are you absolutely working/middle class?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i never felt like i fitted neatly into either bracket - and i'm not sure i ever wanted to either because we all know the class system is dubious (e.g. being proud to call yourself working class always seems kinda dumb) - but out of curiosity i'm wondering whether any of you out there actually meet the unofficial criteria for either bracket i.e. you are the perfect example of a working class or middle class person. non-UK peoples could contribute to this basing it on the system/categories/stereotypes evident in their own country too

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

fuck off, i'm classless.

(read: thoroughly posh boho)

kate, Wednesday, 11 December 2002 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

What are the unofficial criteria again?

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Dad's an immigrant who has worked in a factory all of his life, mother works on near minimum wage as a typist, neither have any qualifications.

What do I win?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)

oof, well going by the stereotypes

working class = either you or most people you know are from single-parent families, you live in a terraced house or flat with no front garden, you have a car but its crap, you and/or most of your friends have a drone-type job e.g. factory, shop/store, mundane small office, you read a redtop newspaper, you like watching football and/or soap operas on TV, you eat fry-ups for breakfast regularly and eat junk food 3-5 times a week, you dont have an ISA, you dont know what an IKEA is, you actually phoned up and voted a Big Brother contestant out, your name isnt in the Bible

if you meet MOST of those then i suppose you would be considered working class

middle class = you/your family/most people you know have a holiday home in addition to the semi-detached or fully detached house you live in in suburbia, you have a job that befits the degree you obtained at the university of your choice and you actually have a career, you have a nice car as do your mum AND dad AND silbing(s), IKEA for you is like church (i.e. every Sunday morning), you read a broadsheet newspaper, you like watching football/soap operas on TV but pretend you dont, you eat cous-cous more often than junk food, you have an ISA, your name is in the Bible

if you meet most of those then i guess you'd be considered middle class

i've just (only just?) realised how pointless this thread is but what the hell...why not talk about how your own background/lifestyle is a curious hybrid of the two described above

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not saying, but I do remember playing bottom-grade football in the sixth form at school and the teams being rich vs. poor. It took us half an hour to sort them out.

lol p xx, Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Born working class

Now Middle Class except crap car, prefer junk food to cous cous, don't have an ISA or a holiday home.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

dr c, i read that you get a free peerage with that kind of car!! Dr Lord C of Garage of that Ilk!!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I am not absolutely either then. Definitely erring on the side of middle though.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess I'm middle class, maybe upper middle, whatever.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

i suspect most people here are, but i think it all just goes to highlight (as it was needed) how the original class system in the UK is now so blurred and has been for a while (last 20 years perhaps), so what kind of divides will exist 20 years from now i wonder?

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)

ed and suzy have dragged us down to mere MIDDLE with their unholy ikea fixation!!!

kate, Wednesday, 11 December 2002 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Sometimes I wonder how closely this 'we're all over that 'class' stuff now' notion is related to the 'we're all over that sexism/racism/bigotry thing now' ideas that have been roasted on some other threads.

It feels to me more like the economic/education x-axis may have drifted upwards, but the cultural/accent/connections curve hasn't flattened out that much.
Oxbridge selection procedures to thread? *ducks*

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Dad works as a mechanic off-shore, he left school at fifteen to get an apprenticeship, mum is a housewife. Through hardwork, has managed to get himself a nice bungalow, with two toilets, a large garden etc etc. ie pretty posh compared to a lot of my mates.

I went to school and got general grades at GSCE's at general level (don't know how this translates to other eductational systems). So I'm usually in dead end jobs when I am working, though I have had decent enough jobs. Think footballs boring, but like computer football games. Only enjoy fastfood when I have a hangover, unless chinese takeaway counts.

Feel slightly more middleclass thank working class though. Don't know why. Think it's the posh house thing.

fractal (fractal), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I got yes for my name is in the bible, and I live in the suburbs. But no for all the other middle class things.

And I got one yes for the working class bit, I like watching football and soap operas sometimes.

I guess I have no particular class identity.

