― Mac Fleetwood, Friday, 29 November 2002 18:24 (twenty-three years ago)
Considering as ILXOR gets indexed by google regularly - beware !
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Friday, 29 November 2002 18:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mac Fleetwood, Friday, 29 November 2002 18:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Friday, 29 November 2002 18:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 29 November 2002 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― kate, Friday, 29 November 2002 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 29 November 2002 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― kate, Friday, 29 November 2002 21:28 (twenty-three years ago)
Allegedly.
― Al Ewing (Al Ewing), Saturday, 30 November 2002 00:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― artistformerlyknownaspl...y (artistformerlyknownaspl...y), Saturday, 30 November 2002 00:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Saturday, 30 November 2002 01:11 (twenty-three years ago)
AFKAP - salut!
― suzy (suzy), Saturday, 30 November 2002 01:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kerplunk, Saturday, 30 November 2002 09:48 (twenty-three years ago)
If, as I suspect, you are a tabloid reporter, there are about half a dozen people posting on this board - naming no names, of course - who could happily take the full record of your continued harrassment of (insert relevant name here) well over your head to your editor, in a professional capacity. I would never dream of telling you how to do your job, but on reflection I feel your work is done here and any further correspondence might impact badly on your long-term prospects.
(Sorry everybody, I just couldn't allow this to carry on any longer)
― suzy (suzy), Saturday, 30 November 2002 10:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 30 November 2002 12:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― AFKAP, Saturday, 30 November 2002 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― justwondering, Saturday, 30 November 2002 14:51 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm sorry if that sounds unsympathetic, because I'm very much on our friend P's side here (while reserving judgement about the boyf's reform). Whether this annoying troll is the same journalist I have no idea, but that's beside the point: I don't see that P has done anything at all morally wrong (whether P is right about the reform is an issue of accuracy of judgement, not morality), and deserves none of the harassment.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 November 2002 16:21 (twenty-three years ago)
Don't be ridiculous. Firstly there's no proof this poster is a journalist or anyone in particular. The posts are anonymous and, according to Graham, were tracing back to an anonymising service. Secondly tabloid editors sanction far worse activities by their staff than a few mildly insinuating posts on an MB (short for message board - use of this abbreviation is a sign of being net savvy). As N. says, this is yesterday's news (and it was never a story in the first place south of the border so I can't see the News of the World being interested).
― David (David), Saturday, 30 November 2002 17:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― doom-e, Saturday, 30 November 2002 17:17 (twenty-three years ago)
[on a point of order, David, the News of the World has a Scottish edition]
― N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 30 November 2002 17:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 November 2002 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)
Fair enough, I didn't realise that. Nevertheless to run a story on this they'd need something substantially more than a rehash of what the Daily Record have already published, wouldn't they?
― David (David), Saturday, 30 November 2002 17:33 (twenty-three years ago)