C.S. Lewis: Classic or dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
His books are well-written and usually entertaining. However, they are always about Christianity, and in the case of Narnia, they were deceptively subtle about it. The Pilgrim's Regress and The Screwtape Letters were openly religious but still quite good. I say classic.

Lyra, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No No No. If i wanted to read boring Anglican propaganda disgused as a cute fairy tale ... wait a muinute why would i ?

anthony, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And they were about as subtle as a whores knickers . THE LION IS JESUS.

anthony, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I only really picked up on the Christian themes many years after reading the Narnia books -- and me raised in an Anglican household, which you'd think would be the perfect atmosphere for Lewis' subtext and all!

Arguably like many writers of his time (including my belov'd Tolkien), his work is now riddled with stuff tagged un-PC, and I'm not talking so much about religious themes as, say, the rampant and negative Orientalism in The Horse and His Boy, to pick one example. For all that, though, when he was on, he was ON, able to discuss religion and deeply felt belief in ways that render the barely intellectual US mainstream version of Christianity down to nothing. Though I haven't read it in years, Till We Have Faces is my favorite of his fictional pieces, while there's one of his tracts -- can't recall which, but it features George Macdonald as a Virgil equivalent -- which I found particularly imaginative. So classic, someone I'll always have at least a little time for.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Propaganda aspect would be dud were it not for being very very poor propaganda, even misfiring entirely: I was brought up at School in exactly the kind of liberal Anglicanism Lewis was meant to be firming up, and I'm sure part of what put me completely off was getting to the Narnia books first and realising afterwards that actual religion was going to be no way this good, or interesting. My (basically irreligious) parents cleverly said oh Tom it's all an allegory for Christianity (they used another word than allegory, I was 4 when I read the books) thus setting me up for disappointment with Xtianity which would lead me down my atheist path.

Tom, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Actually, mentioning school is interesting, because I first discovered Lewis in third grade since our class read The Lion etc. in it. Likely because this *wasn't* church (and we only started regularly going some years later anyway), this reinforced my own particular disassociation between Narnia and Xian thought.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"subtle as a whore's knickers" is pretty good. For a little kid who never even thought about Jesus, though, I didn't see it.

It's better propaganda than what I get around here: well-meaning, faithful Christians saying, "I don't know enough to make sense of any of your questions, but if you just accept Jesus into your heart everything will be fine." At least Lewis tried to come up with logical reasons and explanations for the Bible, even if none of them converted me.

Lyra, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But they were couched in this middle class english, oh lets have an adventure . I thought similar things about the screw tape letters. They were just badly written and obvious. This was the paramount defense Anglicans could mount, at least the catholics had Thomas or Augustine.

anthony, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The animated movie was good though!

And so was 'Shadowlands' with 'Tony' Hopkins.

DavidM, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No it wasnt it. There was nothing good about CS Lewis Ever !!

anthony, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But anthony, you ARE Xtian, are you not? So obv. to YOU it is poor propaganda (you are way past needing propaganda). We are all saying — me on the kids-let thread, which see I guess for my exact argt — that this helped CURE us of Xtianity...!!

mark s, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I am a Catholic, not a protestant. I think CS Lewis cured me out of any love for protestantism.

anthony, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Anthony, could reading his books in school be part of what makes you dislike them so much? I can never like a book I read in school because somehow the teacher always ruins it.

Lyra, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I read the Chronicles like 9 times. I skipped "The Horse and His Boy" the last 8 times thru, not because of any dubious orientalism (which I don't doubt was there in spades) but because it was just breathtakingly boring. I dreaded having to crack its covers.

What's your favorite book of the set? The Sorcerer's Apprentice rocked - magic rings, pools of water that lead to other worlds, kinda like the internet!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sorceror's Apprentice = Magician's Nephew?
Has great rhyme Digory and Polly find in the dead city of of CHARN:
Take your chance adventurous stranger
Ring the bell and bide the danger
Or wonder till it drives you mad
What would have happened if you had...

This = touchstone motto for me (and has thus got me into all sorts of trouble)

Horse and His Boy has a v.spooky scene at the TOMBS, and for some reason I found Cor the white boy in the "oriental" ambience somewhat sexy hmmmm. Have not read for some yrs will tonite. Was it Kerry said perhaps racist? No: there were good Calormenes and they were noble and haughty and brave. Unfortunately they worshipped Satan I mean Tash.

