Israel, Palestine & the Levant rolling events: Oct 23 on

yes I really wish xyzzz wouldn't do this. just embed the tweet. no one cares about embedded tweets; the problem, again, is that people can't read long twitter threads without accounts. copying and pasting text devoid of links is annoying

If Anglo media did this circa Iraq I imagine I would be doing similar.

― xyzzzz__, Monday, December 18, 2023 6:56 AM bookmarkflaglink

The NYT does that too. There was a long story about a group of people in Gaza who lost 100 people. Buried in the middle was a mention that it included some people who perpetrated 10/7 with Hamas:

A few of the family’s dead were linked to Hamas, the armed Palestinian group that has ruled Gaza for 16 years and that led the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel that killed about 1,200 people, according to Israeli officials.

One family member, Hamdan al-Astal, appears to have been among those who attacked Israel. He was not on the Oct. 26 list, but Palestinian news media in Gaza reported his death the day after the assault, saying he had participated.

Another family member who survived, Yunis al-Astal, is a longtime Hamas lawmaker and firebrand sheikh who has compared Jews to bacteria and apes and said it was justifiable to “wipe them out of existence.”

Ten days after Hamdan al-Astal’s death was reported, family members buried Ramzi al-Astal, also identified in Palestinian news media as a Hamas fighter.

More Than 100 Members of This Gaza Clan Have Been Killed in War

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/17/world/middleeast/gaza-al-astal-loss.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G00.2EXa.k7RgphMYscCE&smid=nytcore-android-share

And Palestinian media of course reports the deaths of combatants and terrorists and “humanizes” them.

I would guess that there was a story in some paper somewhere in the US about every single US soldier who died in Iraq.

100 people dead because of one suspected Hamas member and one “firebrand” lawmaker, and maybe one more?

your reaction is totally baffling to me tbh. You want people to not mourn their dead?

― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Monday, 18 December 2023 bookmarkflaglink

That's not what I am saying here. People will mourn him if they feel like it. Who am I to say what people can and can't do?

What I wanted to bring here is how the newspaper is framing it. Which I found it to be of note.

Again, the framing is hard to figure out without a link

― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Monday, 18 December 2023 bookmarkflaglink

This method of tweet posting is insanity-making

― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Monday, 18 December 2023 bookmarkflaglink

yes I really wish xyzzz wouldn't do this. just embed the tweet. no one cares about embedded tweets; the problem, again, is that people can't read long twitter threads without accounts. copying and pasting text devoid of links is annoying

― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 18 December 2023 bookmarkflaglink

People have been "infuriated" if I have done either.

Will note Haaretz is paywalled so it wouldn't work if I embedded anyway. But yes I can look to post the link from archive.ph but I wanted to point at this at a headline level.

no one was 'infuriated' with embedded tweets from what I remember.

It was the fact that they were tweets not the fact that they were embedded, I suspect.

" the problem, again, is that people can't read long twitter threads without accounts."

Just own your own framings xyzzz and perhaps we wouldn't have this problem.

At a thread level its where it's the problem but I won't do a thread app on someone's thread unless someone has already posted that link on x.

I have been told off for merely posting a link to twitter, but it is where I go, still hard to beat as an aggregator.

xp - I don't have a problem, Felicity. Thanks for your concern.

You must have people blocked because I distinctly saw the word "problem" mentioned upthread (other than by me).

I knew what the tweet referred to but I didn’t say anything as I also find your dumping contextless tweets in threads without adding anything of your own annoying - but you already know that.

No one is blocked. Akm is saying we wouldn't have this problem but I am saying many people have different problems with the postings from twitter

xp - again, I find the tweet itself a thing that was worthy of note. People can hunt for the story but it is paywalled.

Who is going to bother to do that? I wouldn’t!

Iran blockading the Red Sea, apparently doing it's best to try to spin this into a wider regional conflict.

Or perhaps seeing how much pressure it can apply without doing so, but that's always a dangerous game

xyzzz, this is what you posted:

Meanwhile, here is an item on Haaretz, humanising a murderer.

---

Haaretz.com
@haaretzcom
·
17h
Yonatan Hatzor, a 22-year-old soldier in the Israeli air force's Shaldag commando unit, leaves behind breathtaking artwork.

His last drawing was sketched on a school blackboard in Gaza, four hours before he was killed

How do we know that the soldier was a murderer? Because he was a soldier? Is this explained in the tweet or the article or is this your opinion? A link would help us understand what you're talking about.

Um, it's pretty clearly my take above the tweet. There is a dividing dash between what's mine and the text of the tweet.

But ok thanks Keyes. That makes sense.

Iran blockading the Red Sea, apparently doing it's best to try to spin this into a wider regional conflict.

that's an astoundingly dim take on the government of Iran and the Houthi rebels who are their proxy. They're claiming to do this in retaliation for Israel's actions in Gaza. That is the literal definition of spinning into a broader regional conflict. They could just have easily not gotten involved.

extended eyeroll

yall will do anything to avoid blaming Israel for anything

The Israel/Palestine conflict doesn't yield much to an analysis that simply apportions blame. It has become a multi-generational cycle of mutual retaliation and reaction, where one of the sides has acquired a far greater power to inflict violence on the weaker party. The only workable solution requires magnanimity, which neither side seems capable of generating in sufficient quantity to overcome their multi-generational fear, grief and anger.