No car in family, don't go on holiday often, don't read the papers often, some of my friends have good jobs some of them don't, never eaten cous-cous & couldn't stand a fry-up for breakfast, have a masters degree and don't make the most of it, been to IKEA once, used to live in a terrace house in Acton, now moved out west to the semi-detached suburbs, keep meaning to get an ISA.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)

As I've said before in What Class Are You? , my dad told us we were part of the intelligensia and I'm sticking with that.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)

In the states we apparently have 11 class divides as opposed to the 4 in the U.K., so it's a bit more difficult to place oneself as each category overlaps with others to an extent. Our middle class doesn't necessarily have a holiday house; just a giant monstrosity of a suburban mcmansion on a postage-stamp sized lot 45 minutes outside of the nearest city.

I was raised lower-middle U.S. class (two-car family, one decent-one crap, decent sized house but never big enough for each child to have their own room, vacations were always camping as it was cheap, first year of college paid for) and now am probably same, as I have a working car, nice loft, know what IKEA is, have decent musical toys and a posh computer, and am working on a post-grad degree (although I'm about $60k in the hole for education thus far.) Oh, I also hate junk food and refuse to eat it, and I love sushi.

webcrack (music=crack), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)

On the other hand, I guess my family was somewhat intellectually elite, both parents college grads, Dad took his E.D.D. (Doctorate in Education) while I was still quite young, went on to serve as one of the top Education figures in my state's government and has been adjunct at several universities.

webcrack (music=crack), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't have a car, never go on holiday, parents not working and haven't worked regularly in my lifetime. All that shit. But I still don't seem to actually have any major financial difficulties, which ruins my ability to browbeat my car-owning bourgeoise scum friends. Life is HARD.

Ferg (Ferg), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I've never been to Ikea, and my name doesn't appear in the bible. I won scholarships to my prep and public schools. My parents owned their own home, without ever having had a mortgage. I own my own home. I went to University, but neither of my parents did.

I am not sure where that places me, but I do now have an overwhelming urge to purchase a piece of Swedish flat-pack furniture with a silly name.

C J (C J), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

my name appears in the Bible under KINGS II therefore i rule you all with an iron fist!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

My dad has a masters and went to law school for a while. My mom has a PHD. I have a name from the bible. I like fried up breakfasts, IKEA, cous cous, NEVER eat fast food, car is ok but used (last car died in flames though), eat junk food though... don't know what ISA is?? (Does that mean something about me too?)

I always thought of myself as coming from a poor family but I think that's mostly because my parents divorced and I was raised by my mom and we had to move around lots and lots and live off food stamps, that sort of thing. And I always feel like I could be making more mula considering how much I (continue to) paid (pay) for college. Parents couldn't help me out with that cost at all, which makes me feel working class.

Feel like one day I'll be securely in middle class position. Will own a house. Maybe make babies one day and raise them in middle class environment. Who knows.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)

i am the third generation now on a pension, but I have a wall of books and a cd player in every room. I have never made m ore than 10 thousand dollars in one year.

Queen G (Queeng), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)

student is intellegensia, often mistaken for working class,often poorer.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

OTM!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Growing up: family was working poor economically, middle class culturally. Now: middle class across the board, I guess.

mike a (mike a), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

My life doesn't match any of the criteria stevem mentioned (apart from factory work), but I'm working class.

DavidM (DavidM), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

David - IIRC you come from Worcester, a place of considerable resonance to romantic Tories (and which the Tories held from Labour by 4 votes in 1945, the second most marginal Tory seat in history apart from the 1966 situation detailed in my Peterborough thread). what you say doesn't surprise me, because I've always thought the stereotypical definition of "working class" works off the assumption that working class people only come from a few inner-city and heavy-industrial areas ... the whole Old Labour cultural mythology was founded on an ignorance of the "continuing" rural working classes after the Industrial Revolution which created the Labour Party.

