National values in a handy chart

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I've always been fascinated by how you can fly to, say, Amsterdam from, say, London and enter, not just a different geological space, but a different cultural space, a place where life is assigned different meanings and values. (In fact, you can do this just by catching the bus from Hackney to Hoxton, or by moving from one apartment to the next in the same building.)

I was fascinated by an essay in the current issue of the Economist which maps the differences between American values and those of other countries. The article is called Living with a Superpower and is available in full online. One table in particular fascinates me. This:

It's a bit complicated, but it's an attempt to map national values on two axes, the 'survival / self-expression' continuum and the 'traditional / secular-rational' continuum. After looking at this for a long time, I rotated the table 90 degrees clockwise and found the table much easier to read when I replaced these axes with 'left / right' and 'poor / rich'. Rotated, it was easy to read America on the right and above on the table, and say 'Ah, America is rich and right wing.' Or to see Sweden and Japan sitting on the left, but up at the rich end, whereas Russia is left but poor.

This is obviously a bit reductive. (For instance, politics is about more than how religious you are and whether you accept traditional values.) The article explains the table with a more complex theory:

'The notion is that industrialisation turns traditional societies into secular-rational ones, while post-industrial development brings about a shift towards values of self-expression.'

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)

(Whoops, for 'geological' in the first line read 'geographical'!)

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)

The 'Living With A Superpower' article.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Damn, I meant to say 'I rotated the table 90 degrees anti-clockwise...'

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:35 (twenty-three years ago)

It is among the most mentalist charts I've ever seen => classic.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

wow. more proof i shoud move to scandinavia. except if seasonal affective disorder didn't kill me, alcoholism would...

masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think it's totally mentalist. The bottom axis makes perfect sense to me, because it follows Abraham Maslow's ideas about the 'hierarchy of needs', which I pretty much buy.

The 'traditional - rational' axis I have more problems with. For instance, Japan is both highly rational and highly traditional, a high-tech feudal society.

I like how the article talks about the most liberal countries being 'post-protestant'. In that term it's sort of implied that even if you've escaped religion, the type of religion you escaped determines the type of post-religious life you have. If you escape a radical, rebellious religion, you have an even more radical, rebellious secular post-religious culture to look forward to.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I also like that map just as a map. I mean, look how far Japan is from everything else! And it's true, Japan feels like that.

Imagine it, too, as an airline map. Imagine you went into a travel agent and said 'I want a holiday somewhere secular-self-expressive, please!'

'Ah, we have a special offers on flights to Stockholm and Kyoto this week!'

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:23 (twenty-three years ago)

(CHARTGAZER!)

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

i cant make head or tails, im a moron.
love me

anthony easton (anthony), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, Chartgazer!

By the way, anyone following the link to the Maslow hierarchy of needs, please be aware that my hasty link is to a site at the University of Tennessee, and the author has added 'oneness with God' as one of the attributes of the top level of self-actualisation. Something that, as far as I'm aware, is not on Maslow's own list.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:33 (twenty-three years ago)

It's its oppositions that are mentalist. Rationality and tradition are not automatically opposed (they seem to mean secular vs religious, which isn't the same thing), and nor are survival and self-expression. I'm familiar with that hierarchy of needs, and if we map what they say to that as a way of changing the axis to money, it does make more sense.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:44 (twenty-three years ago)

The notion that

'industrialisation turns traditional societies into secular-rational ones, while post-industrial development brings about a shift towards values of self-expression'

actually suggests that as nations advance through industrialisation, heading left-to-right along the bottom axis, they should, as they hit their post-industrial stride, turn up and rise up the other axis. Subsistence and tradition are overcome together, replaced by expression and rationality. To see this process in action, we'd have to make the chart 3D, with a line showing one nation's progress, rather diagonal, from a Zimbabwe-like position to a Sweden-like position.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:55 (twenty-three years ago)

(Make the chart 3D by adding the time dimension, I mean.)

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)

But yeah, I agree that tradition and rationality are not necessarily opposed, that was my point about Japan above.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Fascinating. I'm interested in the absence of the Middle Eastern countries. Obviously this is down to the difficulties of collecting the data (they sent out questionnaires, which probably wouldn’t have gone down too well in Baghdad). The Arab/Muslim counties that do appear are down in the bottom-left. On the secular/traditional axis this makes sense to me. But the survival/self-expression (‘quality of life’) one it isn’t so simple. According to the article people who chart to the left on this axis are wary of any form of political activity, even signing a petition. OK, this is true in Iraq, where 100% of the population voted for Saddam in the referendum, preferring to stay alive than to voice dissent. But people in the West Bank/Gaza Strip are among the most political people I’ve ever met. You can’t spend 5 minutes with a Palestinian without discussing politics. Highly politicised and expressive but poor and fighting for survival – where do you chart that? Israel would be problematic too (in much the same way you mention about Japan) – highly rational and highly traditional. It would have to rate highly on the survival axis (need for physical and economic security) but also on the self-expression/quality of life axis (high-tech state for the most part, valuing personal freedoms). But I’m choosing atypical examples. Personally I’d rather live on the left side, though. Give me Skopje over Stockholm any day.

Jane, Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:58 (twenty-three years ago)

One thing I want to know is how this maps to people's experience.

Like, when you fly from Britain to Norway, do you actually walk through Oslo airport thinking to yourself 'Wow, it feels a bit more secular-rational here than I'm used to!'

