Bonnard vs Vuillard

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Which one is punk and which one is new wave?

Poll Results

OptionVotes
Edouard Vuillard 1
Pierre Bonnard 0


Trϵϵship, Thursday, 17 January 2019 21:18 (six years ago)

for me it might as well be terry + the idiots vs the vapors, not particularly arsed about either tbh.

calzino, Thursday, 17 January 2019 22:38 (six years ago)

Yeah i picked these guys because they were both right there at the forefront of post impressionism but today are kind of footnotes. Something in their work seems more... precious? fanciful?... than gauguin or van gogh and consequently less modern. However, both created some great paintings too.

Trϵϵship, Thursday, 17 January 2019 22:41 (six years ago)

I think they were both just mediocrities really, their work to me is bad impressionism as a stylistic device rather than an experimental form of looking and responding to light and nature - see also Renoir. But ignore me - this be juss my humble opinion.

calzino, Thursday, 17 January 2019 22:54 (six years ago)

bonnard for me. very good cats in his work

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 17 January 2019 23:02 (six years ago)

Oh you’re an anti-renoir dude! So yeah, of course you’d hate these guys. I tend to like the early renoir but agree late renoir isnt great.

Trϵϵship, Thursday, 17 January 2019 23:04 (six years ago)

At least bonnard saw his work as being extremely different from jnpressionism fwiw. He painted from memory, not life.

Trϵϵship, Thursday, 17 January 2019 23:04 (six years ago)

three weeks pass...

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

System, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 00:01 (six years ago)

"At the artist’s last retrospective, the critic David Sylvester told me that if I didn’t get Bonnard, I didn’t get painting."
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/jan/21/pierre-bonnard-the-colour-of-memory-review-tate-modern-london

My life drawing tutor is also crazy about him. He might not be as well known as Cezanne or Monet but he's not a footnote. However I just don't get it.

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/53450a26fc05c357994e73c64b36d03f6f94bb2d/0_81_5243_3145/master/5243.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=b79780be7f1dc715ecf9af415a4ba948

Is she bathing in soup? What's going on with the far edge of the bath? Why is her leg as straight as a ramrod? All this and horrible patchy brushwork.

large bananas pregnant (ledge), Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:04 (six years ago)

David Sylvester clearly doesn't know his arse from his elbow, lol if he thinks Bonnard (who is essentially an amateurist chocolate box picture maker) is one of the great talents of post-impressionism.

calzino, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:19 (six years ago)

calzino is RONG. Both are great but going with Vuillard ftw.

pomenitul, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:29 (six years ago)

I'll fite you + D Sylvester!

calzino, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:30 (six years ago)

Although Bonnard avoided public attention, his work sold well during his life. At the time of his death his reputation had already been eclipsed by subsequent avant-garde developments in the art world; reviewing a retrospective of Bonnard's work in Paris in 1947, Christian Zervos assessed the artist in terms of his relationship to Impressionism, and found him wanting. "In Bonnard's work," he wrote, "Impressionism becomes insipid and falls into decline."[16] In response Henri Matisse wrote "I maintain that Bonnard is a great artist for our time and, naturally, for posterity."[17]

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:31 (six years ago)

very benevolent + generous of Matisse there, but utter bollox!

calzino, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:34 (six years ago)

There is definitely something repellent about many of Bonnard’s canvases but things start to make sense the more I look at them

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:35 (six years ago)

The Nabis weren't impressionists per se so much as they were responding to broader symbolist trends in the arts – and Cézanne. There's a reason they focus so heavily on interior spaces, unlike their plein air predecessors. Relative dearth of light (or blindness as inner sight, much like deafness as inner hearing via Beethoven) in painting is fascinating to me.

pomenitul, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:36 (six years ago)

Bonnard’s paintings are about memory, not vision

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:39 (six years ago)

Or memory as vision or vision as memory, Proust-style.

pomenitul, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:44 (six years ago)

I can understand retreating into your bolt-hole studio and making a style of risk-free picturesque art - that sort of looks like what was cutting edge decades earlier but doesn't involve looking anymore, especially in the context of the Great War and the gathering storms etc, but it's not for me.

calzino, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:47 (six years ago)

The subject matter may not directly foreshadow the Great War, but the breakdown of conventional figuration isn't too far off.

pomenitul, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:51 (six years ago)

An approximate aural analogue would be Ravel's La Valse.

pomenitul, Wednesday, 13 February 2019 09:52 (six years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

System, Thursday, 14 February 2019 00:01 (six years ago)

Bonnard destroyed

jmm, Thursday, 14 February 2019 00:38 (six years ago)

lol that i forgot to vote for bonnard

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 14 February 2019 00:39 (six years ago)

Is she bathing in soup? What's going on with the far edge of the bath? Why is her leg as straight as a ramrod? All this and horrible patchy brushwork.

― large bananas pregnant (ledge)

jabba the hutt has great legs

the scientology of mountains (rushomancy), Thursday, 14 February 2019 01:02 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.