An Essay on Smoking

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This was written by an acquaintance of mine, who wants to get into freelance journalism. He is asking for people to critique this effort of his.

Be as brutal as you like (he's not a friend). Any comments would be welcome.....

I’ve been smoking for about a decade now. It’s not a very good habit, arguably the worst in my parade of bad character traits. I’d argue that procrastination is worse, as my plans for quitting smoking are always placed in the nebulous realm of tomorrow. Without procrastination, perhaps I’d be forced to find a clever way of lying to myself that didn’t involve the indefinite future. Regardless, there’s little chance for me quitting in the near future as I have so darn little to live for as a nonsmoker.

Smoking, while it does have a myriad of downsides, does do one thing quite well: it makes you damned cool. The very act of apathy towards one’s health and looks is quite admirable; it’s a wholesale condemnation of the very act of existence. Nonsmokers can manage it by not buckling their seatbelts or binge drinking, but smokers can match this behavior and trump it. Smoke flowing from the mouth and nose in a nonchalant gesture of defiance, glowing embers falling lazily to the floor, the smoker leans back wreathed in the cancer causing agents emanating from his very body, barely aware of the toll they’re taking. You can’t get that aura from huffing gas, even if you can reap the harmful benefits.

I’d stolen the occasional cigarette from my father while in high school, furtively smoking in the alley behind our house terrified that someone would come out of one of the service entrance doors and identify me as a minor. Maybe even he’d tell my father. Once I figured out how to inhale, the buzz was incredibly intense. Me staggering around the alleyway, shoulder ramming into walls as I could barely walk from the buzz, dizzy, lightheaded, realizing what all the hype surrounding smoking was about. It was a merry-go-round without the group experience, and best of all, you never had to push. Sadly, the buzz would quickly fade forever and I’m unable to push a merry-go-round for more than 10 minutes straight anymore, let alone gather up enough kids to make it worth my time and not look like a weirdo.

I started smoking seriously when I was 18. The decision to begin smoking was rather simple for me. I was never cool in high school and I decided smoking would be the way to really break the dork ceiling and excel in my coolness. I had a lousy attitude; all I needed were the props. Plus I was too embarrassed to buy a porno mag at the store, and I needed to buy SOMETHING asserting my adulthood. Registering for Selective Service just didn’t have that soul satisfying “oomph” that I desired. So I bought a pack of Marlboro Reds. They were definitely the coolest cigs; I considered Kools briefly but decided their name was ironic.

The cool attitude from smoking did not help that summer in my hometown. Everyone had already created their own perceptions of me, and cool was certainly low on the list, right below “lady killer” and “sports hero”. I weathered a lot of flak for my lifestyle choice, bearing the brunt of lines such as, “I thought you were smarter than that.”

They missed the point entirely. Intelligence wasn’t in question here. Everyone KNEW I was smart, and if they didn’t I set out to prove it, peppering my conversations from quotes I’d memorized in Bartlett’s. I didn’t actually READ any of the material I quoted, but these yokels in Battle Creek rarely knew the difference. And the ones who did were never out at a coffee shop till 2 AM smoking and drinking coffee. They were busy improving themselves. The plan was flawless.

The real point was how cool the smoking made me. The first goal I set out in achieving with smoking was the smoke ring. I can still remember the awe I felt when I saw Eddie Van Halen blow one ring through the other. This was the fastest ticket to cool I could buy . . . smoke rings. In hindsight, it was probably Eddie’s wicked licks and musical talent that got him laid, but I wasn’t getting bogged down in details. Smoke rings, and plenty of ‘em. That was my technique to master for submission into cool school. In a few short months, I was burping out rings with the best of them. Even Eddie would have taken pause, offered me a swig of Jack, and invited me to the after hours party. I was good at this, and all it took was practice! As the summer prior to college drew to an end, I knew one thing was certain – I was going to be the coolest freshman at Michigan State University, living on an Honors Floor in a dorm dedicated to political science majors.

The saddest truth was borne out early in the fall when I discovered I was not the coolest kid in college, or even the coolest on my floor. This is an extremely tough pill to swallow. Sure, I was moving to an Honors floor at a Big Ten school, but that didn’t make me a geek. I was going to be cooler than these folks. Much cooler. Very few of them smoked!

I learned an important fact in the dorm’s smoking lounge. Smoking will not make you cooler if the remaining 18 hours you’re awake are spent inside the computer lab playing text-based video games. You just can’t recover from a geek factor of that magnitude by smoking. You need to shoot heroin for enough cool points to offset this menacing shadow of nerd.

