Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So Nick Pinkerton mentioned this in an interesting article here http://filmcomment.com/entry/bombast-the-black-list
These sorts of movies are popular for the same reason that fat tomes of historical fiction by the likes of James Clavell, James A. Michener, and Leon Uris used to be the only fiction that you’d find in houses otherwise devoid of books: there is a significant segment of the American public that thinks this business of making characters and stories up out of thin air is a little suspicious and possibly effeminate.
Do you think this is true? And how artistically relevant are these movies?
There's a poll here if you want to vote for the best Best Picture nominee in this category.
Poll Results
Option | Votes |
The Social Network | 10 |
The Wolf of Wall Street | 5 |
Munich | 3 |
Milk | 2 |
12 Years a Slave | 2 |
Lincoln | 2 |
Zero Dark Torture | 2 |
The Queen | 1 |
Good Night, and Good Luck | 1 |
Moneyball | 1 |
American Hustle | 0 |
Captain Phillips | 0 |
Dallas Buyers Club | 0 |
Philomena | 0 |
American Sniper | 0 |
The Imitation Game | 0 |
Selma | 0 |
Capote | 0 |
Argo | 0 |
Letters from Iwo Jima | 0 |
Frost/Nixon | 0 |
The Blind Side | 0 |
The King's Speech | 0 |
127 Hours | 0 |
The Fighter | 0 |
Hugo (borderline) | 0 |
War Horse (borderline) | 0 |
The Theory of Everything | 0 |
― poxy fülvous (abanana), Thursday, 15 January 2015 16:20 (ten years ago)
You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.