ILX Film Club, The (1924-2019)

Brigitte Helm's later life is uh interesting too

Helm was involved in several traffic accidents, and was briefly imprisoned. According to the Nazi Party's Press Chief Obergruppenführer Otto Dietrich's book, The Hitler I Knew, Adolf Hitler saw that manslaughter charges against her from an automobile accident were dropped.

Helm married her second husband, Dr. Hugo Kunheim, an industrialist, after her film contract expired in 1935. Helm stated that she retired from films because she was "...disgusted with the Nazi takeover of the film industry..." In 1935, she moved to Switzerland, where she had four children with Kunheim. In her later years, she refused to grant any interviews concerning her film career.

Sunrise next week, eh? Murnau I find very hard going, unless there's a vampire or a demon to liven things up.

of course i use subtitles to watch movies in languages i don’t speak. that doesn’t make them good for the movie.

Add to this the subversive intellectual element which ruins the upper classes with Decadent Art and the lower classes with violent rabble rousing; the star on Rotwang's door I'm sure is supposed to signal sorcery but it's a bit too close to a star of David for comfort.

i wondered about this too.

But at the same time, as per difficult listening hour's post, I think you can easily cast it as a liberal (pejorative) work instead: the mediator, after all, is not a military strongman, but an effete bleeding heart rich kid with a passion for social reform. Class conflict is cast as being fundamentally about miscommunication. The workers have indeed been given a hard lot in life and are right to protest, but for God's sake they should never resort to violence, and trying to wreck the system can only end in catastrophe - don't you see it's there to protect you, as well? In the end if we all just have a bit more heart things will turn out ok. Won't somebody please think of the children??

I think apart from 'effete' most of this could apply to fascism as much as liberalism, but there's not always a clear distinction between liberal/progressive corporatism and the fascist kind, particularly in this era (e.g. Mosley's New Party). There's an argument that fascism is not right-wing per se (or left-wing) but centrist, both fascism and liberalism promise an alternative to class conflict by appealing to a greater authority that supposedly transcends it, the nation for the fascism and abstract principles that are above/beyond politics for liberalism.

and even if he's a an effete bleeding heart rich kid rather than a military strongman, having the class reconciliation be embodied in a single chiasmatic person with a populist following pushes it more towards the fascist side (but this is probably just the nature of cinema, an individual hero obviously more cinematic than abstract humanist principles)

Does he have a populist following tho? At rhe very very end maybe, mostly he's ignored.

Metropolis also exists pretty much in isolation - there is no evidence of other cities, other cultures. The subversive within is there and as I said coded in an anti-semitic manner, but he is also in the end just a dude grieving for his dead wife. Can fascism truly exist without the threat of an Other?

I think he has a populist following in that he turns out to be the mediator, the figure of destiny that all the workers are explicitly waiting for even when they don't know who exactly who it's going to be.

of course i use subtitles to watch movies in languages i don’t speak. that doesn’t make them good for the movie.

Sometimes I think that subtitles have a negative effect, not because they disturb the purity of the image itself, but because they draw on a different, verbal part of the mind than the image and distract from it. So I wonder, "do I like this subtitled film because in fact I prefer reading"?

some of us have ears that don’t work good!

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sunrise_-_A_Song_of_Two_Humans.jpg

Sunrise: A Song Of Two Humans, F.W. Murnau, 1927
Morbsies #60
Sight & Sound Critics #11
Sight & Sound Directors #33

Malevolent Arugula (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn) at 3:32 10 Mar 23

If you think Metropolis is nonsensical, try Sunrise.

Daniel_Rf at 6:42 11 Mar 23

Sunrise next week, eh? Murnau I find very hard going, unless there's a vampire or a demon to liven things up.

I mean, I'd let him choke me at least once ...

https://i.redd.it/x74u3p1kv6h51.jpg

He is a bit too much into choking women and throwing them off boats, not really acceptable character traits even in a beefcake.

The sexual politics of Sunrise are bat shit even for the period.

otoh he was quite kind to the drunken piglet

Sunrise screened yesterday at a local arts theatre: about 25 people, no walkouts. The presenter did adequately but didn't prepare the uninitiated for Murnau's marriage of late 19th century tropes about city vs country, the infantilzation of a certain kind of feminine object of desire. This is a movie whose male lead chokes his lover, walks out on his wife, tries drowning her, returns to her, and tries choking the lover again; and at the same time Murnau, refreshingly, objectifies O'Brien, arranging him in one scene to look like a Harlequin romance model reversed.

I'd forgotten the comedic bits, i.e. dude obsessed with woman's shoulder strap.

the tone was just wildly all over the place, the whole fairground sequence was so out of place, and then "I know I tried to drown you this morning but let's go sailing at night!" think I could easily write pages about how bad it was and how much I hated it, but in truth it was wonderful and I absolutely loved it.

otm

I had the good luck for my first viewing of Sunrise to be on a big screen, and I went in not knowing much except it was supposed to be great. Thought it was pretty amazing visually, and yes also crazy.

I've seen Sunrise maybe 3 or 4 times through the years and it never fails to amaze me how much its pieces shouldn't work together but, ultimately, absolutely do. Best movie to ever win a best picture Oscar outside of All About Eve.

finally saw SHERLOCK JR yesterday and loved it. the film within a film conceit, culminating in proposing to the girl at the end after seeing it done on the screen, so well executed and I imaging it felt especially fresh 100 years ago. the stunts were awesome and mostly didn’t detract from the story. only major issue I had was the female lead who was kind of a zero

Enjoyed sunrise, my favourite part was the photographers face when he saw his remade statue

yeah, total reversal of expectations, like many other touches a complete joy.

