anyway, i think the first film is ok - its strength is obviously in the novel concept rather than the execution...still dont you think its rather over-rated? i realise the twist is utterly classic and it made a big impact at the time and its hard to empathise with an early 70s audience a lot of the time (mainly because i'm post Star Wars generation i guess), but the sequels seem to be much less fondly regarded and rightly so cos they're pretty poor its gotta be said. 'Return' is just bizarre in the way it carries on straight after the first and mirrors it in many ways - but its pretty confusing in that no-one bothers to explain WHY the Forbidden Zone has a wall of fire and stupid lightning bolts, or why the apes see the mirage of burning apes when they cross the threshold - the worst part is the underground humans singing choir during their bomb-worshipping sermon...needlessly drawn out, implausible and it sounds awful! the other annoying thing is they do not explain how Zira and Cornelius escape the planet once the bomb is set off, there's too much filming of Brent and Nova riding around aimlessly and there's too much else unexplained like how Taylor ended up in the cage, and how humans lost the ability of speech in the first place...'Escape From' is actually more entertaining than i thought it would be but its also excruciatingly ludicrous as well, altho the paradox plotline is always good in any film really - i havent seen the 2 other sequels in the series but i've heard it plummets even further downhill
did anyone see the animated series or TV series when they were young? was it ever shown in the UK?
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 5 January 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 5 January 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 5 January 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)
Weren't these just holograms or something similar set up by the remaining degenerate humans to scare the dumb apes and deter them from venturing any further towards their otherwise undefended bunker or whatever it was?
― David (David), Sunday, 5 January 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)
oh but there is Homer in the astronaut episode:
journo: question for the barbecue cheef, dont you think there is an inherent danger in sending ordinary civilians into space?Homer: the only danger is if they send us to that terrible planet of the apes! wait a minute....statue of liberty....THAT WAS OUR PLANET!'
i conclude that the Tim Burton re-imagining from 2001 is BETTER than the original...i dont suppose they're doing a sequel for that tho eh?
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 5 January 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― duane, Sunday, 5 January 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)
The animated TV series impressed me when I was younger. I think there is a lot to be said for making the apes a bit more hi-tech rather than just having them live on the ruins of human civilisation.
The Tim Burton film is the worst film I have ever seen.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 5 January 2003 22:51 (twenty-two years ago)
Maybe I misunderstood it but in the original films (I've not seen the remake), the technology the apes have isn't copied from humans but reflects their being in an earlier phase of development. They have muskets and things like that which I always thought they'd invented themselves.
― David (David), Sunday, 5 January 2003 22:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― David (David), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― David (David), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:11 (twenty-two years ago)
Conquest of the Planet of the Apes is classic for having been shot on the campus of UC Irvine, but also because it works as satire, probably on purpose
― J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 6 January 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)
i also think the new twist was pretty cool, certainly tolerable - and it would be daft to say it ruined the film
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 6 January 2003 02:16 (twenty-two years ago)
What is thius nonsense about showing Beneath... at three in the morning. I remember watching it when I was seven on ITV on a Staurday afternoon (after the Wrestling). I was shit scared of it.
Oh yeah.
The explaination in Escape From The Planet Of The Apes as to why the apes reach their ascendancy is pure brilliance. Its all due to a virus which wipes out cats and dogs....(If anyone else can finish this off I'd be most grateful, I cannot type it due to laughing too much).
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 6 January 2003 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)
"Battle" is def the worst though. Can we have a thread on "On the buses" movies now? Did anybody tape "mutiny", please please please
― Alan (Alan), Monday, 6 January 2003 10:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 6 January 2003 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)
When the POTA tv show was briefly popular in the UK they re-released the first and third movies on a double bill. At the screening I went to all the kids couldn't stop laughing at Chuck Heston's bare bottom.
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 6 January 2003 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)
well it makes sense in that whats happened - possibly - is that rather than travel back to his Earth, Wahlberg had ended up on the Apes planet far in the future, where Thade used the computer in the room he was trapped in to learn more about human civilisation and then managed to escape he led the apes in advancing further and mimicking the achievements of men on Earth, literally....perhaps this was never the intention of Burton but its plausible in the context of the film. another idea was that Thade had escaped, travelled back in time to Wahlberg's Earth and changed the course of history, perhaps even preventing cro-magnons from emerging leaving apes to evolve to Thade's level but develop the intelligence of humans, consequently developing in exactly the same way apart from the obvious physical differences...scientifically illogical of course but then this IS planet of the apes we're talking about
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 6 January 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― old pedant returns (mark s), Monday, 6 January 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 6 January 2003 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 12:00 (twenty-two years ago)
And is still legendary around here to this day.