Noticed have to say as I reread MN how evident were the elements being slipped into it: eg passage joining the houses is from Stalky and Co., arrival in Dying World is from the Time Machine, etc. I think hewas great at memorable and scary tableaux (several mentioned on the kids-lit thread): Uncle Andrew being IN THE ROOM always creeped me. Or when Lucy is reading the magician's book in DAWN TREADER.

Anthony is cross that HEY THE LION IS JESUS, but I think he's wrong. Lewis tht the Lion was Jesus, but imagination triumphed over faith, and dissolves it.

Surely there are only seven?

mark s, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(ignore final question: 9 time != nine books)

mark s, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dawn Treader has Lewis' creepiest moment in the whole Narnia series:

"Not daydreams, dreams!"

Arguably folks like Neil Gaiman and Clive Barker have spent entire careers capturing the chill of that...

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

wasn't he some dodgy pead...oh no, that was the other guy, lewis carrol...yeah, um dudster galore. for causing feelings of great betrayal - them nania books seemed so inoccuous that we were read them at a state school by our teachers. mungrel....kill the lion.

Geoff, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yo. No killing the lion, even if he IS Jesus.

Lyra, Thursday, 16 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Till We Have Faces is my favorite. A Grief Observed is also a great one. His non-fiction Christianity books are variable: Mere Christianity I can take, but one of them (Surprised by Joy, maybe? the autobiographical one) was kind of rambling.

Joe, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Classic. I don't care what drugs he did (Christianity? Did he sniff it or inject it?) to get those hallucinations.

Momus, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Narnia books are GRATE. all this Christianity shite is a complete blind alley - it went completely passed me when I was small, and I still see the books as primarily fantasy action adventure romps. I love the way the books get darker as Lewis gets older, moving from the naive whimsy of "The Lion, The Witch, & The Wardrobe" & "Prince Caspian" to the outright miserabilism of "The Silver Chair", "The Magician's Nephew" and doomfest "The Last Battle".

Now I want to re-read them.

"Out Of The Silent Planet" & "Perelandra" are good too, though they are so overtly Christian that even I got it.

The Dirty Vicar, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

His autobiography, 'Surprised By Joy', is very good. It describes his early life up to his conversion to Christianity. I read it with an non-Christian but open mind a few months ago and the closing chapters brought me closer to seeing God than I ever have before. This scared me a great deal, although I'm not sure why. Once I finished the book I made a concerted effort to shut it out completely. Maybe I'll think about it again one day.

John Davey, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A Grief Observed is an astonishing book. I can't think of anyone else who has succeeded in transcribing those kind of thoughts so accurately. The Screwtape Letters is the smartest book I've ever read about faith, too.

Nick, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I haven't read 'Surprised by Joy'; it sounds interesting. 'The Pilgrim's Regress' is fairly autobiographical as well, but he tried to turn it into a metaphor (not quite a fairy tale I'm afraid). I was hoping I'd be converted but I had to drop off at the point when Jesus came down to speak to the character.

Lyra, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Just spotted this ad in the LRB: "Tax evasion, forgeries, fraud, duplicity on a grand scale and lies exploiting the name of C.S.Lewis for financial gain: within a few months of CSL's death in 1963, questions abt his life were already surfacing and his literary leavings [mark s note: TOTALLY YUK PHRASE!] were thought to be contaminated with fakery. Year after year, Kathryn Lindskoog [grate name!]has explored with fraud further. The result is an amazing tale with a gripping cast of characters... This is scholarship packed with human interest and suspense.

(There follow encomiums fr. Arthur C. Clarke and Ursula K. LeGuin..)

Aside from ad-style being work of incest- ridden bonobos, and sketch of CSL on book cover being PIECE OF UGLY INCOMPETENT RUBBISH, who on the beertch can tell me more?!

mark s, Monday, 20 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The man PLAGARIZED THE BIBLE.

JM, Monday, 20 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

OK this just occurred to me, while on Pantheon Champion. CLS = big ol Xian yada yada. So howcum when Narnia is freed from iron heel of fascist inseXoR Miraz, first sign of freedom = arrival of Bacchus and Silenus? Ahem can you even *say* Graven Inages, Mr Lewis?

mark s, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But mark s, Lewis's love of the pagan and what he called "northernness" pervade everything he wrote. In Surprised by Joy he makes a big deal about how fairy stories/myths etc prepared him for finding other mysteries. It's not surprising to see Bacchus popping up with the Naiads and Dryads in that context. (Despite the fact that I think that Prince Caspian is the weakest Narnia book.) As someone said above, when I finished that it was the closest I've got to being a Christian since I was a kid.

Sam, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

When I finished Surprised by Joy that is, not Prince Caspian.

