People who say "Well I'm not Christian, so why should I celebrate Christmas?": Classic or Cockfarmer

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
and attention seeking cockfarmer at that.

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)

tell them it is a feast-day celebrating rampant consumerism, overeating and general self-indulgence complete w. fat elfs

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Exactly. The sentence *should* read "Well I'm not Christian, but Christmas is a bloody good excuse for a piss-up or twenty...."

lol p xx, Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Who was that dreadful man on the Nicky Campbell show this morning (no, not him) who was booming in an annoying voice about how dreadful Christmas was and how 6 year olds all want Gucci and Prada?

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

attention seeking? ha.

surely us celebratory types get more attention when people shower us with gifts, cards, fine foods and booze?

just a thought...

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)

My sister is a primary school teacher and she was putting on some kind of Wizard of Oz adaptation with the kids. Some of the parents wouldn't let their children participate because it celebrates witchcraft. That's mad! The Wicked Witch of the West is clearly evil and is conquered!

I realise this has little to do with the thread.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

but still, you called my attention to shit that i hate, so hats off to you. i will put a curse on those dumb parents with my Nimbus 2000 home computer. right on.

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't celebrate xmas, as I'm not religious in any way. I don't buy/receive presents/cards, I don't put up decorations, I don't go anywhere special on xmas day, none of my friends mind, I don't go shouting about my decision to everyone, I let everyone who DOES celebrate xmas happily continue.

Therefore I am not an attention seeking cockfarmer.

Fuzzy (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

how do you not receive presents? if anyone gives you one do you say "I'm sorry, I don't celebrate christmas. You can keep your presents"?

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I dislike the radio/tv schmaltz about the real meaning of Christmas, it feels more fake and simultaneously more annoying than all the flashy lights or consumer indulgences in the world. Isn't the real meaning that there is no strict real meaning, nor any strict religious connection and people now do what they want and treat Christmas how they want, all the better says me.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean all my friends/relatives are aware that I don't celebrate it and so don't send me any

Fuzzy (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

If the purpose of a universal/national dead-of-winter celebration is to get your ya-yas out, stave off the gloom, and celebrate the enduring resilience of the human spirit, a bunch of solemn advent candle scripture readings aren't really cutting it for this elf

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I just hate giving/receiving presents on that scale


Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

How many friends do you have, Jon? Or is it a big family?

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

But you're getting me a present, right? I me, it's me we're talking about.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course, meant to say "I mean, it's me..." and so on...

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)

My family is pretty substantial. I just don't like the idea of people other than kids receiving much beyond some little thing.

Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I remember the xmas when my dad sat me down and said, "Now, Sarah, you're a grown up now, so the relatives won't be getting you as many presents..." *sigh* But I still had to sit at the kid's table (still do).

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)

DV, I don't celebrate Christmas. My family has ruined it for me by celebrating its religious meaning. I cannot forget its origins as a religious holiday. I don't see why non-believers should be expected to celebrate a religious holiday.

I don't think I'm doing this to draw attention to myself at all. In fact, I would much rather not have to discuss it or explain it to people in conversation. But now that you've got me started thinking about it, I really do rather resent the implication that there's something wrong with not celebrating a holiday that originates in a belief system I would rather see wither away. THEY HAD 15 YEARS TO INDOCTRINATE ME AND THEY FAILED.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 18 December 2002 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Its now time for the feats of strength. Its time for Festivus.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

but it doesn't originate in that belief system: it wz borrowed from another more fattening belief system (="i believe the sun will return in spring but just to make sure let's all eat this enormous pudding") to spice up the dour newbie

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

In the Christmas spirit:
Secret Santas

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah fuckin jews

unknown or illegal user (doorag), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Do we have any religious people here who aren't Christians? I mean, are we condemning Hindus, say, for not celebrating Christmas?

I've said before that I think it needs to be commercialised more, and we could do with expunging that vestigial religious thing completely from it. I don't feel that I'm celebrating the birthday of someone in whom I don't believe and even if there was such a historical figure I'm not having this 'son of god' nonsense and anyway this wasn't when he was born anyway, I'm having time off work and partying and watching loads of TV.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

theres no religion left in it anyway man, not in the uk anyway...its all holly and santa and stuff, you know, the good stuff

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Christmas has nothing to do with Christ. The holiday was started in the late 1700's I beleive (I know it's very young) and was based around the day of harvest. Heck, the character Rudolph was invented by a store!

David Allen, Wednesday, 18 December 2002 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Harvest in late December? And are you saying that Rudolph's role in the Christmas Story is a later addition?

