Israel/Palestine post 10/7 - follow-on events/thoughts as relate to other countries

I'm not disagreeing.

I suppose it depends on who you consider the "Western elites" to be. Right wing wankers tend to have a different idea of who constitutes an elite.

There are a million of these in Belfast. Some of them are older than I am.

Free Palestine Mural, St James', Belfast #FreePalestine pic.twitter.com/JPkay9wWcT

— Shamrock Superstore (@shamrocksupers1) May 18, 2021

But Israeli Jews didn’t have that privilege. They couldn’t avoid the cataclysm by relying on the great kindnesses and strengths of America. No one saved the Jews who would become Israel. No one would even take them in after the genocide. So their lesson was the opposite of the American Jewish one.

Come on, man, some of the most psychotically right-wing settlers in the West Bank moved there from Brooklyn. I'm not gonna say they are "typical Israelis" but they support the worst aspects of Israeli society and it's not because they weren't saved by American tolerance and liberalism, it's because they experienced it and rejected it in favor of something they liked better.

On the whole, I did not find that excerpt any more accurate than "they love dead Palestians the more dead Palestinians the better" as a description of the Israeli mindset, to the extent there is one.

That’s ridiculous.

I mean for starters it’s objectively false. The vast majority of Israelis are born in Israel and descended from refugees, either from the Holocaust/DP camps, or neighboring Arab countries who cleansed their Jewish populations, or other persecution like in ethiopia.

Loyalists (and Rangers fans) fly Israel flags partly because they are longest established trolls in world history tbf.

RE: that tweet. In the second half, I lost track of who he is addressing: westerners? western elites? all of whom supposedly support Palestinians and oppose Israel? That doesn't make sense to me when Western governments and economies are aggressively materially on Israel's "side." You can also see in the response to campus protests that Western institutions and the upper/ruling class are personally & financially invested in Israel as well.

The reason the US (as an example) isn't doing anything about the Uyghurs, Syrians, the Rohingya, Indian Muslims, or Palestinians is, to be reductive, because the US is completely indifferent to their lives when it's not actively trying to end them or, at least, acting in explicit opposition to Islamic culture and societies. Islam being a "civilizational" enemy was a totally mainstream opinion to express post-9/11, reverberating into Trump's apparently constitutional Muslim ban. Other Western countries have banned Muslim religious symbols and architecture; there is constant surveillance and police profiling of Muslims across the West; etc.

rob, there's a lot to unpick there and I'm frankly more interested in having this discussion with you than in trying to explain a third person's views, so yeah, glad to see there's some curiosity and happy to answer what I can.

It's an extremely bizarre tweet. I mean telling "the West" to rid the world of every dictator and protect other "small peoples" before asking Israel not to commit genocide seems a position intended to allow Israel to continue their work.

It also completely ignores that Western support goes to Israel, not to Palestine.

RE: that tweet. In the second half, I lost track of who he is addressing: westerners? western elites? all of whom supposedly support Palestinians and oppose Israel?

The twitter conversation is the best source for that, I think. Not that it's essential, just I would refer you there if you're interested in who he's addressing.

That doesn't make sense to me when Western governments and economies are aggressively materially on Israel's "side."

I think you've hit on something important, and I am curious about what doesn't make sense. Maybe it depends on whether we are talking about state action or effects on individuals. If you read ILX it has seemed like in some ways open season on Israel, as a whole, and for over 20 years and by extension, right or wrong, on Jewish people around the world. Not that my comfort is the most important

You can also see in the response to campus protests that Western institutions and the upper/ruling class are personally & financially invested in Israel as well.

I mean yes and no. I think I can see what you see from what you post (maybe I'm wrong). I don't know if you can see what I see. We can get into it more if you're curious.

The reason the US (as an example) isn't doing anything about the Uyghurs, Syrians, the Rohingya, Indian Muslims, or Palestinians is, to be reductive, because the US is completely indifferent to their lives when it's not actively trying to end them or, at least, acting in explicit opposition to Islamic culture and societies. Islam being a "civilizational" enemy was a totally mainstream opinion to express post-9/11, reverberating into Trump's apparently constitutional Muslim ban. Other Western countries have banned Muslim religious symbols and architecture; there is constant surveillance and police profiling of Muslims across the West; etc.