Never have seen any of the films, nothing sparked my interest. I know the catchphrases used in MST3K by heart, though.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)
I watched the original yesterday for the first time ever. Have to say I really enjoyed it, even though I knew how it ended.
Want to watch the sequels but from the sounds of things, I'd probably regret it.
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Monday, 6 October 2008 08:42 (seventeen years ago)
don't be a fule, the sequels are great! the most bizarro franchise in hollywood history, you will not believe your eyes. and they don't get unwatchably dodgy until the 5th film.
my babble about the sequel from The 1970's Science Fiction Movie Poll :
I just watched beneath the planet of the apes the other night. the scene where the ape city army marching through the desert encounters a field of squirming apes crucified upside-down in flames while in the background an enormous statue of the lawgiver begins bleeding from his eyes is like a halfstep from jodorowsky-level wtf.
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/beneath-the-planet-of-the-apes.jpg
and I know I've gone on about conquest for the planet of the apes around here somewhere, the prequel that depicts the rise of the apes as a 60s watts-style race riot. o_O
― Edward III, Monday, 6 October 2008 14:03 (seventeen years ago)
There was one that was set in one shopping preecinct, presumably one of the dodgy sequels.
I see the box set is cheap in HMV right now.
I went for the "likey Lads" one instead.
― Mark G, Monday, 6 October 2008 14:05 (seventeen years ago)
the second one is hysterically awful, the third one (when the apes come to present day earth?) is great
― akm, Monday, 6 October 2008 14:13 (seventeen years ago)
for a serious apprec of the race angle, read this:
http://server40136.uk2net.com/~wpower/images/product_images/9780786426638.jpg
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 6 October 2008 14:18 (seventeen years ago)
I first consumed Beneath the Planet of the Apes as a Marvel comic book, and as that it was classic. Watching the movie was a slight let-down as a kid. But the whole nuclear thing made a big impact on me. I was pretty much obsessed with Planet of the Apes until Star Wars came along.
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 00:04 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.populationstatistic.com/images/vegas_zaius.jpg
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 February 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)
Nope. Try again.
― Mark G, Friday, 6 February 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
? is yr browser older than the Sacred Scrolls?
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 February 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
In the last few weeks I've made it all the way to Conquest and had a pretty good time. For some reason I can't yet pull the trigger on Battle.
― Dear Tacos, how are you? I am fine. The weather is nice. I miss yo (Oilyrags), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
it's pretty uninspired even with the presence of Severn Darden and Paul Williams.
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 February 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
That one was big letdown.
― lemmy tristano (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 6 February 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
obv Fox cut the budget to the bone, but I liked the school buses.
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 February 2009 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
not to mention john huston and john landis, what a bizarro cast
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 6 February 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)
Landis?
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 February 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)
I don't even remember very much about the film...but ^^^^ this.
It was among the few times in my life when the movie is so bad that you actually come out of the experience semi-angry. I have not seen a new Tim Burton movie since, and possibly never will.
― iatee, Friday, 6 February 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)
c'mon, filmmakers fuck up. He did well turning Sweeney Todd into a horror musical.
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 February 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)
yeah but there's a difference between an artistic stumble and a piece of art that's *so* actively bad that you immediately have to really wonder whether or not that person has anything of worth say to the world and whether or not should be making things to begin with...and I remember the remake being one of those.
― iatee, Friday, 6 February 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)
err:
'of worth to say to the world and whether or not they should be'
― iatee, Friday, 6 February 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)
i've always wondered if the nuclear-bomb cult of mutants and their hymns in beneath the planet of the apes was at least partly the inspiration for the holy hand grenade sketch from monty python and the holy grail
― crack?!? wow, maybe they can have china white later! (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 08:45 (fifteen years ago)
The "Planet of The Apes" series is reportedly getting an origin story with James Franco .
According to Variety, the actor has signed on to star in a prequel to the series.
