The State

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Sort of inspired by the gun thread . What level of state involvement in your life do you feel comfortable with . Are you a raging liberatrian who does not want any or a raging communist who finds the state comforting ?

anthony, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm glad there's something there for stuff like emergencies, public lighting, sewer systems, etc, that's for sure. This is something the libertarians often seem to forget, unless I'm to assume they'll do all that themselves. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dang. I was hoping this'd be about that MTV comedy show (featuring cast members from Comedy Central's Viva Variety AND members of avant- rock groop Cake Like!!!).

Hand twin?

I'll answer the question seriously some other time.

David Raposa, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Cake Like = avant-rock? That's it, I'm turning my avant-rock fan club membership card in now.

Sterling Clover, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

There's an avant-rock club? And I'm not in it? Shit, man.

The "avant-rock" thing was an inside joke (known only to me) regarding this AWFUL article I bitched about on my website. (The bitch is still on the front page, if you're (A Href="http://www.popshots.org">curious.

Damn it, people, we're off-track again!

David Raposa, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I just want to draw a pre-emptive distinction between "state involvement in your life" and "state involvement in society at large," two concepts your more rightist libertarians seem to conflate. I'm very much in favor of the latter; my view of the state is partly as a vehicle for collective action of citizens, and partly as a tool for those collective actions which can improve the overall state of the nation. In other words, maintenance of infrastructure does not strike me as enough. I'd be happy to pay 50% taxes if it led to the existence of public works that significantly enhanced the lives of the nation as a whole, even if I as an individual wasn't the target of those benefits.

I also want to close with the following State in-joke: "I'm outta here."

Nitsuh, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

State running transport, emergency services etc = classic.
State telling me what films I can see (and what bits of it I cannot), who I can sleep with etc = dud.

DG, Friday, 17 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I agree with Nitsuh. They are cutting healthcare up here . Why ? I pay 36 % taxes for something .

anthony, Saturday, 18 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i'm down with da dg on dis - keep out of my bookcase, my film collection, my art, but keep the fucking trains/bsues/services running and keep looking after those least able to do it.

Geoff, Saturday, 18 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does nobody see any connection between state-appointed morality and state-run health care? The latter's the wedge/excuse for the former. State-run health separates 'actions' from 'consequences', and if people are freed from that concept then who steps in to legislate morality? Obvious.

dave q, Saturday, 18 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

As in most such matters, I have a problem with the use of the state, not the mechanics. A good humanitarian left-leaning state is essential in the name of what Ned spelled out. In reality, any strong enough institution is strong enough to maintain its authoritarian lock on society despite appearence of moving with the times (Regular elections). It becomed more apparent with the globalisation theme - a wonderful idea in principle, allowing me to meet Finns and eat non- english food (is there any other country in the world that traditionally uses absolutely no spice or flavouring but salt?), allows me acces to wonderful japanese and north european technology (hurrah for seimens!), and gets me on a cheap coach to the 'Dam. On the other hand, evel bloodsucking international corporations suckign the blood of the exploitable.

matthew james, Saturday, 18 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does nobody see any connection between state-appointed morality and state-run health care?

This seems like a sort of lame excuse for having the state do nothing but build roads and utilities, the Orange County right-wing libertarian dream.

I don't know, most everyone here seems to fear the massive influence of corporations, and yet some of you are equally averse to state action. But the state, in theory, is our corporation -- our vehicle for collective action, the one entity with the power to protect our interests over corporate ones. Now before you scoff and point out that it never seems to work that way, realize that in a lot of senses it does, just maybe not as much as you'd life -- we do have a minimum wage, we do have labor standards, we do have food safety regulations, and so on and on. We could do better, in my opinion, but if we're comparing state action versus state non-action, state action comes up winner in my book.

This opinion is probably informed somewhat by identity politics, I should admit, and the fact that I think the U.S. has a responsibility to attempt to correct the legacy of slavery ... the government can do terrible things to people, but employed correctly, it has as much power to improve our lives as a massive corporation has to improve the lives of its shareholders.

Nitsuh, Saturday, 18 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh yeah, that and: "I'm gonna dip my balls in it!"

* cue laughter among State-aware folks.

Nitsuh, Saturday, 18 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I would favor a court system to punish fraud, attack, and robbery, a police force to help prevent it, jails, and an organization to make rules for environmental protection because I sure don't expect anyone trying to make money to do it. Everything else should be under the control of local governments or private citizens. That sounds pretty harsh, but I don't think the role of government is to make everyone's life perfect. It's to protect a few basic freedoms.

