AOL Snaps Up IPC!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It was announced officially today, although there's been speculation here for a while. AOL Time Warner, the US media giant, has just acquired IPC Magazines in the biggest trans-Atlantic deal ever seen in the magazine industry.

The BBC reports the story here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1456000/1456467.stm

AOL also announced 1700 job cuts, on top of 2400 cut earlier this year. It also promises a rebranding and cosolidation of its 'web properties'.

So where now for the NME, its editorial policy and its dwindling circulation, in the hands of such ruthless profiteers?

Momus, Tuesday, 21 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That BBC story.

Momus, Tuesday, 21 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Damn, HTML didn't work!

By the way, it'll be interesting to see if this mammoth news story appears on the NME's News page, or if it will be squeezed out by 'Travis Guitarist To Guest On Starsailor B Side'.

Momus, Tuesday, 21 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Let's try this.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 21 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I could go into my rant mode, and bemoan how the antitrust laws aren't being enforced with respect to media conglomerates, how it's bad for democracy to have so much of the media in the hands of so few, blah-blah-blah. I'd just bore everyone and besides, Noam Chomsky and Gore Vidal (among others) have said all that already and said it better than I can.

Dunno how it will effect NME's editorial policy, though I imagine it will get even more slick and saccharine then it's already been. Wouldn't be surprised if it's marketed more heavily in the USA (à la Time Out), hand-in-hand with said slickness and saccharineness.

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Tuesday, 21 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

not only nme, but also uncut - fuck!

Geoff, Tuesday, 21 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bye bye, NME, and good bloody riddance.

DG, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Uncut deserves better. In other bad news, new laws force webcasters to pay higher fees. Goodbye web radio.

Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Observer had an interesting article about this on August 5th, when the deal was already known about but inspired no protests from politicians who scream bloody murder at any intrusion in British life from Brussels.

Momus, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ABC circulation figures were out on Friday with the Enema down 8% to the 70,000 mark. Media undertakers and soothsayers are already getting out the runes and formaldehyde.

suzy, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Anyone willing to take bets that the next issue with Fred Durst planned to be on the cover will never actually come out?

Last twitchings, etc., hopefully ...

Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But is there really no rationale for a rock- pop weekly OF ANY KIND? NME-kind (as invented by Andy Gray in c.1972, I believe, has self-evidently run its course) its ideas taken up and split apart and spread all around modern media. In 1977, say (to bore you all once again) it did something NO ONE ELSE DID, or rather a whole buncha things. Listings, sleb gossip, pop-rock-jazz-disco news reviews and interviews, counterculture'n'alterna-pol discush, tech stuff, vehicle for design and photog innovation, playpen zone for non- mainstream writers... One by one these have been plucked away, or given away: once it become Indie Weekly (w.occasional added whatever), it was ALWAYS doomed, I think. Not becuz indie = intrinsically bad, but becuz indie = too definitionally stable for not to go stale.

IPC/Reed International were rubbish publishers. Frankly AOL are in at the ground floor w. a title they can take anywhere they want. Idiots if they piss away even 70,000 readers. If I were Martian I'd be phoning em NOW: James Brown got where he is today by marching in, rudely pointing out how rubbish the mag on offer was, and announcing in unarguable manner how he had the ideas to change all that.

mark s, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

When did it become the 'indie weekly' though?

DG, Wednesday, 22 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mere days after the announcement of the AOL takeover, IPC has announced closure of a third of its websites, with the loss of 90 jobs. Loaded's site got the plug pulled, but NME's didn't.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/internetnews/story/0,7369,541756,00.html

Momus, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I hope that means NME is going to be 'phased out' and replaced with its own website.

DG, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Blame the kids who want to read about crap. The music press bangs its head forever against the concrete wall of popular taste, maybe they've given up?

dave q, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I see in 'Campaign' magazine that NME is switching to a 'consumer- rather than genre-led approach". What does this mean, media ppl?

dave q, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

chart mag: Freaky Trigger has won

mark s, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The phasing out of NME as a print publication is looking quite likey according to a freelancer I was talking to at the weekend.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hooray! I'm honestly over the moon about that, if it's true. All those years of reading how important they are and how they define people's taste...not important enough, clearly. The decline of the paper is a case study of what happens if you believe your own hype.

DG, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A thought: given Steve Sutherland's abject failure to improve sales of the paper, shouldn't he have been sacked by now?

Richard Tunnicliffe, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Iron law of publishing: he will be promoted

mark s, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Imagine Steve Sutherland replacing Greg Dyke

dave q, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes...brand director is he not? Damn well shouldn't be.

