do you judge people by the clothes they wear? and should you?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
similar to the looks question, i guess.

(i have quite a lot of thoughts on this one which i'll hopefully post in a couple of hours time, but i have to run off right now.)

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:12 (twenty-three years ago)

For some people, their clothes are a form of expression. So, in those cases, yes.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, utterly yes. A thousand times yes. It's a far more effective method of judging people than by their looks because, bloody hell, they CHOSE those clothes, didn't they?

My brother used to quote some Oscar Wilde aphorism about "I have never met anyone who did not turn out to be EXACTLY as I thought they were within the first five minutes of meeting them."

OK, maybe this doesn't work if they are wearing a uniform, or indeed the standard suit-type uniform that Office People are dressed in, but indeed, yes it does, because it says a lot about a person who would WANT to put on a uniform.

Hair and shoes are the two things you should judge people by, and you will almost never go wrong.

kate, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:15 (twenty-three years ago)

many seem to want to be judged by what clothing they wear.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:16 (twenty-three years ago)

yes - in as much as if i meet someone who obviously takes a great deal of effort on their image and their clothes then i fairly obviously am going to dislike them intensely. all surface. not good. so many more important things. less thought gone into it = better things on their mind

commonswings, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I would say no. In many cases they may not have the resources to buy the clothes they want or there can be other

I wouldn't judge a person's character based on their looks. I would probably be attracted or unattracted to them on that basis however.

I think it's far worse to judge the character of a person based on the way they dress than to choose sexual partners based on the way they look.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:18 (twenty-three years ago)

yes i think so, its the way people present themselves (those that are not making a conscious decision are also sending out a signal don't forget)

it is like art or music, the sleeves and titles are important, those that dont title may think they are saying "titles are unimportant", what they're actually saying is "titles are so important i'm going to make the statement of not giving one"

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:21 (twenty-three years ago)

''I would say no. In many cases they may not have the resources to buy the clothes they want''

OTM!

and you can't base someone's character on what they dress.

really the only way to know ppl is to get to know them.

''it is like art or music, the sleeves and titles are important, those that dont title may think they are saying "titles are unimportant", what they're actually saying is "titles are so important i'm going to make the statement of not giving one"''

that's just wrong! ppl who don't put titles can also be so not bothered to put one, that's all. titles and artwork are no big deal.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I've given this example before, but for years I wore "inappropriate" and not particularly nice shoes, because I actively avoided wearing any leather. If you didn't know me, you could have made an assumption about a lack of asesthetic sense, without knowing what my real motive was. It's dangerous territory. Today I am wearing leftover non-leather dress shoes, which I wear when it rains. But I have worn them other days lately because my regular leather dress shoes have been hurting my foot and I have not had time to go buy new shoes. You could make a judgment about me based on how I am dressed at this particular moment, but a week from now, I will probably be wearing different shoes.

Oh well, I fucking hate worrying about clothes really, so I guess there's my statement. I try to look good, but I rarely achieve what I'd like in that respect.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I think you should judge people based on their socks.

Ok, judge is a strong word.

I guess rather than judge, I should just say that I seek out people whose clothes draw me in.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

since i cant afford to buy the clothes i would like to wear or used to wear when i was able to do so, i agree it can be a mistake to judge on clothing.
my clothes used to be an expression of 'me'.
now they are the remaining few items that are decent enough to wear out in public without looking like a total beggar, and they definately dont reflect me or my personality. most of my things are stuff i used to wear to work, and they are quite boring, whereas my previous personal style was very different to this.

donna (donna), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Obviously you can judge someone based on their MacDonalds uniform - you'll be pretty likely to be accurate if you reckon they work in macDonalds. After that might not be so good.

The obvious thing is it'll only work under certain circumstances i.e. do it on their appearance out of uniform or based on repeated viewings.

Scruffy people obviously are deeper and have more important things on their mind, like that Charlie Manson chap.

tigerclawskank, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

ppl who don't put titles can also be so not bothered to put one, that's all. titles and artwork are no big deal.

But isn't "can't be bothered" also open to judgment?

Anyway, I suppose people who dress as if they don't want to be judged on their clothing are like people who whisper -- it makes you want to listen, but it also raises the stakes on the personality they present verbally. If you have a riveting personality, then this can be a great thing, but it can also backfire.

felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:48 (twenty-three years ago)

a lot of ppl who don't put titles i think don't really even think abt it.

but also: what if you buy a foreign language rec. it has titles but you can't read it or you can't understand the words. does that make a diff. no, of course not.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

no, and yes

Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:52 (twenty-three years ago)

One problem is that people do not necessarily project what they THINK they are projecting in their choice of clothing.