Lyra, Sunday, 19 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The state is 'OUR corporation'? Flaw with that analogy is that a corporation has unity of purpose (i.e., the bottom line), whereas a government with unity of purpose is known as a dictatorship.

dave q, Monday, 20 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

what DG and geoff said. i'm a libetarian when it comes to personal/cultural shit, but i'm all for higher taxes and greater state involvement in education, health care whatever. everyone contributes, everyone wins.

gareth, Monday, 20 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If 'State medicine' = 'they' want to own your body, 'state education' = 'they' want your mind as well?

dave q, Monday, 20 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

they=we

gareth, Monday, 20 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, Dave, you've got it. Education is 'a purveying of things to be rejected.'

Lyra, Monday, 20 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

seven years pass...

How the fuck am I supposed to find a youtube video of the "And" sketch?

Comprehensive Nuclear Suggest-Ban Treaty (Hurting 2), Monday, 23 March 2009 03:45 (seventeen years ago)

Which one is that? God I love this one:

I f'd up the word rear (Z S), Monday, 23 March 2009 03:53 (seventeen years ago)

i'm gonna dip my bawwls in it!

i stole a metal dude's t-shirt in richmond just to watch him cry (latebloomer), Monday, 23 March 2009 03:55 (seventeen years ago)

It's the one about the word "And" - the dude learns to use the word "and" and gets really excited about it. Unsearchable, obv.

Comprehensive Nuclear Suggest-Ban Treaty (Hurting 2), Monday, 23 March 2009 04:07 (seventeen years ago)

naus, Monday, 23 March 2009 04:24 (seventeen years ago)

three years pass...

Is the "ACTION! ACTION!" in the theme song a sample from Nation of Ulysses?

this guy's a gangsta? his real name's mittens. (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:17 (thirteen years ago)

Wedren is even responsible for The State's theme song, "Boys and Girls- Action.” Written in conjunction with Girls Against Boys frontman Eli Janney—"we kept it very DC"—the song was written as the two "banged around with samples" and came up with the thumping, '50s sci-fi-esque theme. For its punk energy and memorable chorus, the pair sampled "The Kingdom Of Heaven Must Be Taken By Storm" by DC DIY-ers Nation Of Ulysses.

Source: a website

del griffith, Thursday, 17 May 2012 01:08 (thirteen years ago)

two months pass...

This guy sounds just like Thomas Lennon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK8zo81gtH8

spanky hotel frogstrot (how's life), Tuesday, 14 August 2012 12:35 (thirteen years ago)

I kept waiting for him to say "Monkey torture".

spanky hotel frogstrot (how's life), Tuesday, 14 August 2012 12:37 (thirteen years ago)

three years pass...

Reading about Rojava and Daesh all year got me thinking, what would a Christian equivalent of the Caliphate look like? Disregarding all Christian organisations since the disciples - how would Jesus govern?

So I translated, or rather 'remastered,' the Jefferson Bible into my native tongue, and while doing so, a vision of a very cozy, very liberal state occurred to me, where the government provides free education, healthcare, infrastructure, a basic income, and hands out carefully tested and updated licenses for *everything* that is potentially harmful to individuals, society or nature, regarding not only physical harm but also oppression and addiction - drugs, gambling, hooliganism, rape, suicide, cannibalism, running a factory, you name it (no seriously, YOU name it, there would be constant ballots on what to license next, bad news for the cannibals I guess) - until the state and the people run out of stuff to legalize.

Once something is legalized, the state helps you do it. A licensed junkie would receive very pure, cheap heroin, licensed smokers and drunkards would get their poison tax-free. A licensed brawler can challenge anyone with a matching license to a fight, even in public, and not be prosecuted... unless she hurts innocent bystanders, which will result in her losing the license (re-application is always possible, 77 strikes out, JHC was very clear about that) and possibly go to jail, doing time with thugs who still have their license, and get to play Fight Club all day while little Miss No-License sits by idly.

Maybe there should be a law that the legal system, including the licensing system, will be shut down immediately once *everything* is licensed, releasing the people into anarchy - although such a law could be used for oppression, I guess?

What I see is a state that limits itself to the role of a gardener who waters all the plants equally, fertilizes those in need, but doesn't pluck the weeds. Crime and hierarchies would slowly fade out, because they need a climate of oppression and inequality to thrive, and the Christian State provides anything but that.