A mag source said James had a great meeting with director Rupert Wyatt over the weekend about the movie, that will be set in the present day and chronicle how genetic engineering gave the animals intelligence. The actor will reportedly play an important scientist in the midst of the war between man and ape.
The effects team WETA Digital, who wowed moviegoers with their work on "Avatar," will reportedly use photo-realistic apes and not actors in costumes for the movie.
The "Apes" prequel is slated to start filming in July and will hit theaters on June 24, 2011.
― velko, Friday, 21 May 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)
Didn't know about this til Franco interview in NYT (in which he rolled his eyes over it, bet the producers loved that).
Plot basically seems to sort of redo the 4th film in the original series, w/ Andy Serkis Gollumizing Roddy McDowall's Caesar:
http://www.filmjunk.com/2010/06/30/andy-serkis-to-play-caesar-in-rise-of-the-apes/
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 September 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
'Return' is just bizarre in the way it carries on straight after the first and mirrors it in many ways - but its pretty confusing in that no-one bothers to explain WHY the Forbidden Zone has a wall of fire and stupid lightning bolts, or why the apes see the mirage of burning apes when they cross the threshold - the worst part is the underground humans singing choir during their bomb-worshipping sermon...needlessly drawn out, implausible and it sounds awful!
rong on so many levels
do you get befuddled by jump cuts too
they were over here, now they're over there! WHAT IS HAPPPENING
― (e_3) (Edward III), Tuesday, 14 September 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
I kept thinking of "Monkey Shines" (which was s'ok).
What are the odds that this movie ends with a shot of an ape perched on the Statue of Liberty? Because, you know ... get it!?!?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 April 2011 14:10 (fourteen years ago)
cgi apes look like crap
when that one jumps off the railing at the helicopter it's like oh noes attack of the panda
― if u see l ron this weekend be sure & tell him THETAN THETAN THETAN (Edward III), Friday, 15 April 2011 14:57 (fourteen years ago)
It also looks like a prequel to "Congo"
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 April 2011 15:48 (fourteen years ago)
Well, now I want to see it more than ever:
It plays out like an escape movie, says director Rupert Wyatt, as Caesar the chimp leads his fellow imprisoned apes to escape the research facility where they're imprisoned. Caesar enlists the aid of Maurice, an orangutan who knows sign language, and a big bruiser of a chimp named Rocket. It's an "A-Team of apes," says Wyatt.
― Anti-mist K-Lo (Phil D.), Friday, 15 April 2011 15:48 (fourteen years ago)
Assuming they're playing this for laughs.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 April 2011 15:50 (fourteen years ago)
wait are we supposed to root for the ape-team or be terrified of them
― i can tina turner (elmo argonaut), Friday, 15 April 2011 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
Saw the Burton POTA in the theater with friends when it came out and actually had a blast watching it. I've paid good money to see movies that were far more dreadful and dull.
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 15 April 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
visually it was pretty cool! if only the script had been worth a damn.
― das reboot (latebloomer), Saturday, 16 April 2011 05:22 (fourteen years ago)
Isn't that every Burton movie?
― Number None, Saturday, 16 April 2011 12:26 (fourteen years ago)
Burton's always been hit or miss but I don't think at that point he had made anything as joyless and uninspired as Planet
― das reboot (latebloomer), Saturday, 16 April 2011 13:40 (fourteen years ago)
Robert Wyatt directed this new Apes? Oh, wait...
― Winky Dinky Dawgz (Capitaine Jay Vee), Saturday, 16 April 2011 16:18 (fourteen years ago)
Where are the orangutans?
― wk, Saturday, 16 April 2011 16:43 (fourteen years ago)
Watching the original again, was struck by how much of a quisling Cornelius is, for a heretic! Nearly shits himself whenever Dr Zaius is around. If they ever closely remake it they'll probably cast Jesse Eisenberg.
also,
orangutans = WASPS (administer the place, sittin pretty)
chimpanzees = Jews (scientists, liberals, just had an employment "quota" abolished)
gorillas = warriors + menials, exploited classes of color
― joyless shithead (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 June 2011 17:30 (fourteen years ago)
I guess those classses resemble the US demographics and segregation mid-20th-century
― joyless shithead (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 June 2011 17:31 (fourteen years ago)
I love the original movie series. After the first one, the best is Escape from the Planet of the Apes, followed probably by Conquest, Beneath, then Battle. Battle for the Planet of the Apes is pretty bad but I do love the very ending with the statue.