The festival at this time of year is ancient, but it may well be as recent as David suggests that it was named Christmas and deemed Jesus's birthday.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

People who answer that way are classic. People who offer it merely to kill other peoples spirits are cockfarmers.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 20:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I am sick of all these British people who don't celebrate the 4th of July. And the Native Americans not being down with Columbus day. Where do they get off?

bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I've said before that I think it needs to be commercialised more, and we could do with expunging that vestigial religious thing completely from it.

South Park to thread!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)

But Christmas has 'Christ' in it. It is a religious holiday. Non-Christians can celebrate the holiday season calling it Christmas, not celebrating Christ's birth, but they shouldn't say that Christans cannot celebrate Christ's birth, even if it may include some crossover because of there sometimes not being much differentiation between the commerical and religious aspects of Christmas.

A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)

And are you saying that Rudolph's role in the Christmas Story is a later addition?

Martin, in some early manuscripts of the New Testament, there is reference to a sheep named Rodeph with a "glowing visage."

But just like the fur slipper. . .

but it doesn't originate in that belief system: it wz borrowed from another more fattening belief system (="i believe the sun will return in spring but just to make sure let's all eat this enormous pudding") to spice up the dour newbie

mark s, you're right to the extent that you're right. However, solstice was adapted and turned into a celebration of Jesus's birth. I can sing Christmas carols now and claim that I am really singing them to celebrate Winter Solstice, but it's kind of hard to ignore the Christian content in lines like "Second Adam from above, reinstate us in thy love."

I remember saying to my brother one time that I celebrated a paganized verstion of Christmas, when he bothered me about the fact that I celebrated it at all--so fine, I've decided for that, and for many other reason, to opt out of it entirely. I'm not really enough of an old time pagan to really seriously try to re-subvert (?) Christmas back to its winter solstice roots, and even celebrating winter solstice itself feels like a pale imitation of Christmas as I once knew it.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 18 December 2002 22:07 (twenty-two years ago)

On Saturday I'm DJing what is being billed as a winter solstice party. Thee organizers plan on a couple 1) making out 2) "killing" a "lamb" 3) pouring the "blood" onto the roots of an evergreen tree that they will have somehow propped up and secured on-stage, at which time 4) the xmas lights strung on the tree will magically light up - at which point I will play a record! However there is a distinct lack of enormous pudding going on here hmm!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)

enormous pudding is key

i like singing carols: i convinced myself when small and concerned abt such things that it didn't count as lying if i was singing it (this is how i squared being in the choir w.being an atheist)

"in the bleak midwinter" is best, it's like anti-solstice propaganda!!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)

"In the Bleak Mid-Winter!" There was a woman in one of my father's churches who once had a good voice, apparently, but who insisted on singing well past her prime. Anyhow, her rendition of this tune led to countless imitations of her wobbly voice by my brother and I (with my sister guiltily laughing).

Christmas carols are great, but I can't enjoy singing them if I'm around anyone who really believes them.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 18 December 2002 23:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Xmass was never considered an important religious event, and was used in past times as an excuse to have a big drunken winter party. This actually caused Xmass to be banned by the Puritans in American colonial times. So, anyone who carps about the "true" meaning of Xmass is a cockfarmer.

Knowing this, I still don't celebrate Xmass. I hate presents, I hate the commercialism, I hate the cheese. I grew up in Florida where there is no fucking snow or reindeer or mistletoe or even winter, and one day just realized how fucking meanless to me all the traditional Xmass symbols were. So, I have nothing to do with it.

fletrejet, Thursday, 19 December 2002 01:10 (twenty-two years ago)

there should be an English version of this thread and an American one, because it seems to me that the English do Christmas much more around cameraderie etc. whereas over where I come from all we do is fucking talk about Jesus until it sounds like we've just stubbed our toes or something

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Thursday, 19 December 2002 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Jesus is the Reason for the Season. Happy Birthday Jesus!

Ex-Tennis Stars, Thursday, 19 December 2002 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

The hell Christmas was never considered an important religious holiday! Puritans aren't the only Christians. And the Puritans are the cockfarmers if they banned it. Christmas can be fun in a Charles Dickens way for the non-believers. If they hate Christmas and try to ruin it for everyone else, then they can piss off.

One more thing that pisses me off --"Holiday" instead of Christmas.

"Holiday" is for crass materialist motherfuckers.

Hannukah and Kwanzaa rock too. Just not as much as Christmas. They will always take the backseat to Christmas. But how could they even compete in the first place?

Ex-Tennis Star, Thursday, 19 December 2002 03:42 (twenty-two years ago)

"One more thing that pisses me off --'Holiday' instead of Christmas." I totally agree with this.