by the old (ie pre-Thatcher and even further pre-Blair) criteria, I am BY DEFINITION neither working nor middle class, in that I come from a strongly Labour-supporting family but I've always lived in the outer suburban south of England. my father is far more culturally proletarian than my mother, but somehow that's never stopped them getting on.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Well I went to public school and Cambridge university, and I am a systems analyst who owns his own house in London, so I am clearly middle class, whether I like it or not. On the other hand, no holiday home or car, and I don't go near IKEA or cous-cous - no one fits the stereotypes all thatwell.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

"Working class" always makes me think of people on minimum wage, slaving hours a day and sending their kids to work and living in houses where there's not enough heating and food. Like, Industrial Revolution conditions, modified a bit by child labor/minimum wage laws, etc. So these descriptions of eating fast food and not having a nice car surprise me.

See, I have far more in common with Stevem's description of working class than middle, BUT I don't have a job so how can I be working class? The middle class description, with having a holiday house and cars for both parents and children, seems more like "rich" to me.

Maria (Maria), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)

well the idea of 'middle class' involves a higher level of affluence than it did, as does working class in fact - i was going to suggest the concept of 'working class' was almost non-existent (as opposed to the underclass which will always be around i guess) - hence the suggestion of a holiday home and more than one car being among the criteria...

but come on! lots of 'working class people' dont have jobs! yes that means the definition is contradictory but its still applicable

also, i DO think my suggestions for criteria just go to prove how nonsensical the classes notion really is, but we do experience the remnants of it in society still

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 23:15 (twenty-two years ago)

The idea of class is completely alien to me.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)

no more jokes about being 'classless' please

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 12 December 2002 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)

So upper middle class I can't see the world any other way -- to my detriment at points.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 December 2002 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)

**dr c, i read that you get a free peerage with that kind of car!! Dr Lord C of Garage of that Ilk!!**

mark, I have not the pleasure of understanding you!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 12 December 2002 08:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Absolutely (upper) middle.

I think Snowy's point is very good.

My rule of thumb is that anyone who goes to University is middle class, regardless of background. Not everyone who doesn't go to University isn't.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 12 December 2002 08:22 (twenty-two years ago)

"warrior", or so they tell me

geeta (geeta), Thursday, 12 December 2002 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I am pentium class.

Not sure about the uni thing, alot of people are very snobbish in the UK about the uni you go to. The whole red brick been around for years thing for instance.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 12 December 2002 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)

My rule of thumb is that anyone who goes to University is middle class,

but, tom, with the huge changes over the last 5-8 years, how reliable is this as an indicator anymore?

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 12 December 2002 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)

That's always been my indicator too, I don't think the recent changes make any difference.

Today's middle classes are (in some ways) the equivalent of the working class in the industrial revolution - long working hrs, no job security etc. At least we have M+S ready meals and DVD players.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 12 December 2002 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)

"My rule of thumb is that anyone who goes to University is middle class, regardless of background."

I don't know. Regardless of background? For me background is perhaps the only true way to define class, I've never been entirely convinced with the notion of changing ones class through economic or lifestyle change.
I didn't go to university, nobody in my family has. But take my elder brother, he grew up in a miniscule flat in a tower block in Cheapside, Birmingham. These days he runs his own [small] business, plays golf, can afford many holidays abroad a year and so on: he now leads a very middle class life. I still maintain, however, that he is working class. The background is indelible, that is the class he was born into and it can't just be erased by earning money (if it can then what is the w/class cut-off point in a person's bank balance?). His children (if/when they come along) will certainly be middle class of course.
And what about middle class kids who 'slum it' and live in squats or caravans in their baggy, bright stripey jumpers or the odd wayward toff who loses everything and ends up in a bedsit in Penge, how come they are never labelled working class because of where they've ended up? They get called drop-outs, but still always middle/upper class drop-outs.
I think it's a very middle-class idea that if one of the lower orders is seen to get ideas above their station or merely drift outside of the rigid parameters set up for them then they can't possibly still be the class they were born into. Is this to do with middle-class guilt or something.
And "I'm classless" = "I'm middle class" surely?