It's ok to be reductive, I feel, as it indicates trust. Just as an aside, FYI to put some things in perspective, when Trump was inaugurated I volunteered with the ACLU to work on legal challenges to the Muslim bans as they are clearly not constitutional.

I want to understand better. But I also don't want to insert myself and become a tourist where it's not my place to lead this discussion, as I find myself getting irritated when people, for example, revive the antisemitism to talk about the instrumentalization of antisemitism (aka "antisemitism, isn't it overrated?") rather than trying to counter antisemitism itself.

Anyway the starting point of this was my comment "relatable." I'd be interested to hear more from PBKR and ivy too.

The guy should have just called them "liberal elites" and not "Western elites" because that's obviously what he's talking about.

If you read ILX it has seemed like in some ways open season on Israel

ILX is not American, and to the extent people on ILX are American, they -- we -- are not collectively in step with the American public or the American government.

But man alive is right, my reaction to that tweet was too knee-jerky, the sentiment in Israel of "no one will come to help us, we are all alone, the world is always ready to grind us to a cinder" is real, I just think the second part "Israelis are clear-eyed enough to see that America is keeping Palestinians down by sending them food and building schools, only by stopping aid can the Palestinians shake off the soft bigotry of low expectations and rise to their full potential" is not an accurate account of the Israeli point of view.

If you read ILX it has seemed like in some ways open season on Israel,

Really unfair for the ILX elites to not be more open-minded about the country actively committing genocide.

One of the things I've been finding striking in Ben Gurion's biography is that I actually don't think he hated Arabs. In fact, he was far more able to put himself in their shoes than some of his Zionist compatriots, and frequently said/wrote things along the lines of "If I were them, I would be doing exactly what they are doing" (i.e. resisting, fighting, etc.) - I had seen a quote or two along these lines before, but I hadn't realized it was a theme of his thinking on the subject. He simply saw them as a rival group and national movement that was incompatible with his own national movement (which he was single-minded about pursuing for pretty much his entire life). He believed it was not possible to create a Jewish state without removing large numbers of Arabs from the land, because he did not believe they would accept a Jewish majority/Jewish state, and he may have been right. And I don't think he faulted them for not wanting to accept it. I have been grappling with this a lot, and it's part of why I want to read more about early binationalism, because I really want to understand if another way was possible. And if it wasn't, I still want to believe that another way is possible today.

Definitely when looking at certain institutions and how they have reacted for the past 6 months, for instance forcing out university presidents to appease donors, calling in the police to take down student encampments—it feels like the elites (the moneyed class) is quite pro-Israel, even if some parts of academia, without much real power, are pro-Palestian.

You can see this dynamic replicated in almost any institution you wish - news organisations, political parties, etc etc

xpost to Keyes When you put it that way, that's helpful, separating the elites as moneyed class from the academic vanguard.

As for news organizations, I'm interested in hearing more about that point. I was glad when you started the discussion about media diets because it feels like so much of this is a propaganda battle.

That tweet just seems insane to me, like literally psychotic

But let a hundred flowers bloom eh

When will the (non-ILX) open season on Israel stop.

BREAKING: Lula has withdrawn Brazil's ambassador to Israel.

— Read Let This Radicalize You (@JoshuaPHilll) May 29, 2024

felicity: idk why we have to consider or analyze a position that is completely unreasonable, condescending, racist, and not based in any kind of material reality. that's all i have to say about it

these thought experiments are getting more and more tedious to me, and are largely people tying themselves into knots trying to justify genocide, and in this particular case trying to pin it to a mentality that the israelis have and the palestinians don't, which is a totally fucked invention of this dumbass who sucks. i don't want to see this shit!

Well obviously you don't have to. Nobody's making anyone read this thread.

I agree with ivy. There are not two symmetrical sides to this conflict and anything suggesting otherwise is gaslighting.

the FP button is right there, folks

As you and your worthless conversations to this thread are ever-keen to remind us.

Contributions, ffs

He simply saw them as a rival group and national movement that was incompatible with his own national movement (which he was single-minded about pursuing for pretty much his entire life). He believed it was not possible to create a Jewish state without removing large numbers of Arabs from the land, because he did not believe they would accept a Jewish majority/Jewish state, and he may have been right. And I don't think he faulted them for not wanting to accept it. I have been grappling with this a lot, and it's part of why I want to read more about early binationalism, because I really want to understand if another way was possible. And if it wasn't, I still want to believe that another way is possible today.