Similarly, a person's own assumptions about certain clothes are liable to affect how they think about someone wearing them, who might actually have no such agenda.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:53 (twenty-three years ago)

It depends what type of judgement yer making: you may judge me as 'boring' or HEM HEM 'goth' (i wish alas alas ect), but really the only judgement which is feasible is 'doesn't have much money and can't afford a seperate work play wardrobe' (that and 'disaster zone'). People who wd instantly class me as 'boring' in that case, I wd probably class as the same, I'd say it judge, but you know, you get as much as you want to find out from a person, if you only go as far as the clothes then yer missing out...

Anyway, it's going home time, time to pull on the ole sackcloth and ashes...

Sarah (starry), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:01 (twenty-three years ago)

gareth - what about people who try and engineer it so that there look is neutral, ie it informs the least amount of prejudices? taking account of the fact that it is impossible to get a look without a hook (ie its poss. to judge even on any dressing)?

When I can, I'll post 'my friend, on dress' which I adhere to.

david h (david h), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)

basically, i mean - i try this because i think people should be judged on their merits, not on what they wear because they are constrained by the extraneous world in their dress choice so you're imposing a judgement on them based on factors outwith their control but judge them on their intellectual/physical/whatever accomplishments then yr judging them on themselves, and not on what the stupid world forces them to wear. "yes david, but if there was something else, which expressed their inner as clothing then they would just go and make it and wear it, non?" NON!

david h (david h), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:06 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't think you have to 'judge' people by what clothes they wear, but it's obvious to me that you can have an idea about a person's tastes, interests, even their occupation (roughly), from the first glance, just from the clothes they're wearing.

about records, julio, i think artwork and song titles are VERY important, and i don't have much respect for bands or artists who don't give a shit about it. even if i don't understand their language, the same thing as with people's clothes applies to bands' projected image. plenty times i've known that i would enjoy a record without having heard a note, just looking at the cover, the pictures, the font they used for the song titles...

joan vich (joan vich), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:14 (twenty-three years ago)

My high school yearbook quote (Darien, CT., 1985) was Sartre; "Appearances may be evil, but they are everything." I still hold to this.

Sean (Sean), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

money is a lame excuse. if you wanted to express yrself differently you'd bloody well find a way come hell or high water. in any case it's all in the details. you make it sound like ur always in every swanky shop picking out outre looks but then- oh no! you can't afford it! sigh! admit you can't be bothered

bob zemko (bob), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I wouldn't like to be judged solely upon my clothes or my hair or my shoes.

only kidding. I would.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:39 (twenty-three years ago)

"Hair and shoes are the two things you should judge people by, and you will almost never go wrong. "

I haven't thought about or got any new shoes in a year, and those someone gave me, and I started wearing them. I haven't gotten my hair cut in a while either. Maybe you're saying you can see how 'cool' I am by lack of concern for these, right? ;)

As for clothes, I get most of mine from other people (minus white socks, underwear and band T-shirts) and they are all different styles so I'm often wearing really nice preppy clothes, and I'm thinking "people will get the wrong impression of me from these, oh well" and the next day I wear torn up jeans and a leather jacket, and maybe the next day I wear tight pants and a colorful shirt. For some reason people always give me thier old clothes so I just wear them. I cannot remember the last time I've been clothes shopping.

A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:45 (twenty-three years ago)

it is like art or music, the sleeves and titles are important, those that dont title may think they are saying "titles are unimportant", what they're actually saying is "titles are so important i'm going to make the statement of
not giving one"

gareth is vv otm here.

money is a lame excuse. if you wanted to express yrself differently you'd bloody well find a way come hell or high water. in any case it's all in the details. you make it sound like ur always in every swanky shop picking out
outre looks but then- oh no! you can't afford it! sigh! admit you can't be bothered

and this is also true, i think.

i have another lecture now so can't set down my thoughts for a couple more hours, but:what do you think yr clothes say about you?

(haha or indeed what do my clothes say about me (if you've met me)?)

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i dont find money to be a poor excuse at all. in reality when it comes down to either eating, paying the power bill or buying that new top i know what i have to do.
it definately isnt because i cant be bothered.
i only wish!

donna (donna), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Not all forms of expressing yourself through clothes can be done without money--sorry. Unless you expect people to make their own clothes. If we don't have the money, we could bloody well make our own clothes.

Anyway, I'm not even talking about expressing oneself. I'm talking about looking good. I decided a while back that I was more interested in wearing things that I look good in than in making a particular statement through what I wear. (And yes, I realize, that in some sense whether I like it or not anything I wear is going to have some semiotic value, blah blah blah, which I can't control.)