I should add that magnanimity is always a shorter reach for the side with the upper hand.

Bigger problem with blaming Iran is that the US is actively assembling a task force of warships to send to the Red Sea. Who's spinning out the conflict to a wider arena? One of these nations is actually in the region IIRC.

Yeah, that’s a bit more exact than I went, milo— the US could stop what is happening in Gaza right now but it will not, and the US could choose to ignore justified blockades of Israel but it will not. It’s not pro-Iran to understand who is dictating terms in this conflict— it is Israel and the US.

this happened a couple of days ago, so apologies if it was posted and I missed it: https://www.lpj.org/posts/gaza-16th-december-2023.html?s_cat=1102

^that's the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem's account of an IDF sniper murdering two women at a church and an IDF tank firing a rocket at a convent sheltering disabled people

No one has posted that link, so thanks

Just had a Israeli government spokesman on the news denying that story, claiming the IDF don't target civilians and bringing up the old "blood libel" accusation - I assume that was aimed at the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem (and, by extension, the Pope).

How to win friends and influence people!

I assume they don't "target" hostages either, and yet

ah just saw gyac posted something on the other countries thread that I believe (?) is related

It is.

Man some of yall will do anything to avoid blaming Israel for anything, huh.
― butt dumb tight my boners got boners (the table is the table), Monday, December 18, 2023 10:01 AM bookmarkflaglink

Agree the force is excessive.

I know you're no longer talking about me, but can you please stop this subtweety type accusation of "yall" unless you are actually referring to anyone itt. Is this just inflammatory rhetoric you are venting or what. Absolutely nobody here has said Israel is blameless afaict.

Have to say it seems just as weird seeing people post as if Hamas has no choice in what it does, including holding hostages or wearing civilian clothing or other clearly established war crimes.

I realize there is cognitive difficulty grappling with all the horror here. It's extremely jarring that it seems some people can put the hostages out of their thoughts. For me it is a second never ending horror show on top of the mass killing in Gaza. Whenever anyone calls this simple I just despair for human kind.

It's extremely jarring that it seems some people can put the hostages out of their thoughts.

Tell that to the Israeli government.

For the Nth time this is not a point that needs to be made to people in this thread.

The thread falls silent whenever we go back to when there was a cease fire, hostages were promised and then the hostage exchange stopped. Are you saying the Israeli government caused that. I really don't get it.

Sorry. I forgot you're in charge of what people are allowed to say itt. I'll know better in future.

this happened a couple of days ago, so apologies if it was posted and I missed it: https://www.lpj.org/posts/gaza-16th-december-2023.html?s_cat=1102

^that's the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem's account of an IDF sniper murdering two women at a church and an IDF tank firing a rocket at a convent sheltering disabled people

― rob, Monday, 18 December 2023 19:25 (thirty-two minutes ago)

Brit MP Layla Moran has family in there, first time in my life I've felt genuine sympathy and sadness for a member of the LibDem party, listening to her talking about how desperate the situation is inside the church.

felicity, I'm confused, didn't you just ask for table not to do "subtweety type accusations"? interpreting "silence" as having a message is unfair

I posted about that in the other thread as it relates to the UK.

yeah sorry I only saw that after posting. I mean, it's probably fine to post here too, but I didn't intend to split the conversation or anything

Isn't Israel arresting people in the West Bank and killing Palestinians every day?

Are we saying this will all stop the moment the hostages are released?

felicity, I'm confused, didn't you just ask for table not to do "subtweety type accusations"? interpreting "silence" as having a message is unfair

― rob, Monday, December 18, 2023 3:06 PM (two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

on second thought, I'm not sure I'm reading what you wrote correctly, please ignore my post

felicity, I'm confused, didn't you just ask for table not to do "subtweety type accusations"? interpreting "silence" as having a message is unfair

― rob, Monday, December 18, 2023 12:06 PM bookmarkflaglink

I don't think so? I said I despair when it seems like people "call it simple."

xyzzx has called it "simple."

Then Tom D said what he said. And I said what I said.

Have to say it seems just as weird seeing people post as if Hamas has no choice in what it does, including holding hostages or wearing civilian clothing or other clearly established war crimes.

"xyzzx has called it "simple.""

I used this rhetorically to comment on that tweet about houses that might be built once Gaza is ethnically cleansed. A source was eventually found. I said it didn't matter and explained further

I thought we weren't going to subtweet?

And table otm.

Yes which is why I am asking table to clarify his "y'all"

Xp

felicity, the “yall” was a reference to akm’s post, i am from an area where “yall” can mean one person or a bunch of people, and i was responding to akm and akm only. apologies for any confusion.