I agree, Robin, about your points re: Worcester (crucial during the '97 election for the battle for 'Middle England'/middle-ground, with New Labour targeting something they called "Worcester Woman" which, as far as I could make out, meant the lower-middle class Tesco shopper and traditionally Tory voting working classes)

DavidM (DavidM), Thursday, 12 December 2002 11:48 (twenty-two years ago)

it wz a complicated joke that i understood yesterday dr c, but today i look at it and think, as happens more often that it ought, "i have no idea what i was talking about"

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 12 December 2002 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think class just analyses down into economic income either, but the extent to which that income is translatable into activities and experiences which can then transform personal perceptions/ideologies/beliefs is why it is a factor: thus by being able to buy into a higher-class lifestyle you might broaden your tastes and conceive of new possibilities in your life, at least to an extent. It's this much more amorphous stuff to do with developed self-image and self-confidence (which overlaps to an extent into 'personality' and education and imagination) that I still find it difficult to discount 'class' as being involved with. As socially aware beings we can develop frameworks of reference which mold/mould our thoughts right from the start in some subtle but lasting ways.

(haha mark I'm not confident I do either - but maybe if I'd been raised upper-middle class I would tend to always think I did, like most of the self-assured what-about-MY-feelings yahs I often hear (because they talk SO very loudly) in certain Edinburgh bars.)

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 12 December 2002 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)

It's different in Ireland, college fees haven't been around for the last few years so university isn't really a good indicator. There are people in my class who'd scream at you if you said they were middle class, but this is more to do with them being real cockfarmers than anything else. Though they probably aren't middle class. I've noticed alot of resentment and anger in seminars and things, I've talked to friends and they say it's similar in their courses too, you get people at college who want to make it clear that they had a massive effort to get there because of their situation and the rest wanting to make it clear they too had to make a massive effort to get there, despite their situation, etc etc.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 12 December 2002 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)

actually I think Tom underlines the outmoded nature of class signifiers by his very existence.

am I right in thinking that Labour had never gained Worcester before 1997? if they failed in 1945 ... well, surely 1966 is the only other possibility? I've always wondered whether the phrase "Worcester Woman" was coined as a nod to Labour having failed to gain it so narrowly in their biggest pre-1997 landslide, to symbolise the desire to go further into Tory heartlands than they'd EVER managed before (hey, we could have had "Peterborough People" as a similar nod to 1966!)

robin carmody (robin carmody), Thursday, 12 December 2002 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Tom E: I am surprised and interested to hear that you're *upper*-m/cl. How do you deduce that?

the pinefox, Thursday, 12 December 2002 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I have no idea which I am. Prob middle.

alix (alix), Thursday, 12 December 2002 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)

culturally he is anything but what he thinks he is, Reynard

robin carmody (robin carmody), Thursday, 12 December 2002 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Background and education, Pinefox. I'd be very interested to hear Robin elaborate though!

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 12 December 2002 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I once asked a friend what cous-cous was and they replied 'cracked wheat' and I understood 'crap to eat' so I think that makes me working class.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 12 December 2002 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm sorry, i can't face more that a quick skim of what's been said above, but i just wanted to chime in with a bit of disapproval for your characterization of working class, stevem. i believe you may have ended up describing some other demographic, 'trailer trash' or 'jerry springer fodder' perhaps. personally i think of working class as being roughly equivalent to blue collar.

your depiction of working class is almost purely negative, which is crap. it sucks to look down on people just because they don't have the education, money, status etc. that you do.

funniest thing about this thread is people touting IKEA as a status symbol!! cheap, mass produced and often (not always) shoddy furnishings - "movin' on up"

ron (ron), Friday, 13 December 2002 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm from abject poverty. My mom's highly educated, but completely insane. She lives on less than $500 US a month from disability (she managed to convince some doctor she has a back problem) in a horribly abused trailer house in the woods.

Although I suppose my current student living is more akin to lower middle class though, what with the computer and my wife's 1999 ford and everything.