As a child I loved the tv series too.
The Tim Burton remake was irredeemably terrible.
― MrDasher, Wednesday, 29 June 2011 19:02 (fourteen years ago)
Anyone seen this?
The title of this film translates to something like “the bumbling ones on the plateau of the apes”; indeed the film is but one of many in the 30+ title O TRAPALHAOES saga, which can be taken to mean “pranks”, “shenanigans” or “pratfalls” – in essence, anything that isn’t helping. Starring legendary Brazilian comedians Dedé Santana, Mussum and Didi Mocó, O TRAPALHAO NO PLANALTO DOS MACACOS’ is a surprisingly earnest (and indefatigably goofy) recreation of the original PLANET, wherein a band of idiot heroes end up “liberating” a simian populace that hates them – save for one comely philosopher-queen chimpanzee...
http://www.spectacletheater.com/missing-links/#otrap
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 June 2017 16:07 (eight years ago)
The first film premiered in New York 50 years ago today.
Rod Serling's original draft, which featured the Pierre Boulle book's modern ape civilization (and no doubt even more Cold War liberal speechifying), is being adapted for a graphic novel.
http://www.slashfilm.com/rod-serling-planet-of-the-apes-script-graphic-novel/
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 February 2018 17:24 (seven years ago)
the 70s series is a treat.
the newest one is good but taking 300+ years after Caesar's death makes me question the plausibility of a lot of what the humans do.
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Thursday, 16 May 2024 23:43 (one year ago)
i keep reading these long articles about how amazing the trilogy is before the new one. and also the new one. who knew? the cgi ape faces just looked so dumb in ads and trailers to me i figured they were like nu-kong or any other new okay-to-bad reboot. now i have to watch them? i was always a fan of those originals. even the really bad last one from 1973 or whenever. like, they are calling them classic epic sci-fi! i didn't get the memo. they are on disney+ except for the new one. maybe i will try them.
― scott seward, Friday, 17 May 2024 00:04 (one year ago)
I found them enjoyable but find the 70s ones deserved more love.
watching Conquest of the Planet of the Apes rn. amazing that in 18 short years they've enslaved apes and are still paranoid of one singular talking ape toppling them all. some real John Connor shit here
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Friday, 17 May 2024 00:31 (one year ago)
was quite a bit prescient about how labor would be devalued by capitalism in the 21st century though
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Friday, 17 May 2024 00:36 (one year ago)
Hated all three of the recent movies. The CGI apes looked terrible at all times, and even worse than that, the first one had James Franco in it. I still love the first two and the fourth from the original series, though. The second one, when the mutants peel their faces off, was a primal childhood terror moment for me.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Friday, 17 May 2024 01:02 (one year ago)
Caesar from 70s movies > Caesar of new trilogy
Nu-Caesar is a watered down revolutionary meant to appease to centrist audiences, 70s Caesar basically a Fred Hampton style revolutionary
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Friday, 17 May 2024 01:22 (one year ago)
why are people stanning so hard in, like, WaPo and NYT for the new ones?? they are think-pieces even! are they in cahoots with big ape?
― scott seward, Friday, 17 May 2024 02:39 (one year ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/movies/2024/05/10/kingdom-planet-apes-greatest-franchise/
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/15/movies/planet-of-the-apes-appeal.html?searchResultPosition=1
― scott seward, Friday, 17 May 2024 02:45 (one year ago)
I remember loving the Planet of the Apes TV show marathons that WGN ran over a few evenings when I was a kid. They did some with the old Flash Gordon serials too.
― The Artist formerly known as Earlnash, Friday, 17 May 2024 02:47 (one year ago)
i must have seen those original films dozens of times over the years when i was a kid. they played them a lot. i never got tired of them.
― scott seward, Friday, 17 May 2024 02:49 (one year ago)
I didn't know this until tonight, because I have an old DVD set of the first five movies from 2006, but in 2008 they put out a Blu-Ray of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes that includes the original ending where Caesar lets the other apes murder the humans. I'm gonna buy one on eBay.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Friday, 17 May 2024 03:01 (one year ago)
The CGI apes looked terrible at all times
Really? I think this still looks brilliant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MB4XrhYLQ4A
― nate woolls, Friday, 17 May 2024 03:29 (one year ago)
Somewhat off-topic but the comedian Dana Gould's Hanging With Dr. Z. schtick in which he portrays Dr. Zaius as a gossipy gadfly of Old Hollywood cracks me up.
