further medical precautions, now shut up and watch the wacky Boris and the Tory Succession Show"

It's kind of funny to see nobody masking in the shops any more and people going back to work with no masks and no apparent need to follow any guidance more than whatever they think is a good idea in the circumstances and meanwhile we moved house last year and told ourselves we'd have a housewarming once Covid was less scary and now I'm just thinking "will I ever feel safe to invite 10+ people to cram into my living room all at once ever again?"

(ok I am a socially anxious misanthrope who hates parties so maybe the answer to that was "no" all along, but it was a nice hypothetical idea, possibly only because at the time it could only be hypothetical, and now I don't even know if or when it could be un-hypothetical)

can you host outdoor?

I wear FFP masks in shops, spacecadet, and was the only one masking at a school meeting (I did have a non-covid cold). and on buses etc. I'm still pretty relaxed about outdoors but then I avoid crowded events anyway cos I don't like mobs of ppl. I kind of forget I'm wearing one. we're the only household I know apart from our parents where no-one's had covid.

we are lucky to be able to avoid offices etc in the main - if I was going to a busy workplace every day I might feel differently.

From the Yong article:

Though previous immunity has been dialed down a few notches, since BA.5 showed up, it hasn’t disappeared entirely. “We’re seeing that new infections are disproportionately people who haven’t been infected before,” Meaghan Kall, an epidemiologist at the U.K. Health Security Agency, told me. About 70 percent of those who currently have COVID in England are first-timers, even though they account for just 15 percent of the country’s population. This clearly shows that although reinfections are a serious problem, the population still has some protection against catching even BA.5.

This is somewhat reassuring, especially coming from Yong, who I've never found hyperbolic but certainly doesn't sugarcoat things.

I don't think BA5 changes my current risk calculus (mask inside, don't eat in except for short visits to airy cafes, don't wear a mask outside unless there's a big crowd). My toddler caught covid last week and seems to be recovering, so if anything I hope I can worry about her less for a bit.

yeah and he cited Kall, who I like a lot too.

Hang on, so only 15% of England has not had Covid before? Official total cases is 19m, but I know they are loads of community survey studies going on - guess I hadn't realised the comparative figures.

As I read it, 15% of people are first-timers, so there's still another percentage who are zero-timers (i.e. have never caught it and still don't have it)

I'm actually not sure what that's trying to say. Obviously everyone isn't going to have COVID at the same time -- are they saying 15% of the entire population of England has COVID for the first time right this minute?

from the study
https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/blog/latest-real-time-tracking-of-covid-19-5/

Our estimates for the attack rate, that is the proportion of the regional populations who have ever been infected, is up to 84.8% nationwide, and now exceeds 80% in all regions. However, the estimated total number of infections to date (67.7m) far exceeds the size of the population of England.

So yes, they're saying 84.8% of people have had an infection at some point

15% have never been infected, but of the people currently infected (presumably chipping away at that 15%) 70% of them are first-timers

15% have never been infected, but of the people currently infected (presumably chipping away at that 15%) 70% of them are first-timers

Yeah, I got that (not being sarky) - just thought 15% was a small number of people! Thanks for the details. It certainly seems anecdotally and locally that people who have avoided it until now are now getting it. <looks around nervously> I'll go and read the full article now :)

I mean, it varies by region but we are talking about Britain, the covid island

In other "COVID is over because we say so" news, my place of employment picked this week of all weeks to quietly kill off our tracking dashboard and remove all quick links to our COVID informational pages.

The directive also came down that all COVID signage is to be taken down.

I cannot possibly imagine why we continue to get new variants.

https://st.depositphotos.com/1760261/1345/i/450/depositphotos_13450038-stock-photo-denial.jpg

oops, screwed up my tags there

handy looking evushield guide, similar to the paxlovid guide i shared a while back

https://covidsafe.fyi/evusheld/guide/

Being a shoegazer rather than a death metaller finally pays off

scene immunity not herd immunity

― avellano medio inglés (f. hazel), Wednesday, 3 June 2020 23:39 (two years ago)

Genuinely think about this blessed joke about once a week, thanking u

This sure looks like massive underreporting:

https://preview.redd.it/tj1xgicpofc91.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=549ccec87e48be8a84ba807f5c066d5934ddc687