Post here when you want to shit on someone passive aggressively until they see it and start a fight with you ITT

we're through the looking glass bitches

✓

What are the rules?

Do we need seconds?

1) shit on someone while pretending you had no intent of saying what you said
2) wait for them to show up and fight back
3) ???????
4) Profit

Err, they (no socks allowed).

xp

5) No socks or dogs allowed

6) valid passport needed

could we move this to ILTMI -- unless we aren't talking about literally shitting on someone

passive-aggressive poops

The fightback begins here now!

Is it possible for the aggressive act of shitting on someone to also be passive? Would be a game changer.

there's a touch of relaxation at the crucial moment

But is the unclenching not willed?

Can the subanus speak

i could imagine a scenario where the aggressive shitter is atop the human toilet and they do a form of autoerotic asphyxiation and accidentally die and then evacuate their bowels onto/into the partner -- thus, considering they are deceased when the shit happens, it would be passive, though originally aggressive?

perhaps it is part of a group activity -- some grotesque human centipede type deal

maybe someone could post some relevant images and this thread could be ... re-branded?

Yes but can you pinpoint the exact moment when life and therefore the self-enabling illusion of free will cease for good? I would argue that an undead act of defecation would be neither passive nor aggressive. We might just need another thread for this.

Georges Bataille please post on ilx the revolution is happening

how would it not be passive?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hy8kmNEo1i8

guys

how would it not be passive?

The effect is passive but the cause is not. Schrödinger's newborn defecating ghoul.

Anyway, we're getting sidetracked. Which ILX nemeses are on first?

https://www.historyanswers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/All-About-History-duel.jpg

Is it possible for the aggressive act of shitting on someone to also be passive? Would be a game changer.

― Dr. Teeth and the Women (Old Lunch), Monday, January 27, 2020 1:29 PM (six hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

Ooooooooops. Although they do say "Never trust a fart."

xp - I'm sorry, but this thread is better used for philosophical discussions about scatological matters.

new board description

The effect is passive but the cause is not.

The cause being the natural voiding of the bowels upon death is pretty damn passive ... or is it the fact that it was somewhat self-inflicted? I guess you could compare it to someone being shot accidentally by a ricocheting bullet -- the act of shooting (picking up on yr surrealist reference upthread) is definitely not passive ... but still I wouldn't say it was neither passive nor aggressive, but potentially both.

or is it the fact that it was somewhat self-inflicted?

Whosoever indulges in erotic auto-asphyxiation is in fact remotely inviting the outcome under discussion. Which brings us to the real question: in scatological matters, should we favour compatibilism or non-compatibilism?

Is passivity necessarily defined by an attendant consciousness in a state of repose? By which I mean, can it only be said that an entity has passively defecated when that same entity is also capable of consciously blasting a dook on command?

I believe so, yes, although we must concurrently allow that the aforementioned dook is a special case of standing-reserve (Bestand), as Heidegger would have it. In other words, there is a more or less narrow window of activity wherein Dasein may draw upon its potential for unclenchedness so as to achieve the desired effect, which implies that we must imperatively distinguish between moments of absolute passivity (Dasein, even at its most willing, is physiologically unable to unleash the dook), moments of potential activity (for a time, Dasein may choose to withhold the dook or not) and moments of absolute activity (the dook must be dropped forthwith), which are in fact… indistinguishable from moments of absolute passivity in that the dook consequently takes over and imprints its will upon its purportedly 'human' progenitor, negating the latter's proverbial aptitude for self-willed activity in the process! This of course leads us back to the very paradox that sarahell and yours truly have touched on, each in our own idiom, yet we may also allow that periodic alternation is in fact the crux of the matter.

too much bloviating not enough shittin'

I challenge you to convincingly distinguish between the two.

Can you all hold off on the actual physical fight until the 200,000th thread celebration and physical fight takes place? Only about 30 new threads to go, should be a fun time, and potentially some great fights on the bill

25 threads to go even!

I saw we throw the two newest posters in the arena.

Damn, now there's a solid suggestion. Everyone's gotta prove themselves worthy of ILXdom after all.

newest poster vs oldest poster or gtfo imo

Do we even know who the oldest poster is tho.

It's Ned. And if it's not Ned, it's still Ned.

How are his pugilistic skills faring?

get raggett greased up, stat

HADOUKEN

who's our newest poster tho? and how can we be sure that ned's not gonna be facing off against a dick-pill bot

Saw someone breathing new life into a 'Prouders' dn. Probably a sock though.

In a way, Fred B. will always be the newest poster.

and how can we be sure that ned's not gonna be facing off against a dick-pill bot

A dick-pill bot? On ilx?! Heavens!

Our middlemost poster will oversee the duel.

Dick-pill bots should be allowed imho, look where anthropocentrism has gotten us.

i for one welcome our new dick-pill bot overlords

👀

xp

HADOUUUUUUUUUKEEEEN

Tell me why no flames coming out

I AM DICK-PILL BOT!

I AM DICK-PILL BOT!

https://render.fineartamerica.com/images/rendered/default/wood-print/12.000/6.000/break/images-medium-5/kirk-douglas-and-tony-curtis-in-the-film-spartacus-gabriel-t-toro.jpg

connecticut comptroller dick pillbot

Soundtrack: Bob Dylan - 'Leopard-Dick Pill-Bot Hat'

lol

leopard-dick ... as in the dick is ... spotted? Oi mates! What 'orrible newsie-wewsies!

43: Weyes Blood - “Movies” - 228 points - 8 votes - 1 number 1 vote

This is vile lol. May the cinema die.

― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, January 29, 2020 6:28 AM

You were supposed to post it itt. Every duel has its rules, even on ilxor.com.

fightclub.jpg

can’t believe anyone would think a guy who doesn’t know anything about politics would start to, nor that someone who routinely follows people around threads and then goes off on them deserves any benefit of the doubt. complete and total mystery!

ps everyone who’s going to steam in like “waaaah what about civility” doesn’t seem that interested in it when we’re having to put up with this guy derail yet another thread with completely unrelated grudges!

Just admit you got it wrong, ffs

the system works

👨‍⚕️

Well fuck civility

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8Wi7SYKDvY4/hqdefault.jpg

waiting for the subanus to start speaking rn

any beefs? here the place!

I've heard beef makes you shit more. Is this true?

I once sonned indie rapper Vordul after an AOL beef

omg ur the wite kid???!!!

yup. where is he now lmao

yo Vordul!

GET IN HERE, BOB GUCCIONE

more like Bran “Unwell“

Give it a rest.

If people want to see another poster momentarily silenced, that’s what FP is there for

I’m in favor of fighting fire with fire but I’m not in favor of pass-agg when the board itself provides a straightforward pass-agg button that anybody can use on a whim