Browserism!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
If you're using Internet Explorer right now, go to www.provocation.net and you'll get a quaint little message.

While I don't have a problem with the webmaster's opinions at all, why is the delivery mechanism sooooo, oh how do I say it,... FUCKING PRETENTIOUS?

(And can someone tell me what the website is, in fact, all about? I'd be embarrassed if it turned out to be a pr0n site, but I'd give pr0n sites FAR more credit than eliminating 95% of their potential market)

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 8 November 2002 22:35 (twenty-three years ago)

If that doesn't work, try this.

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 8 November 2002 22:36 (twenty-three years ago)

DB: The delivery is so awful because the webmaster is a smug, self-righteous prick secure in the knowledge that he is above all of the idiotic plebs who use Microsoft products who might have the audacity to stumble across his site. I think we should send irritating things to his email, like the compile Quake engine. (Alternately, let's sign his webmaster address up to the worst porn sites imaginable.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 8 November 2002 22:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah, if only g0@tse.cx sent love to people's inboxes.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 8 November 2002 22:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Last time I saw a message like that I thought, "oh well, just this once, you bastards," and loaded up Opera and I got exactly the same damn "you Gates-supporting spawn of Satan, FOAD!"-style message. Which I thought was nice. If you're going to be a jerk about people's browsers and deliberately stop them reading their pages then at least bother to check your user agent detection.

(This probably doesn't apply in this case but I can't even be bothered to spend the ten seconds it takes to load Opera or NS to look at the page, let alone download megabytes of new browser to view it, as the webmaster suggests the general public should be gagging to do just because his page might be so interesting.)

Rebecca (reb), Friday, 8 November 2002 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)

well, i am an opera user. the strange thing about this site is that the only content on the page is "this is provocation.net" at the top, and some one paragraph quotation in some scandanavian language. no links, no nothin. that must be one provocative quote!!

the reason i don't use IE very much is because i don't think it works very well, not because of anti-microsoft sentiments. but i tend to harp less on that, and take the PRO-OPERA tack.

UP WITH OPERA

DOWN WITH PANTS

btw, my opera is set to identify is IE, which it does, but build # identifies Opera5. this guy's site showed up for me

ron (ron), Saturday, 9 November 2002 01:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Email sent to this dork:

That was very much not worth loading Mozilla for.

You're an idiot.

Andrew

Andrew (enneff), Saturday, 9 November 2002 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm using IE on a Mac and got a blank page, apart from aforementioned small text.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 9 November 2002 03:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Moi aussi. Perhaps we are excused from using IE by balancing it out with a mac? Darn it, and I really wanted to see what he was saying abt IE!

lyra (lyra), Saturday, 9 November 2002 04:06 (twenty-three years ago)

You were landed on this page because you are using Microsoft Internet Explorer. Nothing wrong with that, really, except that this particular browser is not welcome on this particular server. Webmaster's whim, if you want the easy explanation. The more complex explanation has to do with Microsoft's monopolistic ambitions and the simple measures that people like you and I can take against the arrogant rhino from Redmond.

If the information you were trying to access is worth your trouble, you can install Mozilla, Netscape, Opera, or any other browser and then come back. If, on the other hand, you feel that's too much hassle, then obviously you can live just as happily without the information you were trying to access. In that case, off you go to the next site.

This approach is known as "Microsoft manners" and works very well, as Microsoft itself is proving.

The webmaster.

ron (ron), Saturday, 9 November 2002 04:28 (twenty-three years ago)

vs:

This is provocation.net

Det är det enkla som är det svåra. Den rena avskalade formen, det stringenta
men ändå samtidigt lite mystiska och fantasieggande innehållet. Klar kultstatus.
Efter alla flash-program (som börjar bli jävligt uttjatade och kännas jävligt
billiga vid det här laget) så känns detta som en befrielse.

Thomas Hammar i WebTrend, April 2001

ron (ron), Saturday, 9 November 2002 04:29 (twenty-three years ago)

can anyone identify that language

ron (ron), Saturday, 9 November 2002 04:31 (twenty-three years ago)

I can tell you what it's not: Hungarian, Dutch, German, Finnish.

I got a reply from this dickhead, his name is "Zenon Panoussis":

> That was very much not worth loading Mozilla for.

Whether it's worth it or not, is your own decision and your
own risk. I run a whole bunch of domains under the MSIE block
and I have absolutely no idea which one of them was not to
your taste. In any case, downloading a browser to view my
websites is like paying to enter a newspaper archive or a
porn site: either you do what's required of you and don't
complain or you put a finger in the air and go elsewhere.

