Words, usages, and phrases that annoy the shit out of you...

Hero, as in "the hero ingredient" or "the hero image".

As a verb too… “Can we hero that next week?”

You've got to be kidding.

'hero image' has graduated to a technical term in web design.

Tracer, serious q, do you work in Hell?

https://external-preview.redd.it/m60qR4nDdP8BaDppVDtwlq7PulUPqDqqTJY11tf6RfQ.jpg?auto=webp&s=32c5338bf0407abbea2b9c46f878999ca841690b

Wow, I thought my highly corporate and jargonophilic background would inure me to all kinds of usage, but "hero that" is new to me.

In my business we speak of "heroics" with some ambivalence. Like, you praise people for isolated heroics but you strive for a process that makes heroics unnecessary.

Like, last-minute, late-night, and weekend heroics are great - but it also means that someone failed to plan. With good time management you shouldn't need heroics. Business should not be an emergency. Is the mantra.

What does heroing something even entail, Tracer?

Making it the big thing at the top

Marketing it, sending out newsletters about it etc

https://lizbushong.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Super-Hero-Sandwich-Recipe-www.lizbushong.com-4-1024x683.jpg

we don't need another gyro

Hero, as in "the hero ingredient" or "the hero image".

― Alba, Tuesday, January 24, 2023 2:48 PM (two hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

NNNNNGGGGGG THIS. P Holyrood used it repeatedly in the most recent season of GBBO. The first time, I thought, ".......that's new" and then it just kept happening. Stop trying to make "fetch" happen!

we don't need another gyro

and not a moment too soon

The Age Of Adulting Is Over

https://www.vogue.co.uk/arts-and-lifestyle/article/adulting?utm_source=pocket-newtab

People who complain about the phrase “guilty pleasure” because “pleasure is just pleasure…” No!

Guilt is an important part of pleasure! Feeling guilty about silly things can be fun, transgressive, and important for personal development! Also “personally transgressive pleasure” is a much less catchy phrase.

I agree with this, Chuck.

Like it or not, there is a social dimension to cultural enjoyment. Anyone who claims to be free from it is probably lying.

It doesn't have to be expressed as guilt, exactly. Maybe "I am aware of the social context of (insert cultural product here) and it is a factor in my overall judgment."

Thoughts like "you wouldn't think someone like me would enjoy this, but I do" - as well as the reverse - are totally part of how we engage with art.

I seem to remember Morbius chastising me once for using “guilty pleasure” but can’t find it amongst all the gazillion other posts condemning the term. I always thought it was a concept (maybe I will just call it something else from now on) for the reasons just given and a few more but I just don’t want to deal with the hundreds hundreds of scolds who condemn it from their lofty perch of having perfect knowledge and insight into what they like and why they like it and will provide references upon request.

Thought it was a useful concept

Of course it is a useful concept, and a quick glance at (for example) the epic Dave Matthews Band "bad & hated" thread shows why.

Like, there is a long history of ilx0rz characterizing music by its purported fanbase - fratty douches in white hats, people who work in offices, people who drive minivans, blues dentists / blues dads / blues lawyers, etc.

This intellectual tendency confirms what I have said - that taste inevitably involves a certain amount of social positioning. It was ever thus: in ninth grade, where you sat in the cafeteria was intricately bound up with taste and class and temperament. The boys with asymmetrical haircuts wearing OMD t-shirts did not sit with the long-haired boys wearing Skynyrd t-shirts.

Chuck Tatum's post adds an interesting twist that I had not thought about: transgression.

Like, the feeling that you shouldn't enjoy something (but you do) adds a frisson of daring. I don't mean that it is daring to go to a Kenny G concert, so much. Just that the feeling of enjoying something you're not "supposed to" is part of the experience.

Taste as social positioning — or the balance between taste and social positioning, like not wanting to talk to your co-workers about the music you like because then they'll give you weird looks in the break room ("You know, Jeff, I tried listening to that Cannibal Corpse band and I didn't like it at all") — is fascinating. I think "guilty pleasure" is a very bad and misleading way of phrasing that concept, though. And I totally reject the idea that guilt is an important part of pleasure, but maybe that's because I haven't been to Mass in more than 30 years.

I am thankfully part of a close knit team that values each other's differences and I've sent them pics of me drunk at a Cannibal Corpse show before.

I hate more when people automatically read into like or dislike as a MORAL positioning, like when Wonder Woman 84 was getting a meh reaction, people were accused of sexism for merely stating it wasn't good (including one who was a major DC comics fan for 40 years, loved Wonder Woman, and thought the movie did a character a disservice).

I get believing that at the collective level but it was often levied at individuals without regard for the reason they disliked it.

I hate how people use "what type of music do you like" to mean "what kind of person are you?" and will answer the 2nd question to themselves in wildly different ways depending on what answer you give to the 1st

guilt and somewhat similar feelings like shame and embarrassment and exhilarated abandon aren't necessary at all but can definitely spice up your music life if it's getting stale

I am thankfully part of a close knit team that values each other's differences and I've sent them pics of me drunk at a Cannibal Corpse show before.

