palace of debt

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i opened a water bill for £2900 yesterday.

i have already had to call the bailiffs twice to tell them the person they want has moved (but that was for £50 phone bill)

i think i may have made the wrong decision in moving to this house. (can anyone who knows about legal stuff please email? i need some specific advice)

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 November 2002 11:45 (twenty-three years ago)

It's not your name on the bill though, is it?

alix (alix), Monday, 18 November 2002 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)

no, i'm not associated with the address in any way. but thats not any good if a) the water gets cut off, b) bailiffs take my things away

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 November 2002 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah yes. Ring up the water company and explain. Then run away.

alix (alix), Monday, 18 November 2002 13:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth you rent the property - so water bills are NOT your problem - the person that owns the property pays the Water Bill. You need to contact the owner of your property re: the bill.

It's not your name on the bill though - it simply ain't your problem.

Baliffs cannot touch your property, your name is not the bill.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 18 November 2002 13:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth, every shared house I have ever lived in had the odd person living there who did a runner, maybe not from housemates, but definitely from bills like 'mobile' and 'credit card'. It's not a big deal but it is totally inconsiderate. Nobody there has anything to fear from bailiffs (in my old place once lived two girls who got bank loans and promptly fucked off to Ibiza, cue several visits from men in cheap suits and me opening the door to say 'my, that suit is even cheaper than the last guy's who came looking for those stupid girls.')

Water bill: cutting off your water is only possible after a lengthy legal process.

What you should do is take control of this situation by ringing up the water company, explain that the named person on the bill is no longer a resident of the house, has not been for X time, and you would appreciate their credit department making note of this so nobody's inconvenienced.

However, someone's got to pay for water from now on. You should give them the actual meter reading for the water, put you and one other person's name on the bill, and then it's your responsibility to look after as long as you live there. When you move, you ring up the water company and close the account with a final meter reading and instructions to send the next bill to people living there.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 18 November 2002 13:58 (twenty-three years ago)

the water is in the landlords name, i'd rather keep it that way. dont want to associate my name with the property really.

we also had the electricity bill through, £288, although only £63 is from the last period, which means i'm probably going to end up paying partly for stuff that was there well before i moved in. then theres the landlords supply (£12), for the hall and stairs we share with the other 2 flats. they sent a note saying they'd been round to install a pre-pay meter because it was unpaid, but couldnt get access to the propertly because no one was in. next time, they will force entry and change the locks if necessary!

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 November 2002 14:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Fair enough - they still can't bill you for the water and the landlord should pick up his bills. Still, call the water company and tell them this.

Call London Electricity and explain the situ. with the electricity. Give them a meter reading (it might be at odds with their estimate) and ask for a corrected bill to be sent. This buys time. Your landlord sounds pretty lax but has to be told about both bills. People in the house who were there for the billing period covered by the £288 bill have to pay in proportion and once that's done, close the account. the flat should however agree to start a new electricity account from 1 December.

Key meters are horrible, don't have one.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 18 November 2002 14:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Its Illegal for a water company to cut off supply in Britain, this is probably why the landlord hasn't paid.

I've no idea what the deposit situation is in your flat but no landlord I've ever known gives back deposit without proof that the bills have been paid. So if the landlord still has the deposit, then he should take the cost of the electricity out of this money. However this guy does sound like an unscrupulous guy, you've got to be asking how you got that enormous room for that money. See if you can sort it then consider your position.

Ed (dali), Monday, 18 November 2002 18:50 (twenty-three years ago)

deposit went to the person leaving the room before me. i get my deposit back from whoever moves into my room

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 November 2002 18:51 (twenty-three years ago)

How exactly does anyone run up a water bill of £2900? It's not generally expensive stuff.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 18 November 2002 20:49 (twenty-three years ago)

It's Evian

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 18 November 2002 22:12 (twenty-three years ago)

three months pass...
ok, so, anyway...

got a call from the water company a couple months back. apparently they CAN cut the water off if it is not registered to a name, ie if it is a business property. which ours is, so they needed a name, i gave them the landlords name...(it had gone up to £3300 by this point)

but then yesterday a new bill arrived. now this one was only for £345 and covered the period feb02-dec02, but IT HAD MY FLATMATES NAME ON IT! now, i'm assuming that the water people caught up with the landlord, and he said, ah thats the tenants responsibility, heres her name. that must be how it got on?

so i rang the water board last night, gave a false name, and said "who is this person on the bill? shouldnt it be the landlord on there?" and then asked how my flatmates name got on the bill, and when the last one had been paid. they wouldnt give this information.

so, i thought, ok, lets put the landlords name back on the bill, but they wouldnt have that either, they wanted one of the tenants. i told them that i had never heard of the person they had put on the bill, and gave them the name of one of my other flatmates (except of course i made the name up)

so its still a bit worrying. (i dont officially live at the property, my official address is elsewhere - precisely for this type of situation, so no one can prove i ever lived there). but isnt it a bit worrying that someone can just pop her name on the bill, and that i can do the same?

