Seinfeld: Classic or Dud

I mean he's saying only Larry could do the Palestinian Chicken episode because he's been "grandfathered in", well It's Always Sunny did "The Gang Goes Jihad" in Season *2* and it's probably an even better satire of the situation than the Curb episode is

I think part of it is Seinfeld (the person) came up in a monoculture. There's really nothing you "can't say," because everybody's just talking to their little cult of fans. Like I say, It's Always Sunny has been on for a million years, but nobody really talks about it and there's no universe in which it attains the cultural omnipresence that Seinfeld (or Friends, or MASH) had at the time. And the only reason people are at all concerned with what Jerry Seinfeld has to say now is that Seinfeld the show was so gigantic at the time. If he was the star of some sitcom that ran for two seasons in the 90s and then got cancelled, no one would care about him now and he could say whatever he wanted to the 5000 people watching his YouTube channel or whatever, and the rest of the population of Earth would have no idea who he was at all.

Remember that show MASH that made fun of the US military and had a cross-dressing corporal on it? Yeah, we can't have stuff like that on TV anymore because the extreme left controls television programming and they cancelled it because they thought people would find it offensive... Ok Jerry, whatever you say.

one funny/odd thing about 'monoculture' as it applies to sitcoms now is that it manifests itself mostly through memes, like there are certain screengrabs of It's Always Sunny which I think are way more famous than the show itself. ditto for the "I Want It That Way" cold open scene from Brooklyn Nine Nine or like, that photo of Kevin James shrugging his shoulders on the King of Queens set. one thing I do find irritating about a lot of modern sitcoms (at least the ones that existed 5-10 years ago) is they all tried really hard to create these sorts of viral moments, like every episode had to have at least one thing that was giphy fodder

his complaint sounds more about TV monoculture not existing anymore. like, his reasoning in the full interview for there not being funny shows anymore is that there were no new sitcoms on the fall schedule of the four major networks. I can't remember the last time I've even thought about TV in terms of "fall schedule" or "major networks". I imagine I too would find TV utterly depressing if that was the extent of my TV world

his understanding of comedy as a craft is something I always find interesting.

I do as well, but it's a kind of interest that isn't very flattering to Seinfeld or comedy as an artform! Seinfeld is pretty similar to Scott Adams in that they're openly cold-blooded and mechanical about their approach and seem not to care at all if the material has any meaning to them. Just follow these steps every day, check the x's off the calendar, and by the end of the month you'll have something mediocre but viable, then do it all over again next month, forever.

The interview he did on Colbert a few years back where he seemed baffled that Colbert couldn’t still appreciate any of Cosby’s old records - that was the moment I decided to stop paying attention to Seinfeld the person. It was the prime example of just how highly he regards “craft”, as if one’s humanity doesn’t factor in at all.

There's a profile somewhere - I think the NY Times? - where the reporter is meeting him at a restaurant and is taken aback when Seinfeld is immediately shitty to someone who recognizes him. Not only does he own it, he keeps on complaining about people who try to be nice to him, making it clear he doesn't need to make any more friends and is basically resentful that anyone would think he'd want to know them. Funny guy, but a monstrously egotistical piece of shit.

He kinda reminds me of 00's new atheists. Same temperament, using reason as an excuse to be a jerk

I watched some of his latest Netflix special when I was visiting my mom last month, and I was struck by how misanthropic his act felt. Obviously, annoyance with social norms and pieties has always been part of his comedy, but now it just seems like "I'm old and rich and I have no interest in changing who I am or learning anything new." Not very relatable.

Spectacular, brilliant in its perfect underplaying. [Hidden text. Tap to view]

I watched some of his latest Netflix special when I was visiting my mom last month, and I was struck by how misanthropic his act felt. Obviously, annoyance with social norms and pieties has always been part of his comedy, but now it just seems like "I'm old and rich and I have no interest in changing who I am or learning anything new." Not very relatable.

Seinfeld is pretty similar to Scott Adams in that they're openly cold-blooded and mechanical about their approach and seem not to care at all if the material has any meaning to them.

The interview he did on Colbert a few years back where he seemed baffled that Colbert couldn’t still appreciate any of Cosby’s old records - that was the moment I decided to stop paying attention to Seinfeld the person. It was the prime example of just how highly he regards “craft”, as if one’s humanity doesn’t factor in at all.

