orwell

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
do the actions of winston and julia change the world ?

does it matter ?

anthony easton (anthony), Saturday, 23 November 2002 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)

the world is all in winston's head anyway, surely?

thom west (thom w), Saturday, 23 November 2002 20:31 (twenty-three years ago)

By which I mean that even if 1984 is a plausible society (which it may have been in 1948) the way that it is presented to us isn't, really, because external reality mirrors Winston's subconscious almost utterly.

So, uh: For Winston and Julia to be together and in love, even if they make no impact on the world at large, and even if they are eventually brainwashed into hating each other, amounts to a complete defeat of Big Brother - O'Brien tells Winston: "do not imagine history will vindicate you", or somesuch, but since the Party HAS no history - and also wants no progress - the current moment is all that can be said to exist, and so any defeat of the system for one moment IS a major defeat..

so, uh, no to the first, and no to the second, or rather it doesn't matter that they fail to defeat the system but their actions in failing-etc. DO matter, and a lot.


(My 1984 question: is there any link worth noting between real person Emma Goldman and imaginary person Emmanuel Goldstein?)

thom west (thom w), Saturday, 23 November 2002 20:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I've got a copy of '1984' from the library and shall be reading this next.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 23 November 2002 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

if you search for 1984 and/or orwell there's like half a dozen times where mark s sez he hates it without ever actually saying anything else about it.

thom west (thom w), Sunday, 24 November 2002 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)

(haha the line forms over there behind hornbus thom, and stretches for miles)

jones (actual), Sunday, 24 November 2002 18:36 (twenty-three years ago)

1984 is really quite low on my list of books to re-evaluate, thom: however to be honest the only thing i can remember properly is that the tobacco always fell out of the cigarettes

i certainly detested it when i read it

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 24 November 2002 20:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I enjoyed 1984 when I read it (er 7 years ago) but I certainly don't enjoy the bloody cult of 1984, GRRRRRRRRR

DG (D_To_The_G), Sunday, 24 November 2002 20:24 (twenty-three years ago)

well I have read the damn intro so yes, I can see 'the cult' behind it and why ppl wouldn't like it.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 24 November 2002 20:48 (twenty-three years ago)

DG is OTM. It's a very overrated book. I don't think Orwell was a terribly good writer of fiction - though the first sentence can hardly be faulted. As it happens I was just today reading Keith Waterhouse's analysis of it in the context of earlier drafts.

Animal Farm is a better story, but again overrated. I like some of his essays much better.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 24 November 2002 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the essays/letters books because he's always going on about how terrible a hack he is.

I think I'd like 1984 a lot if I'd read it a few years ago. I only finished it last month and any half-baked theorizing above is largely due to having to write about it for A level. I have no idea if I actually like it or not..

Major problem with 1984 is that it is a model of society in which capitalism seems to disappear sometime around about the 1950s (!), which is rather a large flaw in anything held up as relevant today. Also the existence of 1984 gives a certain irritating shorthand for lazy thinking which would probably have horrified Orwell: does saying something is like Big Brother or the Thought Police (Bester's were better, anyway) ever actually shed any light on it?

(anthony in your question is "the world" the one in the book or the one we actually live in?)

thom west (thom w), Sunday, 24 November 2002 22:29 (twenty-three years ago)

the book.

anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 24 November 2002 22:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark, Martin: what do you dislike about 1984? do you think it's poorly written or just unconvincing as a dystopia?

I disliked it when I first read it at 10, liked it a lot more when I reread it as a cynicaldepressive 16-year-old, but also can't remember much aside from the clock striking 13 and room 101. I thought Animal Farm brilliant when I was very young but don't know if it'd stand up.

Brave New World = possibly better?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 25 November 2002 00:15 (twenty-three years ago)

1984 and Animal Farm are both enjoyable reads, but Coming Up For Air is a far better book than either, from what I remember.