"Christmas was never considered an important religious holiday"

Right now. It's the second most important just behind Easter.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 19 December 2002 04:51 (twenty-two years ago)

How about this one?
TORONTO, Nov 25 (Reuters) - Christmas is becoming an endangered word in parts of Canada in a rash of politically correct behavior - such as renaming a Christmas tree a "holiday tree" - that even non-Christians dismiss as silly.
Toronto city officials began the flap last week when they called the 50-foot (15.2 meter) tree set up outside City Hall a "holiday tree." That sparked much derision and prompted the city's mayor to set the record straight.
"Our special events staff went too far with their political correctness when they called it a holiday tree," said Mayor Mel Lastman. "They were trying to be inclusive and their hearts were in the right place, but you can't be politically correct all the time."
The mayor plans to introduce a motion in city council this week that will officially put the word Christmas in front of the word tree in all future city documents.
The name change led to complaints from Christians and left many non-Christians wondering what all the fuss was about.

Jane, Thursday, 19 December 2002 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Jane, it's not stupid (to call it a holiday tree). Why should the government be setting up a religious symbol?

I'm a little surprised my sister and her husband continue to celebrate Christmas, since there's not real Biblical warrant for it, but I guess they at least don't think there's any prohibition on such things.

It annoys me when people say it's Easter, not Christmas, that's religiously significant though. You can't have Easter unless you have the incarnation first.

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 19 December 2002 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Hannukah and Kwanzaa rock too. Just not as much as Christmas. They will always take the backseat to Christmas. But how could they even compete in the first place?

They couldn't, precisely because Christmas is first and foremost an opportunity for the conquering Christian hordes to announce to the rest of the world: "We won! You get to celebrate our holiday whether you like it or not! Get used to it, muthafu**az! You gotta say our God's name a million times every December and there ain't nothin' you can do about it! We got the hearts and we got the minds!" At which point they begin an end-zone dance which while not as great as the Superbowl Shuffle is at least better than the already-forgotten Dirty Bird.

J0hn Darni3ll3 (J0hn Darni3ll3), Thursday, 19 December 2002 14:28 (twenty-two years ago)

You gotta say our God's name a million times every December and there ain't nothin' you can do about it!

Every knee shall bow and every tongue confess. . .

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 19 December 2002 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Ach, it's all a load of old baloney. But, come on, right or wrong, a decorated tree at this time of year is a Christmas Tree. It's got nothing to do with Hanukkah or Eid or anything else. Who do we think we are we trying to protect by eliminating the word (and retaining the symbols)? Seems a wee bit condescending to me. Anyway, I'm working on Christmas day as bloody usual, so bah, humbug, bugger the lot of it.

Jane, Thursday, 19 December 2002 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Very funny RS ;)

J0hn Darni3ll3 (J0hn Darni3ll3), Thursday, 19 December 2002 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

A number of things should be remembered about Christmas:

i) it is a pagan festival pretending to be a Chistian one.

ii) I gather that it is inferrable from the Bible that Jesus was not born in December. Specifically because shepherds in that part of the world wouldn't have their sheep out at that time of year.

I do think people who live in countries where most people celebrate christmas are attention-seekers if they choose to reject it. In much the same way that I would be a vadgemonkey if I lived in the United States and demanded the right to go to work on Thanksgiving.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 19 December 2002 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the religious meaning of the Christmas tree is pretty small, anyway. I am no botanist, but I am guessing that these fir trees were not that common in Israel 2000 years ago.

We had a debate at my university about whether we should have a tree: UCL was the third university founded in Britain, in reaction to Oxford and Cambridge refusing to admit Jews. It's been known as "that godless institution" for a very long time, and with pride - and it still offers no religious courses at all.

Actually, the most angry protest against our Christmas tree was from a professor (John Sutherland) whose reasoned basis was "they're spending money on a Christmas tree and the bloody heating in my office doesn't work!", which is (you may have spotted) not a theological reason.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 19 December 2002 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)

the heating will certainly be working when he goes to HELL!!

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 19 December 2002 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I do think people who live in countries where most people celebrate christmas are attention-seekers if they choose to reject it.

I think this is a ridiculous claim. Fuck what most people celebrate. (I am just being true to my non-conformist Protestant heritage.) I have my reasons for not celebrating Christmas, which I think I've already made clear. I don't generally go on about it, but this is the internet where I generally go on about everything.

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 19 December 2002 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)

It annoys me when people say it's Easter, not Christmas, that's religiously significant though. You can't have Easter unless you have the incarnation first.

