Thread where we read through this vote fraud affidavit thing

There's probably no point reading through this thing, but it's the nearest I've been able to get to 'evidence' of voter fraud in the recent US election:

http://greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Complaint-Costantino-FINAL-With-Exhibits.pdf

Seen it posted around as 'evidence'. I've decided to try and read it, but also I can't be bothered, so I've put here to remind me to read it and so any of you lot who feel like having a go can do so

What I'm hoping for is someone who knows more about this than me to confirm my assumption that it is bullshit, cheers

It is bullshit. (It is also 90% "I was in a room with people who weren't white and I cried.")

Even a writer at Glenn Beck's site looked through it all and concluded "Yeah these are people who don't know how this process works."

Isaac Saul has a twitter mega-thread detailing and debunking many of the claims of voter fraud around the country, including those in Detroit. It's super long - over 130 posts - but is interesting

covid: are you bitches finally gonna take me seriously?

america:

yes yes yesyes
yesyes yes yes yes
yes yes yes yes yes
yes yesyes yes yes
yes yesyes yes yes
yes yes yesyes

— Joanie Loves Fauci (@MrErikJackson) November 11, 2020

lol don't know how that happened
here's the thread

6/ There’s a process to ensure an even number of partisan watchers are signed up (like in Detroit) and inside polling places. Election officials don’t (and shouldn’t) allow any old swarm of watchers into their polling place. That would ruin the balance of the watchers.

— Isaac Saul (@Ike_Saul) November 5, 2020

aw, I like the original

haha, another fuck up, here's the first post in the thread

1/ ALRIGHT Y'ALL. ELECTION FRAUD DEBUNKING MEGA THREAD. I’m following claims of fraud and looking into them. I think I’ve solved most now. Nothing is holding up under any scrutiny so far so I’m making a thread to track in one place. Please RT! #ElectionResults2020 #Election2020

— Isaac Saul (@Ike_Saul) November 5, 2020

Like Beckett, this:

22. Both officials indicated that Mr. Larsen could not remain in a position that would
allow him to observe their activities; the officials indicated they were going to get their supervisor
(Exhibit A).
23. When the supervisor arrived, she reiterated that Mr. Larsen was not allowed to stand
behind the official with the supplemental poll book, and he needed to stand in front of the computer
screen. Mr. Larsen told her that was not true, and that he was statutorily allowed to observe the
process, including the poll book (Exhibit A).
24. The supervisor then pivoted to arguing that Mr. Larsen was not six feet away from
the first official. Mr. Larsen told her that he was attempting to remain as far away as he could while
still being able to read the names on the poll book (Exhibit A).
25. The supervisor then stood next to the chair immediately to the left of the first
official and indicated that Mr. Larsen was “not six feet away from” the supervisor and that she
intended to sit in the chair next to the official with the poll book, so he would need to leave (Exhibit
A).