A thread about the Denis Villeneuve-helmed reboot of DUNE

has no one seen this yet?

oh i guess there was some opening weekend discussion that i gotta read

Saw it a few nights ago. As with the first, loved it compositionally, the vast spaces where intimate conversations happen. Didn't connect with it or care about it, but as a 2h45m oversized Taschen book never got bored. Thought Walken was retired, so was good to see him.

I enjoyed it but felt like it packed so much in that I need to see it again to really absorb it. My one gripe is that it didn't really give much explanation about what the water of life does to Paul and didn't show much about how his vision was altered and why that helps them. I really like the descriptions of his powers in the book and would have loved to see that translated onto the screen.

yeah villenueve is kind of like nolan in that even the dream sequences are realistic, not stylistic. he handled the visions and psychedelic aspects better in the first film i think

I agree. I particularly like how it hits Paul during the spice harvester scene.

I don’t think his visions of the future were altered, I think he saw everything in context: whether it’s destiny or not is irrelevant, he’s the result of thousands of years of political and genetic maneuvering. so he is either the cog in someone else’s machine or he takes control of the machine, which may be one and the same

it’s not that he decides it’s good to be a dictator, it’s that he understands someone will be and his fault is that he thinks his way is more benevolent. or the right people get killed

worshipping at his father’s skull seems very un-Atreides but if they have to worship someone…

saw it this afternoon and wooooweee that was cool as hell

so glad i saw it in the theater, it looked fucking incredible

austin butler was fucking terrifying (the black mouth! D: ), timothee had great hairography & zendaya’s micro-reactions were a+

great job everyone, thank you fremen, thank you shai hulud

Saw it a few nights ago. As with the first, loved it compositionally, the vast spaces where intimate conversations happen. Didn't connect with it or care about it, but as a 2h45m oversized Taschen book never got bored. Thought Walken was retired, so was good to see him.

This is where I’m at as well. I loved the set designs, costumes and stately spacecraft; I didn’t care about the action movie blockbuster battles and overall would have preferred more strangeness vs blowing shit up.

xp to mh

I agree with what you said. I mean his vision is altered in the sense that once he drinks the water of life he starts seeing infinite future paths all the time and can see through the eyes of everyone who ever lived. The movie doesn't really attempt to represent that or deal with it much at all, but it is a very large part of the later half of the book.

The book is so long vanished in my memory that I don’t clock what’s missing or different. I left the theatre gobsmacked. Little criticisms try to pop up but I quelch them — fuckit, like the LoTR films it’s a flawed adaptation but it’s hard to imagine there will be a better.

i just love seeing the things you imagined in yr head being realized in this grand scale & sure maybe different than what you pictured but gosh it’s thrilling that someone could even make it real yknow

missed from the book: the two-yr-old sassy sage-assassin (it's a very solemn book and alia is one of its few funny characters)
good additions: chani being a swimming truther
tiresome borrow from lynch: a lot too much whispering (DUNE 1 largely dodged this curse iirc)
good borrows from lynch: amniotic foetus-work, ear covered in ants
unfilmable: the voice (sorry but as the product of 10,000 yrs of the bene gesserit arts it's always like sudden-goblinsquawk-gets-good-results)

villeneuve loves to point a camera at sand and that's good in a a film called DUNE 2

anyway i enjoyed this lots for sound-design and look, explications were often a bit curtly on the nose but tbh i read the book WAY too often as a teen so i am literally maud'dib when it comes to knowing what happens next and why plotwise (herbert doesn't write good dialogue especially but he likes things to be sorta-kinda cryptic, ppl never stop muttering "plans within plans within plans" to themselves)

nb i did like the second one a lot but i prob would’ve liked it way more if i rewatched the first one right beforehand. think the movies will work best as two halves of a whole

Moodles — yeah, they don’t really do a lot of explaining that his vision is complete or what that might be. I didn’t mind it too much because it flipped the movie from exposition mode into “I know now why you believe in me, check out what we’re going to do now”

