Artificial intelligence still has some way to go

Where are you seeing ai generated comedy skits?

The AI generated comedy stuff I enjoyed - mostly the steamed hams forever channel - I enjoyed exactly because it was very clearly done by a machine that has no sense of what funny is and no idea what the material put into it means, and so there was a slapstick appeal to seeing it vomit out these countless bizarre variations, I know this is antropromorphic but it felt like having a little fucked up robot pal who keeps trying and failing to produce something.

Not a vein of comedy with a lot of legs but I was hooked longer than I thought I'd be!

Don't think this will happen but a lot of money will be lost on "AI startups" and this could induce a deep recession.

Quite incredible that the tech industry is intent on destroying itself completely via LLM.

Google search: rapidly becoming useless. Windows: Copilot+ renders it unusable. The whole internet is being turned into tie-dye scrambled egg thanks to the stupidity and hubris of AI bros. https://t.co/6CTC9U5DFr

— Gareth Dennis (@GarethDennis) May 23, 2024

maybe one day you can just think about it real hard

― Humanitarian Pause (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 21 May 2024 14:49 (two days ago) bookmarkflaglink

time to volunteer as a test-subject at neuralink!

Where are you seeing ai generated comedy skits?

― m0stly clean (Slowsquatch), Thursday, May 23, 2024 1:00 AM (six hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

i'm not, just saying on podcasts I'm seeing graphics and songs get outsourced to AI sometimes which is fine in service of a dumb joke but it always sorta takes me out of it. maybe its just me though. I guess I'm fine with some of this stuff just don't want it to become bigger than it is.

I was (still am) pretty interested in media literacy in the early 2000s, like I thought with the rise of Wikipedia and online news articles being able to link to their sources so you could read more/check they were representing it accurately (particularly science journalism but hoped it would filter through), I guess I naively hoped that with everyone finally realising that just because it's on your computer screen doesn't mean it wasn't made up by some random person, your average person might pause for a second before taking something at face value because it's "in print" somewhere.


I sort of expected that we'd be forced to get better at filtering out junk from legit content through necessity. Obviously you'd still have loads of people manipulated by YouTube videos or ranting Twitter feeds but twas ever thus.

and the onslaught of AI generated gobsmackingly WRONG content (I got Google gemini to do a very basic maths question and it just... kept lying to me about the numbers I'd given it) makes me realise, nope, belief in human-sounding text strings is being prioritised at all costs by the uber-tech guys and it totally depresses me.

Seems the origin of the Google AI’s conclusion was an 11 year old Reddit post by the eminent scholar, fucksmith. https://t.co/fG8i5ZlWtl pic.twitter.com/0ijXRqA16y

— Kurt Opsahl @k✧✧✧@ms✧✧✧.soc✧✧✧ (@kurtopsahl) May 23, 2024

https://udm14.com/

frogbs longer post otm

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/article/2024/may/23/michael-schumacher-family-win-legal-case-against-publisher-over-fake-ai-interview

whether this answer is a hallucination or not, this seems bad, to me

hey can you repeat that last part pic.twitter.com/HksGRMeXUU

— Giovanni Colantonio (@MarioPrime) May 22, 2024

ah interesting

that's kind of an interesting wrinkle to this stuff, it doesn't know how to lie or use corporate speak. i'm sure companies will find ways to clean this up (for example I'm sure a lot of time was spent on Elon Musk's AI to ensure it can't say anything bad or truthful about him), but right now it seems like a good prompt can still fool it

frogbs longer post otm

― z_tbd, Thursday, May 23, 2024 9:48 AM (two hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

^^ totally

it really was kind of a digital library

this is kind of why i find the whole situation depressing. i mean, it's like we had an opportunity to share all media infinitely and instead it's like a few losers who are pathologically focused on profit took a shit in the whole thing and destroyed our society in the process.

to me it just kind of reinforces the fact that most or maybe all of the internet is "fake" and "not real life" -- i do realize that's almost become like a generational shibboleth but i don't really care if somebody thinks that it's a boomer mentality

most or maybe all of the internet is "fake" and "not real life"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet%2C_nobody_knows_you're_a_dog

First world problems, sorry

capitalism's effect on society is a first world problem?

the other thing is all the ways the internet has 'improved' has been undone by this shit. sure you don't get pop-up ads anymore, instead ads have integrated themselves into every other part of the online experience. social media has exerted enormous effort into making ads look like real posts. there aren't computer viruses the way there used to be but now it feels like viruses just come pre-installed. I recently bought a new PC and the amount of shit it comes with that I don't want is just mind boggling. sometimes it'll even display little ads for it on boot-up, like hey why not try Candy Crush? that's the shit computer viruses used to do! its also true that you don't randomly encounter disgusting/gory/pornographic stuff as often as you used to, but again the algorithms seem geared to feed us psychologically damaging things everywhere we go, like I'd rather see goatse than load up my browser and immediately get hit with "PUTIN INSIDER SAYS NUCLEAR WAR IMMINENT!"

yes I know you can turn some of this shit off. they make it difficult to figure out how. and somehow my computer has a way of factory resetting these particular options every few weeks. very cool.

capitalism's effect on society is a first world problem?

― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 23 May 2024 bookmarkflaglink

The internet and algs going to shit is what's being talked about.

what's your point exactly

everyone in the world goes online pretty much or at least like 80% of them

xp we have much bigger problems

we sure do. this is what i feel like talking about though

Not stopping anyone

frogbs otm

In that the Internet is the delivery system for so much media, news, banking, personal interactions, etc. (and far from that just being the case in the first world) the ways it is continually getting worse ranks pretty high on the problem list

^^^

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:x4qyokjtdzgl7gmqhsw4ajqj/bafkreievrt2aygi7vpodlyp37fvaydrxyfh62dxhcfk4n4ifspevim7oqq@jpeg
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:x4qyokjtdzgl7gmqhsw4ajqj/bafkreieamycd7ezylmxtblb44l7rbmx77pruh65qeba6juj7sfeh554h4y@jpeg

In that the Internet is the delivery system for so much media, news, banking, personal interactions, etc. (and far from that just being the case in the first world) the ways it is continually getting worse ranks pretty high on the problem list

― papal hotwife (milo z), Thursday, 23 May 2024 bookmarkflaglink

Most of these predate AI. Call me when AI disinformation actually causes a revolution (which things like social media claimed they had a hand on).

Right now its telling me that I should eat 1x small rock a day.

I don’t know, was the World Wide Web really ever a reliable source of information? SEO vs random folks just thinking about things. But I love when I run into an old school style .edu page explaining some physics concept or something, those seem to be evergreen.

The Food Pyramid is literally a pyramid!

xp probably not but I think it was at least easier to discern who was full of it and who wasn't, as opposed to AI which gives you like 95% good info and 5% stuff compiled from an 11-year Redditor

interesting googles thing is returning actual specific stuff its absorbed kinda just rephrasing search results, lil different than the other ai stuff thats averaging everything out

So as this example shows we are circling the drain. Not sure how it follows that we are getting from hilarious search results to "every aspect of our daily lives will suck even more now". Fellas, your job is far more likely to suck than this ever will.

The danger of LLM “AI” is not its power, it’s in its shittiness that threatens to subsume the rest of the internet (and by extension most aspects of our daily lives) for SEEMINGLY NO REASON

— punished giorgio (@GMomurder) May 23, 2024

Well good news on that front, plenty of ppl will be losing their job to AI.

Right-wing pundits are going to lose jobs.

OpenAI to start using news content from News Corp. as part of a multiyear deal https://t.co/2GKoWvcHmh

— The Associated Press (@AP) May 24, 2024

We won't be able to use the Internet to fact check inside three years but AI is cool. It's fun to say, at least.

so that one is saying its last updated dataset was in 2021, have any of these been updated since stuff like ChatGPT went mainstream? because if it's pulling stuff from 11 year old Redditors it sure as hell would pull in a ton of AI-generated data if it were to be updated today, meaning this stuff is more likely to get worse not better

https://i.imgur.com/i3zV1NC.jpeg

that's another Onion pull

A relevant LinkedIn post I saw earlier today https://t.co/8INVFAOWT5 pic.twitter.com/dQXnlzqucL

— Ryan Bloom (@BlazeHedgehog) May 24, 2024

i guess everybody on Facebook for the message about now being raw material for their ai. you can opt out but they want an essay with reasons why and even then might ignore you anyway

for / saw

ffs, they should improve autocorrect first

facebook obvs will do whatever they want as they always have, your data is their data

i just hope instagram doesn't take a peek at all of this

https://thebaseballlifestyle.com/why-does-the-baseball-player-wear-pearls/

Pearls are a timeless accessory and have been worn by baseball players for many years. They are seen as a symbol of good luck, team spirit, and fashion. They can also help the player feel more confident and give them a sense of power and strength.

In regard to Scott Jensen's reference to a 'blind panic' among the high tech giants, it's worthwhile to remember that what is causing that panic is the specter of their stock options losing some fraction of their value, so they become marginally less obscenely wealthy.

i will pray for them