DG, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

five months pass...
Re:Iron law of publishing: he will be promoted

Mark Sinker was right ! Steve Sutherland did get promoted ..in December 2001 ! from Brand Director to Editorial Director

IPC MEDIA ANNOUNCES IGNITE! PUBLISHING RESTRUCTURE

Steve Sutherland is promoted to the new role of editorial director for NME. Steve was previously one of the most successful editors of NME in the nineties, until his promotion to brand director status two years ago. Ben Knowles, editor of the weekly, and Anthony Thornton, BSME award-winning editor of NME.COM, will both answer to Steve on editorial matters. He will be responsible for developing editorial strategy with the editors and assisting them to implement those plans.

DJ Martian, Sunday, 17 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

= Director Of Football. Hah!

NME Must be funnier.

Pete, Monday, 18 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

eleven years pass...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/24/ipc-media-time

Vote in the ILM 70s poll please! (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 25 February 2013 16:09 (thirteen years ago)

for those that cant click links at work


Should IPC Media fear Time's return to small-town values?
The UK's biggest magazine publisher is up for sale – and may find its new US owner is at odds with its metropolitan attitudes

david_hepworth_140x140
David Hepworth
The Guardian, Sunday 24 February 2013
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Media/Pix/pictures/2013/2/22/1361555866408/People-magazine-008.jpg
People power: the US magazine is profitable, but how would its new owners deal with IPC Media?

In the 80s I worked for Emap, which arose from a flat, unfashionable part of the country to take its place at the top table of the British magazine industry. Hence I'm interested in the current plans to take some of New York's most profitable and prestigious magazines from the Time Inc stable in New York and place them with Meredith, a company based in Des Moines, Iowa, a state even flatter and less fashionable than East Anglia.

Thirty years ago Emap introduced a provincial approach to housekeeping that the big metropolitan publishers couldn't bring themselves to match. Industry watchers are now looking at the prospect of Time Inc's most profitable magazines, titles such as People, InStyle and Real Simple, being taken over by the publisher of Ladies' Home Journal and American Baby and run from some Dunder Mifflin-style offices in a flyover state rather than a glittering skyscraper in Manhattan. At a stroke the magazines will be less prestigious and more profitable.

It's a huge shift. Time's culture involved writing and rewriting (often at the expense of personality), lavish photo budgets, dogged fact-checking, heavily populated mastheads and a Chinese wall between editorial and advertising that it liked to describe as "church and state". Time Inc spelled New York. Even though its titles were bought and read in the midwest, the company's people wore their metropolitan, liberal sophistication like a badge of honour. How many of those people relish the idea of new masters in Des Moines?

People, which is what this deal is all about, is the most successful magazine of the past 50 years. I spent a little time there in the mid-90s when it was edited by the shrewd, affable Lanny Jones Jr, who described his job as "reflecting what America is talking about around the dinner table on Saturday night". He said the most successful cover was always "a famous, beautiful woman with a problem".

The Princess of Wales was huge for People, which sold massively at supermarket checkouts and proudly claimed that it was the only mass circulation title in America that never discounted its subscriptions. Most US magazine publishing is smoke and mirrors. People makes proper money.

People still sells 3,600,000 copies a week, but it's in decline. Meredith, which calls itself a "media and marketing company", can be expected to farm the numbers rather than polish up the editorial. It clearly has no interest in Time, Fortune or Sports Illustrated, which will remain with the original owner. Titles such as Entertainment Weekly, which have hung on for decades because they contributed towards the company's eye-watering overhead, may come under uncomfortable scrutiny.

Then there's the small matter of IPC Media in the UK, which became part of the Time empire in 2001. It's difficult to see a heartland publisher such as Meredith concerning itself very much with a faraway country of which it probably knows nothing, even if it happens to include the UK's biggest magazine publisher. If it does, I suppose its interest may extend as far as the big women's titles. It's difficult to imagine it losing much sleep over NME, Country Life or any of the other specialist magazines. Then again, if IPC continues its cost-cutting (it recently announced 150 redundancies) and delivers respectable numbers from its established titles, it may leave the British publisher alone.

If the deal goes through there are two things the IPC management have to worry about in the short term. The first is when Des Moines finds out that there's cheaper office space available in Peterborough. The second is when they get their first copy of Nuts.

• This article was amended on 25 February 2012 to reflect the fact that New Scientist is no longer owned by IPC

Vote in the ILM 70s poll please! (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 25 February 2013 16:16 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.