My problem is that I don't know how to iron, which is very limiting.

RS, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:15 (twenty-three years ago)

i dress like a slob but i v v consciously CHOOSE to dress like a slob. also, it's a very affected, sculpted slob look.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)

how can you not know how to iron? hahaha rockist you are a funny human :-)

donna (donna), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)

donna, When I iron, I iron almost as many wrinkles into my clothes as I iron out of them. I really don't understand it. Someone was going to try to teach me but she left town before she had a chance.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I somehow managed not to look too wrinkled by: buying lots of wrinkle free things and being prompt about hanging up my clean laundry.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:41 (twenty-three years ago)

yep true you can do wonders by hanging clothes up the right way, and even folding items under your mattress in a good way can work. unless you have a slat base, then you get funny marks.
how do i know this.........?

donna (donna), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 19:44 (twenty-three years ago)

as promised, my friend on clothing:

"I relate to what you're saying about your personal world being scary a lot better than I relate to a sense of apocalypse. I'm sick of social obligations too. I still feel that even taking an interest in your appearance is oddly hypocritical in some way, although increasingly perhaps I see that as a result of me being a bit puritanical, perhaps seeing physicality as inevitably intruding on our judgment of people, which maybe it doesn't necessarily. Eg. is there much different between appreciating the aesthetics of a record or an outfit? Aren't we all just aesthetes? Of course most people wear nice clothes to feel better about themselves, because we can't escape the idea that better looking=better person. But I'm just saying perhaps not everyone who dresses nicely has this motivation. Or even if they do, they're just striving to be more the sort of person they'd like to be. They're just going about it in a way that seems really misguided to me, because I don't think we deserve any credit for our physical appearance, in the way I seem to think we do for our mental capablilities."

Kinda.

david h (david h), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 20:15 (twenty-three years ago)

That's it, I'm never wearing clothes again.

A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 20:57 (twenty-three years ago)

All the better to judge "you" my dear.

felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

this makes a lot more sense going on toby's comments on the looks thread which i hadnt read till a min ago - and appears i've missed the point ie why is the only valid criteria - by which it is commonly accepted by the intelligent - for judging people: their intelligence/achievements/etc...?

oops

david h (david h), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 22:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Not all forms of expressing yourself through clothes can be done without money--sorry. Unless you expect people to make their own clothes.

that's what i meant, yeah.

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 22:12 (twenty-three years ago)

cf Unless you expect people to make their own clothes.

with:

"yes david, but if there was something else, which expressed their inner as clothing then they would just go and make it and wear it, non?" NON!

david h (david h), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 22:14 (twenty-three years ago)

I see someone wearing a WWII German uniform, I jump to conclusions.

(I write this in, among other things, a Spider-Man t-shirt.)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 7 November 2002 19:10 (twenty-three years ago)

You don't have spiderman pyjamas too do you Martin? That's when you should worry.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 7 November 2002 19:42 (twenty-three years ago)

No, when you don't have Spiderman (or any super hero) pyjamas that's when you worry. What if someone breaks into your house at night, how are you going to scare them away? with plaid?

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 7 November 2002 21:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I think I judge younger people a little more harshly. It's pure jealousy, I'm sure, "clothes always fit ya/life is the pop of a cherry", pooh pooh pee do. I just wish people who can pull off ANY look would be a bit more adventurous.

It's a bit ageist and stupid, I know.

Anyway, I'm almost always thrilled when I see somebody making an effort, whether they look ridiculous or not. Cause I rarely do anymore.

Arthur (Arthur), Thursday, 7 November 2002 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Not wearing pyjamas should hopefully scare any burglars.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 7 November 2002 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Not really, I sometimes draw a general observational conclusion form the clothes someone wears, like he is a comic collector(X-men T-shirt), or she is a goth (dressed in black, and big biker boots). But, that's not judging people, it's a neutral observation as I still know nothing about the individual.

Judging people by the clothes they wear just seems lazy and your assumptions are bound to be shattered.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 7 November 2002 21:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I hope no-one judges me by my holey jumpers. It's more a measure of the local moth population than anything else.

MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 7 November 2002 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)

i do judge people by the clothes they wear and i am sometimes wrong about them. its best to assume that everyones a cock-knocker, that way you can't go wrong.

di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 7 November 2002 22:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I think you should judge people based on their socks.

Dickon to thread...

I would say no. In many cases they may not have the resources to buy the clothes they want or there can be other

This is absolute nonsense. It's perfectly possible, with a bit of time and effort, to dress extremely well on a very tight budget. Today I bought a great tie for 30p. Last week, I got a brilliant shirt for £1.50. You just have to look. Charity shops, markets, car boot sales, jumble sales. There's great stuff out there.