Dan I., Friday, 13 December 2002 04:00 (twenty-two years ago)

There should be a seperate category for family w/mental/physical illness! Like 'Outsider Family' and then maybe you could make money with art dealers speculating on you, people could collect you, you could put on shows. I mean, just invite people round. It wouldn't be embarrassing, cause it would be deep and meaningful. And everyone knows the family's just the greatest deep down, eg The Osbournes.

crystal (maryann), Friday, 13 December 2002 05:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i have just moved to a working class area, apparently. according to the 'criteria' i would be called middle class but it isnt something i consider too much unless someone is attempting to put me in a 'slot', which i resent.
class status seems to me to imply judgement of a persons 'worth', and i dislike that.

donna (donna), Friday, 13 December 2002 06:10 (twenty-two years ago)

But cous-cous, actually couscous, isn't cracked wheat, that's Bulgher Wheat. Couscous is actually a derivative of semolina, which is a product of wheat.

Does this make me middle class?

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Like Suzy, I got a full, need-based ride to a private school. It hasn't increased my earning potential, though. I think what it's done, though, is basically ensure some security - at least I'll always have a job. As far as scholarships - my father got some book when I was in college that lists all the scholarships out there. There are so many that go unclaimed, or there were when I was in school - it might be different now. One of the scholarships I got was a $2,000 Lithuanian scholarship...and I'm not Lithuanian - it's just that no Lithuanians applied!

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 13 December 2002 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

public synchronized Class loadClass(String className, boolean resolveIt)
throws ClassNotFoundException {
Class result;
byte classData[];

System.out.println(" >>>>>> Load class : "+className);

/* Check our local cache of classes */
result = (Class)classes.get(className);
if (result != null) {
System.out.println(" >>>>>> returning cached result.");
return result;
}

fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Ron, to be fair to davidm, his depiction of the middle class was as much of a parody.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)

a couple of the elements were jokey, but still the description rang quite positive in comparison to the working man.

ron (ron), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:27 (twenty-two years ago)

It sounded pretty hellish to me.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Erm, kinda skipped lots of posts so apologies if this has been said already but I just wanted to put my tuppence worth in on this one.

I was taught to define class thus:

Working Class = You HAVE to work to live, you have no choice. (Now the argument is that we now have some sub-classes within this, i.e. Lower and Upper working class. Lower Working class being your unemployed, council house inhabiting, living on the breadline type and Upper being those who own their own homes, own holiday homes, are degree educated etc etc)

Middle Class = You have substantial assets and could choose not to work if you so desired.

Upper Class = You have so much money you will never have to so much as wipe your own arse

Not saying I agree, just saying this is the way it was told to me.

I do think that saying you are middle class just coz you are degree educated and own your own home is a touch on the pretentious side though…

smee (smee), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)

stevem, not davem, sorry.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

i am overly sensitive about this because of where i am in life at this point.

ron (ron), Saturday, 14 December 2002 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Smee's definition is ludicrous - it means that loads of well-off professionals like doctors and lawyers count as working class. Almost everyone does in these terms, so the division becomes rather useless. And the separation between middle and upper is pretty pointless.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 14 December 2002 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)

how can they be "well-off" and "have to work to live" martin?

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 14 December 2002 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Seriously? There is a substantial gap between what I understand as "well off" and Smee's "subantial assets so don't need to work". Obviously some doctors/lawyers/whatever will be in the second category, but I don't think most could afford to simply give up working. I have a pal who earns somewhere near £100k - I'd certainly describe him as well off, and certainly middle class, but he couldn't afford to give up work. These are the people Smee wants to call upper working class, and all I am arguing is that coming up with meanings for words that are so distant from what everyone else takes them to mean is defeating the whole point of language.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 14 December 2002 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)

i. smee is just reporting this defn, not defending it
ii. if they have to work to LIVE they are not well-off, i don't think this is light years outside ordinary usage

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 14 December 2002 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

ie he doesn't have to earn 100k in order just to live!!

