― teeny (teeny), Friday, 7 January 2005 16:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 9 January 2005 17:13 (nineteen years ago) link
Haha I ran AVG on Friday. It found 1,002 - that's ONE THOUSAND AND TWO, folks - viruses on my PC! Mainly trojan horses, but a handful of dialers too.
I've deleted the lot, natch, and done the msconfig thing, and still there are pop-ups on start-up, and problems finding applications (especially the defrag button), and now I've just installed my digicam picture viewer and suddenly AOL won't connect to the interweb anymore! Argh!
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 10 January 2005 10:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 10 January 2005 11:30 (nineteen years ago) link
Or - can you justify buying a new one?
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 10 January 2005 11:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 10 January 2005 16:43 (nineteen years ago) link
*Blushes*
― Rumpington Lane, Monday, 10 January 2005 16:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Monday, 10 January 2005 16:55 (nineteen years ago) link
Express is a smaller and slightly slower wireless transmitter, but it does something Extreme doesn't do, it allows you to play music wirelessly into any old stereo (and it plugs right into the electrical socket in your wall).
I think this is right.
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link
What is the difference in speed between the two?
A little backstory-I currently have my Powerbook anchored to cable modem in the corner of my house, but considering long-term costs I am thinking of getting Airport (our only phone jack is in the kitchen) and switching to DSL. I just worry about everything slowing down.
― .adam (nordicskilla), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:14 (nineteen years ago) link
http://images.apple.com/airportexpress/images/index_speed12162002.gif
― TOMBOT, Monday, 10 January 2005 17:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― TOMBOT, Monday, 10 January 2005 17:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:24 (nineteen years ago) link
You might also find this useful: http://scribbling.net/how-to-fix-moms-computer
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:28 (nineteen years ago) link
try HERE maybe you can find out what kind of speed difference to expect for the privilege of saving a paltry $40 a month
― TOMBOT, Monday, 10 January 2005 17:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:35 (nineteen years ago) link
― TOMBOT, Monday, 10 January 2005 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link
I've actually got a Linksys that I'm about to hook up in a week or two, to a home network of two (2) macs. Do I actually need to mess about with MAC spoofing? I actually have zero idea abbout setting it up, all I know is that I can point my browser to the router's address and there's some web-based admin form.
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 10 January 2005 17:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 13:55 (nineteen years ago) link
type: telnet hostname/IP
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 14:17 (nineteen years ago) link
Ken L: yeah but you can also just go to your web broswer and type in telnet://your.address.here and it'll work too, launch the program for you if you don't want to remember to find terminal.
― Allyzay Needs Legs More (allyzay), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:20 (nineteen years ago) link
A) If you are doing the MAC cloning you have to have your computer physically linked to the router, do not do it over wireless.
B) If you are updating the software for the hardware you also cannot do this over wireless.
C) You cannot do B anyway using a Mac.
Not paying attention to these three steps will result in your router being completely fried. The upshot is that they send you a replacement immediately, for free, because their website DOES NOT TELL YOU THAT YOU CANNOT UPDATE SOFTWARE USING A MAC.
― Allyzay Needs Legs More (allyzay), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― TOMBOT, Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― bnw (bnw), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gator Magoon (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― 57 7th (calstars), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― Allyzay Needs Legs More (allyzay), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― 57 7th (calstars), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― svend (svend), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― 57 7th (calstars), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:17 (nineteen years ago) link
Or you could just use encryption and/or limit access to known MAC addresses like everyone else does.
― caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:07 (nineteen years ago) link
The I386 folder most likely, because it's not guaranteed; it's just a name, but almost certainly contains the installation files for Windows. This is not the same as the windows installation itself, which will be in c:\windows\ or c:\winnt most likely. I take it you bought your PC with Windows pre-installed by a vendor such as Dell?
What it does is if you want to install some new feature of Windows that are not installed by default, it can install it from the I386 directory rather than from the Windows CD. Assuming you have a Windows CD (and a CD player), then that will suffice and you don't really need the I386 directory.
Alternatively, if you're worried about it, you could try compressing the I386 directory (right click, properties, advanced, compress files...)
― KeithW (kmw), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:33 (nineteen years ago) link
I got a plotter, today, for free.
problem is, I think, the plotter's driver doesn't work with anything beyond windows 98 and I have XP.
is there a way of running a copy of 98 from inside XP?? or something??
what else could I do?
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 23:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago) link
I looked online (a bit) and was told it wouldn't work.
I think I may have found a driver that will work.
how boring!!
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 23:25 (nineteen years ago) link
If you can find a driver for say NT4, then there's a possibility, but even at that it's probably likely to fail.
Have fun anyway.
A "plotter" you say! Do they still exist! You'll be coming home with a drum printer and a wireless next.
― KeithW (kmw), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 23:47 (nineteen years ago) link
I think I have found an NT-based driver that, apparently, "works very well with XP".
since I dropped & broke my external hard drive, on sunday, I have no copy of autoCAD to give it a whirl with, though!!
ta!
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 00:02 (nineteen years ago) link
― Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 00:07 (nineteen years ago) link
― KeithW (kmw), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 00:10 (nineteen years ago) link
Either that or everyone on slsk has become a total asshole and stopped sharing, and no one is interested in my files either. The first option seems totally sensible to me, knowing people, but the second seems strange especially considering the new albums I just added.
― Allyzay Subservient 50s-Type (allyzay), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:30 (nineteen years ago) link