I hate more when people automatically read into like or dislike as a MORAL positioning, like when Wonder Woman 84 was getting a meh reaction, people were accused of sexism for merely stating it wasn't good (including one who was a major DC comics fan for 40 years, loved Wonder Woman, and thought the movie did a character a disservice).

I get believing that at the collective level but it was often levied at individuals without regard for the reason they disliked it.

well definitely, comic book people are essentially the epitome of gatekeeping (this particular one isn't like that, but yeah, I take your point, as a collective whole).

No I got you & agree I was referring to Comic Book Guys rather than all readers but was too lazy to capitalise

Like, there is a long history of ilx0rz characterizing music by its purported fanbase - fratty douches in white hats, people who work in offices, people who drive minivans, blues dentists / blues dads / blues lawyers, etc

this is a plague in music criticism in general, i like to think of it as fake sociology standing in for fake music criticism, and yeah it’s dumb

Tumblr wites

it’s least bad i suppose when there’s a real understanding of the actual fanbase but i find that it tends to be based more on lazy stereotypes and social antagonism

There is a lot going on here.

Before I found out that it was on the Index of ILX Film SnobsForbidden Words, I would have used Guilty Pleasure to mean something like “basically I like it, but I don’t feel like writing a PhD thesis defense to explain why.” But people don’t seem to want to accept this for various reasons.

One reason being that it could mean something else such as
A says: It’s a guilty pleasure of mine(translation: I like it even it is junk)
B says or thinks: I like it but I don’t think it’s junk at all, and I don’t appreciate you taste-slumming on my turf.

Or
A: It’s a guilty pleasure of mine (I like it but I am not sure if it measures up to your high standards)
B: I’m taking offense anyway because by not making a clearer assertion you have deprived me of a direct Who Is the Best Battle of the Bands discussion-style attack with which to tear you down, therefore I will attack you another way, for being weak-minded and noncommittal.

Co-worker or stranger’s tastes is yet another thing. Feel like there was once an article in the Onion about how Work Movie Friend Doesn’t Get Along With Regular Movie Friend that said a lot about this but haven’t managed to find it in recent times. See also the wonderful conversational opening gambit: “You like to read! What genre?”

Again I return to a social and circumstantial and contextual aspect of taste.

Alone in my dorm room, I didn't want to hear "No Rain" ever. Dancing goofily with no shoes on while extremely high in an Illionoisan living room with the smartest woman I have ever met, it felt like the perfect song.

If I am trying to focus on writing a book review, I would probably skip past "Life is a Highway" or "Let's Hear it for the Boy," but heading to the beach with in a borrowed convertible, a historical reenactor that I just met, those are frickin bangers.

This is more of what I mean about the social dimension: it's not "I'm embarrassed to admit that I love Phil Collins," it's more like "there's a time for the Romantics and a time for Esperanza Spalding, and I am fine with that."

* "with" is misplaced but you get the idea

"...from (x) by way of (y)" <------ I feel like this is mis-used more often than not! Like...I'm from Michigan, by way of NYC...chronologically I began in MI and progressed to NY.

People often seem to use it as "I'm from a more recent place, by way of a past place" which I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS. Nothing. It's nonsensical.

Found it!
https://www.theonion.com/work-friends-not-mingling-with-other-friends-1819566324

I'm positive it has been covered here, but I've been watching more tv lately, and it seems like every third television commercial uses the word "iconic" to describe their product

iconic anthems: ibiza 2023 hot nights reloaded

I'm positive it has been covered here,

one could say that it's an iconic annoying word

Use of '101' to describe basic knowledge of a given subject - economics 101, flower arrangement 101, BDSM 101, shitposting 101, whatever. Bored of it.

“sonic canvas”

https://i.imgur.com/C6UX84P.png

which isn't some pretentious bullshit like hypnagogic or hauntological (my nominations for thread)

― your original display name is still visible (Left), Friday, January 20, 2023 7:44 AM (one week ago)

do people even use those terms though? I mean, apart from that guy who wrote the article we all complained about like 15 years ago?

really loving your most recent work, KM

lol

i should do sonic. he would not look nearly so smooth haha

In the world of soccer media, people say 'Lacksadaisical'. Possibly they mean to spell it 'Laxadaisical'.

I'm afraid I agree with the people who don't like 'guilty pleasure'.

I see that it's shorthand for saying something nuanced (as discussed above), like 'I like this though it's not usually my kind of thing', but I still think the phrase itself isn't really accurate enough.

I was thinking yesterday about how 'guesstimate' is a bad neologism, because it mainly means 'estimate', a pre-existing word, or 'guess', another.

There could still perhaps be such a thing as a guesstimate, but the word probably doesn't get used precisely enough to denote that thing, and to justify its own existence.

Worse if someone says 'a rough guesstimate'.