― donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 16 November 2002 11:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Saturday, 16 November 2002 12:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Saturday, 16 November 2002 12:15 (twenty-three years ago)
Hilarious thought, though. So when is someone going to photoshop me onto his album cover and call it I Get Ned or something?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 16 November 2002 14:57 (twenty-three years ago)
I GET NED
― you rang? (mitchlnw), Saturday, 16 November 2002 16:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 16 November 2002 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)
(Tom, for various reasons, I won't be able to do an AWK article at this point. Many apologies)
― donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 16 November 2002 19:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 16 November 2002 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)
heard a segment on npr today with andrew wk talking about his luv for bach.was kinda surprised by his speaking voice, sorta rain man-ish : /
― buzza, Tuesday, 14 July 2009 02:07 (seventeen years ago)
our overlords are the children of professors and like ilk
― kamerad, Tuesday, 14 July 2009 02:39 (seventeen years ago)
I can't parse this thread title
― trayce ongz (The Reverend), Tuesday, 14 July 2009 02:47 (seventeen years ago)
I can, but I would.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 July 2009 02:51 (seventeen years ago)
it is my sincere belief that andrew w.k. is one of the most important creative talents the US has produced in a long time, in as much as his worldview and output are singular and startlingly powerful in their vision and execution.
― ian, Tuesday, 14 July 2009 03:01 (seventeen years ago)
wow, so much can change in six-and-a-half years!!
― some sick fuck with a bow and arrow killing roos and koalas (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 14 July 2009 23:41 (seventeen years ago)
AWK strikes me as a benign L. Ron Hubbard or Chuck Paluhuhunhuiuk or a Tony Robbins minus horse, and I'm in favor of benign-ness. We need more benign people in the world, and anyone should be pleased to get a phone call from such a dude.
But in terms of creative art, Tony Robbins is a far more grotesque and compelling figure, not least because he is a freakish sinister teeth monster.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 00:07 (seventeen years ago)
He pretty good in Hudsucker Proxy and Jacobs Ladder, but I hardly think Robbins that great a force in creative art.
― ambience chaser (S-), Wednesday, 15 July 2009 03:17 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/18/fox-news-guest-makes-real_n_239534.html
― kamerad, Sunday, 19 July 2009 04:47 (seventeen years ago)
love the other guests cackling away while the host finishes the question with a straight face
― easily-led zeppelin (haitch), Sunday, 19 July 2009 05:06 (seventeen years ago)
Red Eye is a good concept for a show (the network anchors kick back and goof around for half-an-hour, the show doesn't air till late) but the host is so intolerable it kills it.
― Cunga, Sunday, 19 July 2009 05:32 (seventeen years ago)