― henry s, Friday, 17 May 2024 12:20 (one year ago)
I really like the new series. as far as ongoing 'franchise' sf films it's probably the best one outside of Dune.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 17 May 2024 13:41 (one year ago)
i've now seen all ten ape movies and I enjoy them all...to varying degrees....except for the Burton one, fuck that one.
oh and Battle for the Planet of the Apes really sucks
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Friday, 17 May 2024 13:43 (one year ago)
Kingdom is pretty good but obviously not as good as the 2017 reboot kickoff or Dawn. I think maybe I like it as much as the last one but I'm actually a little fuzzy on that film.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 20 May 2024 16:32 (one year ago)
I am a little bleery as to how equipment that has stayed unused and dormant for over 300 years magically still works when booted up, i.e. the satellites at the end
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Monday, 20 May 2024 16:37 (one year ago)
yeah that's the sort of inanity you sometimes just have to go with
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 20 May 2024 17:52 (one year ago)
one thing that bugged me: given how many fucking guns there are in this country, you'd think they would still be around and plentiful even 300 years in the future.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 20 May 2024 17:54 (one year ago)
cyrus and i watched the first two of the new trilogy last night. gonna watch War tonight or tomorrow. we liked them. you get used to the weird look of all the apes. it is its own reality. cool action scenes. i will never get used to that impossibly-fast-movement thing of CGI though. where everyone scrambles up a building in two seconds. i liked that final battle on the building in the second one. all the metal flying everywhere. it looked cool. can imagine it being very cool on a big screen.
― scott seward, Monday, 20 May 2024 17:57 (one year ago)
War's really good.
what I appreciate the most about the new one is the obvious allegory to early Christianity, where in the mere 300 years after Caesar died, he's been forgotten by some, fondly remembered by a few, wildly misinterpreted by most
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Monday, 20 May 2024 18:09 (one year ago)
i should rewatch War.
there was every reason this one could have really sucked (no Matt Reeves, no Andy Serkis) and I'm glad it didn't, even if some of it seemed like a slight rehash. I don't suppose we'll ever get some weirdo remake of Escape from in this series.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 20 May 2024 22:39 (one year ago)
One.can dream
― Iacocca Cola (Neanderthal), Monday, 20 May 2024 22:50 (one year ago)
No monkey sex scenes in this one, I know, I’m disappointed too
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Tuesday, 21 May 2024 01:22 (one year ago)
i loved the other three remakes a lot but i found Kingdom to be a total snorefest. i turned it off after an hour of eggs and birds and whatever the fuck zz
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 19 August 2024 04:02 (one year ago)
I liked the first two, despite James Franco, but then gave up less than halfway through the third one because I didn't really want to look at extended scenes of apes keeping each other in POW camps, thanks. But I quite liked the recent one. Once it got to the point, it clipped along pretty well.
― trishyb, Monday, 19 August 2024 12:46 (one year ago)
yeah but the new one is like 50% apes keeps each other in POW camps
― There’s a Monster in my Vance (President Keyes), Monday, 19 August 2024 13:52 (one year ago)
keeping
Maybe I'm a much meaner person now.
― trishyb, Monday, 19 August 2024 15:27 (one year ago)
I bought the Blu-Ray of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes that I mentioned upthread and the ape revolution ending is fucking amazing. Apes piling up pyramids of dead cops in the street! Zero conciliation from Caesar! It's fantastic. Highly recommended.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Monday, 19 August 2024 17:46 (one year ago)
i liked the first three remakes but have no desire to watch the newest one for some reason even though it stares at me from hulu every day. maybe i've had enough. that remake trilogy though, really surprised by how entertaining they were. i think i just assumed they would be lame.
― scott seward, Monday, 19 August 2024 17:53 (one year ago)
I thought it was a cool idea that the bad apes were worshipers of Caesar
― There’s a Monster in my Vance (President Keyes), Monday, 19 August 2024 18:02 (one year ago)
yeah the allegory there was...quite blunt
― if this site were a food it would have NO nutritional value!!!!!!! (Neanderthal), Monday, 19 August 2024 18:11 (one year ago)