> You're an idiot.

Look at the mirror and say that again three times aloud.

Z

Andrew (enneff), Saturday, 9 November 2002 04:39 (twenty-three years ago)

WANKER!

Andrew (enneff), Saturday, 9 November 2002 04:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I hope no 56ker ever spent three hours downloading a new browser for that like the error page told them to.

It's Swedish. Anyone speak it? å + ä + ö => Swedish; Danish and Norwegian have the å but have æ and ø instead of umlauts, though sometimes Danish uses aa for å; Icelandic has fun stuff like þ and ð; Finnish doesn't look like the others and indeed isn't related, it has just ä + ö and likes Ks and As and doubled letters a lot, doesn't like different consonants clustering together, especially not at the start of words, and doesn't like B, C, F or G very much; Estonian looks like Finnish gone wrong.

Rebecca (reb), Saturday, 9 November 2002 05:01 (twenty-three years ago)

It looks like something about deciding what to put on your webpages and how difficult it is but beyond that I don't know. I can sympathise with that, though. My own page is empty and desperately in need of "some mystical and fantastic contents: clear cult status". I'm going to bed now and I hope someone will have translated it by the time I get up again.

(Oops, I was going to get up before noon for reasons I can't even remember. Oh well.)

Rebecca (reb), Saturday, 9 November 2002 05:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Swedish to English:
The is the enkla as is the bad. The purify shelling designs , the stringenta but yet at the same time few mysterious and fantasieggande contained. Clear kultstatus. Behind all bottle - program ( as initiates become jävligt uttjatade and feel jävligt cheaper wide this layer ) so feel this as a exemption.

Norweigan to English:
Facts är facts simple as är facts svåra. It rena shells fitness , facts stringenta but ändå at the same a little mysterious och fantasieggande innehållet. Apparent kultstatus. Efter alla bottle program ( as börjar become jävligt uttjatade och kännas jävligt cheap ample facts här layer ) saw känns this as a emancipation.

Finnish to English:
Det är det enkla som är det svåra. Den rena avskalade formen det ankara men ändå samtidigt lite mystique och fantasieggande innehållet. Klar kultstatus. Efter below flash program som börjar bli jävligt uttjatade och pickled jävligt billiga vid det här laget så pickled detta som en befrielse.

Via Intertrans

Graham (graham), Saturday, 9 November 2002 15:31 (twenty-three years ago)

can i just take this opportunity to say how much i hate netscape?

i heart IE, even if it's supposed to be evil etc. etc.

sand.y, Saturday, 9 November 2002 21:24 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, netscape seemed to suck

ron (ron), Saturday, 9 November 2002 23:33 (twenty-three years ago)

"It's the simple things that are also difficult. A clean and basic design, stringent [?] but together still mysterious and exciting content. Definite cult status. After all the flash programs (which are beginning to seem fucking annoying and tacky by now) this feels like a relief."

I can't find the original WebTrend article online so I don't know if it's talking about something else on the same server/domain or what.

Tack så mycket to the people I annoyed in a Swedish chatroom and an IRC channel. Oh, and also to google, http://dictionaries.travlang.com/SwedishEnglish/ and http://hem.passagen.se/qjocke/dictionary/ for allowing me to get 90% of the words and about 0.3% of the meaning last night, I suppose.

Rebecca (reb), Saturday, 9 November 2002 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)

top marks, rebecca

ron (ron), Saturday, 9 November 2002 23:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I switched to IE exclusively a while back because Netscape was really starting to suck shit; almost every time I tried loading a page it would crash, and any updates to the program just seemed to make it worse and worse and worse. I saw that they had completely redesigned it for v.6 so I downloaded it and gave it the ol' college try, because even though I didn't like what it was doing, I still have very good memories of the browser from the early days (Netscape 3 was perhaps the best browser evah). Well, even though I didn't think it possible, it was even WORSE in terms of stability, and the aesthetics of it was god-fucking-awful...I couldn't figure out what anything did anymore, and I really didn't feel like spending hours figuring out a buggy program when IE seemed to work just fine, and seemed pretty stable.

Of course, the conspiracy theorist in me thinks that it's probably behind-the-scenes stuff that Microsoft was doing to the OS and to other applications (not to mention pages created in FrontPage) that was causing Netscape not to run any more. (I seem to recall the slogan, apparently apocryphal, that M$ was said to use while developing apps and OSes: "the job isn't done until (xxx) won't run".)