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 14 December 2002 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

hey ron i think you made a valid point in that the description of 'working class' was perhaps focussing too much on what may be considered negative aspects...the only problem is how to attempt to define criteria looking at positive aspects, and that goes for middle and upper class too. your disapproval almost seems to just boil down to the basic fact that the middle class are literally better off than the working class so obviously thats going to cast them in a more 'positive' light in terms of possessive wealth and cultural preferences...what else could i say? that the working classes wear their hearts on their sleeves more and know how to express love and have fun better? also, i think the other problem is we have a different perception because I assume you are American (due to your 'blue collar' and 'trailer trash' references) and I'm not - the class system seems a lot simpler and even easier to generalise in Britain.

for what its worth if i was to be categorised i would be nothing more than lower-middle class now, and thats only really because i did manage to go to university (and academic progression is a new trend in the family full stop). but i was single-parent from an early age, i did live in a suburban ex council terraced house (and i look forward to renting another one for myself soon!) and my grandparents are all from working class Irish backgrounds. I just find the notion of taking pride in all that silly, tho I am certainly not ashamed of any of it either - acceptance is what I feel, nothing more nothing less, I just want to work to attain a higher quality of living based on what I interpret that to be.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 14 December 2002 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, in which case I'm arguing with the definition Smee is quoting, rather than with Smee. No problem. As for the second point, of course he doesn't need 100k p.a. to live, but there are very few people in the UK who actually do need to work to live - I'm not trying to say that the dole and all that is fulsome, but you can live. Also, that strictness both leaves a huge gap to bridge and is utterly at odds with the upper working class category above, which accommodates my pal pretty well.

I don't suppose there is a precise meaning for "well off", and I suspect common usage is broad enough to take in both our uses of it here. I'd certainly describe someone that way if they are earning way more than the average, rather than saving it for people wealthy enough that they can live well without having to work.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 14 December 2002 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

But cous-cous, actually couscous, isn't cracked wheat, that's Bulgher Wheat. Couscous is actually a derivative of semolina, which is a product of wheat.
Does this make me middle class?

I'd say that knowing this distinction is a middle- or upper-middle class signifier. I own an urban condo but no second home, which according to Stevem's criteria probably means lower-middle class, or middle-working class according to Smee.

Granted, I suspect that both of you are working from a U.K. perspective on class. In the U.S., "middle-class" is so generously defined that it tends to mean "owns his/her primary residence." While Americans tend to speak proudly of working and work ethics, they shy away from the "working class" label -- I think it's perceived as perilously close to the "white trash" label.

j.lu (j.lu), Saturday, 14 December 2002 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Chewshabadoo:
But cous-cous, actually couscous, isn't cracked wheat, that's Bulgher Wheat. Couscous is actually a derivative of semolina, which is a product of wheat.
Does this make me middle class?

j.lu:
I'd say that knowing this distinction is a middle- or upper-middle class signifier.

j.lu I'd qualify that with: it depends how old you are when you know it, and how you find out.

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Sunday, 15 December 2002 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)

class in the UK has always seemed to depend more on the past, unlike the U.S. which appears to use the present as its foundation...both are aware of the term 'new money' though when referring to 'commoners' who suddenly struck it rich somehow (lottery win, business idea becomes unexpected success overnight etc.) and move to a nicer neighbourhood and acquire more possessions etc.

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 15 December 2002 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

There is often some strange disconnect between classes that the other side never has to work, be it because of their inherited fortunes or fat welfare handouts. (Maybe they are all both right and there really is only one poor sap somewhere running the whole contraption like a hamster on a wheel.)

bnw (bnw), Sunday, 15 December 2002 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe it's ned!!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 15 December 2002 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)

ha, clearly its the middle classes that are the glue that holds the western world together

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 15 December 2002 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe it's ned!!

And let me tell you, not only is running on the wheel hard, nibbling on these pieces of wood is a bother.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 15 December 2002 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe it's ned!!