Btw I really liked seeing this British political reporter with a huge platform say this about the (fucking centrists running the) Irish government the other day. But it’s nothing new as I said above.

Terrorism works https://t.co/BuNOVQxR70

— Adam Boulton (@adamboultonTABB) May 22, 2024

And just to be clear, man alive's posts are not the ones I am referring to.

“what if the Palestinians were self-reliant” motherfuck this racist motherfucker, the Palestinian people have survived numerous ethnic cleansing campaigns and genuine apartheid and this asshole has the temerity to tweet such garbage

hard to be self-reliant when insane 20- year old IDF soldiers can break into your house and terrorize your family for no fucking reason at anytime. like why are we even talking about this bullshit point

And tbc I wasn't defending the Haviv Rettig-Gur tweet, which I'm not even sure I entirely understand. But I was disagreeing with Eephus and therefore I guess agreeing with the first part of the tweet.

My partial understanding is that the demographics don’t support this, which I’ve seen discussed as “If everyone lived in one nation then Israeli Jews would cease being the majority”, which then directs back to a two state solution but then there’s the issue of non contiguous nationhood etc. Honestly I have no idea what a workable practical solution would be, but whatever it might be it’ll make the former Yugoslavia look functional.
― Roman Anthony gets on his horse (gyac), Wednesday, May 29, 2024 1:23 PM (seven minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

I know there are some proposals for a "federation" and the like. Like one state made up of two sub-states. Reparations in lieu of right of return, and/or some limited right of return. I don't think everything necessarily needs to be treated as a single unbroken state so long as Palestinians have self determination and equal representation in joint governance issues. The modern western nation state is only one model, and a fairly young one. I'd like to read more about these proposals as well.

Yeah that’s quite similar to the way Bosnia is divided between Republika Srpks and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. My understanding from a friend who lives in one part is that it’s insanely segregated, her example was that she couldn’t catch a train directly between two parts (!). I think my main concern for functioning in such a state might be both under and overestimated: how do you live together in peace after that? Yet we do have examples of people doing so, albeit to varying degrees of happiness. In the end, nobody wants to live like this. It’s just what people are prepared to give up.

I agree with ivy. There are not two symmetrical sides to this conflict and anything suggesting otherwise is gaslighting.

― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Wednesday, May 29, 2024 11:15 AM bookmarkflaglink

Yea, sorry, not trying to suggest there is a symmetry or gaslight anyone. Clearly I have been tactless and I apologize.

BiH still has problems but you can travel between the two parts easily by a pretty comprehensive intercity bus network. The rail system is practically non-existent anywhere in the country.

Yeah I did wonder when I was posting that how true that was. It’s a beautiful country but the little I saw when I visited made it very clear exactly how fucked things are not too far below the surface.

you can just publish this sort of thing in a mainstream magazine i guess - https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/live-law-die-cross-israel

We need to look for standards from within our tradition to set a moral example for the whole world, while making it more practically possible to defend our homeland.

Instead of bragging about the extra danger our soldiers experience for the sake of sparing enemy noncombatants, we should reject the premise that we Jews bear any responsibility for protecting the human shields employed by our enemy.

Instead of threatening Jews with arrest for praying on the Temple Mount, we should take a hint from the “Al-Aqsa” moniker our attackers gave to their day of savage invasion and let Cohens up there on the hill to slaughter lambs for Passover.

And above all—given that land is nearly all that matters to this death-worshipping foe—instead of repeatedly withdrawing troops from areas we have just taken over so we can deny having unchristian territorial ambitions, we should conquer, annex, and resettle parts of Gaza so that Jews and friendly gentiles both can live there safely.

What was that about psychotic Americans settling in Israel?

What in the brain rot did I just read

TBF, Tablet is only "mainstream" in that it's a website people who are online a lot have usually heard of. It posts extremely weird takes all the time.

Tablet is hardly mainstream

mea culpa, i am probably too online

yeah according to one of those web traffic tracking sites, it has 1/12th the visitors of Pitchfork

And probably three times the staff

And just to be clear, man alive's posts are not the ones I am referring to.

― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR)

yes, cosign

https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/adjunct-professor-fired-depaul-assignment-war-in-gaza-public-health/