I also gave Opera a shot as well and was less than happy with the results despite my optimism; a lot of pages just wouldn't display properly, and parts of the browser were detached from the other parts, and it was just a mess of a user experience. I understand it's gotten better, but IE works just fine, still, usually. Whether that's because of Microsoft trickery or not, it doesn't matter much to me. Those who lock people out because they're using a particular browser for philosophical reasons rather than compatibility reasons really need to ...I was going to say "eat hot death", but that's a bit extreme. Maybe they should just go out and have some fun rather than taking their toxic personality out on the world though petty shit like this.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 10 November 2002 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

i still use netscape 4.77, which doesn't suck or hang or anything => the upgrades are shit
i use opera on osX, but i really don't like osX's general file architecture, plus you can't user word or quark on it yet (also pitas won't accept really big blog updates in opera, for some reason, and doesn't reproduce the colour spec of sparks in stone lanes... basically my blogs look nicer in netscape 4.77 colourwise and fontwise, so i still with that...)
i hate ie

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 10 November 2002 01:14 (twenty-three years ago)

I am not a Microsoft fan to say the least, but on my Mac, IE works the best. iCab: nice try.

Sean (Sean), Sunday, 10 November 2002 01:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Sean C's post matches pretty much exactly my own experience. Before CSS got really popular for doing tricksy positioning that Netscape would collapse into one big illegible heap I loved NS and would defend it in arguments, but no more. Opera has some neat features and pro-Opera people always claim it displays everything just fine so I wish it didn't seem to screw up on some CSS and tables for me and also make a mess of form submission, caching and reloading.

I just wish IE had a "Find next" function with keyboard shortcut like, oo, every other program in the world, especially since the Find box itself often takes a while to pop up for me, and that bookmark navigation wasn't so awkward, and that it trusted me enough to let me see the actual error messages instead of taking a few seconds to bring up a local file which says the same thing regardless of whether it's a timeout or a DNS error.

Rebecca (reb), Sunday, 10 November 2002 01:24 (twenty-three years ago)

It USED to be F3, but now that seems to just bop up the internet search function. Oh well.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 10 November 2002 01:32 (twenty-three years ago)

If you're using Netscape 4.77 you really, really need to upgrade. But don't upgrade to Netscape 7 or whatever, grab Mozilla. It's about as fast as IE, and renders everything pretty much the same.

Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 10 November 2002 01:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I haven't actually tried Mozilla (except briefly on other people's linux boxes two years ago) because I was worried that it would be pretty much just like the abysmal Netscape 6. I take it I'm wrong, then?

Rebecca (reb), Sunday, 10 November 2002 02:02 (twenty-three years ago)

It's genuinely much, much better. Try it out. Netscape 6 was an absolute cockup.

Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 10 November 2002 02:06 (twenty-three years ago)

no doubt that one of the major problems with opera is that people design with IE in mind, and some pages display strangely. this is usually not a functional problem, but it sometimes is. also, some sites which incorporate passwords, cookies, security settings (banks etc.) don't work too well with opera. i used to not be able to open my juno mail pages in opera, and actually you still can't, but they have now allowed you to access mail via yr other mail clients, so now i have all my email accounts set up in opera (peace out outlook express!)

ron (ron), Sunday, 10 November 2002 02:15 (twenty-three years ago)

i just downloaded mozilla: what's the good stuff to look out for?

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 10 November 2002 02:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Aw, I still love outlook express- it's so nice. :-) Definitely the best email client for multiple email accounts.

At work I'm still on netscape 4.7 on linux, because it's really fast. I've tried out Mozilla, but not recently, so maybe it's gotten better recenlty-- but last time I tried it, it was sooooooooo slow that I gave up after a day & uninstalled it.

Mark, look & see if it has the popup window quashing code still- I think that it does.

lyra (lyra), Sunday, 10 November 2002 02:29 (twenty-three years ago)

it's not so much that i dislike outlook, it's just really nice to have one less program in the taskbar. microsoft should make it so that you can minimize outlook and only have an icon in the system tray/ notification area or whatever you call it

ron (ron), Sunday, 10 November 2002 02:37 (twenty-three years ago)

I doubt they'd remove features. (although Microsoft have been known to do it for various reasons)

Mozilla is not slow anymore! Try it.

God, I'm sounding like some sort of zealot. I don't even use it myself.

Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 10 November 2002 02:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I just downloaded mozilla. Let's see what happens!