C'mon Scientist - s'like saying it wasn't E=MC2 wasn't the significant achievement it was Einstein's parents getting laid!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 December 2002 20:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Letty Cottin Pogrebin to thread!

rosemary (rosemary), Thursday, 19 December 2002 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)

So should I tell my Jewish relatives that they are a bunch of attention seeking cockfarmers?

rosemary (rosemary), Thursday, 19 December 2002 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Very sharp guy last night, upon being asked about "holiday" plans: "You can say 'Christmas,' you know. We Jews are aware that Christmas is taking place."

(I actually sort of dislike the conflation of Christmas with nearby holidays like Hanukkah. I mean, Jews happen to have a sort of minor holiday during the same month that involves gift-giving, and suddenly we all pretend that it's just their quaint Jewish "version" of Christmas? There's something deeply patronizing about this.) (As for Kwanzaa: it's a made-up communitarian non-religious holiday that's perfectly cool if you're into it, but it's not as if there are so many people who celebrate it instead of Christmas. On the plus side I think it takes the edge off of the patronizing Hanukkah thing: suddenly it's "happy holidays" like whatever you happen to be into doing this month, even if someone just made it up a couple decades ago cause it seemed cool, I hope you have a nice time at it.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 19 December 2002 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

(I mean, next thing you know they're going to have to slide the whole calendar back and be like "yeah, Simchat Torah is the Jewish Thanksgiving" or "Shavu'ot, it's like the Jewish 4th of July.")

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 19 December 2002 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

In this country, I think there are people who more or less think that diwwali is the Hindu equivalent of bonfire day!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 19 December 2002 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Tracer Hand, achievement isn't the issue. The incarnation means that God lowers Himself to take on human form. You are trivializing the concept of God taking human form when you compare it to an everyday biological process.

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 19 December 2002 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Tracer is guilty of unsound theology.

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 19 December 2002 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Tracer is guilty of unsound theology.

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 19 December 2002 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

If you say it a third time that means he's excommunicated!

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 19 December 2002 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 19 December 2002 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Everyone is forgetting the simple fact that Christmas is nothing more than a holiday stolen by the Christians from the heathen hordes of Europe when they were forcing people to become Christians because stealing the old rituals and then pretending that those rituals REALLY are for JESUS made it easier to convert people! Therefore Christmas is not about Jesus, who wasn't even BORN THEN ANYWAY, DUH, it is about HEATHEN PAGEN GERMANIC HORDES DRINKING AND DECORATING TREES!!!!! Who doesn't want to celebrate that???

I'm not a Christian but I don't really belong to any religion anymore and when I did they didn't have a good heathen pagen ceremonial event so I still "did" Christmas.

PS Easter eggs are also part of this whole stolen tradition. HOWEVER Easter sucks cos pets die on Easter

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 20 December 2002 00:51 (twenty-two years ago)

"The incarnation means that God lowers Himself to take on human form. You are trivializing the concept of God taking human form when you compare it to an everyday biological process."

But that's just the first step to the whole goal of the process which is the death/sacrifice. Everything is trivial compared to this.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 20 December 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago)

CS Lewis makes an interesting proposition from the Christian standpoint which becomes a contemptible proposition depending on how high one's level of antiChristianity is: he argues that the reason Christian stories seem to parallel heathen stories is that the Christian story is the truth lying in wait behind all religions, i.e. that the old saw about all religions having a bit of truth to them is correct: and that that truth, clearly seen, is Christianity

naturally this looks like a lot of after-the-fact gymnastics to me, but there you go

J0hn Darni3ll3 (J0hn Darni3ll3), Friday, 20 December 2002 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

in re Easter vs. Christmas, Easter is clearly the more important holiday from a theological standpoint: you can have an incarnation that ends with the total death of the deity -- what you get then is the triumph of evil/materialism/whatevah. Easter is what makes Christianity, for better or worse.

J0hn Darni3ll3 (J0hn Darni3ll3), Friday, 20 December 2002 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Few Holidays celebrate the anniversery of the exact day things happened. Years aren't even exact things anyways.

Does anyone know why Chistmas is called that, because I don't think the pagen hordes that invented it would give it a name like that.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 20 December 2002 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)

No, the Roman hordes called it that after they stole it! Weren't you paying attention?

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 20 December 2002 01:12 (twenty-two years ago)

"Middle English Cristemas, from Old English Cristes mæsse, Christ's festival" So mass of Christ it is.

Maria (Maria), Friday, 20 December 2002 04:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok, cool, but they put it the same time as the winter festival before, and kinda combined them.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 20 December 2002 07:05 (twenty-two years ago)

(I will be sure to tell everyone at my temple not to fear because Christmas is not about Christians but Germans.)

bnw (bnw), Friday, 20 December 2002 08:14 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.