Within 18 months of smoking, my major reason for starting had been blown out of the water by the remainder of my life’s actions. At this point it didn’t matter. I was hooked. Video games and smoking will be what ends my life. Hands hooked like claws from carpal tunnel syndrome, arthritic from the smoking, barely able to get my hand to my neck to suck down another drag through my tracheotomy, playing turn based video games I can use my eyelids to control, that’s how I want to go. Maybe I’ll have a major heart attack in the midst of a game of Starcraft 15.

Smoking has become a different beast since the early golden days. Rarely do I get a buzz, but it is an incredibly relaxing stimulant. I need things to do with my hands in social settings; it’s not an option. Smoking gives me that nice little social crutch. And hey, I can still blow smoke rings! They’re still cool, and I don’t let on about my crippling video game habit in public. I’ve regained coolness simply by hiding that dirty little secret.

Smoking is becoming another dirty little secret these days. I was the only smoker at the party I went to on New Year’s Eve. Some may think, “That’s great, a sign of a healthier America”. I hope they’re eaten alive by fire ants. The only correct response is, “What a lame party!”

Please. Not one smoker but me? Not one angst-ridden atheist contemplating the overbearing problems of sentience and the dislocation of our species as a whole? Not one nihilist fearful of the 1984 to be, offing himself while cigarettes are still unrationed? Not one guy who parties? Or better yet, one girl who parties? Nope. Every 45 minutes I was standing out there alone, without the warmth of fellow smokers’ camaraderie to sustain me. I questioned why I was smoking, and thought about the fact it was the New Year. A time for change. Do I need these things to control my life? Do I need to be cool? Perhaps it was time for a New Year’s Resolution to better health!

Who am I kidding? I’m going to be the coolest fucking guy in the cancer ward.

C J (C J), Friday, 3 January 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)

The writing is fine, but the theme is tired, boring, played-out pseudo-decadence. You know what else feels totally great and makes you feel incredibly cool? Heroin. Listen, I love to smoke, but I don't kid myself: "the coolest guy in the cancer ward" is a guy dying a horrible, ugly, premature death, occasionally visited by loved ones who resent that he was more concerned with how cool he seemed to himself than with how painful it would be for them to have to witness his slow self-inflicted death.

Lemme guess what's next: "Vegetarianism? But meat tastes so good!"

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Friday, 3 January 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

ie the writing is fine but what it's actually saying is hackneyed bullshit? Someone needs to read "Politics and the English Language" methinks...

chris sallis, Friday, 3 January 2003 23:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Mr Sallis, you are a patronising git and I claim my five pounds.

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 3 January 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I was going to be cooler than these folks. Much cooler. Very few of them smoked!

'Very few of them smoked!' needs two exclamation points instead of one.

Very few of them smoked!!

Lemme guess what's next: "Vegetarianism? But meat tastes so good!"

Or what about 'The adrenalin rush I got as I guided my SUV off the asphalt into the forest contained a few trace elements of guilt -- but, holy god, it felt great to wheelspin through those saplings!'

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree with Darn13lle and Sallis that the writing style is very good in form. It's plain and grammatical. It is exactly the style of prose of essays I read in magazines.

However, the theme of the essay doesn't fully take advantage of the intimacy afforded by the plain style of writing. The descriptions of events from the writer's personal life felt authentic. The others didn't.

felicity (felicity), Saturday, 4 January 2003 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)

There's no incentive to read it. It need to set up some reason why it's interesting or different, or just have some decent gags, or soemthing.

Graham (graham), Saturday, 4 January 2003 01:00 (twenty-two years ago)

pretty good, but a little clunky. for example:

It’s not a very good habit, arguably the worst in my parade of bad character traits. I’d argue that procrastination is worse, as my plans for...

the close proximity of worst & worse bugs, as does two instances of argue. and the second sentence is undermining the first

ron (ron), Saturday, 4 January 2003 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Really rambles. It's not interesting enough, or witty for that matter, to make the reader want to read on.

However it is well-written in terms of structure and vocabulary.

David Allen, Saturday, 4 January 2003 02:06 (twenty-two years ago)

ron, instead of saying something "bugs," I think you should say it "earwigs." (Note: this is specific to ron.)

felicity (felicity), Saturday, 4 January 2003 02:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I only read 2 or 3 random sentences, but I agree with all the comments.

