quick pull from the PTA thread because this is something that deserves a bigger discussion
Paul Thomas Anderson: C or D?
― My homies buttthole surfers' record sounds like a f (Western® with Bacon Flavor), Tuesday, 24 March 2026 04:40 (three weeks ago)
Scorsese's Raging Bull would be an interesting one to look at. IIRC Mardik Martin wrote it, then Scorsese (who typically rewrites all of his scripts even though he doesn't always take credit) reworked it with DeNiro, and then Paul Schrader came in and made substantial changes as well. It's also based on a book, so that's another layer that's essentially the foundation before the first draft.
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 05:02 (three weeks ago)
Most famous is Welles and Citizen Kane, and David Fincher's movie makes the same mistake Pauline Karel did in shortchanging Welles's considerable changes even though his rewrites were well-documented. In Kael's defense though, she never saw anything on paper before she made that claim.
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 05:04 (three weeks ago)
*Kael not Karel
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 05:05 (three weeks ago)
Also saw Mulholland Drive this weekend, and Lynch turning a series pilot into the resultant feature film is a brilliant "rewrite" on his part. (The pilot is pretty much intact within the film though, it's really the final stretch beginning somewhere around the "Apartment 17" scene that's newly written material done after the pilot was completed.)
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 05:08 (three weeks ago)
John Milius and Francis Ford Coppola are credited for Apocalypse Now, but arguably the best lines were written for the narration, and those were completely rewritten by Michael Herr. (Coppola was already writing narration inspired by Herr's Dispatches, so it made sense to hire the source when he wasn't getting a satisfactory result.)
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 05:15 (three weeks ago)
Also To Have and Have Not, ostensibly based on an Ernest Hemingway novel - it got a major rewrite from William Faulkner:
Hemingway and Hawks were close friends and, on a fishing trip, Hawks told Hemingway, who was reluctant to go into screenwriting, that he could make a great movie from his worst book, which Hemingway admitted was To Have and Have Not. Jules Furthman wrote the first screenplay, which, like the novel, was set in Cuba. However, later versions changed this to Martinique to avoid violating President Roosevelt's Good Neighbor policy. Hawks's friend William Faulkner was the main contributor to the screenplay, including and following the revisions. Because of the contributions from both Hemingway and Faulkner, it is the only film story on which two winners of the Nobel Prize for Literature worked. Filming began on February 29, 1944, while Faulkner continued to work on the script, and ended on May 10.
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 05:25 (three weeks ago)
Scorsese (who typically rewrites all of his scripts even though he doesn't always take credit)
Even though I think directors rewriting their films-in-progress is different than an outside hand, after watching After Hours a few weeks ago, I learned that Scorcese added his own scene to the screenplay, the one with Griffin Dunne and the bouncer outside Club Berlin. He modeled it on Kafka's parable Before The Law.
― Come On, (Eazy), Tuesday, 24 March 2026 06:12 (three weeks ago)
Aaron Sorkin is another name (along with Tarantino) that's been attached to "The Rock," which supposedly had tons of external input; wiki even claims that Sean Connery brought in his own writers for his dialogue, and they ended up rewriting a lot of the script. "Groundhog Day" is definitely one of the more famous rewrite stories, bouncing back and forth between Danny Rubin, Harold Ramis and the occasional input/interference from Bill Murray. And of course there are movies like "Jaws" that got punched up by a lot of writers. Joss Whedon famously punched up "Speed," but got steamrollered on "Alien 4." There were rumors that William Goldman *and* Robert Towne contributed to "Good Will Hunting," even if Ben and Matt got the Oscar, but I think that's just rumor. Of course there are different kinds of rewrites. There are rewrites that take a plot or premise but start over from scratch, there are screen doctor rewrites on dialogue, there are loose collaborations, there are contractually anonymous contributions and there are antagonistic rewrites that lead to legal action, etc.
I found this fun old New Yorker article about arbitration:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/10/20/credit-grab
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 13:28 (three weeks ago)
A famous one is M*A*S*H which was thoroughly reworked even though Ring Lardner Jr. is the ONLY credited screenwriter. He was very upset by how much Robert Altman et al changed his script, but he ended up winning the film's only Oscar for it.