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4JXmfWO9yi/?igsh=MWxnMmQwOGJvdnRhZQ==

Make Arrakis Great Again

unfilmable: the voice (sorry but as the product of 10,000 yrs of the bene gesserit arts it's always like sudden-goblinsquawk-gets-good-results)

i thought the voice ruled, loved it every time

i loved it too if that means "made me larf nonstop"

Jeet Heer and David Klion talking both films, also brings up things I’d forgotten about the books

https://www.thenation.com/podcast/culture/dune-and-the-allegories-of-empire/

Contains Jeet’s line: “the Spice is dialectical materialism”

they shoulda got Corpsegrinder to do "the voice"

finally got a copy of the first book. about to crack it open.

unfilmable: the voice (sorry but as the product of 10,000 yrs of the bene gesserit arts it's always like sudden-goblinsquawk-gets-good-results)

i thought the voice ruled, loved it every time

they shoulda gotten the dude from Greta Van Fleet to do the voice

xpost that line actually did ring false to me as well

The full on ORANGEness of the first fifteen mins felt like pandering to (my) basic desire of how Arrakis should look and surely some tribute to the '84 version. More eclipses dammit.

This was v good but didn't quite have the wow factor of the first, maybe because I knew more or less what to expect.

Minor niggles - when paul strode out of the sandstorm and the baron ran away, they could have just shot him.

Fremen sometimes use breathing tubes when they bury themselves in the sand and sometimes they don't. when they do, they use tall wide black tubes visible from far away, except to the harkonnen apparently.

i'm finally reading this book and find it makes a lot more sense after seeing the films. I've tried to read this four times in my life and couldn't get past the first two chapters previously; I frankly could not tell wtf was going on before, partly due to the jargon, I guess. But I'm loving it now.

herbert is very much in the "i know a lot of writers who use subtext and they're all cowards" camp

'what is a gom jabbar'

i just started the book and am a little relieved I'm going in with some understanding already

Anyway, that's a headline.

https://gizmodo.com/dune-2-sandworm-dismount-denis-villeneuve-messiah-wb-1851306314

― Ned Raggett, Monday, 4 March 2024 20:43 (one week ago) link

is it going to be more dramatic than 'they just ride the worms til the worms get tired out and have a lil nap?"

saw this in 70mm 15-perf imax at the amc lincoln square. sat way too close which actually took away from the grandeur of it, i think. perfectly fine movie, altho i think paul's arc falls pretty flat to me - paul moving around the desert from event to event felt like villeneueve moving a chess piece to make sure he hits all the plot beats of the book but with a lot of heavy smear.

i liked walken's big flying disco ball. thought the final battle was going to be a lot more epic based on what i was seeing on twitter - like, fremen riding hundreds of sandworms and a much bigger city rather than the eight or so we got. i did like that villeneuve doesn't treat the battles as pornography - just as plot gestures - you never doubt that the battle is going paul's way - which is how it is in the books. altho, the shelling of sietch tabr then feels very perfunctory and hollow.

thought the fremen sand hiding could have been used to better effect. i like when they pop up in the middle of the harkonnen, less so when they pop up and then have to run 3 football fields to get to the baddies. what's the point of hiding, then?

in the book-version of sandworm-riding, sandworms have a favoured side*: the insertion of the hooks into the rings renders this potentially the itchier side, so the worms rotate along their central axis to keep hooks as high as possible and limit sand intrusion -- then when the hooks are taken back out, they rotate back to place their favoured side in contact with the sand, the fremen nimbly dropping off to dismount during the turn

but this entails worms riding entirely proud of the sand -- like basically on top of it, where this film suggests they travel *through* the sand, with only their top surface poking out above -- it makes for much more dynamic cinema (otherwise motionless fremen seemingly skating at tremendous speed across the desert surface) but renders dismounting way more of a problem (like at best jumping off a speeding vehicle)

*the favoured side is hornier!