Only if posting on ILx is some secret support of the world economy. But I have heard stranger macroeconomic statements.

j.lu (j.lu), Sunday, 15 December 2002 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Ronan eats batterburgers=no class haha

I am middle class although I've been on the dole for most of the year. Oooh, I'm slumming it lalalalla!

Michael Bourke, Sunday, 15 December 2002 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Only if posting on ILx is some secret support of the world economy.

Every post I make = another million Nikes are sold. Er, somewhere.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 15 December 2002 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)

three weeks pass...
Earlier today I did an interview with about the Archers with an NYTimes Journo. I think this makes me middle class

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

How did that come about?

RickyT (RickyT), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

"As for the second point, of course he doesn't need 100k p.a. to live, but there are very few people in the UK who actually do need to work to live - I'm not trying to say that the dole and all that is fulsome, but you can live"

I'm sorry, but that statement makes my blood boil! I'm so upset I can't even string together coherant argument!!!!

smee (smee), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Through suzy. Lifestyle piece on top UK radio soap, The Archers. as the only regular Archer's listener she knows. Contrasting with US TV soaps (why has Joe Grundy never had an evil twin?)

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I am aggressively upper middle-class. Fuck with my Benz and I'll smoke ya.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)

using language like that makes you automatically underclass of course

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

No, that makes me upper middle-class who is posing like a mug.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Joe Grundy might not, but Shula Archer surely does.

RickyT (RickyT), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I've no idea who taught smee her definition of middle class but it does seem ludicrous. The middle classes are professionals, managers etc. - not people so rich they can draw a comfortable living wage from pre-existent assets. That is the upper class.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...
So, twice in the past month, people have said to me in conversation "Oh, but of course, middle class people like us...". I don't understand the thought process here. What is it with automatically assuming people are middle class, just because... because what? Because I'm not wearing Burberry? Because I can lift my knuckles off the floor? Or because, I have the horrid feeling this is the right answer, because I'm not black or Eastern European.

I dunno, it just seems that now more than ever the Working Class are the one true enemy in Britain, and it's just fucking shit how there's not even the slightest drop of liberal heart blood dripping on us.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 16 June 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

What was supposed to be the uniting factor in the phrase "middle class people like us"?

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 16 June 2006 20:35 (nineteen years ago)

The first time was an Asian girl talking about how she felt uncomfortable in a working class pub, and how "middle class people like us" don't have the same animosity towards other races. The second time it was "Isn't it funny how middle class people like us would know the lyrics to "Gangsta's Paradise"?"

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 16 June 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

haha "Gangsta's Paradise" was a huge hit. She might as well have said isn't it funny that you know the words to "Tubthumping" or "All Star".

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 June 2006 20:46 (nineteen years ago)

"We weren't poor we were po', couldn't afford the o-r"

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 16 June 2006 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

Are these people kind of university or 'post-university' people Dom? Someone posits a further education as automatically conferring middle class status on a person about a third of the way up this thread, an idea which has always done my head in. But at the same time, you get people who clearly quite relish the idea that university might be a chance to move up the greasy pole

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 16 June 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

Messer Passingteeno is clearly working class like I am - you are, dood, i just feel quilty for siding here, but at the shame time i'm aware of the stott stott stapleton of hour tickaway or sump'n.

Shadow of the Waxwing (noodle vague), Friday, 16 June 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)

To re:pizzle. Only the meddle class deny the existence of class.

Shadow of the Waxwing (noodle vague), Friday, 16 June 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

i don't like this thread. it's prob cos i'm on working class money.

michael wells (michael w.), Friday, 16 June 2006 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

Of the two people, the Asian was in her early 30s, whilst the expert on obscure ethnic pop star Coolio was the same age as me.

And, yeah, Noodle V brings truth.

(x-post)

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 16 June 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)

once, recently, it seemed like class boundaries had become blurred

this was a realignment, masquerading as a blurring

class boundaries are as strong as ever,

duff (duff), Friday, 16 June 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.