Obviously you can judge someone based on their MacDonalds uniform - you'll be pretty likely to be accurate if you reckon they work in macDonalds. After that might not be so good.

I don't buy this either. Even when someone is wearing a uniform, you can tell a lot by the way they wear it. At school, we had to wear a uniform, but everyone had their own way of wearing it and each way said something about that person. A common form of 'rebellion' was for kids to wear their ties very, very short, or very, very long. Undone top buttons, untucked shirts etc etc, all ways of showing the wearer's individuality (my particular form of rebellion was to always wear my uniform very smartly, to wear crisp white shirts and to polish my shoes everyday - I was rebelling against the rebels)

yes - in as much as if i meet someone who obviously takes a great deal of effort on their image and their clothes then i fairly obviously am going to dislike them intensely. all surface. not good. so many more important things. less thought gone into it = better things on their mind

This is also wrong because less thought gone in to what to wear could also mean someone sat on their arse all day playing solitaire and didn't realise the time and so didn't have much time to get ready.


I think they way I dress says a lot about me. I certainly hope it does.

jamesmichaelward (jamesmichaelward), Friday, 8 November 2002 00:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Am I Cool Or Not?

Momus (Momus), Friday, 8 November 2002 00:11 (twenty-three years ago)

No, because you are not smiling in any of the pictures, (or does that make you cool?)

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 8 November 2002 02:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Sure if you want to spend 16 hours a week in thrift shops, you might be able to piece together a decent outfit. People have other thing to do, however.

Rockist Scientist, Friday, 8 November 2002 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)

i kind of don't like when you can tell that someone is trying to look nice. also if they are trying to have a 'look'

ron (ron), Friday, 8 November 2002 05:26 (twenty-three years ago)

A friend of mine has a strong aversion to men wearing what she refers to as 'carrot pants', which are basically trousers/jeans that are tight at the bottom.
Since she mentioned it I keep finding myself looking at the bottom half of mens legs. I had to have a big of a giggle when I saw an ex the other day and noticed that his jeans were rather 'carrotish'.

Penny Lane (Penny Lane), Friday, 8 November 2002 05:35 (twenty-three years ago)

i talked about these once already i think... a guy at work has these horrid pants which are not only 'carrotish' to the extreme (border on skin tight, and this guy's a rail), but they are two colors of denim. i really don't like to have them within my field of vision.

ron (ron), Friday, 8 November 2002 05:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I always think those Nike ticks are like ticking off sheep.

I get a kick out of white socks. In every sense.

Dickon Edwards (Dickon Edwards), Friday, 8 November 2002 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I dont care how people judge me. Judging me by my clothes is going to give one impression which might be right. Judging me by my writing is going to give another; by my company in the pub a third etc etc. I have enough friends that I can't be doing anything too awful so I'm not arsed really.

I would judge people by their clothes but I can't 'read' clothes - I dont recognise labels, styles, even fabrics. I can kind of recognise really obvious 'style tribes' and I can see when someone is dressing in a way which shouts "I AM A COMPLETE LOONY" but other than that I'm completely fashion-blind.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 8 November 2002 15:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Surely all goth prejudice counts as judging people on their clothes?

Anna (Anna), Friday, 8 November 2002 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)

That's on their make-up Anna.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 8 November 2002 15:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Not the flowing black velvet?

Anna (Anna), Friday, 8 November 2002 15:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah to be a goth hater you have to be able to judge them harshly when they are in mufti.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 8 November 2002 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)

eight years pass...

I'd be judging someone who wore [Removed Illegal Link].

good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 12:51 (fourteen years ago)

ugh sorry, link still works tho

good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 12:53 (fourteen years ago)

these both (? - think there're only two) got taken off sale today apparently

the wrong terry to fuckwit (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 14:19 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.raoul-moat-t-shirt.com/links.html

diouf est le papa du foot galsen merde lè haters (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 16:39 (fourteen years ago)

who is mr street peeper?

Bob Six, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:30 (fourteen years ago)

I noticed this t-shirt earlier today, thought it was o_Offensive and crap:

http://www.coggles.com/product-media/3IYU/350/478/Brooklyn-We-Go-Hard-Mens-Yellow-Homeless-White-T-Shirt-1.jpg

Brooklyn We Go Hard – Yellow Homeless, mens white t-shirt with a faded yellow homeless print, taken in Borough Park, Brooklyn. The short sleeve t-shirt also features a scoop neck and ‘By Ben Hoffman’ signature rear print.

dubplates and monster munch (seandalai), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 23:08 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.