Aaron A., Saturday, 4 January 2003 02:58 (twenty-two years ago)

am i earwiggin ya? i don't mean to earwig ya!

ron (ron), Saturday, 4 January 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, but I like when people just say, "It bugs." But don't worry, ron, you don't earwig.

felicity (felicity), Saturday, 4 January 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Points for mentioning Eddie VH tho!

dave q, Saturday, 4 January 2003 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Re essay tho, whole thing seems a bit too reasonable and amiable to be a worthwhile read. Here's mine: "I hate people. Consequently when people attempt to prolong their own lifespans I think they're being selfish, stupid assholes. Who the fuck needs more pensioners? Besides, I have no plans to be the coolest guy in the cancer ward because I intend to do the decent thing and OD on something before it gets that far, or drop some acid and drive off a bridge maybe. Hopefully the coming war will desensitize people to how trivial and ephemeral life is and we can all come back to our senses and hustle ourselves out of here business-like instead of hanging on to life like spurned stalkers." (That said, I promise to quit once I'm back in 'the world', as Nam vets would've put it)

dave q, Saturday, 4 January 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I think you're all being far too nice. First, as a commissioning editor I wouldn't even greenlight this from someone who is a famous smoking writer in NYC (and if I had, I'd be the worst kind of boring weekend newspaper hack leisuresector editor and it would have been in the can a month ago). And another editorial requirement means it would have to be about one of his vices ONLY and be much, much funnier and exponentially more grotesque. I'd want to read about lung cookies with blood flecks which taste like those blobs of Knorr's cream of chicken soup mix which you find in the bottom of a mug if you don't stir enough. I'd like my reader to squirm, really, and this just doesn't cut it. So SPIKE SPIKE SPIKE.

Oh and an aside: who hates SUVs more, Nick or Ed? FITE!

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Suzy is right, I think. Your friend particularly needs to learn that you need to grab a reader in your first paragraph (or better still, sentence), and shouldn't rely on a good sub writing a strong standfirst for you. This has a boring, mundane first paragraph (with gauche moments as highlighted by Ron), ending on a whiney note. No good at all.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I read the "parade of bad character traits" and my gut reaction was ugh and then I read the quote John Darnielle extracted without looking at the rest and felt vindicated. Guy seems more interested in painting the picture he wants to rather than whatever the truth might be.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Thank you to everyone who has responded so far - I will convey the gist of your comments to him. I think it is a bland piece of writing too - he is actually a pretty funny guy who does a lot of stand-up comedy gigs, so I know he is capable of much better work than this. Perhaps he should not be trying so hard to be 'serious', and write more in the style he is used to.

Thanks again, everyone.

C J (C J), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Stand-ups writing articles is a dud in 99.5 per cent of cases. Even if the comic in question is rather gifted at comedy, the prose they spunk out is generally rubbish and, well, prosaic in the extreme. I can think of about a dozen comics who have written novels that did little to convey the nuances and timings in their sets and even less to justify the huge amounts of money paid to them by publishers.

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it'd be better if it was more like an ILE thread, ie start about smoking, but end up with some dodgy innuendo via some lofty ideas and belly laughs.

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

He's gone off in a bit of a huff now, I think. This is what he just said to me:

"I wouldn't consider this ready for publication either. This is "finished" in terms of a finalized first draft. My style is solidified, the points I'm trying to make are there, and all that is required is fine sanding on the language.

You are right though, it *is* clunky at times; the intro (with argue/worst in proximity), the oscillation between first and second person, there's a few sentences in the Merry-Go-Round paragraph that need to be trimmed/rewrote, some other niggling things that would be brushed up or removed.

In terms of lack of interest or boring reading, that's your opinion. You want something crucifying smokers, IMO, whereas I'm not interested in doing that. I'm more interested in the twisted honesty of a smoker, and the motivations of starting smoking for ME. And, frankly, I think it reflects the attitude of smokers rather well.

I wouldn't expect everyone to like it, and if there's critique from a style/language standpoint I'm happy to hear it. But non/ex smokers' opinions of the actual subject matter interests me about as much as a dog crapping. Smoking's bad. Gee, surprise."

C J (C J), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm very pro-smoking, and I found it boring.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

My complaints about the piece are related to its suitability for publication in a magazine or newspaper and/or suitability for submission to an editor in its present state. And an editor is more likely to take something that is ready to go and is not a 'first draft' from someone 'new' - because the people your friend will be competing with for space in the journalistic sphere will not need to re-write (I am rarely asked to make changes in my work and in over 10 years of writing have been spiked TWICE, and one of those was because the newspaper was worried about the legality of something said by my interviewee about a person who hid from being reached for comment).

I'm sorry to be so discouraging but the calibre of this piece would not pass muster with any of the people I work with on a regular basis.

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)

someone should take the knife to it and post thier version.

suzy??

ron (ron), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, I don't think your friend actually wanted any help.