yeah i kept on waiting for shots of the worms curling away from the sand - felt like the movie version was kind of tame

they definitely do talk about the worms getting tired and passing out in the books, don't they?

they do tho i think more in the context of long fremen trips in the southern hemisphere than in context of battle (which i'm guessing was actually a novelty manoeuvre at scale, since the sardaukar are completely taken by surprise)

herbert is very much in the "i know a lot of writers who use subtext and they're all cowards" camp

― the defenestration of prog (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 13 March 2024 21:19 (two days ago) bookmarkflaglink

im not sure i entirely agree with this -- the reason he had to write dune messiah is that he felt the first volume very much underdramatised the implied and intended bleakness of the outcome, though it can be discerned if you read subtext into the many irulan chapter-heading quotes: that paul's victory necessitated becoming his hated foe (combination harkonnen corrino), with irulan's official deification of him the index of this

of course part of the problem is that he is kind of a one-note terrible (solemn & earnest) stylist, plus vol one was written at great speed (on mushrooms) -- so it's a skill issue (he's definitely attempting subtext but it comes across either blundery or opaque, with everyone constantly whispering "plans within plans within plans" to themselves, which is sad to say his version of irony)

enjoyed max's annotated version as usual https://maxread.substack.com/p/dune-part-2-annotated/

altho i disagree about chani - i prefer the book chani!

also still sorely missing the guild navigators... need more navigators...

a thing i've seen a few times is ppl complaining that deneuve's version isn't really weird enough

well ok but i don't think dune 1 the book *was* all that jam-packed with in-scene weirdness (that very largely arrives with messiah: when we see a navigator upfront plus the facedancers and the ghola, and the disconnect between all-present visions and what ppl can actually see)

the book's all-wise toddler assassin stuff did feel v weird on-screen (courtesy lynch and alicia witt's surviving performance) and definitely in the abstract it's a loss (tho i'm not sure it's a thing DV wd be good at, any more than lynch has a feeling for sand). but in the book it's more like a a teenage tomboy break with decorum than mushroom stuff: ppl keep saying alia scares them but she is mainly just cheeky and funny and rude (and the best character)

yeah i think the weirdness from the other 5 books cast a retroactive weird pall over the first book, which for example does not contain nor hint at a god emperor worm man nor intergalactic space farmers

but i wonder how much of the stuff in the first book that villeneuve did put in the movies comes off as weird to non-book readers. the pain box, the gom jabbar, the whole concept of the bene gesserit, big anus worms...

i also think people may be grimly anticipating all the cuts that villeneuve is going to make to dune messiah and/or shaping the story to make dune into a movie trilogy (i don't think he has the stomach to make it to god emperor)

and of course dune '84

was toying with the idea of printing some KEEP DUNE WEIRD bumper stickers

Keep Arrakis Weird, surley

xp to mark s, he definitely uses allegory, but what i mean is that each character’s motivation is explained in laborious detail with those paragraph(s)-long asides and he doesn’t really care much about surprising you. the ending of the first book is clear from the start, and he doesn’t try to fool the reader otherwise

indeed it probably was a skill issue, rather than a defiant rejection of the concept

the mst3k-esque multi passenger worm jamboree/parade shit was very wtf

also still sorely missing the guild navigators... need more navigators...

yeah but you see dune '84 had guild navigators, villeneuve's did not (maybe - nobody knows what the daft punk guys were). point for lynch

The 80s Emperor/Navigator scene is great, as much for the lavish imaginative set and a gaggle of pugs as anything. Villeneuve's depiction of Shaddam and his world was barely there - to at least contrast that with a Navigator design as wild or wilder than previous in a brief scene would've at least made an exciting contrast.

I would've maybe also had one or two of those big pet spider things in the arena with Feyd-Rautha.

Best line from that excellent substack article:

Thufir Hawat is a mentat, a human trained for “supreme accomplishments of logic.” They are basically, like, what Scott Adams thinks he is.

lol yes

when you hear that yellow #5 will shrink your balls… the bene gesserit have been there