Sam, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Overt love of paganness = pore xtian propaganda

Which is I think what I sed in the v.v.v.first place: you end up worshipping the lion and NOT jesus...

mark s, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Just finished reading the books having fished them out from my parents' house last w/e. No religious conversion to report. Not very keen on powerful women, our CS, was he?

Tim, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Witch = Empress Jadis = feminazis
Susan = subhuman bimbo-tart
Lucy = Jill = Aravis = boys (Jill Pole geddit)

mark s, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Plus I forgot erectile penis-claw snake- queen of the underworld: excuse ME!! What's that abt please?

mark s, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one year passes...
My first grade teacher read (all or some of) The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, and I loved it at the time, for the whole magic of the everyday turning into an entirely different world. By the time I tried to read the rest of it (in college), I was too turned off by the allegory.

I read his trilogy Out of the Silent Planet in junior high, and like it. I seem to remember The Peralandra including some sort of pagan-like celebration of sexuality. (The protagonist is named "Ransom," but it's not an allegory, according to Lewis.) I also read and enjoyed at least part of one of his scholarly books with a title like The Allegory of Love at around this time. Surprised by Joy annoyed me, particularly for the passages where he talked about how he thought the sado-masochistic bullying rituals (not his description) he went through in school were a positive thing. I read it shortly before the time when I renounced my faith, which also may have had something to do with my reaction. I know one intelligent (but very quirky) person who became a Christian partly as a result of reading Lewis.

I think he was a good writer. I think some Christians give him more credit for his apologetic work than what he deserves. (Then again, I only know Mere Christianity second-hand.)

Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 15 March 2003 19:55 (twenty-three years ago)

(Actually Lewis and Tolkien were sort of role-models for me in 7th grade, when being a Christian philologist/literary scholar/writer had great appeal to me. I pretty much wanted to be a professor along those lines at that point.)

Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 15 March 2003 20:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the Narnia books seem a far more interesting and honest way of dealing with his christianity (and it's v. much HIS christianity, right?) (ie. nevermind this anglican/catholic thing) than Screwtape or the 'grown-up' science fiction, although I think I've never been able to make it more than about three pages into Screwtape. I mean, GOD. (heh)

One thing I like about Narnia was wondering how the Inklings would take it if, say, Tolkien read them Aragorn's death, as lovingly detailed in appendices to vol. three, and then Lewis gave them Reepicheep getting his tail cut off: this sort of tallies with the "not another fucking elf" remark attributed to Lewis, somehow. I've no idea if the Inklings actually worked like this, though.

thom west (thom w), Saturday, 15 March 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't recall ever reading the Narnia books. I did read the Screwtape book a few years ago and found it moderately interesting. I'm totally non-religious, but open-minded in terms of literature.

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Saturday, 15 March 2003 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)

the "not another elf" came from another Inkling, I think, and was probably apocryphal. Lewis loved Tolkien's books, anyway. (and not just because of their friendship: JRRT detested everything about Narnia)

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 15 March 2003 22:42 (twenty-three years ago)

did tolkein write anything bout christianity?

Maria (Maria), Sunday, 16 March 2003 22:06 (twenty-three years ago)

maria, at the end of his famous(ish) essay on fairytales he sort of brings it in (as a way of justifying the "happy ending"): it's a bit clumsy and odd (and hard to understand, which he very rarely is) and makes you realise that — like c.s.lewis — the logic of his best aesthetic sensibilities was a bit at war with his faith

what can you say about a man who professes totally conventional belief in God, and devotes his entire life to creating a mythology in which no one spends a second worshipping anything? (except maybe gollum?)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 16 March 2003 22:13 (twenty-three years ago)

His answer to that was that (in the 'West,' at least -- ref. to 'heathen kings' in ROTK) the mythology and truth of God and angels, aka, Eru and the Valar, was so implicit and intrinsic that there wasn't a need for any sort of conventional religious trapping. Which is as all-encompassing and sweeping a religious fantasy one could want ("Hey, we're all in agreement on the big stuff!") while also allowing for an acknowledgement of the multiple nature of evil -- it isn't just Sauron, thus Boromir and Denethor for a start. Denethor is seen ultimately as having been misled by Sauron directly, true, but his nature was already in place. Yay shades in grey in a supposed black/white universe!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 16 March 2003 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Ha, I'm glad it's this thread rather than that other CSL one where I come off as a complete dick. (ps I still don't like him though for the same reasons as Anthony)

Dan I., Sunday, 16 March 2003 23:33 (twenty-three years ago)

ten years pass...

So the Screwtape Letters are very interesting.

cardamon, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 03:31 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.