Naive, I know, but hey, it's Christmas.

Wes Brodicus, Friday, 18 December 2015 14:26 (ten years ago)

licensed smokers and drunkards would get their poison tax-free

Perhaps you based this conclusion on The Golden Rule? Because offhand I can't think of anything else this could be connected to in the New Testament. iirc, Jesus showed zero interest in the mechanics of governing a state.

Crime and hierarchies would slowly fade out, because they need a climate of oppression and inequality to thrive

Crimes require only passions in order to exist. Hierarchies are inherent in all social groupings, but they do not need to be as inimical as present day hierarchies are.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 18 December 2015 17:05 (ten years ago)

Christ was explicitly uninterested in governance - "render unto Caesar" etc. This was no doubt a self-preservation move by early Xtians (don't piss off the Romans!) but it nonetheless obscures any real political solutions Jesus might have had.

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 December 2015 17:13 (ten years ago)

licensed smokers and drunkards would get their poison tax-free

Perhaps you based this conclusion on The Golden Rule? Because offhand I can't think of anything else this could be connected to in the New Testament.

Basically it's 'our daily bread' applied to everything. Sounds perverse, I know. (My problem with this is that God is supposed to hand out the bread, not the state. And if the state gets fancy ideas about casting people into fire for cursing... maybe with an asbestos suit? jk)

iirc, Jesus showed zero interest in the mechanics of governing a state.

True. He was very much invested in how flocks and swarms and fields and gardens work, though.

Wes Brodicus, Friday, 18 December 2015 18:29 (ten years ago)

by providing for the existence of a fruitful earth, sun, soil, rain and suchlike, god has already done 99% of the work in providing us our daily bread, wine, weed and what have you. I think we're supposed to take it the last 1% of the way.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 18 December 2015 19:43 (ten years ago)

... like Ikea, you need a few simple tools and there's some assembly required.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 18 December 2015 19:46 (ten years ago)

If I read JC's examples correctly, to the birds that one per cent consists of staying in motion and seizing oppurtunities -- and why not to us? A clear position, in a modern context, on (voluntary) vagrants and other, uh, possibly digital nomads.

BTW,

"Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earthy
Where moth and rust doth corrupt, And where thieves break through and steal:
But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven. Where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt,
And where thieves do not break through nor steaL
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also."

Yes, Christ foretold cloud computing.

Wes Brodicus, Sunday, 20 December 2015 18:32 (ten years ago)

eh. irl, those 'clouds' consist of massive server farms in windowless, featureless, gray buildings covering acre upon acre, attended to by a small handful of lonely technicians who wander up and down the empty aisles rarely seeing one another. hardly anyone's idea of 'heaven'.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 December 2015 18:43 (ten years ago)

We don't know what heaven looks like from the outside.

Wes Brodicus, Sunday, 20 December 2015 18:58 (ten years ago)

according to some, heaven looks like cloud computing. but it is obvious to you and I that such confident assertions are misplaced.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 December 2015 19:13 (ten years ago)

Have you ever trashed your laptop?

JC's late-career attempt at apocalyptic ranting reads like a failed standup routine in this modern translation.

Wes Brodicus, Sunday, 20 December 2015 19:32 (ten years ago)

Not sure what apocalyptic ranting you are attributing to JC, but the Book of Revelations was written by St. John the Divine, who may or may not be the same person as John the Apostle, but who certainly was never the same person as Jesus. But none of this is very germane to The State, so it's probably best if we stop.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 December 2015 19:46 (ten years ago)

The OP wasn't about MTV either, and the ranting (and lots of it) is in Matthew 24, but yeah, ok.

Wes Brodicus, Sunday, 20 December 2015 19:56 (ten years ago)

Checked out Matthew 24 & 25. Not up to Revelations in terms of whores of babylon, satanic goats, sky-riding specters, and overflowing bowls of blood, but a passable first draft.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 December 2015 20:40 (ten years ago)

yall know this but just so that jesus is clear, "the cloud" is what data merchants call their computers so that you will put your data on them, only being boring on this point cuz as digital space continues to be frenziedly enclosed the airy doublespeak is just gonna get prettier and prettier and it's prob easier if we just let the advertisements make the allegations about transcendent post-material freedom rather than going to the trouble ourselves

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 20 December 2015 20:52 (ten years ago)

sry. the lord is my sheeple

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 20 December 2015 20:55 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.