I feel that this is what Seinfeld (the sitcom) is all about, a stand-up comedian who can only see the world and other people in terms of comedy and is alienated from society as a result.

Like how there's something dehumanising in doing an impression of someone, everyone likes to feel that they are a unique, complex human being with a soul, and an doing an impression of them is like saying - no, I can imitate certain inflections and habits and physical characteristics and create something that everyone recognises as 'you', all you are is the sum total of all of your various mundane characteristics, there's no transcendent, ineffable essence. And there's this running joke in the show where Jerry is dating this beautiful woman but he becomes fixated on some particular habit or characteristic she has to the point he can't be attracted to her anymore, like he can't turn off this comedian's instinct to turn people into types, or to mine them for comedy fodder, even in his private life.

I think this is why Seinfeld being such a bad actor works in the context of the show, he's a comedian surrounded by actual human beings but unable to connect with them, in a different register to everyone around him. It makes it feel modern too, despite what he says about it being something you wouldn't be able to make today, like how millenials and zoomers are very self-conscious about what 'types' they belong to, inclined to neurotically categorise themselves and others to the point that every individual trait or behaviour indicates an 'identity'

a low-key strand in seinfeld is that within the show jerry-the-comedian isn't actually a “good” comedian

larry david certainly knows this lol but maybe jerry never did

He's a bit like Franzen - if he wasn't a brusque asshole with a limited superego, he's be less interesting/effective

I think that combination of ego, neediness and curiosity -- he does seem curious about other people, despite his pathological need to keep his distance -- makes him a fun interviewer on his car show

Seinfeld is just v lucky he got to be in the show Seinfeld.

he acknowledges that though, whenever he talks about the show's success (including in this very interview) he mentions that it was maybe a decent fringe thing that only got elevated into what it was thanks to the other 3 leads

there was a good bit with him on Stern where he talks about a potential 10th season and how much money he was offered, and how he couldn't do it because he knew they couldn't maintain that level of quality. he likens it to a comedian who does a great hour, and then goes on for an extra 15 minutes, leaving everyone thinking "he was good, but I got tired of him in the end", and how that was the one reaction he was desperate to avoid.

Lol I might read it. Hate how the most annoying, predictable bits are always pulled out.

that's a shame, here's one more (from the gq interview)

There’s nothing I revile quite as much as a dilettante. I don’t like doing something to a mediocre level. It’s great to be 70, because you really get to preach with some authority: Get good at something. That’s it. Everything else is bullshit.

happy to be reviled by this guy.

i've seen enough episodes of the show over the years, it's a very good show. but i started watching s1 recently and the standup bits were the worst "men like sports! women like handbags!" shit imaginable.

he's worse than kenny bania!

yeah the standup in the show is pretty bad, though I think Seinfeld's actual stand-up routine is pretty funny. idk if that's on purpose or not, as mentioned a few posts ago one of the best running jokes in the show is that Jerry is a hack comedian who nobody really likes. the only people who defend him are his parents. they have the Kenny Bania character who clearly is supposed to be a stand-in for Jerry, a guy whose entire life is like a bad stand-up act. and of course Jerry hates him.

they establish that pretty early too, I think one of the first S2 episodes is the one where he tries to break up with a girl because she won't stop boring him with banal observations about her day, only to have her break up with him first upon seeing his stand-up act

hardcore dilettante to thread.

The Curb finale was very cute. Wonder if I'll ever see another thing he's doing.

they have the Kenny Bania character who clearly is supposed to be a stand-in for Jerry

One of my favorite Seinfeld moments is when he offers to write for Bania and the result is the terrible "What's the deal with Ovaltine" routine.

the only reason you "couldn't do" the homeless rickshaw bit now is it would read as too obvious satire of half of Big Tech's business model

Great soref post up there.

It’s great to be 70, because you really get to preach with some authority: Get good at something. That’s it. Everything else is bullshit.

Jerry is certainly out of touch with humor and all that but I have to say he's right on the money here. Some good life advice. Hate admitting this

nah it's a fine life to be shit at everything

the creator of Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee boldly comes out against doing something at a mediocre level

You can be a dilettante and get good at things, just seems mean hating on a harmless personality type.

