which is worse

I disagree

First option is worse because celerity in agreement generally denotes complete adherence to one's rightful views. Exceptions irrelevant.

if someone agrees with me quickly it demonstrates that they were breathlessly awaiting my input as ought be the case, which is gratifying

but yet

if someone goes through everything i said in order to detail exactly how they agree with me that is also satisfactory so

darraghmac you The Riddler!!!

I wonder how well deems would manage his social interactions if he lived in Japan?

we'll find out hey

Not completely enough. But really they’re both fine in practical terms because I can keep the pressure on forever.

xp - safe journey

At work there’s two ways of doing things: my way, or my revised way after I make minor concessions due to your intransigence.

hazelnuts

may have missed an option tbh

someone u hate agreeing with u?

no no ill put a finger on it later havent the time now

something about presuming to respond at all, maybe. once you've been told.

i usually agree with you when i can parse what you're saying, which is almost never

i promise when i meet people over a pint i make perfect sense, perhaps i am an excellent nonverbal communicator idk

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

otm

ilx is like a delicate scientific instrument for measuring such things

may have missed an option tbh

― Catherine, Boner of JP Sweeney & Co (darraghmac), Monday, 27 January 2020 09:50 (one week ago) bookmarkflaglink

someone u hate agreeing with u?

― opden gnash (imago), Monday, 27 January 2020 09:54 (one week ago) bookmarkflaglink

no no ill put a finger on it later havent the time now

― Catherine, Boner of JP Sweeney & Co (darraghmac), Monday, 27 January 2020 10:03 (one week ago) bookmarkflaglink

something about presuming to respond at all, maybe. once you've been told.

― Catherine, Boner of JP Sweeney & Co (darraghmac), Tuesday, 28 January 2020 00:10 (one week ago) bookmarkflaglink

i think.....

"people posting things without confirming with one first"

....might be the option ive missed

one, or one's protectors, perhaps.

- candidates being allowed to run against my candidate

- other people being allowed to vote

^ has potential

- people being able to post on a thread

idk does that last one fit but

depends on the people being allowed to post on a thread but it's pretty awful

people can post whatever wherever they want and i have the right to think their posts are empty and stupid

Same.

the fact this poll ended in a tie is beautiful. everyone should be proud.

I am the most proud since it was my vote in particular that made it a tie

it was a good poll

steaming poll of trite!

- consistently claiming that not supporting your candidate makes other people 'x'-ist against them

^ a real contender, this one

should other people have different opinions?

v relevant and timely, ty sb

so that's settled

- your disagreement with me is because you havent read this link

vs

- your disagreement with me is a moral failing, you disagree with me because you are a Bad Person

I wonder how well deems would manage his social interactions if he lived in Japan?

― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 25 January 2020 21:02 (three months ago) bookmarkflaglink

we'll find out hey

― Catherine, Boner of JP Sweeney & Co (darraghmac), Saturday, 25 January 2020 23:43 (three months ago) bookmarkflaglink

:( we did not find out hey

- your disagreement with me is because you havent read this link

vs

- your disagreement with me is a moral failing, you disagree with me because you are a Bad Person

― BSC Joan Baez (darraghmac), Friday, 6 March 2020 14:08 (nine months ago) bookmarkflaglink

I think that this might actually be ILX 2014 vs ILX 2018- if i think of it

NB im not judging btwn them

Both awful