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 10 November 2002 03:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm using mostly Mozilla now myself. You can block pop-up ads, you can change the look of the browser (admittedly, not vital, but it's fun), everything runs as well as IE, and if you like running several pages at once you can let others load in the background on an extra tab.
Plus, I don't see why everyone is so upset with this person, he is making a perfectly good point about Microsoft. Why send him rude emails?

daria g, Sunday, 10 November 2002 03:46 (twenty-three years ago)

mozilla is the wasp's nipples

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 10 November 2002 03:47 (twenty-three years ago)

it feels a bit "smarter" about things frinstance no "google toolbar" required, as you can type any old thing in the address area and hit "search" to do a google search (tho you must specify this in the prefs)

the nonconformity [insert Black Flag symbol here] of user-interface elements like scrollbars and form fields was jarring to me at first

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 10 November 2002 05:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I use iCab for 98% of my web stuff. It's easily the fastest browser I've seen for Macintosh (non-OS X, anyway). I keep my iCab installation pretty lean (i.e. no plug-ins except Quicktime), so when I want to do anything that uses a lot of plug-ins (like watching a Flash cartoon), or anything that is picky about your choice of browser (like paying credit card bills online), I use IE. Also the CSS support in iCab is still unfinished, which can be a pain in the ass -- hopefully they'll fix that soon. I should probably replace IE with Mozilla, but I get frustrated by the "undefinitiveness" of Mozilla releases, if that makes any sense -- I don't like feeling like I have to update all the time -- and I find it to be a rather buggy program with a somewhat kludgy interface.

One of the nicer features of iCab: you can keep it from passing the "Referer" value in HTTP. This is a boost for privacy, but it also comes in handy for other things. For instance, when that image from somethingawful.com was linked, I saw the intended picture, not the penis picture, because iCab kept them from seeing where my browser was coming from. And when slashdot.org linked to a website recently, and that site temporarily blocked page requests from slashdot.org in order to deal with the "Slashdot effect" (bandwidth/server problems caused by getting 10,000 or more hits in an hour), I was able to get through to the site using iCab.

I've just installed the newest version of Opera on the Win98 machine at the office, and hope to start using it instead of Explorer, but so far, it doesn't really "feel" good enough for me to feel comfortable advocating for it in the office. Maybe I'll try Mozilla there too, though I've heard vague hints that Mozilla can potentially destabilize a Win98 system -- has anyone had any problems along those lines?

Phil (phil), Sunday, 10 November 2002 06:39 (twenty-three years ago)

mozilla is fast on os9, as of this morning anyway

(phil, i never worked out how to use that browser system w.the lion's face: but thanks for trying to help out an old man anyway)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 10 November 2002 12:17 (twenty-three years ago)

i think you can do that on opera too, phil. there is a check box to 'disable referrer logging'?? is that it?

it seems that mozilla and opera function very much the same.

re: searching in opera: there are about 15 or so search windows you can place in your links bar. there are about 35 predefined searches that you can access through the address field. for instance, type "g fremme" to google search "fremme" etc. you can easily define your own searches, for instance i made "gl" for google+i'm feeling lucky and "gs" for google site: and so on. you can do all of this in IE also. probably mozilla??

the one thing i did like about the google toolbar in IE was that your search words automatically appeared in the toolbar for in-page finds, i currently have to type 'f fremme' to find the word on the page

ron (ron), Sunday, 10 November 2002 16:40 (twenty-three years ago)

(phil, i never worked out how to use that browser system w.the lion's face

[insert Kalaupapa/Molokai joke here]

but thanks for trying to help out an old man anyway)

You're welcome -- always glad to help. MacLynx is a bear, and now that you've got your new iMac (right?), Mozilla's probably your best bet. I do like to keep around a copy of WannaBe for those "give-me-text-and-nothing-but-text" moments, though. It's nice for looking at sites in slow-loading tables.

i think you can do that on opera too, phil. there is a check box to 'disable referrer logging'?? is that it?

Sounds right to me!

Another thing I like about iCab -- the HTML checker. It comes in very handy, especially when you're trying to do ADA-compliant websites...

Phil (phil), Sunday, 10 November 2002 17:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Mozilla is far better than IE these days. also you can download Phoenix if you just want the browser - it's just the browser component of Mozilla, and lightning fast.

Opera's good too, but i think Mozilla currently has the edge slightly.

michael (michael), Sunday, 10 November 2002 19:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I use Omniweb all the time at home. I have problems with a few companies' javascript which I have to use Mac IE for, though sometimes that and sometimes even WIndows IE doesn't help.

(Rebecca: You're forgetting to be rubbish again. Keep up)

Graham (graham), Sunday, 10 November 2002 19:45 (twenty-three years ago)

attn: opera users. does your browser keep the ilxor visited links?? mine keeps other links marked as visited but not on this bitch

ron (ron), Monday, 11 November 2002 15:36 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.