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 15:56 (three weeks ago)
wiki even claims
“his own writers” were Clement & LaFrenais, who have openly discussed their work on the movie
― uploading this content requires perseveration (sic), Tuesday, 24 March 2026 18:07 (three weeks ago)
There is a great little ebook by Danny Rubin about the writing of Groundhog Day, and (iirc) he was amiably non-defensive about what was his and what wasn't
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 18:15 (three weeks ago)
Supposedly Bob Gordon wrote "Galaxy Quest" based entirely on the log line he was provided summarizing David Howard's spec script, never even reading the original script until the movie was completed.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 18:34 (three weeks ago)
The bonus features on Batman include an interview with Sam Hamm where he goes over a few common complaints comic book fans have given him about the movie, and long story short, they're changes made after he was done working on the film (like Alfred bringing Vicki Vale into the Batcave, something the Tiny Toons cartoon show even poked fun at).
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 18:51 (three weeks ago)
Re: MASH & Ring Lardner Jr. His script was a very straightforward adaptation of the original novel, which got retooled on-set by Altman and the cast via improvs. This was the first time Altman had been able to indulge in what would become his trademark. The vibe of the scenes generally stayed the same; mostly what was changed was dialog, but he also notably dropped both the beginning and ending from the original script, and slightly expanded Sally Kellerman's role to carry through to the end of the film.
― Lithium Just Madison (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 24 March 2026 18:52 (three weeks ago)
"Alien" is credited solely to Dan O'Bannon, but apparently the shooting script was written by David Giler and Walter Hill, who had already done several rewrites of the draft by O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett. I haven't read them, but here are the two different scripts, if anyone wanted to compare:
https://www.avpgalaxy.net/files/scripts/alien-dan-bannon.pdf
https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/alien_shooting.html
My limited understanding is that the O'Bannon/Shusett script is really fleshed out, and the Hill/Giler script is pared down? I glanced at the latter, though, and clearly the dialogue as we know it is a far cry from what is on the page, so someone must have taken another pass at it. Like, check out this familiar scene/exchange. Scene is basically the same, dialogue is a lot less refined.
RIPLEY Ash let it on board. Ash let it grow inside Kane. Ash blew the warning signal.
LAMBERT Why.
RIPLEY Special Order 937.
PARKER What's that.
RIPLEY That's what I want to know.
Ash's head is placed on the table. His eyes flicker into consciousness. RIPLEY What is Special Order 937.
ASH You know I can't tell you that.
RIPLEY Then there's not point in talking to you. Pull the plug.
ASH Special Order 937 in essence asked me to direct the ship to the planet, investigate a life form, possibly hostile and bring it back for observation. With discretion, of course.
RIPLEY Why. Why not tell us.
ASH Would you have gone.
PARKER It wasn't in the contract.
ASH My very point.
RIPLEY They wanted to investigate the Alien. No matter what happened to us.
ASH That's unfair. Actually, you weren't mentioned in the order.
LAMBERT Those bastards.
ASH See it from their point of view. They didn't know what the Alien is.
RIPLEY How do we kill it.
ASH I don't think you can. Not in this ship, given its life support systems. But I might be able to.
RIPLEY How.
ASH I don't know quite yet. I'm not exactly at my best at the moment. If you would reconnect...
RIPLEY No way.
ASH Don't be so hasty. You'll never kill it without my help.
RIPLEY We've had enough of your help.
ASH You've barely got any oxygen left. If you don't go into hypersleep, you'll die with or without the Alien.
RIPLEY Nice try, Ash.
ASH I will do whatever I can to help you. I swear it.
PARKER Pull the plug.
LAMBERT I agree.
ASH You idiots. You still don't realize what you're dealing with. The Alien is a perfect organism. Superbly structured, cunning, quintessentially violent. With your limited capabilities you have no chance against it.
LAMBERT You admire it.
ASH How can one not admire perfection. I will kill it because I am programmed to protect human life as you know.
RIPLEY Even if you have contempt for it.
ASH Even then.
Bitter and angry.
RIPLEY Sorry Ash. I don't buy it.
ASH You egocentric morons. You'll be ripped to shreds, destroyed and...
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 19:15 (three weeks ago)
I found this which goes into a fair amount of detail, rewrites were ongoing even as it was being shot - and after!https://alienseries.wordpress.com/2016/07/27/alien-the-1978-scripts/
― ledge, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 20:30 (three weeks ago)
That's pretty interesting. I imagine that kind of stuff happens with a lot of movies.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 21:25 (three weeks ago)
Again, with Batman, they were rewriting the end up until the last minute, literally. Nicholson was climbing the bell tower and yelled at Burton “why am I climbing the tower? What’s going on?” and Burton replied “we’ll talk about it when you get to the top” because he didn’t have the new pages yet and needed to buy some time.
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 24 March 2026 23:01 (three weeks ago)