― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Monday, 25 November 2002 14:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 25 November 2002 14:55 (twenty-three years ago)
I forget to say 'thanks in advance' before. I'm losing my touch.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Monday, 25 November 2002 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mike Hanle y (mike), Monday, 25 November 2002 15:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Monday, 25 November 2002 15:32 (twenty-three years ago)
All depends. I've got a reasonable enough model that has a hard time playing CDs with a thick amount of artwork on the disc itself (say the Manics' Holy Bible, for instance. Why this has never affected any similarly treated DVDs is a mystery. I'm going to be getting a new player anyway to satisfy my 'play anything released anywhere' jones...
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 25 November 2002 15:58 (twenty-three years ago)
That said, it works brilliantly as a CD player - the Resume functionality alone, as well as having Jog/Shuttle controls, being able to programme it on a TV screen, and it appears to be totally shock proof.
― Graham (graham), Monday, 25 November 2002 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)
:-(
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Monday, 25 November 2002 17:38 (twenty-three years ago)
:-O
Should you want to.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Monday, 25 November 2002 17:52 (twenty-three years ago)
And also, since sound is not the only priority on a DVD player - to get the quality of a $500 CD player you would have to pay maybe three times as much.
― , Monday, 25 November 2002 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)
Shouldn't greater sensitivity make it less likely to get stuck, etc, because it was making such a precise reading that any glitches could be chewed up and spat out, making everything sound perfect?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Monday, 25 November 2002 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)
Older machines can't manage CD-Rs at all, but do manage CDs (Graham: Orange Book part II media uses a dye invisible to the 650nm DVD laser wavelength [it's absorbed in both burned and unburned regions] - hence the problem with CD-Rs and the need for a separate beam/optics. CD-RWs [Orange Book III] use an alloy whose reflectivity is much lower than the data layer in CDs or CD-Rs, but which is *not* wavelength-dependent. In order to deal with retrieval of data from double-layer DVDs, even first-gen DVD machines were equipped with the automatic gain control circuitry you now find in the newest CD players, so they generally *can* read CD-RW. Phew!)
While PJM's Panasonic does have 650nm and 780nm lasers, it might not have a dual-focusing system, so it might struggle to read the data layer on a CD (1.2mm into the surface of disc, compared to 0.6mm for DVDs) if there's lots of nasty scratches in the way. There is some disclaimer on the Panasonic website about this model reading CD-R and CD-RW only if the disc is in good nick. I guess it doesn't quite conform to the MultiRead standard, but just makes a vague gesture in that direction. A bit like when people ask me the way to Selhurst Park on a Saturday afternoon.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 25 November 2002 23:42 (twenty-three years ago)
In the meantime, thank you all very much.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 26 November 2002 21:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― babylon's burning (Mooro), Tuesday, 26 November 2002 23:40 (twenty-three years ago)
The reason this stuff is floating round my head is I'm thinking of buying a cheap-ish DVD machine (though maybe not a supermarket dubious-brand special), with a view to maybe trading it in for a DVD-recorder when the formats sort themselves out next year. Any recommendations/warnings welcomed. Leaning towards a (massively reduced) Sony from Richer Sounds at the mo' - do they still buy back your stuff at 50% of the retail price on the Supercare plan? Needs to play DVD-R(Authoring) discs, have digital outputs, do the whole NTSC to 60Hz PAL thing; don't need progressive scan or RGB outs.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 09:49 (twenty-three years ago)
Yes
― Mooro (Mooro), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 10:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 11:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 12:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 12:27 (twenty-three years ago)
Next on ILE:
"I've just bought a new toaster. How likely is it that it will brown the tops of the slices of bread properly? I suppose I could go and try it for myself but I thought it would be easier to ask on the internet."
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 12:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 12:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 12:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 13:05 (twenty-three years ago)
Graham: Coax is OK - will link with MD and HD just fine. Maplins coax-optical (or vice versa) convertor on shopping list also, to save dragging bits of gear around. Curious to see what comes out of the digital output - whether it's true 24/96k PCM or not.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 13:47 (twenty-three years ago)
There is dicking about to be done.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 14:18 (twenty-three years ago)
My amp only ever says PCM 44.1, but the only time it's been set to mix DD to PCM was when I first got it, so I'll hva e another fiddle.
― Graham (graham), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 14:34 (twenty-three years ago)
I guess there are music-only DVD-'video' discs (i.e. *not* DVD-A), which maybe make use of the PCM tracks and don't contain DD or MPEG-2 audio, and these might push hi-res pure PCM out of the digital output. Right now, I can't think of any examples. (Bjork, Autechre?)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 19:16 (twenty-three years ago)
I wouldn't know where to look on the web to find out this kind of thing, I don't even know what I want to know before I find out. I did a quick search for 'Panasonic DVD blah blah problems', which apparently works very well for prospective car buyers, but all I could find were glowing reports.
Mooro, is Babylon's Burning your nickname from the Ruts list?
MP3 ability seems to be quite common, apparently this kind of thing is important to young people these days.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 19:35 (twenty-three years ago)
Just trying to make pun on 'burning' ...
... and obv failing
― no more silly names on this thread (Mooro), Wednesday, 27 November 2002 22:54 (twenty-three years ago)
What about those CD repair kits? They look about like a Ronco/K-Tel Remington Fluff-Away, you stick your scratchoXOR CD in and turn a plaggy handle and hey presto! it comes out as good as new. Or not. I suppose they work on the same principle as T-Cut.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 28 November 2002 08:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Thursday, 28 November 2002 13:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 28 November 2002 13:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 28 November 2002 16:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 28 November 2002 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 28 November 2002 18:20 (twenty-three years ago)
Graham: thanks for clearing that up. The cheap-ish Sony I've been eyeing up saucily is the DVP-NS700, now replaced by the 705, and allegedly 60% off at Richer Sounds. Gawd knows if they'll have any in stock. I'm sure it does everything I want. The 305 I've been using at work and that seems nice enough, but lacks certain pushing-imaginary-specs-up-bridge-of-nose twattery. That I like.
Is the multi-region thing still under-the-counter, don't-say-anything-to-the-wife type shadiness, or do some machines (from the major manufacturers) just come with kosher RCE-busting? I note the multi-region Sony at RS is 40 quid more.
Now begins the rather pathetic quest for DVDs with PCM tracks on them.
(Sorry for the swearing).
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 28 November 2002 21:58 (twenty-three years ago)
Ooh, I found one: the film version of Tommy!
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 29 November 2002 19:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Friday, 29 November 2002 19:15 (twenty-three years ago)
PJM needs to report back on his replacement machine.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 29 November 2002 19:32 (twenty-three years ago)
The new machine coped admirably with the first of the offending CDs (Disc 2 of Nigeria 70) so my hopes were pretty high that the problem had been solved. Sadly, the second CD (Disc 2 of Harlem World - The Sound of the Big Apple Rappin') didn't quite make it. But I tried it on another CD player and it didn't work on that either, although the skipping was of the more traditional variety that we all love so much. So I think we can put it down to being a knackered CD. Good job it's crap anyway. The track that won't work is 'Party People' by Rappermatical 5.
You can always rely on 'Tommy'.
According to the box, Jimi Hendrix's 'Blue Wild Angel' features the option of watching multi-angled shots of the same thing at the same time. It's not all porn, porn, porn.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 29 November 2002 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)