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 11:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I hope Gareth doesn't mind me hijacking his thread a little here but I'm in a similar situation at the moment so it seems appropriate to mention it here rather than starting a new thread. A few months back I moved into a house with some friends... we actually got the place because the mother of one of my housemates works for the letting agency. This was good because it gave us a good few perks and she's been brilliant at actually helping us get on our feet with the place, but the downside is that the whole arrangement has been pretty unprofessional from start to finish.

Now, because I moved in there just over a month after the other three, my name isn't on any official papers or bills and, I suppose, I don't officially live there. Obviously because I'm using gas and electricity and so forth like the others I don't mind chipping in for a quarter of the bills, that seems only fair.

When it comes to council tax I'm less sure. Essentially, my housemates mum claims to have worked the whole council tax thing out for us - two housemates are exempt from paying due to being full-time students, so its just myself and her son that should, technically, be liable. She claims she has paid my council tax contribution of about £150 for the six-month tenancy period (the fact that when I leave I'll only have been there for five months is neither here nor there), and that I can pay her back over the next couple of months. Then, when the council tax booklet appeared in the house a few days back, the other three names were on it but not mine. Obviously two of them are still exempt, but is there any chance that I'll still be liable? Or there a chance she's charging me for half of her son's council tax bill? It's just that, as I haven't actually signed a contract and don't officially live there, I can't really afford to fork out for a tax bill I don't legally have to pay. Any ideas?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 11:30 (twenty-three years ago)

where do you officially live?

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 11:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay the thing is there is a council tax exemption only if one person is eligable to pay it. If two people (ie yourself and her son) are registered at the property then the property would have to pay the full amount. (How this is then dealt with internally is your business - most places would make the students pay too). Councils are relatively slow on checking this, but if they think it is going on will chase it up.

I think you should pay her, but ask why she didn't ask at the time. You have still saved a fair bit - thirty quid a head isn't bad.

Gareth, the classification of the property must have changed to residential somewhere along the line else it is illegal for people to be living there (and the water rates you have been charged look like commercial ones) - to do this they water company would need the name of the sitting tenant or whoever pays the bill (they prefer sitting tenant actually). The £3400 may not have been paid, if the costs in chasing up a non-traceable person, or a mistake caused that then they will just wipe it out and start fresh.

Items you need to make a successful claim is proof on the amount of time you lived somewhere, proof of who lived their, proof of the inclusivity or non-inclusivity of the contract (do not actually need fully paid up contract for this - a copy of the original advert will do). Small claims courts are always the quickest and easiest way to sort this out after the fact.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 11:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I think you should pay her, but ask why she didn't ask at the time. You have still saved a fair bit - thirty quid a head isn't bad.

Ah... I'm actually being charged £150 just for myself. If it was thirty quid a head I reckon I'd have coughed up without asking any questions. I did wonder why I wasn't being offered a contract to sign though, this might explain things. It's also worth mentioning that in two months time we'll all have moved out of this place, so I am quite happy not to pay it if I don't have to.

(I officially live at my parents house, by the way, where there are no such problems, obviously).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 12:04 (twenty-three years ago)

30 quid a head per month. How much rent are you paying a month (if you don't mind me asking). After all if they are doing you a favour lets not be churlish. If you're never going to see her son again and hate them all then don't bother. Otherwise save the money and buy me a beer on Thursday.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 12:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Heh... this is true - the argument is largely theoretical as she's already done me a big favour by paying it... even if I am paying half his share (which I don't think I am), its only fair if I'd otherwise get off scot-free etc etc.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 12:33 (twenty-three years ago)

So do I get a free scotch?

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 12:36 (twenty-three years ago)

one month passes...
5 separate final notices for unpaid council tax of £900-1000 arrived today. the bailiffs are due in 24 hours. how can there be £8000 of debt for somewhere i have lived 6 months?

gareth (gareth), Monday, 28 April 2003 21:33 (twenty-two years ago)

shouldn't the landlord be the one worrying about this?

Mary (Mary), Monday, 28 April 2003 23:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Unfortunately, whoever is resident in the property has to worry about the large men in cheap suits even if they are not liable. Large men in cheap suits tend to focus the mind.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Have you phoned Islington council? I know this sounds obvious, but it does help (see when my housemates and I all got court summons for unpaid council tax due to computer fuck up. Wankers)

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah G, call the council and tell them that you are all renting from landlord on an 'all bills inclusive' deal and give them name and contact details for the landlord.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 09:27 (twenty-two years ago)

they've got name and contact details, its his name on the bill. thing is, theres no contract, theres nothing, i dont even legally live there, so when i'm gone, nothing to tie me to place, but while there is risk to take.

anyway, i move in with sister now for a while, i cant be bothered with it. i is south of river!

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Join us, Gareth... joiiiiiiiiiin ussssssssss....

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

W00h00! South of the river!

Except we are moving NORTH of the river! Nothing personal Gareth.

(And if you have a car or van can I borrow it?)

Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 09:51 (twenty-two years ago)

i have no car or van. i used taxi this morning, moved most of stuff, still have some clothes and things at old place which will move later, but the valuable stuff is out now

i have moved things, but will probably not move actual body, till actual shit happens, to give sister more room, then i have rent free till end of june, i save money for trip to texas and LA:)

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Gareth in South of the River Shocker. At least you'll be closer to work now.

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

this is not the case!

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Grrr.

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.