I understand the appeal of Getting Good At Something, as a way to infuse some meaning into our intrinsically random existence it's not the worst option, as ever the problem is when you start judging others based on this.

like i said i hate admitting it and I am judging him so

I don't think he's striving to be good at comedy so much as he wants to be the world's greatest hack. For a guy whose sitcom broke a lot of staid rules, he really doesn't seem interested in doing any convention-breaking or form-elevating in his standup. He doesn't even work blue?

If your entire ethos is incremental, robot-like improvements, why not surrender to an AI now instead of waiting till 70?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hb_iHIwHwJE

Jerry saying hello at the end from the Black Lodge.

it's sad that ai is now too good to make things like that

one thing I've realized through this is that Jerry is one of the few people whose work I really do enjoy (well, at least Seinfeld, which is the greatest sitcom ever) where I don't really care at all what he's like in real life. I don't really connect with him on a human level at all. its funny because he's a guy who not only can separate comedy from comedian (see: the fact that he *still* brings up how much he likes Bill Cosby) but seems baffled when others can't. its like there's no empathy center in his brain.

through Curb you sorta get the impression that Larry was the neurotic one while Jerry was a more or less normal dude doing observational comedy. I think it's kind of the opposite. might explain why those last 2 Seinfeld seasons (after Larry left) were so strange.

They're both neurotic, but Larry (at least the version of himself on Curb) approaches his tribulations with a mischievous glee that makes you want to root for him. Jerry is always a bit aloof and never all that believable when his sitcom self is required to have a big emotional reaction. It's observational comedy in its truest sense, I suppose: standing apart from the world rather than getting involved in it. Seinfeld the show works in part because George brings a Larry-like energy to counter Jerry.

With Larry David, "no hugging, no learning" seems like an aesthetic choice -- it's like he has no particular interest, as a performer, in seriousness. With Jerry it seems more like deliberate avoidance -- he seems emotionally incapable of hugging or learning (unless it's learning "the craft").

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujVDvbz3s7c

With Jerry it seems more like deliberate avoidance -- he seems emotionally incapable of hugging or learning (unless it's learning "the craft").

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX3_L8z2uw4

lol

its funny because he's a guy who not only can separate comedy from comedian (see: the fact that he *still* brings up how much he likes Bill Cosby) but seems baffled when others can't. its like there's no empathy center in his brain.

Watch the Garry Shandling episode of Comedians Getting Coffee. Specifically at 9:30. It's awesome how Shandling calls him out on something along those lines.

one of the best running jokes in the show is that Jerry is a hack comedian who nobody really likes

false. his closest friends don’t like his act, but his character on the show is offered a major network sitcom, his a regular guest on the tonight show, and kramer is shocked when he finds out how much money he makes. jerry plays a very successful comedian, similar to the level of success jerry himself had in the late 80s

re: curb being grandfathered in, i don’t think it’s always sunny is a good counterexample. the first season of its always sunny was only 5 years after the first season of curb, and 2005 wasn’t much more politically correct than 2000. curious if anyone itt can come up with a counterexample that debuted in the last 10 years.

michael mcintyre is a hack comedian who no one really likes but he's very successful. lots of other examples

he acknowledges that though, whenever he talks about the show's success (including in this very interview) he mentions that it was maybe a decent fringe thing that only got elevated into what it was thanks to the other 3 leads

i’ve definitely seen or read interviews where he unmodestly says that he and larry david were writing the funniest material ever and that their high standards and perfectionism made the show what it was. the fact that neither jason alexander or michael were never funny in anything ever again supports this (and julia louis-dreyfus wasn’t funny until veep)

michael mcintyre is a hack comedian who no one really likes but he's very successful. lots of other examples

― Humanitarian Pause (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 1 May 2024 6:31 PM (one minute ago) bookmarkflaglink

nearly every episode of the tv show seinfeld starts and ends with clips of jerry performing at comedy clubs and killing. everyone in the audience is laughing, and the jokes are indeed very funny. the theory that the character in the show is a bad comedian is idiotic

it's less that he's a bad comic and more that his friends and relatives don't hold the profession in very high regard