Ally C (Ally C), Monday, 25 November 2002 00:22 (twenty-three years ago)

has anybody said this yet? but: dudes, its true, 1984 has already come true in the us of a, what with this new security defense bill...now they can listen in on anything, any conversation, especially, if you're a non-hispanic brown person...did you know that your phone conversations, especially your cell phone conversations are much more apt to be recorded and listened to here in the "land of the free" than in china (too many people!) - just what do you think the NSA's job IS in the first place?

V, Monday, 25 November 2002 12:35 (twenty-three years ago)

This sounds like picking on V, and it sort of is, but can we add a 1984 clause after that one that says the first person to evoke the Nazis loses the argument? It's only a notch less abused as a rhetorical device.

I don't think Orwell wrote good terribly good fiction. Bar the odd well-honed sentence I think his prose was dull or even stiff, and I think he came up with a schematic plot and slotted simple character-shaped things in and hoped they'd pass for people*. I haven't read him in many years, so I have little faith in my opinions here, and there is no point in your taking me at all seriously...

* Obviously this reads better in regard to 1984 than Animal Farm, where nobody expected convincing human beings. This may be why that story works rather more crisply.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 25 November 2002 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Has the backlash been building since it got the Guardian's "best book of the millenium" award?

Anyway, 1984 is absolutely classic. A great novel of ideas, it sets up its world immediately, and it could well be said that it's downhill after the first chapter, but what a chapter.

I think a lot of it has sunk into the fabric of life (hence Big Brother and room 101), but a lot of it, like Brazil, has got more relevant over the last decade. Apart from John Poindexter's Information Awareness Agency, see the current war without end and basically the 90s as the era of Implausible Deniability: "We and you know that what we are saying is lies, but it will go in the history books and you won't say a thing or we'll sue the hell out of you."

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 25 November 2002 14:47 (twenty-three years ago)

V post above is absolutely on-point. No, nobody talks about it or cares pretty much, let's just go on with our lives until our civil liberties are completely eroded away. Anybody who speaks up now seems like a crackpot.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 25 November 2002 15:23 (twenty-three years ago)

well, the extreme overuse of "oh no!! it's 1984!! oh no!!" as a scare-meme has probbly done a fair amount of unintended harm to the battle against such stuff, same as any cliche will

but i haven't read the book for about 30 years so i imagine i don't have a very fair picture of it specifically

mark s (mark s), Monday, 25 November 2002 15:35 (twenty-three years ago)

"1984 has already come true in the us of a"

only if you assume Bill Gates does not exist!

thom west (thom w), Monday, 25 November 2002 15:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I see why people think it (1984) doesn't really work as a novel, but the last section of the book - where WS is now "cured" and waiting for the bullet - filled me with such sadness and dread that I will forgive it anything.

Sam (chirombo), Monday, 25 November 2002 16:00 (twenty-three years ago)

six months pass...
I think it's a great book. Rener bought a copy the other day, and I've been skimming through it. It's just full of top stuff.

it's funny, people are always saying that Orwell can't do characters, yet the people in that book are among the most vivid I've ever come across.

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

thirteen years pass...

https://twitter.com/pixelatedboat/status/823724412729839617

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:26 (nine years ago)

that's from the second part, right? nobody reads that part.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:28 (nine years ago)

Just checked and yes it is but still, its nowhere near an excuse.

Fkn hilarious tho'.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:31 (nine years ago)

idg are people just now reading this book for the first time?

"We've always been at war with Eurasia" has been our motto for decades

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:31 (nine years ago)

They're reading it for the first time not assigned in grade school, which for plenty of people means that yeah, it's their first time actually reading it.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:38 (nine years ago)

idg are people just now reading this book for the first time?

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau)

yes, people are always reading this book for the first time.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:40 (nine years ago)

'Homage to Catalonia' might be more instructive reading (or 'Down and Out,' really).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:42 (nine years ago)

One of the local beer theaters in Portland screened the John Hurt adaption on Inauguration Day

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:50 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.