the first is tops. economical. visually very cool. paul w.s. anderson begins the series strongly. did he ever think he would make 6 of them and marry the star? who could know that in hollywood? alexander witt-directed second movie is fun and there are memorable moments but the visual flair is muted. maybe it was a money thing. russell mulcahy-directed 3rd film might be my least favorite. though alice is awesome and i like the vegas sequence a lot. it's no highlander though. the 4th movie definitely has its moments and i could have watched the tokyo hive assault forever, but the prison breakout drags at times. still solid though! the 5th might be my fave since the 1st. i love all the various hive simulations of different cities. i could live down there. finally saw the 6th and last and i think it was a fitting over-the-top end. satisfying. alice in old lady makeup. laser hallway. awesome visuals. 106 minutes. cost a mere 40 million to make and box office was 300+ million. that's how you do it. though i do sometimes daydream about what paul w.s. could do with a cameron budget. the sky would be the limit! he's supposed to be planning a series of monster hunter movies. eagerly anticipating if that's the case!
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_U-mwwtnrAt0/TI5Kg1QkoKI/AAAAAAAAAEo/QEPfbBwsJrc/s640/vlcsnap-2010-09-13-11h49m59s101.png
― scott seward, Saturday, 17 June 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
these movies are all terrible but i have a weird affection for them anyway
― cast your vote for fully automated gay space luxury communism (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 17 June 2017 20:56 (seven years ago)
i love them. but i wouldn't recommend them to anyone. or i wouldn't recommend them to adults anyway. i just watched them all again with my 14 year old. he was really dubious about watching them for the longest time. but he enjoyed them. i have a real thing for underground top secret facilities. i was so excited to see stuff in the hive in the last movie that were new. new rooms. the board of directors cryogenic room. loved that.
― scott seward, Saturday, 17 June 2017 21:02 (seven years ago)
i will pretty much love any movie set underground. earth's true future.
― scott seward, Saturday, 17 June 2017 21:05 (seven years ago)
The second movie went too far in attempting to actually adapt the video games - once they broke free of that, then they were freer to poke around in what you could do in a zombie movie.
Comparisons to the Fast & Furious series - probably intended to wind down after a few, then started making money, then started making more money. Also they both killed off, and then brought back, Michelle Rodriguez.
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 17 June 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
Budget Total (all films):$290 millionBox office Total (all films):$1.233 billion
― scott seward, Saturday, 17 June 2017 21:53 (seven years ago)
i don't know how common it is for one person to write the screenplays for every movie in a series this long. it does add continuity. auteurism at its finest. i do love the editing/sound/sound editing in these films. so crazy.
― scott seward, Saturday, 17 June 2017 21:56 (seven years ago)
I don't know how many of them I have seen (three? four? all of them?) but they are hugely enjoyable. That continuity element is genuinely impressive. They all blend into one in my mind.
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:11 (seven years ago)
I only watched the first one. On VHS. I remember that the protagonist air-kicks a dog zombie.
The Redlettermedia guys watched them all in one sitting.https://youtu.be/caKcJ9Jllfc?t=18m15sgood part starts at 18:15 or so
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:16 (seven years ago)
Why the hell would anyone care about what RLM thinks of these movies.
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:21 (seven years ago)
You could probably drop those last three words.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:23 (seven years ago)
I liked the first and third ones a lot, the second not so much, and packed it in after the fourth (which I think was the only one I saw in a theater). Part of me wanted to watch 1-5 and then go see 6 in a theater, but that didn't happen. (I had a similar plan revolving around the Underworld series, and that didn't happen either.)
― grawlix (unperson), Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:37 (seven years ago)
i was hoping i could watch 1-5 with rufus and go see 6 at the movies with him but it didn't happen. only a fortuitous trip that the other two people in the house took for a couple of days made this recent marathon happen.
― scott seward, Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:45 (seven years ago)
we watched two a night for three nights.
the last one is well worth watching. tons of fun.
― scott seward, Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:46 (seven years ago)
these are great movies, paul ws anderson is far and away the most talented paul anderson in hollywood. mortal kombat and event horizon are also tremendous
― adam, Saturday, 17 June 2017 22:54 (seven years ago)
I've seen more of these than I'd care to admit. They're bad films through and through but I don't find them bad enough to be enjoyable, just extremely mediocre. Apart from the occasional moments of schlocky action there's little that's even memorable about them, certainly not on a character or story level. If any potentially interesting development happens it seems to get overwritten by the time the next one rolls along(cf: the clone Alices).
I am fairly certain I have seen the third and fourth but cannot remember anything about them. In fact when Ali Larter's character appeared in a re-cap at the start of the fourth one I remember thinking, "Hang on, when was she in it?"
PWS Anderson is the hackiest of hacks. I'll give him Event Horizon, but I walked out of his Three Musketeers as it was such bullshit. Even the Chris O'Donnell version is better(well of course it is, it has Tim Curry).
― Pheeel, Sunday, 18 June 2017 00:03 (seven years ago)
I love the backwards intro to Retribution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXfYlkkuEZI
― scott seward, Sunday, 18 June 2017 00:49 (seven years ago)
that and the tokyo intro are the best.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI8FGDaZ3Yw
― scott seward, Sunday, 18 June 2017 00:51 (seven years ago)
When _did_ Tim Curry become the tasteful face of bad taste?
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 18 June 2017 00:59 (seven years ago)