I was thinking Sunrise reminds me a little of Before Sunrise, not just the name, both films we're mainly just hanging out with a couple as they spend time together.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/The_Passion_of_Joan_of_Arc_%281928%29_English_Poster.png

The Passion of Joan of Arc, Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1928

Morbsies # 40
Sight & Sound Critics # 21
Sight & Sound Directors # 30

This was the first one I've seen already (shocking) so I just put on my DVD, but here is a youtube link for easy viewing.

So yes, I voted for this in the morbsies poll, love it, now not sure I would put it above everything else from the 20s. her performance is outstanding, what utter devotion to a role, and not only does it look absolutely incredible, but the use of dolly shots seems revolutionary. but, do I care about it beyond the performance and the cinematography? not sure. there is a lot of theology here that goes over my head, cannot pretend I understand everything that's happening. feel like critic-wise this might be the new battleship potemkin, and there will be another in 20 years.

This one never doesn’t work on me. Watched it fresh after the S&S results and, unlike with POTEMKIN, I was engrossed the whole time and wet-cheeked by the end.

Falconetti is riveting, just one of the all-time great performances. And Dreyer basing the script on the actual trial records was a smart choice — the film is adulatory in a way but not hagiographic, imo, and I think the trial transcripts keep it grounded.

I've only seen it once, live accompaniment, definitely unforgettable (as is the quotation in My Life to Live, as is the "Nothing Compares 2 U" video).

And just in case all that’s not enough for you, Dreyer threw in Antonin Artaud to sweeten the deal.

as far as films from this era go, I loved Chaplin’s The Kid with Jackie Coogan (1921) and Safety Last! from Newmeyer/Taylor (1923) starring Harold Lloyd.

Sunrise and The Passion of Joan of Arc are two of my favorite films of all time, but I hated Metropolis

The Kid and Safety Last are both good, but a bit too basic for my tastes, I thought these two Keaton films were a nice step up from that.

I considered adding the best-rated film for every missing year, on the plus side that would have meant not just Harold Lloyd and even Méliès, but unfortunately on the negative would also have meant sitting through many hours of D.W.Griffith.

I'm hardly the person to advocate for Griffith--I've never voluntarily seen a film of his, just what I saw in film class; maybe j.lu would want to--but there are at least two films of his that are highly regarded (Way Down East and Broken Blossoms; I've seen the former) and I'm pretty sure have zero to do with the film that destroyed his stature or the follow-up that was supposed to excuse that one. But if you can't get past the fact that it was him who made them, I can appreciate that.

Yes, omitting all of Griffith, as good as it might feel, is not an accurate portrait of film history

sorry, didn't want to get into the griffith debate again, will just say that I don't agree and leave it at that

I mean, it's empirical but whatev

(Intolerance and Broken Blossoms aside, I don't even particularly enjoy Griffith that much.)

I'm doubtful there's any such thing as "an accurate portrait of film history" but even if there was I don't see that that is what we're supposed to be doing on this thread?

Been having a look through and these are the films which would be added if I followed the "one for every year" rule

Voyage dans la lune, Le Méliès, Georges 1902
After Death Bauer, Yevgeni 1915
Intolerance Griffith, D.W. 1916
Outlaw and His Wife, The Sjöström, Victor 1918
One Week Keaton, Buster & Edward F. Cline 1920
High Sign, The Cline, Edward F. and Buster Keaton 1921
Nosferatu Murnau, F.W. 1922
Safety Last Newmeyer, Fred C./Sam Taylor 1923
Unholy Three, The Conway, Jack 1930
Shanghai Express von Sternberg, Josef 1932
39 Steps, The Hitchcock, Alfred 1935
Make Way for Tomorrow McCarey, Leo 1937
Holiday Cukor, George 1938
His Girl Friday Hawks, Howard 1940
Double Indemnity Wilder, Billy 1944
Enfants du paradis, Les Carné, Marcel 1945
Victims of Sin Fernández, Emilio 1951
Kes Loach, Ken 1969
Goodbye, Dragon Inn Tsai Ming-liang 2003
Transporter 2, The Leterrier, Louis 2005
Clock, The Marclay, Christian 2010
Field in England, A Wheatley, Ben 2013
First Cow Reichardt, Kelly 2020

Love Holiday, love Kes. Simple as.

Oh god, THE CLOCK needs to be added and mandatory

and Goodbye, Dragon Inn

Victims of Sin Fernández

One of my favourite screenings over the last few years.

One Week Keaton, Buster & Edward F. Cline 1920
High Sign, The Cline, Edward F. and Buster Keaton 1921
Nosferatu Murnau, F.W. 1922
Safety Last Newmeyer, Fred C./Sam Taylor 1923
Unholy Three, The Conway, Jack 1930
Shanghai Express von Sternberg, Josef 1932

All highly recommended by me.

I'm not inclined to defend D.W. Griffith, although he definitely helped create the feature film as we now know it.

ok, I've done it.
not sure if a good idea, but I've done it.
(check link at top of thread for confusing new details)

would advise anyone about to watch Man With A Movie Camera to check the updated list.

downloaded the whole of jeanne d'arc without noticing the inter titles were in French. i might be able to scrape by with my cse grade 2.