I think you do feel these things. London - Amsterdam is a short trip in space, but a long way in values: 'Blimey, legal spliffs, legal hookers, euthanasia... and the age of consent is 12!'

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)

POLE GETS WRONG PLANE TO INDIA, NOTICES NOTHING FOR WEEKS SHOCK!

OleM (OleM), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Sweden here I come, then. Or something.
Interesting map, but shouldn't Spain and Italy be a bit further down the on the trad values? (I don't know)(but look how far down Ireland is in comparison).
The Middle East is conspicuous by it's absense.

DavidM (DavidM), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Jane: is your preference for Skopje something like escapism?

Could we add a 6th rung to the Maslow ladder of needs -- once you've done the self-actualisation thing, Level 6 is escape? Knock the tower down and start again?

I know from my own experience that I like hanging out with people lower down the Maslow ladder because I get to embody, for them, values (liberal values) I'm otherwise skeptical of. In other words, I escape the Freudian 'narcissism of small differences' trap. To put it another way, imagine a left wing Labour politician who hates most people in his own party and hangs out with Conservatives, because they make him more comfortable with his own left wing beliefs.

Is that it, or are 'traditional-survivalists' just nicer people?

We tend to like people who are struggling better than people who have arrived. I'm tempted to add 'the same way we like puppies better than people'.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:11 (twenty-three years ago)

More like nostalgia I think. There’s no reason why your traditional-survivalist can’t achieve Maslow’s idea of self-actualisation. You can be secure, stable, loved, fulfilled etc. in Moscow or Tehran just as much as you can in New Orleans.

What I find depressing is the idea that with inevitable Western-style industrialisation and development we’ll all end up occupying the same value-space in the top-right of the chart with no room for diversity or even debate.

Skopje wins over Stockholm because it forces me to confront ideas and values I find difficult. In don’t get that in Stockholm, Brussels, Berlin, Glasgow. I do get it in Atlanta. But if we all end up squeezed in that top right-hand corner, yawn.

Jane, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Ireland further to the political right than Chile is... interesting. I would probably have a better cause to complain if we hadn't had the same party in government for 85% of the state's history.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

POLE GETS WRONG PLANE TO INDIA, NOTICES NOTHING FOR WEEKS SHOCK!

that was legitimately funny (esp. re this chart)

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, good call. But, to be fair to the chart, it should really read:

POLE GETS WRONG PLANE TO INDIA, NOTICES SOME PARALLELS IN DEVELOPMENTAL STATUS (BUT NOTHING ELSE) BETWEEN THE COUNTRIES.

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:01 (twenty-three years ago)

although the "poland/india not being that much different" vis-a-vis Momus' chart does make one think that there are some interesting parallels between these erstwhile very different places. both countries, for instance, have in recent times gone from left-leaning governments and largely-closed economies to right-leaning governments and more open economies -- resulting in larger disparities in wealth (more so with Poland than with India) and traditionalist backlash (i.e., the Hindu party in India and a rather nasty right-wing Catholic backlash in Poland). both were also in recent history controlled by foreign countries with alien cultures (the British Raj; Partition-era Poland) and religions (the Anglican British vs. the Hindu/Moslem Indians; the Protestant Germans and the Orthodox Russians vs. the Catholic Poles), the latter which the foreign powers tried to enforce onto the natives (to varying extents and to varying degrees of success). which, of course, tended to reinforce traditionalist tendencies in both countries, and in ways that blurred the normal "left/right" split (i.e., Gandhian notions of social and economic organization leading to resistance of British rule; and Polish dockworkers -- in solidarity with regime dissidents -- carrying icons of the Black Madonna while protesting the Soviet-sponsored) dictatorship.

plus, i'm sure that curry kielbasa would taste very nice -- i'll have to try it sometime.

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

China is ex-communist?

Amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:09 (twenty-three years ago)

all of the above kinda making the same point Suzy made, though in my case at greater length and in more tedious detail.

also interesting how armenia and azerbaijan also have the "not very different" status on this chart, since the two have been at blows for the past decade. those small differences can be very important, indeed.

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd bet Saudi Arabia would be somewhere south of Morocco on this chart. Very interesting I must say.

Amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Not 'tedious detail', Mr Self-Effacing, fantastically well-informed socio-political detail!

By the way, this (and the last post) is Momus posting as Suzy (visiting with Kate and her right now. Their house in Clerkenwell is more rational-secular than mine in Bethnal Green).

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Another question to pose of this chart is, what are its implications for assimilation? Mexico and the USA are much closer together than, say, Germany and Turkey. Would this suggest that Mexicans have an easier time adjusting to the culture of the United States than Turks have making a go of it in Germany? (Discounting the issues of climate/language/etc.)

Amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

But (Momus here) it might be more a question of what direction the country is going in. Is Turkey going in the direction of Germany (they do want to join the EU, after all), no matter how far down the line that may be? Is Mexico going in the direction of the US?

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe it would help to think of the chart as a giant curling field, and all of us as brushers?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:15 (twenty-three years ago)

What sense of the word 'help' is that, Tracer?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:37 (twenty-three years ago)

don't the dots for each country look like pucks? And their eventual trajectories determined by what? little movements that add up

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 5 January 2003 01:50 (twenty-three years ago)

the colors for that map are well-icy

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 5 January 2003 02:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Currywurst has already been invented, Tad, and rules.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Monday, 6 January 2003 12:16 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.