Ally (mlescaut), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I could say so much but my new shoes are looking cool and I've a beer in my hand and this daft punk remix of the ice cubes is pretty cool so I don't really want to go on a rant.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

This is the (abridged) remix:

I?ve now that smokes by around one decade. It?s not a very good, debatable habit the worse one of my parade of the bad characteristics of the character. I?d discusses that the delay is worse, because my plans to stop to smoke are always put in the cloudy kingdom morning. Perhaps without the delay, I?d is forced to find a way ready of the lie me that didn?t implies the future indefinite. There?s costs what costs, little occasion for me who stops the future in near because I have darn so little to live for like nonsmoker. Smoking, whereas it has a myriad of downsides, makes a thing absolutely well: to him it does cursed fresh. Same the act of the apathy towards health and watched of one?s is absolutely admirable; it?s a greater condemnation to by same of the act of the existence. Nonsmokers can handle not fastening it his seatbelts or to go of borrachera to drink, but the smokers can match this behavior and trump he. The smoke that flows of the mouth and the nose in a gesture nonchalant of the challenge, live coals which they shine intensely that they fall lazily to the floor, the smoker behind inclines wreathed in the cancer that causes the agents who emanate of their same body, as soon as found out to take from they?re of the toll. You can?t obtain to that aureole of the gas huffing, even if you can harvest the harmful advantages. Robbed I?d the occasional cigarette of my father whereas in the High secondary School, smoking furtively in the alley behind our house it terrified that somebody would leave one of the front doors of the service and would identify to me like minor. Perhaps equal he?d say to my father. Once it calculated outside how inhaling, the humming was incredibly intense. That it staggered around alleyway, shoulder that beat in the walls as it could walk hardly of the humming, been annoying, lightheaded, making on which he was all surrounding to smoke of hype. It was a tiovivo without the experience of the group, and the best one of all, you never had to push. Sadly, the descolora humming quickly by always and incapable I?m to push a tiovivo by more than 10 minutes straight more, let frunce single upon enough cabritos make it worthy of my time and not to seem weirdo. I began to smoke seriously when he was 18. The decision to begin to smoke somewhat simple era for me. He was never fresh in High secondary School and decided to smoke would be the way really to break the ceiling of dork and to excel in my coolness. Lousy had an attitude; all needed Is were the supports. They disturbed to me more also to buy mag of porno in the warehouse, and I needed to buy SOMETHING that affirmed my adult age. The positioning for didn?t right of the selective service has ese?oomph of satisfaction of the soul? that I wished. I so bought a package of the red ones of Marlboro. They were definitively cigs fresher; Kools considered briefly but it decided its name was ironic. The fresh attitude to smoke did not help to that summer in my native city. Each one had already created its own opinions of me, and fresh certainly low era in the list, the right underneath asesino?lady? and hero of los?sports. I resisted to many of the anti-aircraft fire for my option of the life form, taking the strongest part of lines by ejemplo?I I thought to him was more elegant than that one? They lacked the point entirely. Wasn?t of intelligence in the question here. Each one KNEW ME was elegant, and if they didn?t that I needed to prove it, that it ripened my conversations with pepper of I?d the memorizadas quotations in Bartlett?s. Didn?t I READ really anyone of the material that I quoted, but these paletos in Battle Creek knew the difference rarely. And those that never did it were towards outside in a coffee store until coffee that smoked and that drank of 2. They were occupied improving. The plan was without defects. The true point was how he is fresh smoking did to me. The first goal that I needed in the accomplishment with smoking era the ring of the smoke. I can immovable remember the fear that felt to me when I saw to Eddie V

This Is the Remix, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)

That is pure magic.

C J (C J), Saturday, 4 January 2003 22:22 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.pornolize.com/cgi-bin/pornolize2/pornolize2.cgi?lang=en&url=http%3A%2F%2Filx.wh3rd.net%2Fthread.php%3Fmsgid%3D3207741&submit2=submit now this is good writing...

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 22:56 (twenty-two years ago)

haha! excellent!

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 22:59 (twenty-two years ago)

i wish that everyone who has ever called nick or suzy pretentious or poncey could see the two of them cackling themselves sick over finger-fucking pornolised ile threads...

kate, Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:10 (twenty-two years ago)

You mean they aren't doing it in a pretentious manner?

(Only joking, honest!)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the fact that when you put my site through there, one of the links up top seems to be implying I'll fuck all ya'alls.

Ally (mlescaut), Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Hurrah!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:40 (twenty-two years ago)

it's different every time

ron (ron), Sunday, 5 January 2003 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry if you feel patronised RickyT, only I don't see how one can appreciate the style of an anyone's writing without essentially sympathising with the content. Precisely because the content of that essay sucks I dislike the urbane, 'professional' style it's written in all the more.

chris sallis, Sunday, 5 January 2003 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Suzy - what do you think about Freaky Trigger?

dwh (dwh), Sunday, 5 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Pornolisation is brilliant, my post FT was cast as F "Admiral Browning" T. And ILM: IL "Dick Dripper" M.

dwh (dwh), Sunday, 5 January 2003 20:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Like Freaky Trigger loads but read it far less than ILX.

suzy (suzy), Sunday, 5 January 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.